-0 Checked signatures, SHA hashes, simple server run with federation enabled and checked waves still work, checked the CAPS FILES (CHANGES, DISCLAIMER, KEYS, LICENSE, README.*, THANKS).
1) Noticed the source release contains a few wiab-server.log.[01] files that should not be there... 2) CHANGES not updated to mention RC7 - even if nothing beyond the name changed - which is probably more confusing for end users if not documented. 3) I agree with Christian that the folder is a bit confusingly named 0.8, when it really means rc8 for 0.4.0. Similarly for the artifact which is named "[projname]-incubating-[version]-alpha" rather than the more conventional "[projname]-[version]-incubating". I also don't think "alpha" deserves to be in the artifact name. Do we intend to have a 0.4.0-beta and then a 0.4.0? This seems confusing... Sorry, but we should probably have another RC. Ali On 15 April 2015 at 09:21, Dave Ball <w...@glark.co.uk> wrote: > +1 > > Tested simple local server, sign up, local waves, adding and removing > recipients. > > Dave > > > On 15/04/15 01:08, Ali Lown wrote: >> >> Aah. The closing time for this has snuck up on me. I will test this >> out in the morning. >> >> Seems like we could do with a few other people checking it as well >> though... >> >> Ali >> >> On 11 April 2015 at 18:25, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> But theactial release won't have the RC8, as it's will be >>> incubating-0.4.0-alpha >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 3:04 PM Christian Grobmeier >>> <grobme...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I would name it like: >>>> >>>> 0.4-incubating-RC8 >>>> >>>> I think this is a more convenient pattern. However for this vote I think >>>> it's fine. This is more a suggestion for the future. >>>> however I would pass your information on the naming to the IPMC vote - >>>> I guess it might confuse people there too. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015, at 23:31, Yuri Z wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It's release candidate 8 for version 0.4.0 alpha. If you think we >>>>> should >>>>> name it something else - let me know. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:35 PM Christian Grobmeier >>>>> <grobme...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> However, I am still very confused by the link saying it's 0.8 and the >>>>>> artifacts saying it's 0.4. >>>>>> Are we sure this is what we want? It might pass the IPMC also because >>>>>> naming the release is not something which can/should be blocked, but >>>>>> it >>>>>> might confuse users. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015, at 21:49, Yuri Z wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> RC8 is now available for review. >>>>>>> It's basically RC7 with artifact names fixed to include "incubating" >>>>>>> Artifacts can be found here: >>>>>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.8-incubating/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha') >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The release version will be: 0.4.0-alpha >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is taken from branch (same as RC7) >>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave. >>>>>> >>>>>> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC7 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Reminder on what included previous release candidates: >>>>>>> RC6 included: >>>>>>> - Bug Fixes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> RC5 included: >>>>>>> - Added MongoDB based deltas store and migration tool for deltas >>>>>>> migration >>>>>>> from file to mongo based store. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Added client/server profiling. >>>>>>> - Added Atmosphere framework as replacement of Socket.IO. >>>>>>> - Added alternative - Gmail style initials avatars. >>>>>>> - Decreased number of permutations in dev compilation and added GWT >>>>>>> superdev mode. >>>>>>> - Upgraded the server to Jetty 9.1.1. >>>>>>> - Added JDK 7 compatibility. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> RC4 included: >>>>>>> - More licensing fixes >>>>>>> - Federation works >>>>>>> - New and updated translations >>>>>>> - And more... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES, and a >>>> >>>> list >>>>>>> >>>>>>> of changes in CHANGES at the above artifact distribution url, as >>>> >>>> well as >>>>>>> >>>>>>> being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Action Required: >>>>>>> Test the release and make it works on your environment - at least >>>>>>> standard >>>>>>> configurations. Please go over the source files and make sure they >>>> >>>> don't >>>>>>> >>>>>>> contain anything that cannot be released under Apache Wave due to >>>> >>>> legal >>>>>>> >>>>>>> issues. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This vote will close around 0000 GMT 16-th April 2015. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release it! >>>>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but... >>>>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but you really should fix.... >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Definitely not because... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks > >
