Hello! I still have suspicions about RNNoise and its probable non-free model. I'm curious in context of my package libtgowt where I got to cut the library out. What is the current consensus on this library in Debian community? I already asked on debian-ai@ but nobody answered ever since.
-------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Nicholas Guriev <nicho...@guriev.su> To: Debian Deep Learning Team <debian...@lists.debian.org> Subject: RNNoise's model and DFSG Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 20:19:37 +0300 Hi folks! I'm reading ML-Policy draft[1] and I can't get whether it's allowed to include into Debian main archive the unchanged model from RNNoise[2] library. Given that their model[3] is not completely open. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/deeplearning-team/ml-policy/-/blob/master/ML-Policy.rst [2]: https://jmvalin.ca/demo/rnnoise/ [3]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25978309 There are packages[4] that already contain the model data. Is it okay or should be fixed somehow? [4]: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=-10%2C+*0%2C+*-3%2C+*1%2C+*-8%2C+*-6%2C+*3%2C+*-13%2C&literal=0 --- Please CC me directly, I'm not subscribed to the list.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
