I think tomorrow (13th) is a bit short-notice for people now - even if
they may still be available.

I propose the next suitable time: 20th April, 1800 as the time for the hangout.

Ali

On 11 April 2015 at 17:49, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> looks like the 6pm UTC on the first day is pretty good for everyone that
> has filled in the doodle except ajr13 unfortunately. We just need to
> confirm the time so people can make plans to be available. Unfortunately I
> was not present during the last hangout so some information on how the
> "calling" process happened would be helpful.
>
> @Grobmeier:
>  - Agreed
>  - Seems the 6pm (UTC) sessions early in the week are pretty common
>  - Sounds like a good idea, more information the better
>
> On 11 April 2015 at 22:12, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Just checked the doodle and had this on mind:
>>
>> - we should make sure that as many committers as possible are there. In
>> example. I consider Ali a very important person to participate
>>
>> - from mentor perspective, I think it's ok if at least one of us can
>> participate. I would be sad if I can't meet you all, but if there is a
>> time when everybody except could make it, chose it.
>>
>> - I would like to suggest a Q&A -after- the official Wave meeting for
>> people, who are interested in working with Wave but are concerned
>> because they don't know what Apache is. What I want to say is: do you
>> have any questions on the ASF, would like to learn how it works, or
>> anything else, we could clarify this after the first part. That said, it
>> would interesting to know if there are any folks who would like to see
>> there ASF related questions answered, even when they are not related to
>> Wave.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015, at 10:16, Upayavira wrote:
>> > Thanks for this, Evan.
>> >
>> > Given it was you that proposed the Hangout, it would seem reasonable
>> > that we try to accommodate you. Anyone here have any objections to an
>> > earlier concall, say, 2pm UTC? Are there any Pacific time participants?
>> >
>> > Regarding the document, we need to keep it *really* simple. To be quite
>> > frank, when you are trying to restart someone’s heart, you don’t worry
>> > much about a sore on their leg. We need to be looking for the absolute
>> > simplest things we can do that might make this project more accessible.
>> > They have to be small enough that someone here can undertake them with a
>> > reasonable certainty of completion and success. The main resource we
>> > lack at the moment is people to actually do the work, so we need to
>> > identify small, manageable tasks that will help draw in new resources
>> > which might, in turn, allow us to take on larger tasks.
>> >
>> > Upayavira
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015, at 04:43 AM, Evan Hughes wrote:
>> > > Google Doc full of talking points, available for anyone to edit as they
>> > > see
>> > > fit. Its a combination of the summary Mr Grobmeier made from the other
>> > > thread and some person thoughts.
>> > >
>> > > Talking points for hangout
>> > > <
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_7wraANGg6XKfvENPwEgEn7_umlU0Y1eA5CjQcuvhxU/edit?usp=sharing
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Need to make sure the hangout is recorded as for myself 12am 2am & 4am
>> is
>> > > 50/50 shot ill be able to stay awake to watch it live haha.
>> > >
>> > > On 7 April 2015 at 05:26, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Times are whatever you set the doodle timezone to be (Top right).
>> > > >
>> > > > Ali
>> > > > On 6 Apr 2015 20:17, "Upayavira" <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I presume times are UTC?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015, at 02:39 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
>> > > > > > Here is a fairly large Doodle poll to see see when may work as a
>> good
>> > > > > > date/time for a hangout.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > http://doodle.com/uz9vq9qiwyuqigsa
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Let me know if you want more time options.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Ali
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On 4 April 2015 at 07:28, Michael MacFadden <
>> > > > michael.macfad...@gmail.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > I would be happy to participate.  Perhaps the first thing to
>> know
>> > > > is..
>> > > > > What time zones people are all in.  I am in US Pacific Time Zone
>> (UTC
>> > > > > -7:00).
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > ~Michael
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On 4/2/15, 7:40 AM, "Evan Hughes" <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >>sure, just need to know what time of day is suitable for the
>> speakers
>> > > > > as we
>> > > > > > >>should keep a record of it for people to view whenever. Thanks
>> to the
>> > > > > other
>> > > > > > >>threads there's plenty of stuff to compile a list of talking
>> points,
>> > > > > I'll
>> > > > > > >>put something together over the next week.
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>On 2 April 2015 at 23:33, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>> I think another hangout would be a great thing to have.
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>> @Evan: Are you happy to organise this?
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>> Ali
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>> On 1 April 2015 at 16:23, John Blossom <jblos...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > > >>> > Id be glad to listen in, but since I am not a technical
>> > > > > contributor, I
>> > > > > > >>> will
>> > > > > > >>> > try mostly just to monitor.
>> > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > >>> > All the best,
>> > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > >>> > John Blossom
>> > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > >>> > email: jblos...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > >>> > phone: 203.293.8511
>> > > > > > >>> > google+: google.com/+JohnBlossom
>> > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > >>> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Evan Hughes <
>> ehu...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > >>> >> Hey all,
>> > > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > > >>> >> could we get a Google hangout of the Mentors and
>> contributors to
>> > > > > > >>> solidify
>> > > > > > >>> >> the direction which wave will be heading and pointing out
>> what
>> > > > > needs to
>> > > > > > >>> be
>> > > > > > >>> >> done other than just thoughts on the mailing list.
>> > > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>>

Reply via email to