How exactly is a host that knowingly and willingly provides services to a spammer innocent? It seems to me that vitriol should be directed towards those providers that rake in the spammer money each month and use their "innocent bystander" clients as shields.
Will knowing where to direct the vitriol help me run SpamAssassin better? Will it improve my scoring rules, or allow my users to train their Bayes databases?
Honestly, this is now at least as off-topic as it was earlier, when someone pointed out that it was off-topic and should be taken to private email.
(Not going after you personally, Mr. Mize. Yours was just the most recent message to arrive, and formed an easy point of entry for my comment.)
Please, everyone, take this thread elsewhere?
--Kai MacTane
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"This trembling, adored,
Tousled bird mad girl..."
--The Cure,
"Burn"------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
