tory even though i created user &
is in user path of /home/user.
What am i missing here
Regards
Andrew
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Commu
Has anyone told fresmeat.net about the release?
--
Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#
ourse.
And no offence to the original poster, but that question is actually
just a "Your Mileage May Vary" question. That's how Tony figured you
weren't an admin, or at least a newbie admin.
--
Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
es_policy ask
> > install Mail::SpamAssassin
> >
> > or is there a specific CPAN upgrade command/syntax?
> >
That CPAN command sequence should be fine. I have no idea if you need to
stop postfix before running it or not, I don't use postfix.
--
Andrew <[EMAIL PR
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 15:23, Ryan wrote:
> I am reading through the requirements, and see the need to
> install HTML::Parser. Does anyone have a guide on installing
> this? I tried to pull the individual modules down, but the
> in turn have requirements. I am strapped for time, and can't
> wander
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 18:38, useni teejee wrote:
> DEAR FRIEND,
>
> I AM A DIRECTOR OF THE CONTRACT SECTION OF THE
> NIGERIAN TRANSPORT AND AVIATION HEADQUARTERS IN LAGOS,
Spaming the Spamassassin list. This is a joke, right?
I love it.
--
>
> I have a similar number of accounts on my mail server. I have a P4 1.5GHz
> 1G RAM Dell workstation running spamd. The box coasts most of the day and
> works hard during a spam storm.
>
> We process an average of just over 50,000 messages per day. We call
> spamc from the global procmailr
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 03:14, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Just grep for "http://spamassassin.org/tag"; in the installed .cf
> (configuration) files. Specifically, "10_misc.cf".
>
Won't this get overwritten with the next upgrade they install? Is there
a more elegant solution (local.cf or some such t
sendmail receives the e-mail it is not passed to procmail.
Instead it just gets sent before filtering.
Thanks All!
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
handheld. Power & Color in a com
ndmail does not pass the message to procmail.
Sendmail will receive the message and skip the filter.
Is there something I am missing?
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
handheld. Pow
ail -Y -a $h -d $u
-- Andrew
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Kasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and Procmail
> At 09:04 AM Friday, 11/29/2002, And
ceived the message, but it wasn't passed to the spamd and no logfile
or logs were recorded. Same thing again, maybe not reading /etc/procmailrc?
-- Andrew
> First things first -- Is procmail working?
>
> /etc/procmailrc world readable?
>
> cat sample-spam.txt | procmail
>
> che
procmail isn't reading /etc/procmailrc ..
I tried adding /tmp/procmailrc to the flags in sendmail for procmail,
though it didn't help. I think I might also try and compile it on another
machine to see if I get the same results.
Regards,
Andrew
>
> >
> >Yep, the message is
endmail /var/log/maillog ;
'Suspicious rcfile "/etc/procmailrc" ..
Though when I run the command without /etc/procmail nothing is logged?
Do I also need to add a path (eg, /tmp/procmailrc) with the -m option
in my sendmail.cf file?
-- Andrew
- Original Message -
From: "Ric
dmail does not run procmail?
Is this behaviour by design?
-- Andrew
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Duzenbury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and Procmail
> At 07:54 PM 11/29/0
Hiya All,
My Sendmail/Mimedefang/Spamassassin installation does not seem to be
recognising the blacklist_to and whitelist_to lists.
The filter picks up the blacklist_from and whitelist_from perfectly. Anybody
know what might cause this?
Regards,
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED
This may be a duplicate, but I saw it on Slashdot. MIT is holding a spam
conference on Jan 17th,2003. Details are at
http://www.spamconference.org.
Thanks.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkg
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 03:17, Michael Moncur wrote:
>
> If you think that's an easy solution, you're not getting as much HSM spam as
> I am. That rule only matched 23 HSM spam out of over 300 from the last 30
> days in my corpus.
>
> OVERALL% SPAM% NONSPAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME
>834
Fellow Assassins,
Here is an example of some of the URLs coming through in spam mail.
http://www
Would a rule like /w/ match this?
Regards,
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does
";
my $status = $spamtest->check_message_text($mail);
-- end script --
Thanks!
Regards
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
he
Hi Everyone,
Does anybody know if there is any limit for the character length of a
rule?
(so - '/RULE/' < 254 characters)?
I'm just setting up a database to hold my rules. So I am just deciding
if I should use a Memo field or not for the rule?
Thank
at /usr/local/bin/spamassassin line 69.
If anybody can help with the above error I would appreciate it.
Thanks in advance.
-
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you
is working but
still no headers. Here is a sample.
2003-12-26 20:23:06.720264500 connection from
localhost.arda.homeunix.net [127.0.0.1] at port 2960
2003-12-26 20:23:06.744287500 info: setuid to andrew succeeded
2003-12-26 20:23:06.756475500 processing message
<20031227004445.CXRH23238> for
Thanks for the response. I received a reply off list that told me
basically the same thing. I rewrote my .qmail file so that spamc
wouldn't run into a dead-end and everything is working now.
In case anyone is interested, here is what it looks like now.
|/usr/local/bin/ifspamh andrew a
Would it be possible for an additional mysql preferance for a threshold to
be added to an upcoming spamassassin release for mail deletion? e.g. A
user sets required_hits to 5, and sets deletion_hits to 10, any mail
between 5 and 10 is tagged, anything above 10 is deleted.
(from
what I've read) delete email above a user-defined deletion threshold
without a mysql preference from spamassassin. It seems that way anyway..
Cal Evans said:
> To the moderator of the FAQ:
>
> Can we make this a FAQ?
>
> Not to be rude to you Andrew, I know you are just aski
which only
contains the spam tag, and doesn't rewrite the original subject header. I've
attached a sample message that has this problem.
Andrew Hoying
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Justin Mason
> Sent: Thur
pit the
mail out to stdout? I saw Dave Weiner's maildrop scripts, perhaps that is
the better solution?
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
eir filtering. Oh yes, and a cron job so that
we only keep two weeks' worth of spam on hand.
Thanks again, this is perfect.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
parameter) but the
documentation isn't _ugly_. :-)
Hope someone finds this useful. Should be faster than wrapping it in a Perl
script anyway.
Regards,
Andrew
diff -ur Mail-SpamAssassin-2.0/spamd/spamc.c new-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.0/spamd/spamc.c
--- Mail-SpamAssassin-2.0/spamd/spamc.c Tue
> Also, I haven't applied Andrew K's patch for spamc to handle EXT and HOST;
> I'd prefer to do that in the 2.1 devel tree.
Sounds good to me, I've only really been able to cursory test the code anyway.
It seems to work well, even when you specify environment variabl
success and ask a couple of questions.
Great job guys!
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
It appears that the whitelist_from parameters of SpamAssassin (at least those
found in the SQL database) are case sensitive. Since email address are not
case sensitive, should the check also be case-insensitive?
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin
y for your good
> buddy "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Interesting. I was under the impression that case-insensitivity was mandated
by the RFC.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
hey wish.
I see; I stand corrected. :-)
Since my whitelist was *@passport.com SpamAssassin should have whitelisted
*@PASSPORT.COM as well. I'm not worried about it, just thought it was funky
and decided to bounce it off the list. :-)
Thanks for your responses, Jeremy and Jason.
I can't believe this made it in as spam, and with a high score!
(x is me censoring)
Regards,
Andrew
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 358 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2002 12:26:01 -
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (
I wrote a very short script to do this:
-
#!/bin/bash
echo From: $1|spamassassin -R
-
You then just pass the script the e-mail address you want to remove, and it
removes it.
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J
alled when the mail is delivered locally (and in my case, is delivered
through the standard mechanism (not an alias). I haven't heard of spamc
being run earlier in the delivery queue.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing l
in the development
side and the client-side. I have many happier users now, and many of these
feature requests I should be able to do on my own and then contribute back
with a HOWTO.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
that's all we need to help the everyday user. A test for the
MSN/Hotmail signatures that removes a point or point and a half.
Does anyone else see this as a potential good thing/problem?
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL P
* 0.8 -- Forged hotmail.com 'Received:' header found
This test seems to be plain wrong; If I send a message from hotmail, it gets
tagged with this score. Is this a known problem?
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL
think I have a "pure" enough base
to do so, and especially nothing that huge. :-)
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
his test but I'll see what I can do to
correct it, as it's likely a very good test.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Is there any reason I can't add *@PASSPORT.COM to the global whitelist (in
SQL)? I keep getting "confirm your email address" messages from various
@PASSPORT.COM (block caps) addresses and despite my having it in the
whitelist, it keeps getting detected as spam.
Regards,
Andrew
rom". The From line is block caps so I figured it shoudl
match at least one... :-)
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> I don't think 866, 855, 844, etc are toll free numbers. 877, 888 and
> 800 are it AFAIK. Does make sense to add 877 to the 888 rule though,
> and to make the - into a [\-\s]
866 is a toll-free area code.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spa
itelist_from seems to be ignored. individual users seems
to work and GLOBAL does seem to be recognized.)
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
e the passport "From" field is in block capitals?... testing..
yes that is why.)
So now... is this a bug in SpamAssassin or are these mailers broken?
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.source
ch for SA1.5 and 2.0[1] which used the environment
variables qmail provided, but it also had the ability to pick any two
environment variables. IIRC it also allowed you to ignore or keep the tags
and domain. Works like a charm here.
Reg
h-scoring test but it seems to trigger on some very common bcc: mistakes
that people make. In particular this one from Outlook Express
5.00.2919.6600:
To:
Has anyone else run across this or has anyone made any changes to the test
that I might like to try before I try and f
t you have to configure to pipe mail
through spamassassin -r.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
f 0.7 points for Fwd: variants and another 2.6 points
for common hotmail/msn footers but am still getting a fair number of false
positives (about 10 out of 1500 emails) because of this score.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[
mpliments on this fact, as we run a dialup ISP. Thank you.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
y saturday idea, what does everyone think?
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
pam bucket.
I'm strongly opposed to any single score being greater than about 3 or 4 at
the very most. These large score tests just seem to cause pain.
Regards,
Andrew
(btw: that message came across as spam to my very mellow SA 1.5 system with a
default score of 6):
X-Spam-Report: 6.5 hits
g list (talking about spam, and
> sometimes quoting it) in the non-spam corpus.
Very likely. I am maintaining a folder of mis-detected email (non-spam
detected as spam) so I can run these into the GA and help out with the
"hairy-assed edge" of spam and nonspam. :-)
Regards,
Andr
. I'm sure there are many other email
clients which work this way as well.
You can't "encourage" proper use if the software vendors don't give the
ability to the users, and the ability to coerce the software vendors to do so
varies inversely to the size o
> (none of the "remove" rules triggered)
True, but gappy text should have been triggered. Maybe we need a gappy
remove-specific test, because there's a lot of nonspam gappy text out there
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk m
experiences are the same
as those for people using SA with very different email types? I'm all for
political incorrectness, but not when it's obviously harming entire languages
and there are literally hundreds of other tests which are correctly
spamfile'ing the email.
Regards,
m to the spam hold directory
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Flag: YES
/opt/vchkpw/domains/gate-way.net/0/spamfile/Maildir/
# everything else to stdout
:0
|
If you didn't want your own spam folder, just eliminate the three lines
starting with :0: (and the comment above).
Regards,
Andrew
_
> Yes, that might be a little high -- anyone bought a house recently, or know
> a realtor who'd like to contribute to the non-spam corpus?
I have several emails in my "notspam" folder from realtors sending details for
housing to her clie
s the appropriate action.
What strangeness is happening between SA and razor to cause this to fail?
NB: The only other directive in my razor.conf file is the location of
razor's list file, which IS correctly obeyed.
---
Andrew Heberle
___
Spamass
unless you examine the headers.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
coarse filters but via SpamAssassin was very quick and
easy to change (without having to restart qmail).
You're right though, doing it via qmail itself would have been a better way to
do it. It is interesting to note that aside from myself, my mail server
hasn't seen it anywh
ally have -ve-scoring tests for all the common Hotmail/MSN footers for
our dialup ISP; it really seems to help keep people's hotmail friends from
being spamfiled.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://
will
> have to go hunting for it in their caught mail folder.
It's a problem here too; I have kmail put lists in the appropriate folders and
don't filter on SPAM until all of that is done.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin
> want a false positive?
I am running SpamAssassin on a mid-size (~4000-user) dialup ISP. I'm not
finding nearly the same level of trouble as you are, but then again I've
added a lot of addresses to the global whitelist and made some custom scoring
s up next is
You must supply a valid email address.
You must supply a valid password, and confirm it.
I'm already subscribed (about 2500 messages in my folder) -- so how exactly
does one unsubscribe? And could the page be updated to reflect the correc
the list because I'm not using SA anymore; rather that the
traffic is getting very heavy now and I really don't have any issues with SA
anymore. This is one hell of a great piece of software.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk ma
le through
SpamAssassin but it only seems to have looked at the first email. I suspect
this would be easy to do in perl but I'm only skilled enough to modify
existing scripts.
Any suggestions or scripts?
Thanks!
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Sp
appreciated.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
- Original Message -
From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrew Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 10:13 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin corrupting mail file
> > Spa
Hi,
I have installed spamassassin and spamcheck.pl (exim wrapper)
Exim: configuration
#Spam Assassin
#spamcheck:
# driver = pipe
# command = "/usr/local/bin/spamcheck.pl ${sender_address}
${pipe_addresses}"
# prefix =
# suffix =
# check_string =
# escape_string =
# for debugging c
quity trading, so it is doubly abusive to our corporate image. My question
is, what can I do to stop this, and how do I go about finding who is the
source of the spam?
Thank you,
Andrew
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is lookin
outside of US jurisdiction?
Thanks,
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of dman
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:47 AM
> To: Spamassassin List
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [OT] Help - someone is using our company domain
Hi
I have followed all the various documents I can find on setting up the PHP
interface for spamassassin, but I am still unable to past the user login.
Can someone point me in the right direction or offer some suggestions as to
why the authentication is failing.
Regards
Andrew
ncluded in the GA?
I've got a very "typical internet email user" userbase to pull stats from --
would running their mail spools through the GA on a regular basis and
contributing the scores back be something you would like
> 18:15:06 up 6 days, 21:40, 3 users, load average: 15.22, 8.96, 7.77
> The server in question is a dual Pentium III 500 Mhz, 512 Mb Ram,
> /var/qmail/queue is a UW SCSIII and the storage is a Mylex, raid 5.
How much mail do you push? My little setup does about 3-4k messages/day, if
I'm read
UNDISC_RECIPS 1.40
score HOTMAIL_FOOTER1 -7
score HOTMAIL_FOOTER2 -7
score HOTMAIL_FOOTER3 -7
score HOTMAIL_FOOTER4 -7
score HOTMAIL_FOOTER5 -7
score
ne to activate the spamass-milter).
Any hints or tips on what I'm doing wrong here would be great!
Thanks all.
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. Y
oo Groups and MSN groups are now up to a score of -7. I'm sure
that's letting some spam through but with over 5000 users I can't be sure
that they are NOT subscribing to some of these racier web/mail groups. :-/
Regards,
Andrew
header FWD_MSG Subject =~ /\[?Fwd
before SA sees it.
Regards,
Andrew
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Spamassa
ion in case there's something
terminally wrong. :-)
Regards,
Andrew
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Em
> test FROM_EGROUPS ok
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> test FROM_EGROUPS fail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> (note: always write tests ;-)
What are these tests?
Regards,
Andrew
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for d
> If it's yanked out, all I ask is that the upgrade docs make this clear
> so that I can put some of 'em back in my local site-wide whitelist.
I would humbly suggest BIG FLASHY LETTERS explaining this -- it is a very
important point.
e a document giving an example configuration for this?
Regards,
Andrew
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Emai
evel. :-)
With this kind of database I can get a very good look at what tests are in
normal messages and which specific tests are scoreing best this week/month as
compared to before. (the date would also be inserted but I do those
automatically, not in the select itself.)
What do you all t
failing.
Cheers
Andrew
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Spamassassin-talk
> not to spam, or at least inform people to set up local whitelists for that
> kind of thing)...
Yes, that is why I'm thinking of creating this database -- we can see what
tests are consistently bad and modify/eliminate them. I have a terrible
problem with opt-in lists being tagged, as
yeah, it's not easy...another thing I've considered is (and I'm shamed
> to admit that microsoft seems to have come up with the idea) to create
> whitelists based on your addressbook's... so messages from people who
Yes. I think that SA's auto-whitelist wor
. Aww what the hell, parse up all the headers... it's only disk
space and CPU time. :-) I can always drop data that doesn't seem to be
helping later but i need most everything at the start to make some decent
analyses.
Regards,
Andrew
__
27;m guessing that they had to be scored negatively because the GA marked other
tests as very good indicators of spam but the combination of those tests and
the ones marked negatively were found in non-spam email. :-)
Regards,
Andrew
___
d for everyone.
>
> Be sure to restart spamd after making any changes in local.cf
It is also possible to add the test in the local.cf but use the sql
preferences to set it to 0 for user GLOBAL, but 5 for your own personal
account. That way it doesn't aff
Hi
Can someone tell me if there is an automatic process to keep the mail rules
updates from the contributions of people from around the world.
I ask, as over the past few week I have had more and more spam get through
not being detected.
Cheers
Andrew
Hi
Is it possible to local system wide whitelist and blacklist enteries from an
SQL database rather then from the config files in the spamassassin
directory.
This would make it easier for remote updates as I would not have to edit the
file.
Cheers
Andrew
I received a spam with a forged From: coming from a good email address at my
company today. Headers below for anyone interested.
Regards,
Andrew
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 31 18:56:31 2002
Return-Path: <[EMA
;
even used outside the tech community? What types of spam are you finding it
in?
Regards,
Andrew
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- ht
I'm still very new to this so excuse me if I'm speaking below your
intellect, but I had a similar problem when I first tried sa-learn. I
was using --file instead of --mbox. I tried:
sa-learn --spam --mbox definitely_spam
and it worked fine.
- Andrew.
-Original Message-
Fr
ith a folder for spam but
other than that they could have any number of mbox files with various
names under their ~/mail directory. I only have 3 right now but I want
to get a good system going and then deploy it more widely. Any
suggestions on the best way to do this?
Thanks!
- Andrew Cla
thing was being reminded about grep having not used it for the last 5 or
so years in windows-land. In case anybody's wondering, I have procmail
move suspected spam into spam/probably_spam and then the couple of us
using this computer move our email into spam/definitely_spam when we
clean out tha
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
