I think the idea is a good one, particularly with the bugzilla comments.
I for one though would hope that you and others continue to post new rules
and rule changes/enhancements to the user list...
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
~~~
Temper is what gets most of us into trouble.
Pride is
reading the man pages that come
with Razor and can't quite decide how exactly to run it if I even need to
do anything special as long as I am using spamc/spamd
Any pointers, advice and so on are always appreciated.
Thanks....
Ed
~~
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
~~~
"The ultimate
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 11:36:19PM -0800, Ed Kasky wrote:
> > I just want to be sure that it passes the mail to the recipient even if it
> > reaches the set threshold. Right now I have it set so this way so that
> > each user
called handlespam. I don't have the url handy but if you
go to www.kluge.net/~felicity you should be able to find what you need...
It's been working very well for me.
Ed
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Igor Demi wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> Can spam assasin be configured so that if it reje
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Y
system, IMHO.
Ed
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourcef
wing
you a rough kind of respect simply by not ignoring you. You should
instead thank him for his grandmotherly kindness."
I was originally going to ignore this, but I thought better of it, hence
this reply.
/me thinks he should make thi
Maxwell Ochieng wrote:
The INSTALL manual is talking about user based spamassassin
configuration while on my case its a sitewide configuration
It still applies, since that's how I'm using it. Time to STFW I guess
then...
--
R
Ed wrote:
Maxwell Ochieng wrote:
The INSTALL manual is talking about user based spamassassin
configuration while on my case its a sitewide configuration
It still applies, since that's how I'm using it. Time to STFW I guess
then...
...to clarify, by STFW, try google...you'll
Maxwell Ochieng wrote:
I would like help on how i can delete or quarantine mails tagged as spam
by SA am running qmail+qmail-scanner+spamassassin.
Thanks,
Maxwell
Even though I'm sure this isn't the answer you want, RTFM. The FM you
should read is the INSTALL file in the distribution, it give
Jack Coates wrote:
just got a spam that SA 2.55 not only didn't catch, but specifically let
through because of whitelisting. I don't have a manual whitelist that
matches this message, but I do have auto-whitelist turned on.
Is there a way to parse the auto whitelist files and see what's in them?
I'
at 04:55:08PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37]:
> > I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
> > doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
>
> We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another shameless plug
for t
ar 10 22:24:21 yoda sendmail[15385]: g2B6OL7F015385: g2B6OL7G015385:
return to sender: Service unavailable
Mar 10 22:24:21 yoda smrsh: uid 501: attempt to use IFS=' ' && exec
/usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #tester
Mar 10 22:24:21 yoda sendmail[15385]: g2B6OL7G015385: to=&quo
Is anyone using SA with PMDF. Or on Tru64 platforms.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
"Undisclosed-Recipient"
Any other suggestion as to what else to add? I was surprised to see such a
low score on this one...
Thanks in advance
Ed
~~
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dev.c-zone.net (dev.c-zone.net [63.172.74.195])
by e
Not using Exim here. Am I getting closer with the following?
To =~ /^?$/i
Ed
~~
At 12:52 PM Tuesday, 3/19/2002, dman wrote -=>
>On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:10:08AM -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
>| On 18 March 2002, Ed Kasky said:
>| > I am in the process of learning regex and hav
zored" piece of spam make it's way to the recipient
as it can with SA??
Of course, shoot me if this stuff is in the docs somewhere
Ed
At 10:25 AM Saturday, 4/6/2002, Craig wrote -=>
>Install SA, install Razor, then run spamd without the -L flag and it'll
>use Razor.
be sure that this will continue if I use
spamc/spamd but also want it to report to the razor database without having
to invoke the script on saved messages one at a time. Or does it already
do that and I just don't know it??
Wouldn't be the first time ;-)
Ed
At 11:01 PM Saturday, 4/6
Why not do all 3 private ip ranges?
10.0.0.0- 10.255.255.255 (10/8 prefix)
172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 (172.16/12 prefix)
192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 (192.168/16 prefix)
Ed
At 11:04 PM Thursday, 4/11/2002, Craig R Hughes wrote -=>
>dman wrote:
>
>d>
At 10:01 AM Monday, 4/15/2002, Craig R Hughes wrote -=>
>blame the weather. I was out in the park listening to the Giants on the
>radio
Outstanding! Another Giants fan
Ed
~~
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
Some people would not recognize subtlety if it hit them on
At 11:39 AM Monday, 4/15/2002, Craig R Hughes wrote -=>
>EK> Outstanding! Another Giants fan....
>
>EK> Ed Kasky
>EK> Los Angeles, CA
> ^^^
>
>Ouch! That must suck.
Only when I'm stuck in traffic or yearning for Clement St. dim sum on
We are proposing to use SA on our main mail gateways. Unfortunately,
users need (want) to know what rules caused a particular message to
classify as spam. I agree that keeping the info in the headers is a
technically eloquent solution, but it is a human factor thing...
Ed...
-Original
Sidney -
Could you post that procmail recipe to the list?
Ed
~~
At 04:27 PM Monday, 5/20/2002, Sidney Markowitz wrote -=>
>On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 14:18, Peter Scott wrote:
> > Does anyone have a rule for matching the Klez virus?
>
>Following Craig's suggestion, made
Google is the only way to go...
Ed
At 02:25 PM Thursday, 5/30/2002, you wrote -=>
>Geocrawler is shit. No search features what so ever...
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
"It has been my experience that folks who have no vices have very
few virtues."
-
urs before Received: date
1.6 MISSING_MIMEOLEMessage has X-MSMail-Priority, but no
X-MimeOLE
0.5 MIME_BOUND_NEXTPARTSpam tool pattern in MIME boundary
2.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
--
Ed Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Descri
I'd like to add Bayes filtering to catch a bit of spam that's passing
through. I have some questions, if I may...
It says I have to send a large corpus of recent mail through it sorted as
spam and non-spam. I have a large corpus of non-spam in my archives, but
it's not recent. Do I have to wor
I've been getting a bunch of really simplistic messages that are not enough
to generate four points. Something like:
Totally happy ladies open to behave as madly as you ask.
Go for it.
I'm not here
Each one uses different link and remove text.
Has anybody found some good rules to catch these?
I just installed 2.60 and while checking my install noticed the following:
>debug: DCCifd is not available: no r/w dccifd socket found.
I saw in the change logs that support was now built into SA and was
wondering it it was worth the effort to get it running...
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles,
At 07:57 PM Wednesday, 9/24/2003, Bernd Kuhls wrote -=>
On Mi 24 Sep 2003 06:21:34p Ed Kasky wrote:
> >debug: DCCifd is not available: no r/w dccifd socket found.
Sep 24 16:03:23 router dccifd[861]: 1.2.7 listening to
/etc/apache/mail/dcc/dccifd
My netsat:
unix 2 [ ACC ]
Are the SA 2.6 RPM's for Redhat available anywhere?
Thanks.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL
Got it - thanks.
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 12:54, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:36:31PM -0700, Ed Young wrote:
> > Are the SA 2.6 RPM's for Redhat available anywhere?
>
> Same place as usual. Check out http://spamassass
nce upgrading to 2.6, I have seen message take as little as .5
second up to over a minute. I just haven't had time to debug and see where
it's slowing down at times...
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
"Opportunities multiply as they are
Total spam volume : 1134 kbytes
Total clean volume : 5 Mbytes
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Mike Carlson wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what is the highest scoring anyone has seen SA give a
> message? I had one come through at 37.54 the other day.
That particular report was generated using:
http://www.gryzor.com/tools/#spamstats
I also use another script that I found that works in conjunction with MRTG
to generate graphs:
http://users.2z.net/rpuhek/scripts_public/spamd/
HTH...
Ed
At 11:17 AM Friday, 10/3/2003, you wrote -=>
How
amassassin to automatically report high
scoring spam to razor?
If not, what would be a good way to do this? I suppose I could write a
filter to call spamassassin -r ...
(I'm using it on a relay server and so right now it is a manual process
for me if I want to submit a mail.)
Ed Kas
At 07:23 AM Friday, 10/3/2003, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote -=>
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Ed Kasky wrote:
> Our highest score since Sunday:
> spamd[21411]: identified spam (55.0/7.0)
>
> Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 1242
> Number of spams :
At the risk of sounding either naive or stupid - or both...
What exactly is the difference between 'spam' and 'ham'? (aside from the
obvious culinary differences;)
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
"If a man harbors any sort of fear, it percolates through all
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> Better a bozo than a mish man, some might say. We've all been / will be
> bozos at some time or another (ever done 'rm -r' in a directory where
> you shouldn't?)
Curious minds have to know....
What is a "mis
uch paper.
> I'm not bothering!
--
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
~~~
Friends: People who know you well, but like you anyway.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. D
thout warning people what was coming
and what they could expect. What are the chances that all their customers
read that email?
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
Bad day: Spouse is reading a new book : "Celibacy. The Secret Weapon."
t office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
If you hav
looked at my razor-agent.log, but it's not very infomative.
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
We are born naked and hungry and it's down hill from there.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, Th
Who learned everything he knows about SA from the members who contribute to
this list..
:-)
At 07:40 AM Friday, 6/13/2003, Dan O'Brien wrote -=>
Special thanks to Ed Kasky for pointing me in the right direction.
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
The washing machine in my he
x27;s 3 to
4.5.
Could this be related to cpu speed or dns or my setup?
Inquiring minds want to know ;-)
Happy Father's day to all the fathers out there!!!
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember.
11738]: [ 6] Found 1 Discovery Servers via DNS
in the
razor2.cloudmark.com zone
Would it help do you think if I put the discovery server entries in the
hosts file?
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
Don't let your mouth write no
Razor v2.34
>
> If I turn Razor2 off, I get times of .5 to 1.5 seconds. Otherwise it's 3
> to
> 4.5.
>
> Could this be related to cpu speed or dns or my setup?
>
> Inquiring minds want to know ;-)
Hi Ed,
Check back through the archives for messages from me for an explan
ifferent user or as root? I tried running it as
spamd but then realized I'd have to change permissions on all the home
directories and haven't take that leap as of yet.
If I remember correctly, Theo put a fix for this into 2.60-cvs...
I'll look for it on cpan when it becomes ava
result, instead of seeing .3 to 1.5 seconds, I am seeing 5 to 15 seconds.
I double checked dns and router settings and they seem to be functioning
normally - no dropped packets, etc.
Any suggestions as to how you to approach this or where to look next are
greatly appreciated...
Ed Kasky
Los
I too would like to know - the only copy I could find on my machine was in
the source directory dated at the time of my last update...
Ed
At 07:33 PM Thursday, 7/31/2003, Sanjay K. Patel wrote -=>
How can someone generate this report on the their local copy of
spamassassin?
-SKP
-Origi
ssassin/Conf.pm: ``-D'' should be [CB]<-D>
/usr/bin/pod2man: bad option in paragraph 301 of
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm: ``-D'' should be [CB]<-D>
/usr/bin/pod2man: bad option in paragraph 370 of
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm: ``-R'' should be [C
re than one school of thought on this
issue. I am subscribing to the theory that if it's spam, whether SA caught
it or not, I report it as described below.
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Ed Kasky wrote:
>> I had the same thought when I first starting using SA ;-)
>>
>> I d
I get a bunch of mail that looks like this:
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from out008.verizon.net (out008pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.108])
> by hagrid.greenberg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCF146CB
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 20:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
>R
on't remember what MTA is involved but Sendmail using smrsh will
complain about a piped alias. I found this out when I added demime to my
majordomo aliases.
I wound up having to take the latter course in order to run the multiple
commands based on an alias.
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . .
At 06:15 AM 9/17/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>I'm thinking "antivirus application"
>
>On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Ed Greenberg wrote:
>
> > I get a bunch of mail that looks like this:
> >
By the time I see it, it's mime has somehow been broken. It just shows up
I'm pretty sure I've seen it before, but cannot for the life of me find it
now... can spamassassin tag an email as spam if it's over a certain
threshold, but under another, and if its over that threshold, just nuke it
as obvious spam?
Like if it's 0-4.9 it's ok.
5-19.9 it's Spam, but delivered
specific port (like 8080) or do I
need to open 2703 for the reporting?
TIA for any help on this...
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
"Main's Law"
For every action there is an equal and opposite government program.
to limit how many ports I open to traffic.
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
"It's not a very big step from contentment to complacency."
- Simone De Beauvoir
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
ch time.
Well, must reload Mt. Dew now... good luck!
Ed Freeberg
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailin
skip the filter.
Is there something I am missing?
Just a shot in the dark, but, did you create any recipes in .procmailrc?
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
There are 3 kinds of people, those who can count & those who can't.
---
---
=END EXAMPLE==
--
Ed Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ved 2 legitimate emails without plain text in those 7 years.
--
Ed Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
At 03:58 PM 2/12/2003 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On Tuesday, Feb 11, 2003, at 19:07 Canada/Mountain, Ed Benckert wrote:
Seems like the work put in to dynamically add 'bad sites' based on spam
to a web filter is a waste of time. The problem is spam, not people
clicking on links in spam.
A
sane holiday!
Ed Kasky
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Two wrongs do not make a right - it usually takes three or more.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or
assassin" for site rules dir
Any other way to monitor the file's effectiveness?
Ed
. . . . . . . .
There is so much good in the worst of us and so much bad
in the best of us that it ill behooves us to find fault
with the rest of us. -Mom
Start spamd with -D debug options and then tail
Found a few...
3.0 BigEvilList_192URI: Generated BigEvilList_192
Thanks!
Ed
. . . . . . . .
"We made too many wrong mistakes."
-- Yogi Berra, 1960
At 10:46 AM Monday, 1/5/2004, Gary Smith wrote -=>
Wait for a while to get some spams. Then check the log file. Als
At 4:01pm -0600 1/5/04, David B Funk wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Ed Kasky wrote:
>
Any other way to monitor the file's effectiveness?
Ed
Create a simple test mail message that contains a URL fabricated using
any one of the hosts listed in BigEvil.cf. Feed the test message to
"spamc
I found in the rules that spamassassin ships a rule for checking against
bl.spamcop.net. In the score file, it gives this a zero weight, encouraging
you to give it some score if you donate.
Since I am a spamcop customer and feel justified in using them, I copied
the line:
score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMC
modify my ~/.spamassassin.cf to consider this
character set as local? There is an "ok_locale en" but what do I use
for others that I want to add so that it considers them local?
Thanks,
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EM
er Internet, Inc.
> http://www.frontier.net/
>
Will this one be added to v2.0 so that I don't have to worry about adding it
again when I upgrade?
Thanks,
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> Charlie Watts
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Frontier Internet, Inc.
> > http://www.frontier.net/
> >
>
> Will this one be added to v2.0 so that I don't have to worry
> about adding it
> again when I upgrade?
>
> Thanks,
> Ed.
>
>
BTW, this is the li
> > > I hate to encourage such nonsense in their choice of MUA, though ...
> > >
>
If it matters to anyone the X-Mailer that originated the "windows-184"
character set is:
X-Mailer: MSN Explorer 7.00.0021.1702
---
Ed.
__
YES
/opt/vchkpw/domains/gate-way.net/spam/Maildir/
# This one sends everything nonSpam to stdout
:0
|
Also change your .qmail-default to:
| preline procmail -p -m /path/to/procmailrc | /opt/vchkpw/bin/vdelivermail
'' bounce-no-mailbox
I have been using this for about a week now and it works fine.
---
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
http://bluedot.net/mail/archive/read.php?f=2&i=3177&t=3162
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
MAILER-DAEMON message:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1)
procmail: Error while writing to "|"
Normally the first line is shown but for some reason procmail adds the
second one as well but it works as expected. If you figure out how to make
procmail silent o
mails get false-positive
> ratings. Not recommended.
>
> --j.
Perhaps devise a method for deleting really Spammy messages - say greater
than 15. All of the false positives that I have seen are 10 and under.
Keep ones that are under 15 which makes it easier for scanning for legit
messages
report_header 1
defang_mime 0
use_terse_report 1
This makes it work best if you want the original HTML message to remain
readable.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Michael Geier
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:03 PM
> To: [sa-
www.myparty.yahoo.com 0 W32/MyParty-A
Of course seperate columns by TABS and run qmail-scanner-queue.pl -g
afterwards.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Justin England
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL P
lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
>
MY mistake. That rule above is for qmail-scanner. I thought it was a
question for the Q-S list. But for SA you could create a BODY rule that
looked for www.myparty.yahoo.com with a score of 100.
--
Ed.
___
very queue.
>
> Regards,
> Andrew
>
It is if you use the qmail-scanner (see
http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net) which now incorporates Spamassassin as
an optional scanner. This runs using the qmailqueue patch.
---
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk m
If someone from any of my domains is a Spammer then I want to see it.
Otherwise if it got put into the Spam bucket I may not be as likely to see
it. I won't tolerate anyone abusing our mail services by being a Spammer.
Just an idea for ya,
Ed.
PS. Thanks for integ
ges so that means that if you want to block
the Spam you need to filter it further down in the delivery process. I
personally use procmail but others use maildrop in the .qmail-default files.
___
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ke:
whitelist_from *@certainty.net
in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Works for me.
---
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Upgraded to v2.01 and seem to be getting more missed Spam than in v1.5.
This one message that I just recieved made it thru. I would have thought
that the "line of yelling" and "unsubscribe" would have triggered a score
but they were missed.
Here it is:
Return-Path: <>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTE
ld have gotten a LINE OF YELLING and
UNSUBSCRIBE. Something appears broken.
--
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
of lame replacements,
> most of which were promptly (and rightly) shot down.
>
> Greg
>
Thanks for the reply. I am not so good interpreting the tests. Does anyone
know of a good reference that would help me to interpre
How do I get a list of addresses that are currently in the auto_whitelist
database? Is there a way to remove a specific one aside from sending a
message to "spamassassin -R"?
---
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
am
using v2.01 stable.
---
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
ple set thier threshold to 100 or 999 for that
> matter.
>Can anyone see any problem with this approach?
>Don
>
How does solve my original problem of false negatives? all that it would
take would be a few marginally spammy mes
>
> How does solve my original problem of false negatives? all that it would
> take would be a few marginally spammy messages < 5 then once the
> threshhold
> is reached then they can Spam away!
>
> --
> Ed.
>
>
I've seen this happen already with some stu
How in the world did this one get thru? It contains the word Penis three
times and Viagra. I am using v2.01 stable.
Ed.
-Original Message-
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 01 09:20:17 2002
Return-Path: <[EMA
thru 1.5
but I'm betting it would have caught some of them.
I realize that 2.01 was a significant change from 1.5. Was there a greater
emphasis on reducing false positives? Is what I'm seeing typical for other
SA users out the
k penis added
to its list of Porn keyowrds to check for.
---
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
ss there is life;
> along that path is immortality.
> Proverbs 12:28
So, shouldn't the message have been tagged with the PENIS_ENLARGE test? The
word Penis was in the body two times.
--
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECT
y.
Its a work in progress that needs a little more development. Once this
shortcoming is overcome then I will gladly use it again sitewide.
Thanks,
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> Having said that, I think apart from the issues with AWL, it's not *too*
> bad.
>
> C
>
Here, Here!! :-)
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Get rid of the "-a" switch in spamd.
---
Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
> O'Hanlon
> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sitewide a
as no affect. Any ideas why this has been added? I
checked some old emails that were checked under v1.5 and they do not have
this add'l header.
Any help or enlightenment appreciated,
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https:
tagged
like this today.
---
Ed.
-Original Message--
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 06 15:10:24 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 841 invoked by uid 150); 6
*@diamondwebdesigns.com
whitelist_from *@elijahlist.com
whitelist_from *.echampions2000.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:42 AM
> To: CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] US
I finally found the whitelist_from entry in the sitewide
/usr/share/spamassassin/60_whitelist.cf file (didn't know that it existed).
For some reason *@yahoo-inc.com is listed there. Any reason why this was
included?
Thanks,
Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
