Hi all, Thanks for taking part in verifying this release candidate, it is great to finally be able to take a potential release to the others in the incubator! (I apologize for not following up sooner, I have finally graduated from Uni, so am now sorting out what comes next...)
These results supersede the email I sent dated 18th October, with the results now looking like: +1: 6 (+1 mentor, +4 non-binding) +0: 0 -0: 0 -1: 0 Ali On 18 October 2015 at 02:48, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this RC. > > Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October which has now well > and truly passed. > > My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize that I failed to put > this in my original email, so you are allowed to ignore this for > failing to meet my own deadline). > > The result looks something like (including mine): > +1: 3 (2 binding) > +0: 0 > -0: 0 > -1: 0 > > Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to meet the release > requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more + than -) [0]. > Binding votes as decided by people in [1]. > > @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving away from Apache, as > this vote does seem to suggest that there is not enough interest from > the currently defined committers to maintain this project here. > > I am not really sure why none of the other committers responded at all > to the vote... > > Ali > > [0]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification > [1]: https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave > > On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel <jeremy....@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 >> >> +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel> >> Public Information Officer >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> I did the following: >>> - Checked signatures >>> - Opened the binary and verified it works. >>> - Opened the source and verified that it can be built and works. >>> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10. >>> >>> Ali - Thanks for making this RC! >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > RC10 is now available for review. >>> > Artefacts can be found here: >>> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/ >>> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha') >>> > >>> > I have included both source and binary artefacts for convenience. >>> > >>> > The release version (if successful) will be 0.4.0-incubating >>> > >>> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the incubator-wave >>> repository. >>> > >>> > Notable changes since earlier initial release attempts include: >>> > - Use of typesafe config >>> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc. >>> > - Assorted tweaks to build system >>> > >>> > A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES, and a >>> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts. >>> > >>> > Action Required: >>> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly the source ones) >>> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime problems in a >>> > 'standard' configuration. >>> > >>> > We are not looking for a perfect first release, as there is plenty of >>> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases, but we do want to get >>> > 0.4 out soon (at long last). >>> > >>> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October 2015. >>> > >>> > [ ] +1 Release it! >>> > [ ] +0 Ok, but... >>> > [ ] -0 Ok, but you really should fix... >>> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because... >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Ali >>> > >>>
