On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:35:04AM +0100, Claude Frantz wrote: > "John A. Hengstler" wrote: > > > > I have noticed this as well..... > > > > I am using spamd on a separate server, and local.cf on that server > > is ignored. I can put rules into /usr/local/share/spamassasin and > > the pull in just fine. But putting new rules into local.cf are > > getting ignored per documentation doesn't work for me. > > Here I'm running spamd on the same system. I'm surprised to see that > spamc and SA called via amavisd do not give the same result. In my > understanding, spamc is simply calling spamd. When using spamc, > local.cf is used. When called via amavisd, local.cf is ignored.
Does amavisd use spamc? I thought amavisd being a perl program would simply load the spamassassin module at start and use it directly rather than making a spamc call which causes a fork in spamd to filter the message. I have never used amavisd so I probably don't know what I'm talking about. -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
