I was thinking CVS... but not keeping changes local is important (so noone is holding out on something important on accident). Would CVS be able to do this? I always thought CVS was more like a different kind of FTP (How I've come to understand it is that you have people that can update the source and others that can just view and download it. Am I missing something?) - k ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "kath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:01 PM Subject: Re: [techtalk] File sharing over the internet > kath wrote: > > > > Is there anyway for all of us to sync files easily? The closest thing I > > can describe how I'd like to do this is MS Frontpage extensions (But of > > course, not that). I'd prefer everything to be done in real time (maybe > > thats not the right term... I mean that all of us are using the freshest > > copy from the server with nothing local except for images waiting to go > > up to the server). > > This looks like the sort of problem that CVS (concurrent versioning > system) was designed to solve. > > If you're familiar with CVS, that's probably enough answer. If not, > please say something & I (or someone else) can give you a quickie > CVS tutorial - and/or tell you the range of CVS-like options. > > > > > Jenn V. > -- > "Do you ever wonder if there's a whole section of geek culture > you miss out on by being a geek?" - Dancer. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jenn Vesperman http://www.simegen.com/~jenn/ > _______________________________________________ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
