Thank you Evan for the huge amount of work involved in replacing the
old Ant system.
@Yuri: Are you on updating the Jenkins script to call the test suite
through gradle instead?
Ali
On 16 December 2015 at 15:44, Yuri Z wrote:
> Hi
> I have just merged pulled request by Evan Hughes that replaced
Evan,
You are correct that the file header has been changed from the
original which looked like [0].
I am not aware of any reason that the Google agreement made with the
ASF during the migration would not cover this particular file under
it.
As such, my understanding is that the "licensed to the
ition to forward this to general@incubator?
>>
>> Thx
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, at 05:10 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>> > Upayavira,
>> >
>> > Am I overlooking something?
>> >
>> > I definitely wrote 6 committe
Hi Ian,
I am not sure about the best way to import this into eclipse, I have
always used the CLI tools directly. I have CC'd the dev-list in case
they have a better answer for you.
The inability to find ${build.classpath.path}, ${build.macros.path}
suggests that you are missing/failed-to-import/
2015 at 19:46, Upayavira wrote:
> Congrats Ali, and good luck with your future plans!
>
> Can I ask you to check those tallies? I'm sure there are more
> committer/PPMC member votes than two.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 03:22 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>&
supersede the email I sent dated 18th October, with the
results now looking like:
+1: 6 (+1 mentor, +4 non-binding)
+0: 0
-0: 0
-1: 0
Ali
On 18 October 2015 at 02:48, Ali Lown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this RC.
>
> Well, I set a &q
or the rc 10.
>>
>> Ali - Thanks for making this RC!
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > RC10 is now available for review.
>> > Artefacts can be found here:
>> > https://people.apac
Hi Evan,
I have to admit that I am not a fan of those waves at the bottom of
the page, reminds me of a strange skirting board...
Not sure there is enough mocked-up to get a feel for the changes you
envision for the website?
I think the main problem with the current design is our rather
text-heav
Hi all,
RC10 is now available for review.
Artefacts can be found here:
https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/
(Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha')
I have included both source and binary artefacts for convenience.
The release version (if successful) will be 0
Upayavira,
I do concede that after watching over Wave here for the last 3 years
the project doesn't appear to have progress hugely far in terms of new
user-visible functionality, but I don't think that this means the end,
as there has been a slow-but-steady set of work on more underlying
things -
> On 1 October 2015 at 08:28, Ali Lown wrote:
>
> > I have expanded upon the wave report a bit from last month.
> >
> > Looks like the mentors forgot to sign it
> >
> > Ali
> >
> > On 30 September 2015 at 02:58, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
&
> On Oct. 1, 2015, 2:42 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Ship It!
Committed as fdb393268f94986d7d8e31b5258149895efc15b3.
- Ali
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38849/#rev
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38849/#review101232
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Ali Lown
On Sept. 29, 2015, 11:56 a.m
should we build it as well?
- Ali Lown
On Sept. 29, 2015, 11:56 a.m., Martin Letis wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
I have expanded upon the wave report a bit from last month.
Looks like the mentors forgot to sign it
Ali
On 30 September 2015 at 02:58, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 02:15:05PM +, Marvin wrote:
>
>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 14 October 2015, 10:30 am PST
> On Sept. 30, 2015, 10:18 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > LGTM.
> >
> > Thanks Martin.
Committed as fa9886b22dc0c801cad99c85135f5bc63becc4bc.
- Ali
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38831/#review101170
---
Ship it!
LGTM.
Thanks Martin.
- Ali Lown
On Sept. 29, 2015
> On Sept. 30, 2015, 10:11 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > LGTM.
Committed as bdb8f24e1cbcb3e5b1c98199c86632cabd2c8d84.
- Ali
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38785/#rev
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38785/#review101168
---
Ship it!
LGTM.
- Ali Lown
On Sept. 29, 2015, 12:03 p.m
o you mean built from master (11a0d2e),
or built from the 2.7.0 tag?
I think we should commit this change at the same time as updating the GWT jars
stored in third_party/.
- Ali Lown
On Sept. 26, 2015, 9:17 a.m., Martin Letis wrote:
>
> --
Evan,
> Yeah I think better to ignore my original request, I understand why it
> isn't in the git repository now so all sweet.
Phew. It wasn't me being oblivious to something in your original request. :)
> Should be able to have docs
> transferred from confluence + new design and new design for
ide to explain the basics. The user guide just
>> explaining how to configure server connection. To consider configure the
>> app with a default Wave that could be used immediatly.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Pablo
>>
>>
>> 2015-08-21 1:29 GMT+02:00 Ali
Hi Evan,
Not entirely sure what this would constitute. Are you proposing
redesigning the website from scratch to not make use of the Apache
CMS?
Currently the reference version lives in the Wave subversion space (as
required for all the CMS scripts to work properly). This is already as
close to a
Hi all,
As many of you know, Roshan has been working on developing an Android
client for Wave, as part of GSoC '15. The code base can currently be
found on his github account[0].
I will let Roshan provide the full details of its functionality, but
the core features are all there (signup, signin,
Hi Yuri,
Evan was having a problem running the server using the run-server.sh
script, with the error below:
(Note that it works fine using ant run-server, due to that being
completely separate from the script)
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
com/typesafe/config/ConfigMe
Hi Evan,
I have merged these into the (newly created) 0.4 branch in the docs repository.
Not sure how to close the pull requests though, as I didn't meet the
required criteria (different branch).
Should I clone these over to the master branch though? Is the master
branch even useful or should we
Hi Roshan,
I have to admit that I am not entirely sure what I should be looking at here...
The current logic in the xActivity's seems fine to me, though it
doesn't do anything more than the mockups currently.
I think it worth correcting at this stage, but you have used "sing"
instead of "sign" as
Hi Roshan,
These look great!
I am interested in seeing how blip editing translates to this UI. How
should we handle multiple user cursors on screen at the same time? How
do we render gadgets/attachments?
With regards to the sign up/login page, how does this work for
different wave servers? Does
t;
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:21 PM Yuri Z wrote:
>
>> I tested by checking out the RC 9 branch and fetching jars/building - it
>> worked fine. I didn't check federation.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM Ali Lown wrote:
>>
>>> If y
release version, and we could potentially tag
documentation to match final releases including minor versions?
Ali
On 16 May 2015 at 11:49, Yuri Z wrote:
> I think it is.
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 2:03 AM Ali Lown wrote:
>
>> @Evan: Okay great.
>>
>> I have merged t
not, should get infra to hook this
up.
Thanks,
Ali
On 16 May 2015 at 00:03, Ali Lown wrote:
> @Evan: Okay great.
>
> I have merged this PR into the incubator-wave-docs repo.
>
> For reference: as the github repo is a mirror, with the master being
> on git-wip-us.apache.org,
mmits locally and pushing it back upstream. Github can
auto-detect this occurred and closed the PR for me.
Does this seem a reasonable workflow?
Ali
On 15 May 2015 at 09:06, Evan Hughes wrote:
> @Ali, submitted today
>
> On 15 May 2015 at 05:12, Ali Lown wrote:
>
>> @Evan: T
about the protocol specifications
>>
>> after the "Documentation" is built I will submit a pull request to the
>> main so you guys can see if you like it.
>>
>> On 6 May 2015 at 00:41, Ali Lown wrote:
>>>
>>> The repository is at https://gi
hat was the issue with federation?
> >
> > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM Ali Lown wrote:
> >
> >> -1 due to the inability to start the server with federation enabled.
> >> (I will change this to +1 if this is me failing to build correctly).
> >>
> >
in the RC8 binary package? @Yuri: Do you get the same error here, or
do you get something different when you build from the artifact in a
clean folder?
Ali
On 5 May 2015 at 18:23, Yuri Z wrote:
> Great, thanks Ali. I checked that the source compiles and runs.
> On Tue 5 May 2015 at 17:
on,
> it does use restructured text instead of markdown but is more extensible
> and can easily produce a pdf format compared to markdown. Gonna spin up my
> own repo and see how it is, been looking at the syntax and it isn't that
> bad.
>
> On 1 May 2015 at 01:53, Al
I think we may wish to extend the vote duration, as no-one seems to
have responded.
I have just gotten around to this email in my inbox, so hope to get to
this this evening...
Ali
On 29 April 2015 at 20:44, Yuri Z wrote:
> RC9 is now available for review.
> Artifacts can be found here:
> http
Hi David,
As Yuri has alluded to, we have a variety of possible Starter Tasks,
in varying difficulties, and levels of documentation.
You can find them here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20WAVE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20
ast the organization).
>>
>> 2015-04-28 16:40 GMT+02:00 Ali Lown :
>>
>> > Yuri,
>> >
>> > I think the main reason to move is to make it easier for people to
>> > make changes, over the existing confluence system. So I would have
>> >
Sounds good.
Ali
On 29 April 2015 at 11:27, Yuri Zelikov wrote:
>
>
>> On April 20, 2015, 8:04 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
>> > CHANGES, lines 65-69
>> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33237/diff/1/?file=931060#file931060line65>
>> >
>> > I tak
e better to move in small steps. Like to go over current
> documentation and open tickets with requests for improvements wherever
> something is missing or not clear.
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:33 PM Ali Lown wrote:
>
>> Well, doesn't look like anybody else has much o
both website and docs?
Ali
On 25 April 2015 at 02:52, Evan Hughes wrote:
> indeed and yea without a doubt
>
> On 25 April 2015 at 09:59, Ali Lown wrote:
>
>> Hi Evan,
>>
>> +1
>>
>> After giving this some more thought post the Hangout, I do think th
Hi Evan,
+1
After giving this some more thought post the Hangout, I do think that
moving the docs to Git provides us with a measurable improvement over
the current situation - particularly with the ability to keep docs
synced with the releases via branches, and the reduced barrier to
entry for ch
> On March 9, 2015, 6:15 a.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> >
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> Any other comment? @akaplanov?
>
> Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
> I can't reproduce this situation on Ubuntu with Chrome and Firefox.
> Try to input the same text in another application. Possibly th
.
build.properties
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33237/#comment130917>
Err. When did we get to 0.6.0?
I thought we were handling 0.4.0-rcX
- Ali Lown
On April 15, 2015, 8:09 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
>
> ---
>
; > > just a reminder that this is happening 20th April, 1800
>> > >
>> > > On 13 April 2015 at 18:49, Christian Grobmeier
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > great, lets make it 20th april
>> > > >
>> > >
ink before
> posting a vote for preview?
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:41 PM Ali Lown wrote:
>
>> Yuri,
>>
>> > 1 - This one is nasty, forgot to remove the logs... We need to fix the
>> > release script to ignore logs...
>>
>> Yes, this would b
Yuri,
> 1 - This one is nasty, forgot to remove the logs... We need to fix the
> release script to ignore logs...
Yes, this would be good to automate so it doesn't get missed in the future.
> 2. Right, but this one is minor I think.
Yes, but just something we should probably do.
> 3. So, what
obably have another RC.
Ali
On 15 April 2015 at 09:21, Dave Ball wrote:
> +1
>
> Tested simple local server, sign up, local waves, adding and removing
> recipients.
>
> Dave
>
>
> On 15/04/15 01:08, Ali Lown wrote:
>>
>> Aah. The closing time for this has s
Hi Roshan,
Yes, generally there should be a ticket in JIRA for each 'thing' that
needs doing - some of the TODO's may already have a ticket - but I
doubt most of them do as some are quite old.
We mention the process (in a _very_ brief form on the getting started
page[1]), but generally:
1) Creat
Aah. The closing time for this has snuck up on me. I will test this
out in the morning.
Seems like we could do with a few other people checking it as well though...
Ali
On 11 April 2015 at 18:25, Yuri Z wrote:
> But theactial release won't have the RC8, as it's will be
> incubating-0.4.0-alpha
t. Its a combination of the summary Mr Grobmeier made from the other
>> > > thread and some person thoughts.
>> > >
>> > > Talking points for hangout
>> > > <
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_7wraANGg6XKfvENPwEgEn7_umlU0Y1eA5CjQcuvhxU/ed
Hi Ben,
> I think that you're right to include the wave in full for a first pass.. So
> the email would include three parts "text/plain", "text/html" &
> "application/wave"
>
> The above thou may make the email huge in some cases where its a public
> wave or there are lots of participants, would i
I meant "votes".
On 9 Apr 2015 10:49, "Ali Lown" wrote:
> Are all 7 of those vores binding?
>
> Do we really need a vote for fixing the name?
>
> Ali
> On 9 Apr 2015 08:02, "Yuri Z" wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> The vote should be over with
working fine.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Roshan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Ben Hegarty wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I'v
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32893/#review79247
---
Ship it!
LGTM.
- Ali Lown
On April 6, 2015, 7:23 p.m., Yuri
Hi Ben,
> Sending multiple versions of the email using the MIME implementation would
> be perfect, I have just a couple of questions...
> 1. I would assume we should send "text/plain" and "text/html", should we
> also send something like "application/wave"? What would "application/wave"
> look lik
adden wrote:
> Ali,
>
> Adding them now. First one is in.
>
>
>
>
> On 4/4/15, 12:30 PM, "Ali Lown" wrote:
>
>>@Michael: What CSS type issues are these? Could you raise a JIRA issue for it?
>>
>>Ali
>>
>>On 4 April 2015 at 19:58, Mich
s.apache.org/r/32893/#comment128352>
This may prevent federation between older versions of the server and ones
running with this change.
Whilst it should occur - as we really shouldn't have anything saying
'google' left in here, I am not convinced this is the right patch
Times are whatever you set the doodle timezone to be (Top right).
Ali
On 6 Apr 2015 20:17, "Upayavira" wrote:
> I presume times are UTC?
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015, at 02:39 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
> > Here is a fairly large Doodle poll to see see when may work as a good
&g
p a record of it for people to view whenever. Thanks to the other
>>threads there's plenty of stuff to compile a list of talking points, I'll
>>put something together over the next week.
>>
>>On 2 April 2015 at 23:33, Ali Lown wrote:
>>
>>>
Hi Ben,
> I've read through the JIRA issue and it talks about having two messages
> being sent but one of those should just be the wave message being updated
> though the wave system, and a second email should be sent though the old
> school system using the update to the wave using just the unrea
R, CHANGES, THANKS, LICENSE and RELEASE-NOTES files.
>>
>>On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:53 PM Ali Lown wrote:
>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>> Tested install, federation, memory and file backends.
>>>
>>> Ali
>>>
>>> On 2 April 2015
Hi Ben,
I remember Bruno doing some work on this a while back. You should be
able to find his patches in the list archives.
The issue seems to be currently assigned to Kasun, but I don't recall
anything coming of this, so you should be quite safe to have a go at
it.
Please re-assign it to yourse
+1.
Tested install, federation, memory and file backends.
Ali
On 2 April 2015 at 14:38, Ali Lown wrote:
> I have so far tested the SHA digest, GPG signature, and the
> KEYS/CHANGES/RELEASE-NOTE files, all are fine.
>
> I intend to test federation tomorrow to check it isn'
e?
>
> Also one more question, why don't we have tag for this RC?
>
> All after all, I think it should work out and give my +1.
>
> I have not tested technically, just formally.
>
> Regards
>
> Christian
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015, at 15:38, Al
I have so far tested the SHA digest, GPG signature, and the
KEYS/CHANGES/RELEASE-NOTE files, all are fine.
I intend to test federation tomorrow to check it isn't broken.
Has anyone checked the file copyright notices?
Ali
On 2 April 2015 at 00:31, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
> On 4/1/
I think another hangout would be a great thing to have.
@Evan: Are you happy to organise this?
Ali
On 1 April 2015 at 16:23, John Blossom wrote:
> Id be glad to listen in, but since I am not a technical contributor, I will
> try mostly just to monitor.
>
> All the best,
>
> John Blossom
>
> ema
uccessfully submitted the proposal.
>> > So can you please proved a subiable time to discuss about the next step
>> in
>> > the IRC.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Roshan
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Ali Lown wro
you?
Ali
On 28 March 2015 at 16:48, Roshan Lakmal wrote:
> Yes
> I have successfully submitted the proposal.
> So can you please proved a subiable time to discuss about the next step in
> the IRC.
>
> Regards
> Roshan
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 8:05 AM, A
; [3] - https://community.apache.org/guide-to-being-a-mentor.html
> >> [4] -
> >> https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/profile/register/org_
> >> member/google/gsoc2015
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Michael MacFadden <
> >> micha
;>
>> Key: WAVE-400
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-400
>> Project: Wave
>> Issue Type: New Feature
>>Reporter: Frank Ren
>>Assignee: Ali Lown
>>Pri
le are above (and outside) the
block they are commenting. Could you move this to there?
- Ali Lown
On March 9, 2015, 12:23 a.m., Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
if you can give me a brief introduction about what we can do on GSoC then I
> can start making my proposal because proposal deadline is Friday (27th)
> [1].
>
> Cheers,
>
> Roshan
>
> [1] - https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2015
>
>
>
> O
+1.
One of my main time-sink responsibilities is about to come to an end
(post an AGM later today).
Ali
On 23 March 2015 at 22:22, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> +0.5 (to be realistic)
Christian,
This seems to be the age-old Wave problem.
Regarding your last comment, is there any precedent for a project
leaving Apache and returning at future point - it does seem like a
strange set of circumstances would be needed to trigger it?
Ali
On 23 March 2015 at 14:06, Christian Grobmei
original code is Java it mostly works on Android, except
>> specific GWT parts that have been replaced.
>>
>> Pablo
>>
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/Zorbel/swell-android
>> [2]
>> http://p2pvalue.eu/blog/awakening-decentralised-real-time-collaboratio
ct to a Wave server and
>> operate
>> > > at Wavelet-level with the original Java code. A new UI for the
>> > > conversational model could be added on top of it.
>> > >
>> > > As long as original code is Java it mostly works on Android, except
Hi Roshan,
You will probably be interested to read about the Client-Server
Protocol[1], and its associated protobuf implementation[2], as this is
what currently defines the 'split' between the WebClient and the
Server parts of WIAB.
As this protocol works entirely with deltas, you to retrieve the
Michael,
If you could write the report this quarter, that would be great!
(Though there hasn't exactly been a lot to write about...)
Ali
On 1 March 2015 at 18:56, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> If not one else is able. I am more than happy to help
>
> ~Michael
>
>
>
>
> On 2/28/15, 12:42 AM, "Chri
Yuri,
That sounds like a great plan.
I would love to help, but am swamped this week.
Thanks,
Ali
On 1 December 2014 at 14:32, Yuri Z wrote:
> Hi
> There wasn't a lot of activity recently, but I think we still need to do
> the release. I ll merge some changes that were already approved in the
>
Hi Joseph,
I think that the only sensible option is to delegate the resolution of
this action in the case of conflict back into the application, so some
sort of extension of (4) that allows some arbitrary lambda expression
to be passed as the onconflict method. (Depending on the situation,
they mi
That server is due an upgrade. (IIRC it is running ~rc3).
I agree that it broke in the xmpp upgrade. Looks like the Log class
doesn't exist any more, and we should change it to use the the WIAB
logging infastructure.
I have exams on Monday+Tuesday, so I don't have time to look into this
until Tue
I have extended the Wave report with a few more details.
Feel free to change/add more.
Ali
On 29 August 2014 11:16, Yuri Z wrote:
> I updated the Wiki. Please feel free to update/add details.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
>> Any takers?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
sure about
>> whack.jar
>> The websocket.jar looks is not used as i was able to run the server and
>> tests without it. I guess we need to return the dependency on xmpp and
>> whack, but preferably to use public third party repositories.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:59
s, right?
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014, at 03:32 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>> >> > I would expect LICENSE/NOTICE to need to be updated to include i
4:52 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>>
>> Not sure about the origins of websocket.jar (is this a really early
>> version of Java-Websocket?)
>>
>> Maybe it would be easier if we just include the single source file in
>> the our repository? (MIT license, can we do that?)
&
about the origins of websocket.jar (is this a really early
version of Java-Websocket?)
Maybe it would be easier if we just include the single source file in
the our repository? (MIT license, can we do that?)
Ali
On 24 August 2014 23:48, Ali Lown wrote:
> Sure.
>
> I am going to bed now
testing federation without setting up verification, so I hadn't
spotted this issue).
src/org/waveprotocol/wave/crypto/WaveSignatureVerifier.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25021/#comment89708>
Could we lose these trailing spaces?
- Ali Lown
On Aug. 25, 2014, 11:42 a.m., Pabl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25020/#review51394
---
Ship it!
LGTM.
- Ali Lown
On Aug. 25, 2014, 11:25 a.m., Antonio
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20371/#review51393
---
Ship it!
LGTM.
- Ali Lown
On July 13, 2014, 9:43 a.m., Pablo
; On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
>
>> Done.
>>
>> Can we find some automated way to get pull requests emailed back to the
>> list?
>>
>> Ali
>>
>> On 24 August 2014 23:30, Yuri Z wrote:
>> > Please review https://github.com/apache/incubator-wave/pull/6
>>
Done.
Can we find some automated way to get pull requests emailed back to the list?
Ali
On 24 August 2014 23:30, Yuri Z wrote:
> Please review https://github.com/apache/incubator-wave/pull/6
been pre-squashed for submission?
Ali
On 21 August 2014 23:38, Yuri Z wrote:
> Unless there's an Apache policy against that, I think we should prefer
> GitHub pull requests.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
>
>> Yuri,
>>
>> I s
Yuri,
I shall take a look at this tomorrow morning.
(We should probably decide whether we are going to use PR as the
review procedure instead of Review Board?)
Ali
On 21 August 2014 23:31, Yuri Z wrote:
> Hi
> I made some changes to the original full text search with Solr patch by
> Frank Ren
I created an issue in Jira for this.
I bisected the problem to the commit that added jetty9.
I tried using an up-to-date version of jetty9 - same problem on windows.
Seems like some sutble problem with the way routing is handled in jetty9 on
windows.
I then ran out of time.
Ali
On 18 Aug 2014
Jul 24, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier <
> grobme...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Thats good then, thanks for letting me know.
> >>
> >> On 23 Jul 2014, at 22:59, Ali Lown wrote:
> >>
> >>> The thumnbail_patterns files
>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thats good then, thanks for letting me know.
>>>
>>> On 23 Jul 2014, at 22:59, Ali Lown wrote:
>>>
>>> > The thumnbail_patterns files were fixed by Vicente bac
Hi Ronny,
Thanks for raising this again. I had lost your previous email in an inbox purge.
I have made a bug for this (WAVE-413), so that we can track progress
on this bug.
As for the data loss, could you raise this as a bug too. Is this only
on the windows server as well?
Thanks,
Ali
On 4 Augu
.
(Not sure if this is really the best way to handle merging RC/release branches.)
- Ali Lown
On July 18, 2014, 3:53 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
1 - 100 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
