Re: [techtalk] Mutt functionality

2001-07-07 Thread Claudine
On Thursday, 05 July 2001, David Merrill wrote to techtalk, > > > 3. Can we cut and paste text within and between > > > emails with Mutt? > > You use your regular text editor, so you can do anything you would do > within it. Cutting & pasting between two emails is not made really > easy by mut

Re: [techtalk] Security mailing lists

2001-07-07 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 11:19:55AM -0400, Michelle Murrain wrote: > The mention of SELinux reminded me - anyone have recommendations for > a good, low-medium traffic e-mail list that focuses on security > issues? *NIX focused, or general is fine. Go to http://www.securityfocus.org and have a l

Re: [techtalk] File sharing over the internet

2001-07-07 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:38:15PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Conor Daly wrote: > > As a matter of interest, how does CVS cope when: > > 1. I checkout source and start editing. > > 2. You checkout the same source and start editing. > > 3. You finish editing and checkin your version. > > 4.

Re: [techtalk] SELinux

2001-07-07 Thread Caitlyn M. Martin
On Saturday 07 July 2001 08:26 am, Marcia Barrett Nice wrote: > http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/ > > Has anyone on this list looked into this? Yes, in detail. I wrote the white paper for another federal Agency on this, recommending that they continue to monitor the progress of the project but tha

Re: [techtalk] SELinux

2001-07-07 Thread Julie
Michael Carson wrote: > > Julie wrote: > > >It wouldn't constitute a secure system on account of I have a > >small child living in the house and he knows how to boot from > >CD-ROM =and= use most of the tools in my toolbox ;-) > > >Oh dear. How wonderful and terrifying at the same time. :)

Re: [techtalk] SELinux

2001-07-07 Thread Julie
Michael Carson wrote: > > Julie wrote: > > >Marcia Barrett Nice wrote: > > > >>http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/ > >> > >>Has anyone on this list looked into this? I'm slowly but surely working > >>my way through the documentation (you know, in my free time at work > >>usually) and I wondered what pe

Re: [techtalk] SELinux

2001-07-07 Thread Julie
Marcia Barrett Nice wrote: > > http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/ > > Has anyone on this list looked into this? I'm slowly but surely working > my way through the documentation (you know, in my free time at work > usually) and I wondered what people whose opinions I (tend to) trust > about this sort o

Re: Screen is your friend (was Re: [techtalk] Mutt functionality)

2001-07-07 Thread Andrew Wendt
On July 7, 2001 04:47, Telsa Gwynne wrote: > screen has to be one of the most underrated apps there is. So many > people don't know about it. I prefer it over kterm's tabbed terminal > windows and powershell (gnome-terminal-based similar idea) because > it is all keyboard-driven and you don't nee

Re: [techtalk] File sharing over the internet

2001-07-07 Thread kath
> Is there an rsync client for Windoze? rsync is, I think the best bet > to synchronize files securely (you can use ssh) between unix boxen, > so I'd look for an rsync client, maybe. (If it doesn't exist, this > sounds like a cool project.) lol, I was just talking to my friend about this. I was

Re: [techtalk] File sharing over the internet

2001-07-07 Thread Michelle Murrain
At 6:40 PM -0400 7/6/01, kath wrote: >I'm currently working on a large project (web based email). Well >its large for me, anyway. > >I'm working on it with another user (she is in two locations, on one >same machine, was at home and now at university). > >I am on 2 computers: Laptop I bring to

Re: [techtalk] File sharing over the internet

2001-07-07 Thread Conor Daly
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 10:35:39AM +1000 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] thought: > kath wrote: > > > I was thinking CVS... but not keeping changes local is important (so noone > > is holding out on something important on accident). > > > > Would CVS be able to do this? I al

Re: [techtalk] Slack 8 & Realplayer 8 problem

2001-07-07 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:57:10PM -0400 or thereabouts, Jennifer Davis wrote: > I've been on this list for a week or so now and I haven't written anything > yet (sorry!). :) > I just purged my Slackware 7.0 and replaced it with Slackware 8.0. It has > been my easiest install ever of Slackware

Re: Screen is your friend (was Re: [techtalk] Mutt functionality)

2001-07-07 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 11:15:46AM +1000 or thereabouts, Mary Gardiner wrote: > > A tailor made solution for this kind of thing is the 'screen' utility. screen has to be one of the most underrated apps there is. So many people don't know about it. I prefer it over kterm's tabbed terminal windows

Re: Screen is your friend (was Re: [techtalk] Mutt functionality)

2001-07-06 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 01:46:40PM +1000, Mary Gardiner wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 09:42:07PM -0400, David Merrill wrote: > > Very cool. The kde virtual terminal (konsole?) allows something very > > similar, but the various terminals show as tabs on the bottom of the > > window. Quite slick.

Re: Screen is your friend (was Re: [techtalk] Mutt functionality)

2001-07-06 Thread Mary Gardiner
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 09:42:07PM -0400, David Merrill wrote: > Very cool. The kde virtual terminal (konsole?) allows something very > similar, but the various terminals show as tabs on the bottom of the > window. Quite slick. I use PWM as my window manager, which is very minimalist but allows m

Screen is your friend (was Re: [techtalk] Mutt functionality)

2001-07-06 Thread Mary Gardiner
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 11:27:53AM -0700, Akkana wrote: > I usually just run another copy of mutt in a different shell window. > Or if I'm not in X (running on the console or over a telnet line), > I ctrl-Z to suspend the mutt process, use more or vi or another mutt > or whatever is easiest to vie

Re: [techtalk] File sharing over the internet

2001-07-06 Thread kath
lping your brother get off it, again? Ok, done bashing you publicly. msg me when you get in ;) - k - Original Message - From: "James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:27 PM Subject: Re: [te

Re: [techtalk] File sharing over the internet

2001-07-06 Thread James
uot;kath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:01 PM > Subject: Re: [techtalk] File sharing over the internet > > > > kath wrote: > > > > > > > Is there anyway for all of us to sync files easily? The clo

Re: [techtalk] File sharing over the internet

2001-07-06 Thread kath
e the source and others that can just view and download it. Am I missing something?) - k - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "kath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:01 PM Subject: Re: [techtalk] File sharing

Re: [techtalk] Mutt functionality

2001-07-06 Thread Akkana
Conor Daly writes: > > > 3. Can we cut and paste text within and between > > > emails with Mutt? > > > > Well, you can run two mutts open on different messages > > and cut and paste like that. > > This is the one thing that bothers me about mutt. I suppose I could have > vi shell out and star

Re: [techtalk] X issues

2001-07-06 Thread coldfire
> > by default, X dumps logs to /var/log/XFree86.0.log ... it should mention > > that if you get the error "Fatal: No Screens Found" .. > > I'm wondering if this is distro specific tweak to a config > file? I've got a debian box that was fatal erring everywhere and no > log file in /var/log. hrm

Re: [techtalk] X issues

2001-07-06 Thread ktb
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:07:45AM -0400, coldfire wrote: > > Start X from the command line like so - > > $ startx > X.out 2>&1 > > or to just view the output of X - > > $ X > X.out 2>&1 > > by default, X dumps logs to /var/log/XFree86.0.log ... it should mention > that if you get the error "Fat

Re: [techtalk] Mutt functionality

2001-07-06 Thread Conor Daly
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 09:33:24PM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Telsa Gwynne thought: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:57:43AM -0700 or thereabouts, Michelle Dukich wrote: > > Searchable by the standard commandline tools > (grep thing Mail/receive*) or by a keybinding which is > usually

Re: [techtalk] X issues

2001-07-05 Thread coldfire
> Start X from the command line like so - > $ startx > X.out 2>&1 > or to just view the output of X - > $ X > X.out 2>&1 by default, X dumps logs to /var/log/XFree86.0.log ... it should mention that if you get the error "Fatal: No Screens Found" .. abe

Re: [techtalk] Mutt functionality

2001-07-05 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:57:43AM -0700 or thereabouts, Michelle Dukich wrote: > 1. We tried to use Mahogany and slurped all our old > emails over to it. It is COMPLETELY useless to search > for old messages by keyword which is a BIG need for > us. From what I have read in Sven's Man pages, it

Re: [techtalk] Mutt functionality

2001-07-05 Thread Arvid Warnecke
Hello Michelle, On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:57:43AM -0700, Michelle Dukich wrote: > 1. We tried to use Mahogany and slurped all our old > emails over to it. It is COMPLETELY useless to search > for old messages by keyword which is a BIG need for > us. From what I have read in Sven's Man pages,

Re: [techtalk] X issues

2001-07-05 Thread ktb
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 01:53:51PM -0400, Michelle Murrain wrote: > At 12:04 PM -0400 7/5/01, coldfire wrote: > > > I have an X problem (I always get nailed with X problems). I did a > >> new Progeny Debian install (which uses XFree86 4.0, which detected my > >> Video card - a 3D labs permedia,

Re: [techtalk] Mutt functionality

2001-07-05 Thread Steph Donovan
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:57:43AM -0700, Michelle Dukich wrote: > Hello all: > > Okay, a while back I asked for recommendations for an > email client for Linux and the overwhelming favorite > was Mutt. I am getting ready to download Mutt for my > friend and I who have a few serious issues we wa

Re: [techtalk] X issues

2001-07-05 Thread Michelle Murrain
At 12:04 PM -0400 7/5/01, coldfire wrote: > > I have an X problem (I always get nailed with X problems). I did a >> new Progeny Debian install (which uses XFree86 4.0, which detected my >> Video card - a 3D labs permedia, and, I guess is using that driver. >> XF86Config-4 has the right modes,

Re: [techtalk] X issues

2001-07-05 Thread Michelle Murrain
At 12:07 PM -0400 7/5/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi, Michelle, > >Are you sure the version is 4.0, as in the first 4? If so buggy... >Seriously, try upgrading to either 4.0.3 or 4.1 and let us know if that Actually, it's a 4.0.2 package, but I'm going to upgrade the box to woody, since i

Re: [techtalk] X issues

2001-07-05 Thread Martin . Caitlyn
Hi, Michelle, Are you sure the version is 4.0, as in the first 4? If so buggy... Seriously, try upgrading to either 4.0.3 or 4.1 and let us know if that helped. All the best, Caity ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.o

Re: [techtalk] X issues

2001-07-05 Thread coldfire
> I have an X problem (I always get nailed with X problems). I did a > new Progeny Debian install (which uses XFree86 4.0, which detected my > Video card - a 3D labs permedia, and, I guess is using that driver. > XF86Config-4 has the right modes, horizontal and vertical refresh for > the monit

Re: [techtalk] switch function in C (or how to read commandline args?)

2001-07-05 Thread Conor Daly
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:06:57PM +1200 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Penguina thought: > > > > "Tokenizing" is the right term. > > My response was to CD's token defs > > >CD>So, I can do something like: > >CD> > >CD>#define FORCE_SWITCH "--force" > >CD>#define CONFIG_SWITCH "-C" > >CD>

Re: [techtalk] switch function in C (or how to read commandline args?)

2001-07-04 Thread Almut Behrens
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 08:02:25AM +1200, Penguina wrote: > > it might make sense to separate out the issues of > > command-line interface packages > > hash tables > > lexical analysers > > parsers > > tokens: what they are & the variety of things you can use th

Re: [techtalk] switch function in C (or how to read commandline args?)

2001-07-04 Thread Penguina
"Tokenizing" is the right term. My response was to CD's token defs >CD>So, I can do something like: >CD> >CD>#define FORCE_SWITCH "--force" >CD>#define CONFIG_SWITCH "-C" >CD> >CD>and so on? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >P> No. CD asked "Can I do X" this is P answering "No" to CD. But P (me) w

Re: [techtalk] switch function in C (or how to read commandlineargs?)

2001-07-04 Thread Penguina
it might make sense to separate out the issues of command-line interface packages hash tables lexical analysers parsers tokens: what they are & the variety of things you can use them for how to initialize function pointers, then invoke

Re: [techtalk] switch function in C (or how to read commandlineargs?)

2001-07-04 Thread Penguina
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Conor Daly wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 08:17:58PM -0500 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, > Jeff Dike thought: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > Now that's interesting. So how do I tokenise the strings? There are a few good references on doing this -- strtok is a good th

Re: [techtalk] Promiscuos setting

2001-07-03 Thread Subba Rao
On 0, Subba Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My system is running Tcpdump and Snort at the same time. Both these tools > are running with the '-p' option. This setting I believe does not put the > ethernet interface in promiscuous mode. > > The system I am talking about has 3 ethernet interfa

Re: [techtalk] switch function in C (or how to read commandline args?)

2001-07-03 Thread Conor Daly
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 08:17:58PM -0500 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Jeff Dike thought: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Now that's interesting. So how do I tokenise the strings? > > OK, let's say you have an interpreted language, and a program being > interpreted has this in an inner loop:

Re: [techtalk] switch function in C (or how to read commandline args?)

2001-07-03 Thread Almut Behrens
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 01:33:50AM +0100, Conor Daly wrote: > Thanks James and Jeff for the thoughts. It kinda looks like an if else-if > chain is my only option. nah! there are much more crazy options... :) Basically, I would of course agree that a list of if-else-if-strcmp()'s is perfectly su

Re: [techtalk] Kickstart woes

2001-07-03 Thread Magni Onsoien
s h: (This mail is OLD - but I just returned from vacations and while waiting for my kickstarting to finish I read some mail. Kickstart really sucks until it works, then it's a dream. Or at least not a nightmare.) > I've currently been playing with Kickstart. When I tried it out, it > booted th

Re: [techtalk] netmeeting incoming behind linux router

2001-07-02 Thread Martin . Caitlyn
Hi, Robin, What version of the Linux kernel are you using. ipchains/ipmasq in the 2.2.x kernels really aren't designed for two way traffic through a NAT. iptables in the 2.4.x kernel will do the job you want. I have no experience with Microsoft NetMeeting, but I have had to configure a firewal

Re: [techtalk] (Rant) Linux and security

2001-07-02 Thread Martin . Caitlyn
Hi, Kath, Since I do Linux security (among other things) for a living, I'm going to comment on some of the things in your rant. > I scanned the machine (nmap-ed) as a favor for my friend and was totally _unshocked_ > to find that this guy had basically a stock Linux (probably Red Hat) install,

Re: [techtalk] switch function in C (or how to read commandline args?)

2001-07-02 Thread Conor Daly
Thanks James and Jeff for the thoughts. It kinda looks like an if else-if chain is my only option. On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 08:05:04PM -0500 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Jeff Dike thought: > James Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Also, from an aesthetic point of view, a single block

Re: [techtalk] ssh woes/mysteries

2001-06-30 Thread P. M. Wright
On June 29, 2001 02:25 pm, Michelle Murrain wrote: > The strange part, is I also can't ssh into that box from a Mac OS X > machine that sits next to it. But other linux boxes on the network > work fine. try ssh-ing from the Mac OSX box using the IP number, rather than the server name. I'll bet yo

Re: [techtalk] switch function in C (or how to read commandline args?)

2001-06-30 Thread James A . Sutherland
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 17:56:28 -0500, you wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> What you can do is switch() on the FIRST character of the word, then >> use strcmp() to check for each possibility - something like this: > >Yuck. Argument parsing is not a performance problem. Arguments? No. I just use

Re: [techtalk] switch function in C (or how to read commandline args?)

2001-06-30 Thread James A . Sutherland
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 21:32:38 +0100, you wrote: >I want to read a bunch of commandline args or config options from file >in a C program. Now, in bash, I can use a switch structure to do stuff >based on the *string* presented. AFAIR, in C, you can only switch on an >*int*. > >So, how do I use a

Re: [techtalk] Marking the Mutt folder contents

2001-06-30 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 10:13:43PM + or thereabouts, Subba Rao wrote: > > I do tag several email and save them to a folder in one attempt. How do I > 'delete' or mark the contents of the email folder as 'read' in one attempt? t for tag a message. T for tag a pattern. in this case th

Re: [techtalk] ssh woes/mysteries

2001-06-29 Thread Mary Gardiner
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 02:25:52PM -0400, Michelle Murrain wrote: > I'm stumped, totally. Suggestions? Is there anyway you can run ssh (the client request, not the server), in verbose mode. The switch on the command line is -v, but perhaps graphical clients won't support it. This will give you a

Re: [techtalk] Software/GUI specs

2001-06-29 Thread Michelle Murrain
At 9:54 AM +1000 6/28/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Michelle Murrain wrote: > >>Hi Folks, >> >>Are there systems out there, besides UML, that people use to >>specify functionality of software, and/or the way a GUI will work? >>I'm looking for a method that will make it easy for everyone >>invol

Re: [techtalk] anacron question answered

2001-06-25 Thread Martin . Caitlyn
Hi, everyone, Never mind :) I found my answer on a French language page on at and cron. The answer is... yes, anacron is controlled by /etc/cron.allow and /etc/cron.deny. Also, disregard my reference to /etc/cron.d/cron.allow. That's Irix, not Linux :) All the best, Cait

Re: [techtalk] hey, where's OSDN??

2001-06-24 Thread ktb
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 12:37:05PM +0100, Carla Schroder wrote: > Hi all, > > Since yesterday, Freshmeat, Slashdot, Sourceforge, and Thinkgeek are nowhere > to be found. Anyone know what's going on? Linux.com is up, but there are no > news or updates. Maybe them bad crackers got in again? Someon

Re: [techtalk] hey, where's OSDN??

2001-06-24 Thread Mandi
According to a former VA guy in my LUG, VA should be fine for a while just burning money, although they are laying people off in an attempt at profit. The other rumor is that there is a hardware issue. It looks like stuff that is hosted with exodus in that group is down - themes.org, /., fres

Re: [techtalk] hey, where's OSDN??

2001-06-24 Thread Clifford Crawford
On Sunday, June 24, 2001, at 07:37 AM, Carla Schroder wrote: > Hi all, > > Since yesterday, Freshmeat, Slashdot, Sourceforge, and Thinkgeek are > nowhere > to be found. Anyone know what's going on? Linux.com is up, but there are > no > news or updates. Maybe them bad crackers got in again? Som

Re: [techtalk] email web interface

2001-06-24 Thread Walt
At 03:53 PM 6/23/01 -0500, you wrote: >On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 04:40:29PM -0400, David Merrill wrote: > > Can anyone recommend a good web interface for my mail system? I have > > imap enabled already, so as system using that would be fine. > > The sysadmins at my new job are pretty paranoid about

Re: [techtalk] dead mouse

2001-06-23 Thread Julie
Daniel Manrique wrote: > > > > > No idea about USB mice, though - or how you get the input from mouse > > wheels. Anyone? > > they're on /dev/input/mice. Reading raw input works just as usual using > cat. > > Judging from the way you configure them in X, the wheel works just like an > extra pai

Re: [techtalk] email web interface

2001-06-23 Thread ktb
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 04:40:29PM -0400, David Merrill wrote: > Can anyone recommend a good web interface for my mail system? I have > imap enabled already, so as system using that would be fine. > The sysadmins at my new job are pretty paranoid about security, and > almost all the ports are clos

Re: [techtalk] dead mouse

2001-06-23 Thread ktb
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 03:48:32PM +0100, Conor Daly wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:53:21AM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, > James A. Sutherland thought: > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:40:57 -0500, you wrote: > > > > >David Merrill wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> My mouse s

Re: [techtalk] dead mouse

2001-06-23 Thread Conor Daly
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:53:21AM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, James A. Sutherland thought: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:40:57 -0500, you wrote: > > >David Merrill wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> My mouse suddenly died on me. Occasionally I can get it to move, but > >> then it moves

Re: [techtalk] dead mouse

2001-06-23 Thread Daniel Manrique
> > No idea about USB mice, though - or how you get the input from mouse > wheels. Anyone? they're on /dev/input/mice. Reading raw input works just as usual using cat. Judging from the way you configure them in X, the wheel works just like an extra pair of buttons; rolling the wheel up counts a

Re: [techtalk] dead mouse

2001-06-23 Thread Daniel Manrique
> So how does one read raw data directly from the mouse? > > Curious minds, and all that. cat /dev/mouse worked for me. Of course it also horked my mouse, so be sure you're not doing anything terribly mouse-dependant before trying this. - Roadmaster * Save a tree- use

Re: [techtalk] dead mouse

2001-06-23 Thread James A . Sutherland
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:23:44 -0500, Julie wrote: >David Merrill wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:52:59AM +0100, James A. Sutherland wrote: >> > I'd agree the problem is the PC side of things, but I doubt it's >> > hardware. More likely to be a driver problem: you get very similar >> > results

Re: [techtalk] dead mouse

2001-06-23 Thread Julie
David Merrill wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:52:59AM +0100, James A. Sutherland wrote: > > I'd agree the problem is the PC side of things, but I doubt it's > > hardware. More likely to be a driver problem: you get very similar > > results if you have the wrong mouse type configured, since

Re: [techtalk] dead mouse

2001-06-23 Thread James A . Sutherland
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:40:57 -0500, you wrote: >David Merrill wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> My mouse suddenly died on me. Occasionally I can get it to move, but >> then it moves jerkily and coasts to the side of the screen. All 3 >> buttons still work. I've tried two other meeces which both do the

Re: [techtalk] dead mouse

2001-06-22 Thread Julie
David Merrill wrote: > > Hi all, > > My mouse suddenly died on me. Occasionally I can get it to move, but > then it moves jerkily and coasts to the side of the screen. All 3 > buttons still work. I've tried two other meeces which both do the same > thing, which afaics rules out the mouse itself.

Re: [techtalk] dead mouse

2001-06-22 Thread ktb
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:50:32PM -0500, ktb wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:43:44PM -0400, David Merrill wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > My mouse suddenly died on me. Occasionally I can get it to move, but > > then it moves jerkily and coasts to the side of the screen. All 3 > > buttons still wo

Re: [techtalk] dead mouse

2001-06-22 Thread ktb
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:43:44PM -0400, David Merrill wrote: > Hi all, > > My mouse suddenly died on me. Occasionally I can get it to move, but > then it moves jerkily and coasts to the side of the screen. All 3 > buttons still work. I've tried two other meeces which both do the same > thing, w

Re: [techtalk] sign up to make money

2001-06-22 Thread Kai MacTane
At 6/22/01 02:22 PM , Kelly McQuarrie wrote: >How is this considered a technical topic? >-Kelly > >On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Cherry wrote: > > Dear Friend: > > [blah, blah, spam, blah...] Hey! Your attempt to question the topicality of this spam is an assault on the spammer's First Amendment rights!

Re: [techtalk] sign up to make money

2001-06-22 Thread Kelly McQuarrie
How is this considered a technical topic? -Kelly On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Cherry wrote: > Dear Friend: > > Make money to paste following as websit and sign up: > > http://net-4-biz.affiliatetracking.net/al/af.cgi?120305 > > > Cherry. > > ___ > techta

Re: [techtalk] simple question on technical training

2001-06-22 Thread Kelly McQuarrie
Hello: My company has a general rule that we get two classes a year. They send us to more sometimes if something comes up and they need us to learn something new. That's just within my business unit and it's not an actually policy or anything. Kelly McQuarrie Unix System Administrator Ericsson

Re: [techtalk] password policy?

2001-06-20 Thread Eric Lammerts
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Nicole Zimmerman wrote: > > chage -M 90 -W 10 > > > > will set the account of username to expire every 90 days and issue a > > warning that the password is going to expire 10 days in advance. This > > command actually edits the /etc/shadow file to produce the desired resul

Re: [techtalk] Mail accounts

2001-06-20 Thread James
I toyed with it for a bit and now its working.  I hate computers!   - kath - Original Message - From: kath To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 11:28 AM Subject: [techtalk] Mail accounts Been having some trouble setting up mail accounts on Deb

Re: [techtalk] Gnomish weirdness (Gnome 1.4, Mandrake 8.0)

2001-06-20 Thread Martin . Caitlyn
Hi, Telsa, and everyone else, To answer some of your questions: My system boots to kdm, which is the default for Mandrake. The problem is the same no matter which window manager I use for Gnome. I've tried sawfish, icewm, and enlightenment, and the results were the same, so it is Gnome-specif

Re: [techtalk] Gnomish weirdness (Gnome 1.4, Mandrake 8.0)

2001-06-20 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 03:25:00PM -0400 or thereabouts, Caitlyn M. Martin wrote: > Hi, everyone, > > I decided to play around with the latest version of Gnome kindly provided > my Mandrake, and something really weird is happening. Somehow, my letter > "r" key has been remapped. Do you know h

Re: [techtalk] password policy?

2001-06-19 Thread Julie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, Nicole, > > > Will I have to do this for every username? Yes I can write a script > (which > > I have done a lot of lately), but if there is an easy way to do it > > automatically that would be nice :o) > > Hmmm... I never checked into that. I always just did i

Re: [techtalk] password policy?

2001-06-19 Thread Martin . Caitlyn
Hi, Nicole, > Will I have to do this for every username? Yes I can write a script (which > I have done a lot of lately), but if there is an easy way to do it > automatically that would be nice :o) Hmmm... I never checked into that. I always just did it as accounts got created. I never had to

Re: [techtalk] simple question on technical training

2001-06-19 Thread Martin . Caitlyn
Hi, My company insists that you pay for your own training, but if you get it approved in advance they reimburse 100% of the cost. They also reimburse for certification testing, provided you pass. They have an approved CBT vendor, and if the class is available that way you really need to justif

Re: [techtalk] password policy?

2001-06-19 Thread Nicole Zimmerman
Thanks Caity :o) > chage -M 90 -W 10 > > will set the account of username to expire every 90 days and issue a > warning that the password is going to expire 10 days in advance. This > command actually edits the /etc/shadow file to produce the desired results. Will I have to do this for eve

Re: [techtalk] password policy?

2001-06-19 Thread Martin . Caitlyn
Hi, Nicole, and everyone else, > What's the best way (IYHO) to do linux password policies? I think some of > this can be accomplished with cracklib. The policies need to at least > match, the unix one can be stronger than the windows policy (I don't think > the policy problem works both ways).

Re: [techtalk] DVD player?

2001-06-18 Thread Julie
Mandi wrote: > > The guys at my LUG really like videolan > > they're at videolan.org. they have an nice screen shot > of princess mononoke running in gnome... ;) Thanks! I'm watching "The Matrix" as I type this ... -- Julie (as should be obvious from the load average ...). -- 12:02am up

Re: [techtalk] simple question on technical training

2001-06-18 Thread Raven, corporate courtesan
Heya -- Quoth wildgrass: > I have a simple question on technical training. How much is your > company's technical training budget for each person per year? > Mine is US$1500 per person, per year. Most courses cost more than > that. Which means I rely a lot on self-teaching. In my experience

Re: [techtalk] DVD player?

2001-06-18 Thread Mandi
The guys at my LUG really like videolan they're at videolan.org. they have an nice screen shot of princess mononoke running in gnome... ;) They have versions of their software for a lot of different platforms. HTH --mandi On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Julie wrote: > Greets, > > I'm trying to get a

Re: [techtalk] passwords don't work (problem fixed!)

2001-06-17 Thread Christian MacAuley
Thanks to everyone for their helpful advice about fixing my web server. We ended up connecting a dummy terminal to the box and resetting several passwords, and now it works fine! Much easier than i'd expected :). Thanks again! ~Christian - Christian MacAuley work - h

Re: [techtalk] Looking for a script

2001-06-16 Thread Conor Daly
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:38:33PM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Conor Daly thought: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 07:45:37AM -0700 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, > Keith Barringer thought: > > Some time ago I posted a question here regarding FTP > > servers. From that I picked out ProFT

Re: [techtalk] Looking for a script

2001-06-16 Thread Conor Daly
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 07:45:37AM -0700 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Keith Barringer thought: > Some time ago I posted a question here regarding FTP > servers. From that I picked out ProFTPd and it has > been doing a wonderful job ever since. > > The system has a limited hard drive area an

Re: [techtalk] exim sending problems

2001-06-15 Thread Raven, corporate courtesan
Heya -- It could be easy, or not. After you make any config changes to exim, you have to killall -HUP exim to have it reread exim.conf. So if you forgot to do this after setting up exim, that could be your problem. > The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was > r

Re: [techtalk] groupadd/useradd difficulties

2001-06-14 Thread Julie
gabriel gryffyn wrote: > > hi, > > i just installed Mandrake 8.0, and am having some trouble with useradd, of > all things. > > the most obvious problem is that when i use groupadd, i get an error that > says: "error locking group file" i get this same error when i use useradd > -g and try to

Re: [techtalk] passwords don't work

2001-06-14 Thread Martin . Caitlyn
Hi, Christian, I had this exact problem on an SGI box. It turns out there was an error in the /etc/passwd file for my account. I like to use bash (which is a custom shell in Irix) and had moved the executable from /usr/freeware/bin to the more standard /usr/sbin without remembering to change t

RE: [techtalk] passwords don't work

2001-06-14 Thread Brian Sweeney
I would've said perhaps NIS issues, but that doesn't seem to be a factor here since your on a cobalt. You need physical access to the box, and you need to login as root and check the logs; chances are messages or secure will have the info you're looking for. Could be a problem with PAM, but coba

RE: [techtalk] xinetd and tcp_wrappers

2001-06-14 Thread Brian Sweeney
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [techtalk] xinetd and tcp_wrappers > > > At 16:08 14/06/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Does anyone have any experience using tcp_wrappers in conjunction with > >xinetd, as opposed to inetd. The tcp_wrappers man page

Re: [techtalk] xinetd and tcp_wrappers

2001-06-14 Thread Paul Hardacre
At 16:08 14/06/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Does anyone have any experience using tcp_wrappers in conjunction with >xinetd, as opposed to inetd. The tcp_wrappers man page that came with Red >Hat 7.1 still refers to the inetd.conf file, but, of course, that no longer >exists. Is there any reas

Re: [techtalk] pain in my NIS

2001-06-13 Thread Almut Behrens
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:51:32PM -0700, Brian Sweeney wrote: > NIS is, occasionally, the bane of my existence. ... of mine, too ;) > The latest is the following > error whenever I run make in the /var/yp directory (this log is what shows > up on the slave server; the master just says the slave

Re: [techtalk] login problem on a cobalt raq3

2001-06-13 Thread Jen Hamilton
I have no idea about Cobalt web servers, but if this were a linux box I would think there may be a problem starting a shell. I'm assuming there is one because it uses ssh/telnet. If it is racked at an ISP, do they have support that you can call who will hook up a console (or look at the LCD displ

RE: [techtalk] The End of The World

2001-06-13 Thread Brian Sweeney
, June 13, 2001 1:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [techtalk] The End of The World > > > OK, I'll bite. > > Which world is going to end? > > > > = > > bill t wrote: > > > > I just returned from the TLUG

Re: [techtalk] The End of The World

2001-06-13 Thread RobertWichert
OK, I'll bite. Which world is going to end? = bill t wrote: > > I just returned from the TLUG meeting, where Jim Mercer had attended. I tell > you the end is near. > > (Jim Mercer, for those who don't know is one of the freeBSD Gurus) > > ___

Re: [techtalk] Compromise, perhaps?

2001-06-13 Thread Raven, corporate courtesan
Heya -- Quoth Brian: > The other day whilst I was on vacation, another sys admin noticed > that check-packages on a machine had been altered, and on that day a > login via telnet from an unknown ip was detected. This made him > worry, so I checked it out today, and found this in the logs: > > r

Re: [techtalk] Extreme Tech article

2001-06-13 Thread Michelle Murrain
At 10:25 AM -0400 6/12/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > An interesting read on Extreme Tech talking about Linux and Win 2K and >> which is best for your needs. > >> >http://www.extremetech.com/article/0,2299,s%253D1027%2526a%253D2166,00.asp > > Well... I suppose it's interesting if you like a p

Re: [techtalk] Re: techtalk digest, Vol 1 #525 - 15 msgs

2001-06-13 Thread Daniel Manrique
> > I'm sure you noticed but that webpage had an .asp > ending which is active server page, which is Microsoft > stuff. I think that article is just a subtle > Microsoft ploy to steer people from Linux. I wrote Use of ASP usually indicates some sort of sympathy for microsoft products; however,

[techtalk] Re: techtalk digest, Vol 1 #525 - 15 msgs

2001-06-13 Thread Joseph Barney
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 13. I am a lucky man! (Brian Sweeney) > 14. Re: I am a lucky man! (Julie) > 15. Motherboard (traiano) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:06:31 -0400 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [techtalk] Extre

Re: [techtalk] The End of The World

2001-06-13 Thread Erin Clarke
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 07:41:47PM -0700, bill t wrote: > I just returned from the TLUG meeting, where Jim Mercer > had attended. I tell you the end is near. > > (Jim Mercer, for those who don't know is one of the > freeBSD Gurus) So, what did the Enigmatic Jim say or do at yesterday's TLUG m

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >