On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 07:30:42AM -0700, Creede Lambard wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 06:08:42AM -0400, Rick Macdougall wrote: > > > > BSDi 4.3 handling the spamd, being called from a Slackware 8.1 box with > > spamc and I see the same thing in 2.60-rc3. Not often mind you, I get > > about 600 spams a day personally and about 4 slip through without > > processing. All the spams are under 10k in size, just no mark up what > > so ever. > > > > Going to try rc4 today and see if that fixes anything. > > > Oh good, maybe I'm not alone in this. :) > > I didn't check the sizes on the mails that slipped through, although some of > them were just knockoffs I sent myself with a short body like "foo bar baz". > > Bob Apthorpe suggested that mails over a large limit (100K maybe) get > dropped. That's not the problem I'm facing, although now I'll know that if I > see a very large mail drop through unprocessed it's not a symptom of this > problem. Thanks.
Spamd running with -m parameter? If spamc can't connect to spamd, (all slots full on the spamd server), it just passes the message through. If spamd dies while running under something like DJB's daemontools, one to several messages could get through while the spamd daemon is being restarted. You probably need more spamd hardware/time slots. -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
