e
the spam email to be fair.
-Scott
Jürgen R. Plasser wrote:
Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.troutpocket.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
My redhat 8 box with courier and spamassassin doesn't have sa-learn included
in the rpm. All three of my test boxes below have the most recent versions
from apt-get. The redhat 9 box has the rawhide rpms of spamassassin.
However, they require libcrypto.so.4 which isn't available to redhat 8 af
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 08:04:22PM -0700, Scott wrote:
My redhat 8 box with courier and spamassassin doesn't have sa-learn
included in the rpm. All three of my test boxes below have the most recent
versions from apt-get. The redhat 9 box has the rawhide rp
n his website today, but I'll keep a look
out. Here's his site:
http://people.redhat.com/cturner/
Scott Langley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator
Rural Network Services
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkG
://spamassassin.org/devel/sa-user-admin-0.1.tar.gz
If you extract them, you find that they both date back to January 2002.
Does anyone have anything newer or improved they would like to share, or
should I start from those?
Thanks.
Scott Langley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator
Rural Network
Just checking... but this file is supposed to go into the spamassassin
directory with all the other .cf files, right? No futher config necessary?
This looks like a great addition, but I've never added anything besides the
'out-of-box' cf settings. Please verify for us SA newbs.
rors are from mimedefang below, but I still
posted here because the errors didn't occur until SA started in
with the new bigevil.
Thanks for any help.
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log# Jan 15 09:04:27 linux1 sm-mta[17033]: i0FH4Qnm017033:
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=3232, c
nes on TV! This one's
> for real!
>
> -- Homer Simpson
> A Milhouse Divided
>
--
Charlie Scott
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conferenc
gave the error. I guess time to hit up the
mimedefang folks.
Thanks!
Scott (loving sunny SoCal 70 degree weather) Harris
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 8:16 PM
> To: 'Scott Harris'; Spa
Carl Chipman wrote:
For the new people on the list, I was wondering what the following acronyms
mean:
LART
UBE/UCE
Are the acronoyms in the FAQ?
Carl,
Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool
Unsolicited Bulk/Commercial Email
Google is your friend,
HAND,
Scott
--
Scott V. Blomquist,A-SA-CN-NRK
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Scott Harris
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 9:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Chris Santerre'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Problems running begevil and tripwire tog
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Scott Harris
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 2:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Problems running begevil and tripwire together
>
> I think I
1.9.1, which
> is the current
> version.)
>
> Perhaps there's a Perl module that could do this
>
> Martin
My wget client checks for a newer file, or did I miss your point?
Scott
wget -N http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/bigevil.cf
--12:39:36-- http:
nse... 200 OK
>
> The clue is the "200 OK" message. If If-Modified-Since was
> being employed, the return code would have been "304 Not Modified".
>
> The overhead of this probably doesn't matter on this scale, though.
>
> Martin
Cool. Thanks for the
blem).
>
> That's just my $0.02. You mileage might vary.
>
> Gary Smith
>
>
>
>
To add to this, I just keep all my config files in CVS
(sendmail, mimedefang, SA). It has been a life saver
for just such problems.
Scott
-
scanning time, among other things.
If you are not exceeding the 30 second timeout with spamd, you may not
have enough spamd processess allowed to handle the simultaneous spamc
requests.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:18:58PM -0500, Larry Gilson wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Scott Lambert
> > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 7:32 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Miss
TOR is good for
+16.
A lot of people on this list need to calm down and stop over-reacting.
I seem to remember something about babies and bathwater.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t directly rather
than making a spamc call which causes a fork in spamd to filter the
message.
I have never used amavisd so I probably don't know what I'm talking
about.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
S and %#&&$^ come out to play. Sometimes I'm wrong but I don't
get ulcers worrying about it.
Bikeshed -- See :
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#BIKESHED-PAINTING
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAI
ist server's IP (Server B)? That
way you avoid the hop through Server A.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Pre
eeing. I'm now starting to back off on the threshold to eventualy get it back to
5.0. CF's like bigevil are expecting your threshold to be 5.0. I believe even Bayes
assumes your threshold is 5.0.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[
D]
ourceforge.net>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Re: [SAtalk] stats
Which then the perl scripts could easily identify. Of
course this is very specific to the configuration listed
above
HTH,
Scott
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by Eclip
mething similar. The style rule just wasn't getting nearly all
of them.
rawbody INCH_NOPOINT_1 /\]*\bsize(=3d|=)0/i
describe INCH_NOPOINT_1 INCH CUSTOM RULE -- 0pt font size tag
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix
The attached message sent through spamcop has tripped the
FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA. Maybe it needs to be looked at?
--
Scott Lambert KC5MLE System Administrator
Attention Customers:
Refer-A-Friend and receive one month of service for free!
For further details, please visit
s (like ourselves) that don't want the newest
untested code.
If something like this DOES exist, someone point me to it :)
Scott
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
we collapse spaced-out single letters before
testing? I'm no regex expert, so I don't know what the cpu cost of these
changes would be.
-- Spam follows -
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 4 09:32:37 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from l
skatoon, SK CANADA Linux Support, Web Programming
306-221-7393Network Security, Firewalls
> On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 07:59, Scott Walde wrote:
> > The following one got through. I changed CALL_888 to:
> >
> > body CALL_888
>/(?:call|dial).{1,15}8(?:88|77|66
On 4 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Yeah, I just looked it up online:
Sorry, hit send before I saw this.
> I'll cover all of those prefixes in a single rule and rescore with the
> GA.
Please also notice: I'm looking for either '-'es or ' 'es in the phone
number as the spam I got was in the fo
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Then all we need is a catchy nickname for my first release :)
How about "SpamAssassin: Reduce your spam by 581%"?
ttyl
srw
--
Walde TechnologyNetworks, Internet, Intranets
Saskatoon, SK CANADA Linux Support, Web Programming
1.
I would have hope this had been flagged as real spam, so why the large
negative hit total?
Scott Nolde
GPG Key 0xD869AB48
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Thus sayeth the previous author:
>Date: 14 Feb 2002 17:51:39 -0800
>From: Craig Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Scott Nolde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [SAtalk] negative hit total?
>
>Is the email from @yahoo.com or yahoo-
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> >> Actually, this raises an interesting issue with AWLs where it'll have
> >> no way of knowing you're you and not someone else with whom you
> >> regularly correspond, which is probably bad, because as you point
> >> out, the spammer can easily say th
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Michael Shields wrote:
> Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > this is that rules which are really non-discriminators end up sometimes getting
> > odd-looking scores. For example, CYBER_FIRE_POWER is just not likely to really
> > be worth -4.020 if looked at in isola
porating "fuzzy" hashes into Razor
using the nilsimsa algorithm. (See http://freshmeat.net/projects/nilsimsa/
for more information.)
I think the fuzzy matching would be much more appropriate for detecting spam
than a checksum or SHA hash.
-Scott
__
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:14:18AM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Scott Doty wrote:
> > One of our senior system administrators, Kelsey, has had contact with Vipul
> > -- I understand Vipul is working on incorporating "fuzzy" hashes into Razor
> &g
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:20:46PM -0800, Scott Doty wrote:
>
> I wasn't aware that nilsimsa required one to check against all the
> hashes in the database. I take it there's no way to index the hashes
> to speed up matches? (e.g., maybe only check hashes that have ap
ains showing in the test as listed in your post. "Kill 'em all and let
/dev/null sort 'em out!", sez I.
While most people were not as vociferous in their support of the test, the
message seems to be that some inspection of tld's would be appreciated.
-Scott
___
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> If you delete one path, delete /etc/mail/spamassassin. I don't know what
> distribution has /etc/mail and what software supports this, but Debian
> certainly does not. (Wouldn't it be stupid to have an /etc/mail with just
> spamassassin stuff in it?)
w
s and such.
So far, response has been good...
-Scott Doty
CTO, Sonic.net
Nick Handle: SCD
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
ew -f -d spamcan -p 783
...I'm assuming that spamc is timing out, and the procmail failsafe flag
is taking over.
Has anyone else seen this problem?
Also, our spamd is patched to avoid the cpu-churning regex problem.
Thanks,
-Scott
___
Spam
ly large about these messages.
I've noticed an increase since ORBZ went off the wire -- I've commented out
that check in spamd, we'll see if that gets it.
-Scott
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.s
rt looking?
---
Scott Baker - Webster Internet
Network Engineer
503.266.8253
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
red by a satire piece. For shame, doc.
-Scott
"George W. Bush chastised Microsoft for exporting e-mail monitoring
jobs when the US had a fully staffed FBI already in place."
-From the article
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PRO
ed as "possible
> unsolicited commercial mail"?)
Or for that matter, "Spamassassin thinks this is spam"?
BTW, a minor nit: not all spam is commercial -- I prefer "unsolicited bulk
email"...
-Scott
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 07:09:13PM -0800, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
> The "broken" recipe looks like this:
[...]
> # Tag spam, pass non-spam untouched.
> :0fw
> | /home/kevinc/bin/spamc -p 7783
Add a "-f" (filter) to spamc so it passes the message alo
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 11:14:32AM +0100, Tony Evans wrote:
> As a totally frivolous query, what's the highest score anyone's seen on
> [legitimate] incoming SPAM [using the default SA scores]?
>
> I've seen scores in the low 30's.
45.1
http://www.soni
e
Note that "yourmailbox", if it's the default inbox for procmail, should be
cleared before you run the procmail loop.
(Note: I have this all scripted out with procmail using ".filemailrc", so
that I can automagically file away messages from my inbox after reading.)
-Scott
bustmail.pl
Description: Scott's Mail Buster
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 03:16:51PM -0700, John Lang wrote:
> Should this work?
>
> whitelist_from*@my-cast.com, *@elitepc.com
Try
whitelist_from *@my-cast.com
whitelist_from *@elitepc.com
-Scott
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing li
5 (23%)
>
> I'm seeing great hit rates too. So far so good!
Unfortunately, I'm seeing a remarkable increase in spamd timeouts (from
which the procmail defaults to delivery without any SA header lines) -- I
suspect the DCC server is impacted?
-Scott
__
t the spamd timeouts, he thinks it's
razor hanging it...
I just set my RAZOR_CHECK score to 0.0, we'll see if that gets it.
-Scott
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. Yo
Setup my cobalt raq4 with redhat 6.2 and newest release of spamassassin.
Everything works great. Except the startup script. It starts the application
fine. However stopping it does not work. I modified it to just kill the
process dead but that is not ideal. Anyone have any insight?
The original s
Matt I have installed SpamAssassin on both the cobalt RaQ3 and RaQ4
To install I downloaded the RPM from this URL.
http://www.hughes-family.org/spamassassin/
Specifically this one
http://www.hughes-family.org/spamassassin/spamassassin-2.20-1.i586.rpm
The only thing that does not work correctly
Ok now I remember this. It is easy to fix. Here is what needs to be done.
Don't give up ;-) it is worth the effort when you are done.
The RPM installs the files your system is looking for in
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm
This is not the path that your perl is looking for th
k] Installing on a Raq; failed--compilation aborted
> On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:29:42AM -0700, Jim Scott wrote:
> > Move these files like this.
> >
> > cp -r /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/
> > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/
> > cp -r /usr/lib/perl5/site_p
$seconds1)*100 + ($microseconds2-$microseconds1);
push(@times, $et);
}
@t2 = sort(@times);
printf "%9d ASCII_FORM_ENTRY\n", $t2[5];
--- end test script ---
Those who are interested might want to look at
www.spamwolf.com/sa/test_maker.html
Scott Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
How does one go about viewing the email addresses in the users whitelist? Is
there a utility to view this?
Jim
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Ema
1. Since I am now using spamassassin and it is now putting all the messages
tagged as spam in a folder called caught spam. How can I then use the
spamassassin -r to report all messages in that mbox file? I assume that if I
use spamassassin -r < caughtspam it will report it all as one big message?
Perhaps there would be a way to detect this message better as spam?
Jim
--- Begin Message ---
Title: notepad.gif
You are receiving this email from Blue Chip Brands. If you would prefer not to
receive messages of this sort in the future, please see the unsubscribe instructions
at the b
Definately something wrong with this one.
Jim
--- Begin Message ---
Title: Is your laser printer costing you more than you thought
Is your laser printer, copier, fax, or Inkjet printer
costing you more than you thought? Perhaps we can help !!We can save
you up to 70% on toner cartrid
of data,
even with no repeats. Even 100,000 spams aren't going
to impact the database enough to warrent trimming.
Scott Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download
HOST Uses %-escapes inside a URL's hostname
score HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST 1.849
I think ESCAPES_DIGIT /%3[0-9]/ might be a good test too,
and not just inside URIs. Escaping /any/ character that
doesn't need to be is suspect.
Scott
Does anyone have a rule for matching the Klez virus? Normally I wouldn't
confound spam protection with virus protection, but this is one I want to
head off before it even gets downloaded.
--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technol
At 05:02 PM 5/20/02 -0500, Shane Williams wrote:
>On Mon, 20 May 2002, Peter Scott wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have a rule for matching the Klez virus? Normally I wouldn't
> > confound spam protection with virus protection, but this is one I want to
> > head off b
n transmit, they convert to CRLF.
But there is a general agreement that no changes to the body
of an email should be done unless they are required or requested.
As long as this is a user selectable option, I don't see any
problem with it, though some might claim the default should be "
At 09:08 AM 5/26/02 -0500, dman wrote:
>On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 06:53:08PM -0700, Scott Nelson wrote:
>| At 11:01 AM 5/25/02 -0500, dman wrote:
>| >
>| >That sounds bad to me. I clearly recall a section of RFC821 stating
>| >that an MTA MUST not mangle a message in any
is could be parsed into parts for rules checking.
i.e.
headerIS_ADDRESSED_TO_ME To =~ /$local_email/
describe IS_ADDRESSED_TO_ME To: contains your email address
score IS_ADDRESSED_TO_ME -3.0
headerIS_FROM_MY_DOMAIN From =~ /$local_domain/
describe IS_FROM_MY_DOMAIN From s
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:46 PM
Subject: Fw: Does Size Really MatterWGXP
In a recent survey conducted by Durex condoms, 67% of
women said thatthey are unhappy with the size of their lovers. Proof that
size doe
I am using versin 2.20 and installed Razor and I see spamassassin is now
using it. I would like to also use DCC however after installing it per
Readme I do not see any indication that it spamassassin is using it as well?
Does DCC work with version 2.20?
Also what would need to be done if I ever w
MAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] DCC and Razor usage
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 08:39:53AM -0700, Jim Scott wrote:
> > Does DCC work with version 2.20?
>
> Not directly (you'd have to patch 2.20 to add the
Any chance someone is willing to share some code to put together a nice web
inteface for end users to configure personal settings for SpamAssassin on
Redhat 7.x with MySQL and PHP or perhaps even just a perl script?
I know there is some stuff included with SpamAssassin but they dont seem to
meet
Also on the RaQ4 you will need to set special permissions just to even get
the .procmailrc file to work in each users directory.
This is what I had to do.
chmod 711 usersdir
chmod 644 .procmailrc in each users directory.
userdir being the directory of the user you want to setup a .procmailrc fil
- Original Message -
From: "Arr MiHardies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:49 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] A couple questions regarding spamassassin
> Just a couple quick spamassassin questions. I've checked through the
> docs, and cant seem to find w
- Original Message -
From: "rODbegbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Fw: [Razor-users] Announce: Vipul's Razor v2
rODbegbie wrote:
> Off to do a build now. I'll report back on how it does with SA later.
Initial
PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Fw: [Razor-users] Announce: Vipul's Razor v2
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:55:07PM -0700, Jim Scott wrote:
> debug: Razor is available
> debug: Razor Agents 1.20, protocol version 2.
As I just posted (crossed in the ether), SA is using
How come this list does not have the reply to: set to the spamassassin list?
Every time I want to reply to the list I have to type in the email address.
Or as I see others do they use the reply to all feature and then the user
and the list gets a copy.
Is it just me?
Jim
_
Just upgraded my test box and while running in debug mode I am seeing these
messages. Does this indicate that it is not looking up these lists? I looked
in 50_scores.cf and they are not set to 0. Is there some setting now that
you need to use to turn this on? What does it mena by "but did not get
Ok I have just installed on a new machine SpamAssassin 2.30 and Razor 2.x
and SpamAssassin is reporting that razor is not found. Does the version of
SpamAssassin support Razor 2.x? Or am I required to install an older version
of Razor? I thought I heard someone early say that Razor 2.x also instal
in --lint" to make sure you don't have errors in
your user_prefs?
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites
arn 1
auto_learn_threshold_nonspam-2
auto_learn_threshold_spam 15
Have I missed something here?
Thanks!
Scott
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com.
Did you know that Dice has over 25,000 tech jobs available to
from someone who has received heaps of these emails
in recent times.
Brian Scott
BTW it is impossible for the messages to be generated through any
agents installed on my systems. The technical details are complex but
no, I do not have a virus on my Macintosh.
--
: 63.30] EARN UNLIMITED INCOME WORKING AT HOME!
hth
Scott
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
al.cf:
dns_availableyes
skip_rbl_checks0
use_dcc1
use_pyzor1
use_razor11
use_razor21
dont forget to set environment:
RES_NAMESERVERS=xx.xx.xx.xx (your DNS)
S.
Scott Kopel
English Department, FSU
Mail Code 1580
850 644
ould paste in or attach a sample local.cf with some rbls
configured, I think that would help.
thanks
btw I am using SA with Mailscanner and local.cf is linked to their file
called spam.assassin.prefs.conf
Scott Kopel
English Department, FSU
Mail Code 1580
850 644 6177
Scott Kopel
English Depar
users/sa-spam
ln -s /home/users/sa-ham
Have each user subscribe to the new linked folders.
There may be an easier way, but this worked great for me.
hth,
Scott
--
Scott V. Blomquist,A-SA-CN-NRKTINLC(tm) #2598
ITI/Bear&CoRochester, VT
802-767-3174(v) 802-767-372
Debbie D wrote:
server running very high loads
One of my servers, which normally receives 10,000 messages per day, has
seen 25,000+ in the last few days.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:03:02PM -0700, John Schneider wrote:
> Please forgive me if this is already answered in the list archives. But, if
> it is, I didn't find it:
cd ${WHEREYOUUNPACKEDTHESOURCE};
find . -name 'README*' -print;
cat ${FILETHATLOOKSRELEVANT
Covington, Chris wrote:
I've noticed that Columbia University has an SA rule for no reverse DNS:
Have you used this technique before? For me, it was an incessant pain in
the ass. You will be bombarded with complaints. The very reason that I'm
using SA is that host-based blocking, with the except
server),
it just passes the message through. If spamd dies while running under
something like DJB's daemontools, one to several messages could get
through while the spamd daemon is being restarted.
You probably need more spamd hardware/time slots.
--
Scott LambertKC
Sorry for jumping in.
If performance is an issue, how about an option like...
HIT_AND_RUN 1
...that would cause spamd to stop processing once your threshhold had
been met? IOW why keep scanning text once the message has been
identified as spam? I'm sure that I'm missing something here but I'd
what do the 4 different scores mean? and how does one use them?
HTML_MESSAGE 0.160 0.001 0.100 0.100
score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0 2.25 0 1.50
Scott Kopel
English Department, FSU
Mail Code 1580
850 644 6177
---
This sf.net email is
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:39:18PM +0200, Chr. von Stuckrad wrote:
> So may be something like this hit us too...
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Scott Lambert wrote:
> > If spamc can't connect to spamd, (all slots full on the spamd server),
> > it just
e.
>
Are the perl DBD libraries installed? Can you use mysql from the
command line?
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email is spon
. I'm reading the docs now but I'm
getting about 100+ messages a day so any help would be great. That and
the damn thing carries a 104K exe attached.
Thanks Scott
--Message
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nhfgdbxclf"
This has seemed to work for me as well. Like you pointed out the ones
that have no .exe still manage to get in.
Scott
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 20:46, Dale Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:37:27AM +1200, Simon Byrnand elucidated:
> >
> > Although I havn't tried
Running SA 2.60 on a redhat 8.0 box w/o latest perl updates. When I
run --sa-lean --dump data I get back;
Use of uninitialized value in numeric lt (<) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm line 1281
Any ideas?
====
Scott Renda
HTS
[EMAIL PROTEC
Mike Carlson wrote:
What is the best way to kill spamassassin and restart it again after making
a change to the local.cf file?
`/usr/local/etc/rc.d/spamd.sh restart' on FreeBSD.
IIRC, this just kills and restarts the daemon. I seem to remember that
`kill -1` does not work.
---
. Just a few minutes ago, I followed a
list member's advice and created a user for spamd to run as and chown'ed
the directories. Now Bayes works but Razor2 is broken. :(
Ideas, anyone?
Thanks!
Scott
---
This sf.net email is
Whatever was going on when I ran 2.55 (most likely my failing eyesight
or memory), 2.60 *does* log a restart...
Sep 30 16:09:34 s2 spamd[97092]: server hit by SIGHUP, restarting
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to gee
Malte S. Stretz wrote:
kill -HUP should work with SpamAssassin 2.60 under Perl 5.6.1 and up. I
heard that it doesn't work for some people though. Just have a try.
Let me clarify: When I made a change to `local.cf' and typed...
kill -1 `cat /var/run/spamd.pid`
...nothing showed up in the log to
1 - 100 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
