On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 07:27 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > No, that is not how it works. It is not only nice to have. > We want the "preferred form of modification" in the package and a > binary > blob is often not. > > > For example, a program might contain a picture, but not the project > > files from the image editor that created it. > > Actually, if we have that infortmation, We'd ask for the project file > to be included.
I agree that this is absolutely desirable to have those files included, not only for computer programs. However, has there ever been a case where software was excluded (or patched) because it did not include the “project files” for its data files? Regards
