Robert Nicholson wrote:
> RE:
>
> X-Spam-Status:
> Yes, hits=10.7 required=0.6 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
> DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,HTML_60_70,
> HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_GREEN,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,
> HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 11:45:35PM -0500, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> How do I implement this?
spamd --socketpath=/path/to/socket/file
spamc -U /path/to/socket/file
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thi
As far as I know, Amavisd-new doesn't support the inclusion of
individual test's scores. I wish it did, since I use it (amavisd-new) as
well, but it works *very* well otherwise. However the syslog file (for
the mail facility) will have all the tests that every email amavisd
see's, so you could
My mistake I think. I diff'd the amavisd chroot ruleset
(/var/amavisd/usr/share/spamassassin) from the authoritative
/usr/local/share/spamassasin and saw they were different.
I solved this by refreshing the ruleset in the amavisd chroot from the
set in /usr/local/share/spamaassassin.
I was at fir
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 23:45:35 -0500 "Mike Loiterman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just reading the release notes for 2.60 and noticed this:
>
> - spamd now supports UNIX-domain sockets for low-overhead scanning,
> thanks
> to Steve Friedl for this. This is strongly recommended if you'r
Hello all,
what's going wrong please?
spamd[11860]: razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Insecure
dependency in open whi
le running with -T switch at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i586-linux-thread-multi/Razor2/Client/Config.pm
line 414,
line 1.
saxophon:/tmp/razor-agents-2.36 #
Michael Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any difference in code between the final and the RC6 release?
Yes.
bug 2489: check_num_received checks one less than it should
bug 2491:
1) the learn_to_journal option was only good for autolearning and using
sa-learn, but "spa
when will it be in cpan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.ne
"Mike Klein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In response to my complaint of weak rules out of box:
>
> I have rtfm (INSTALL, USAGE, website). It states (step #7 in INSTALL file):
> [...]
Just use the GTUBE string for testing that SpamAssassin can correctly
mark a message as spam. The GTUBE string
Hello Mike,.
MK> For myself...I will make it so a single line of "PEN?S
MK> ENLARGEMENT" is enough to trigger as spam.
The value of SA is that it can be customized for individual
user needs, and that it is easy to change scoring, as well
as to write your own rules.
I also have some words and phr
>> From: Jens Strohschnitter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 7:01 AM
>> To: SpamAssassin
>> Subject: [SAtalk] Logfile of Spam-detected mails
>>
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> is it possible to write a logfile that only contains
>> entries that showes spam-detected mails l
Hi,
I've just upgraded my version of SpamAssassin (2.54) to the latest
version 2.60. Having feintly recalled some discussion on the list or
elsewhere about having to rebuild the Bayes database after this upgrade
I decided to make a backup of my existing Bayes files.
Upon restarting SpamAssassi
Hello everybody,
Once again I have an email that scores 17.8 points when weighingthe email
using spamassassin -tD but when it's actually delivered is scores 3.8
points.
Coincidentally the 14 point difference are my rules and the text
inquestion is inside html code. So my questions are :
1. How
I'm using SA 2.60 RC6.
I have noticed that Bayesian scores are not monotonically increasing.
For example, score for BAYES_90 is LESS then the score for BAYES_70
(when network is used)!
Is this correct?
Is there some reason behind it?
Thanks.
--
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> what's going wrong please?
>
> spamd[11860]: razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Insecure
> dependency in open whi
> le running with -T switch at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i586-linux-thread-multi/Razor2/Client/Config.pm
> line 414,
> line 1.
My b
back in bus. when 2.6 my perl instalation had broken
so i had to reinstall perl
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk
i have 18 email in this folder
why would i get these results?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> sa-learn --spam --dir
evolution/local/Inbox/subfolders/spam/
Learned from 2 message(s) (6 message(s) examined).
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Using
redhat 9.0
amavisd-new-20030616
Postfix version 1.1.12
spamassassin 2.55
I am having a strang problem with what appears to be that
my locall.cf file
is not being read.
When i set a user to recive all incoming mail with the
all_spam_to setting
and restart amavisd the user will recive all spa
SpamAssassin doesn't block mail. All it does is mark it up for content.
That mail seems to have been marked up for spam content correctly.
Therefore, your problem is not with SpamAssassin but rather with the
product that you've configured to quarantine mail.
> -Original Message-
> From:
I have required_hits set to 10 in my
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and the
message is only scoring a 7 and is still being blocked and
sent to my spam-quarantine mailbox. What is up with
that? This is a copy of the email sent to my $spam_admin =
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Unsolicited bulk email fro
Even if it were whitelisted, there should still be the SA header tags
indicating scores, etc. It doesn't *look* like it could be over the max
message size. I've seen this myself quite a few times, where a message
gets to a user without being processed by SA, although it does pass
through the SA sys
What was always_add_report set to?
I noticed in 2.55 even if the report was included in HAM the wording
still suggested the message was spam.
What was X-Spam-Status set to for this message that you claim was
interpreted as spam?
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 06:58 PM, CHRISTOP TATRO wrot
I broke down and installed ClamAV, after being deluged by hundreds of
Microsoft virus e-mails per day that SpamAssassin didn't catch. It
works great, catching all those viruses and keeping them out of my
inbox. (I'm not particularly worried about viruses themselves since I
read my e-mail using mutt
I've searched and found similar issues but nothing that helps me out. I'm
getting this since upgrading from 2.55 to 2.60:
Sep 23 07:06:20 rs spamd[1936]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor
Insecure dependency in connect while running with -T switch at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-linux/IO/Soc
Whenever I try to change the scores in the rules of
configuration file, with, e.g., score DIET 7.0 score
WEALTH 8.0etc., SAProxy stops checking for that rule, i.e., it has the
effect of setting it to zero.Using SAProxy v 1.2.1I am a
newbie. I know SA is now up to v. 2.6. What is the differ
Forgive me but do the # of hits actually have to be more than
required_hits?
I was under the impression that if I set required_hits to 6 then
whenever hits was greater than or equal to required_hits then that mail
would be considered spam.
From: "Mei Kwan NG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue Sep
I was wondering if there are any reporting tools out there for
generating reports for spamassassin. I am using Spamassassin 2.55 with
sendmail and spamass-milter.
--
Jon Fraley
Unix Systems Administrator
Glen Raven, Inc
(336) 586-1148
---
Th
This was answered earlier on today by Daniel Quinlan. The long and
short of it is, RTFM. :)
(Read the README file, in particular the reference to Razor2.patch)
Daz
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Goodwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 September 2003 13:16
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi, have any improvements been made to sort out spammers who are
forging failure notices?
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:05:39 PM Asia/Bangkok
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Return-Path: <>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The manual (http://au2.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html)
doesn't make it clear if user defined tests "header", "rawbody" etc. match
one line at a time or the entire message at once. Experimentation reveals
it's done one line at a time. The manual would do well to tell this.
I would
> There are 4 great open source MTAs out there : Postfix, Exim, sendmail and
> qmail.
>
> 3 support spam and AV scanning with no patching.
>
> Save yourself the pain.
What about not messing with qmail-queue or qmail-scanner at all.
Just use a .qmail file in the user's dir.
$ cat .qmail
| /usr
Robert:
Thanks for the help.
> Something like
> > body RM_b_V-drug/V[Ii1\|[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> but for the subject, right?
Yes, this is along the lines of what I wanted since, at least my version of
SA, has only a rudimentary test in the body, which does not of ourse address
the Subject li
i notied autolearn=ham does that mean if a spam passes as ham it will learn it has
ham, how can i disable this autolearn feature and what does it really mean, i did not
find anything in the doc
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGee
So, just exactly where is the documentation that defines the criteria
for what gets auto learnt?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Sp
hi!
i am new to this list so i hope my question is not too
simple for you.
i use SuSE OpenExchange 4 with amavisd-new + spamassassin 2.53.
configured in /etc/amavisd.conf log_level = 5 (debug)
that i get lots of text in /var/log/mail. OK.
in the log it says:
Sep 23 14:55:09 mail amavis[8823]: (0
On Sep 22, landy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 07:56, Markus Gaugusch wrote:
> > On Sep 22, Tom Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Spamstats does that.
> > Thanks! That's EXACTLY what I wanted :)
>
> for this to work do you need spamd?
>
> i use procmail/postfix
> an
I use both ClamAV and f-prot on our corporate servers. Both
are free and both trap this virus. I frontend SA with MailScanner
as it has a lot of functionality (calls virus scanners, blocks on
file extension type, etc.) and it works great. It calls SA via it's
API so you get all the advantages of
I read the howto on setting up Spam Assassin on Win32.
I have Spam Assassin up and running as well as integrated
into my mail server under Windows. It works great!
I am searching for a way to set preferences on a user by
user basis under Windows. Could not find anything anywhere on
I'm using spamassassin 2.55 direct from procmail on a PII450
running .rh8.0. I notice that mails with dos executables
get through, even though I've the line
score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 5.0
in my ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file. Other rules in the
file work fine.
Any ideas?
Garret.
--
Garret D
i have required_hits set to 10 in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
and the message is only scoring a 7 and is still being blocked and sent to
my spam quarantine. What is up
with that?
Unsolicited bulk email from:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fw: test
According to the 'Received:' trace, th
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> But it seems like some of those .EXEs have different "magic" bytes. This
> works for me:
> /^TV[qp]QAA[MI]EAA[A8]A/
>
> You can change this in EvalTests.pm, line 2413.
For a lot of people it'd probably be easier to edit local.cf to insert:
ra
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 11:41:46 +0200 Federico Giannici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using SA 2.60 RC6.
> I have noticed that Bayesian scores are not monotonically increasing.
> For example, score for BAYES_90 is LESS then the score for BAYES_70
> (when network is used)!
>
> Is this correct?
Ye
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 13:21 CET Garret Brady wrote:
> I'm using spamassassin 2.55 direct from procmail on a PII450
> running .rh8.0. I notice that mails with dos executables
> get through, even though I've the line
>
> score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 5.0
>
> in my ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file
well for me
the rule of MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 5 was working fine in 2.55 now in 2.60 it does not
work and the email gets tag with 2.5 when my settings in user_prefs says it should be
over 5
it appears 2.6 is ignoring my .spamassassin/user_prefs
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 03:48:55PM -0400, Joh
At 08:29 PM 9/23/03 +0700, Robert Nicholson wrote:
So, just exactly where is the documentation that defines the criteria for
what gets auto learnt?
In short, the email is autolearned based on computing it's score as if
bayes were disabled, and then comparing that score to a threshold you set.
Th
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Landy wrote:
> ihave same problem and it was fine in 2.55
>
> problem began with 2.6
I think that's just coincidence. The tests are exactly the same in both.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to ge
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:21:40PM +0100, Garret Brady wrote:
> I'm using spamassassin 2.55 direct from procmail on a PII450
> running .rh8.0. I notice that mails with dos executables
> get through, even though I've the line
>
> score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 5.0
ihave same problem and it was fine in
Hallo Markus Gaugusch,
am Dienstag, 23. September 2003, 09:00:19, schriebst Du:
> You need to pass the logfile name of your mail-daemon, e.g.
> ./spamstats0.4b5.pl /var/log/mail
> I use spamd, and it works.
> Markus
you have an link for this script? Thank you.
--
Viele Grüße, Best regards,
Ji
> "MA" == Mrvka Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MA> so i see that spamassassin is working, BUT where do i configure
MA> spamassassin?
MA> (company-wide)
You can do it in the site-wide spam assassin local.cf file, or since
amavisd runs as a particular user, do it in that user's personal
co
Dear all,
When running sa-learn --dump from SA2.60 (on RedHat9) I get the
following output:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric lt (<) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm line 1281.
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000
Hi,
I'm currently testing the following:
# Add checks of MessageLabs Virus Blacklist
header RCVD_IN_VBL eval:check_rbl('vbl', 'vbl.messagelabs.com.')
describe RCVD_IN_VBLVBL: sender is listed in VBL - see
http://vbl.messagelabs.com
tflags RCVD_IN_VBL net
sco
I think this would be
fullTEST_NAME/regex/
Samuli Kärkkäinen wrote:
> The manual
> (http://au2.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html) doesn't
> make it clear if user defined tests "header", "rawbody" etc. match
> one line at a time or the entire message at once. Experimentat
You'll need to do this in your SMTP
server (if possible).
If it allows, you would need to
modify how your SMTP server calls SA, for each user you would specify the path
to their user prefs file.
-p prefs,
--prefspath=file, --prefs-file=file Set user preferences
file
You would al
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:42:56PM +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 September 2003 13:21 CET Garret Brady wrote:
> > I'm using spamassassin 2.55 direct from procmail on a PII450
> > running .rh8.0. I notice that mails with dos executables
> > get through, even though I've the line
> >
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:54:51PM +0100, Daniel Bird wrote:
> Also, as you can see above, It's showing no tokens learned even though I
> have run "sa-learn --import" from my previous install of SA2.55 ( I
> guess this may be in error because of the error message above ?)
>
> Any guidance would
Hallo Matt Kettler,
am Dienstag, 23. September 2003, 16:38:51, schriebst Du:
> At 08:29 PM 9/23/03 +0700, Robert Nicholson wrote:
>>So, just exactly where is the documentation that defines the criteria for
>>what gets auto learnt?
> bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam n.nn (default: 0.1)
> Th
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 08:47:15 -0400, Jay R. Yablon wrote:
>I am a newbie. I know SA is now up to v. 2.6. What is the difference between SA and
>SAProxy?
SAProxy uses SA as its basis. AFAICR, SAProxy 1.2.0 contains the
equivalent of SA 2.55, so I expect 1.2.1 is a slight bug fix.
SAProxy does n
Just Upgraded to 2.6
I using spamd/spamc and have these 3 errors in my log:
(I edited out my site info)
cannot write to /var/spamassassin/bayes_journal, Bayes db update ignored
debug: open of AWL file failed: lock: 24174 cannot create tmp lockfile
/root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock.[MY
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 16:44 CET Landy wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:42:56PM +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> > Jepp, the rule is slightly broken, especially for those "use this patch
> > now" worms. It currently uses this RegExp:
> > /^TVqQAAME/
> > But it seems like some of t
Go check your filesystem rights on those file & directories. That's happened to me
before, and I was waiting for it to happen this time too, and mysteriously, it didn't.
My gateway boxen must be contagious. :)
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Heggood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hi,
thats all I need, but how is it possible that the SPAM-Mails
will not be quarantined. Only it should be written a logentry
and the mail should be delivered to the recipient, marked as
spam (*SPAM*).
is this possible, too ? Thanxx for your reply
>
>
> Yes. In your exim config, mak
Hi
all,
My current setup is
that all of my company's mail goes through a smtp gateway with SA 2.60, Exim
4.20, Razor 2.36 and Perl 5.8. Since upgrading to SA 2.60 I have gotten
the following error in my logs:
spamd[32311]: razor2
check skipped: Illegal seek Insecure dependency in conne
> Head for http://www.exit0.us and
> http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm -- you'll
> find plenty of rules there that will give you a good start at building
> your own rule base, including my own V-drug body test which can be easily
> converted into a subject header test
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:54:51PM +0100, Daniel Bird wrote:
Also, as you can see above, It's showing no tokens learned even though I
have run "sa-learn --import" from my previous install of SA2.55 ( I
guess this may be in error because of the error messa
When I run -
spamassassin -d --lint
on my newly created local.cf file, I get "Command not Found" as the only
reply. Does that mean there is a problem or that the test proceeded to the
end of the file?
/s/ John
---
This sf.net email is spo
Hello,
I have checked various pods and archives as well as the distributed
filters but can't determine if this is possible.
I am running SpamAssassin on Unix Solaris 9. I have been using procmail
and perl for years and until I installed SA I had rudimentary spam
detection with procmail's weighte
Can I set Spamassassin to not scan mail from specific domains? If I can how
do I set it to do so. I tried adding the domains to the whitelist in
local.cf in the form of whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc. This does not seem to work.
I am running Spamassassin on Solaris 9 Sparc
Just a little word of warning
From their web page:
"MessageLabs does not recommend that people use this list for blocking
email as it is highly likely to list ISP smarthosts due to viruses that
route in that way."
So don't use it as an RBL in, for example, a sendmail.cf.
But I would very muc
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:55:37 +0200 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Antoine Jacoutot
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, here is my complete log; it does show lines about razor, but
> there's nothing in my razor logs (/root/.razor/razor-agent.log):
>
I've noticed that my .razor/razor-agent.log was last writt
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:30:39 +0100, Brian Morrison wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:55:37 +0200 in
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Antoine Jacoutot
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> OK, here is my complete log; it does show lines about razor, but
>> there's nothing in my razor logs (/root/.razor/razor-agent.log):
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:16:47AM -0500, Philip Mak wrote:
...
> Unfortunately, sometimes one of these virus e-mails passes through a
> virus-stripping SMTP that removes the virused attachment, leaving the
> rest of the (junk) message. These messages end up passing through the
> ClamAV filter sinc
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:48 AM + Jim
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> spamd --socketpath=/path/to/socket/file
>
> spamc -U /path/to/socket/file
If this is the recommended configuration, then I would suggest that 2.61
change the spec file to make use of this in RPM-based installations.
--On Monday, September 22, 2003 10:15 PM -0400 Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This is interesting. In 99% of my messages, the subject is capitalized but
> the From/To are not.
I see the same, but my distribution ratio would be the reverse of that. Maybe
we have two variants of the wor
Hi,
Just curious when 2.6.0 version will end up in CPAN. I just checked
and when i did a "i /spamassassin", here's my partial results:
DistributionJ/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.01.tar.gz
DistributionJ/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.44.tar.gz
DistributionJ/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassi
First, thanks so much for Spamassassin. It works so well!
I received an email with the following Received headers:
Received: from ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com
[24.93.36.230]) by waterloo.OrangeBlood.org (8.12.8/8.12.8)
with ESMTP id h8NDa2UW031261 for <[EMAIL
--On Monday, September 22, 2003 10:33 PM -0400 Theo Van Dinter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60.tar.gz
> http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60.tar.bz2
Not sure what you might do to fix this, but "rpmbuild -ta" with the bz2
Trying to install SA 2.60, everyting builds and installs fine, but when I
try to start spamd, in complains about bytes.pm not being installed. it
is, but under the perl 5.8 libs. The reason for this is that a long time
ago, I thought I'd join the CPAN bandwagon and install SA with it. To my
hor
hello
i've looked around on the docs and through the files themselves and connot find
the directive that tells spamd where to log its information. it's currently
logging in my /var/log/maillog file which i assume is by default. i'd like to
change it to combine with my exim setup using the /var/lo
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I thought I'd join the CPAN bandwagon and install SA with it. To my
> horror, it installed perl 5.8 (I use 5.005) and all the mods.
This was a bug in the CPAN modules themselves, prior to CPAN v1.63 or so
(I forget exactly). Following the recommend
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 01:36:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To make a long story short, even though 2.53 didn't mind this, none of the
> later versions will start without this. Is upgrading to 5.80 a Good Idea
> (TM)? I'm afraid it will break all kinds of other things that depend on
> 5.
> > You need to pass the logfile name of your mail-daemon, e.g.
> > ./spamstats0.4b5.pl /var/log/mail
> > I use spamd, and it works.
>
> > Markus
>
> you have an link for this script? Thank you.
>
First hit after googling for spamstats and perl:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/spamstats/?topic_id=
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:35:27AM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> Not sure what you might do to fix this, but "rpmbuild -ta" with the bz2 file
> fails because the spec file is looking for the gz file. I suppose the makefile
> that generates the tarballs could include one of two generated spec files
I have just installed v2.55. I have been getting non stop message like
the one attached. I have tried to creat a rule but cannot seem to stop
this from coming in. I just recently added score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE
10.10 to my 50_score.cf file and still no luck.
Any suggestions would be great.
>
> Is downloading the tarball and installing it myself fundamentally
> different than just doing the install from CPAN?
>
> thanks,
> mark
read the install file it will tell you how
>
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome
begin quote
Spam detection software, running on the system "pepino.despiertapr.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root for det
Hi There:
I'm having a problem with spamd creating lockfiles in the home directory
of my filtering agent. I get these errors after starting spamd:
Cannot open bayes databases /var/spool/filter/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W:
lock failed: File exists
Cannot open bayes databases /var/spool/filter/.spam
FWIW, my little rant was all over nothing. I just installed 5.8 from FBSD
ports and then everything worked fine, including SA. Interestingly, it
looks like SA looks for 5.8 first when launching, because I kept 5.005
under /usr/bin, and put 5.8 under /usr/local/bin (I did not run the
"use.perl po
> > You can change this in EvalTests.pm, line 2413.
>
> For a lot of people it'd probably be easier to edit local.cf to insert:
>
> rawbody MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE /^TV[qp]QAA[MI]EAA[A8]A/
>
for me local.cf did not work
i'll try evaltests.pm
-
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:38:48 +0100 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Brian Morrison"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will try again with the latest Razor patch in the 2.60 release version
> of SA.
Razor now patched correctly with contents of 2.60 Razor2.patch file, SA
now returning Razor results again.
Phew! T
Can anyone please help me on this?
"CHRISTOP TATRO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Using
> redhat 9.0
> amavisd-new-20030616
> Postfix version 1.1.12
> spamassassin 2.55
>
> I am having a strang problem with what appears to be that
> my locall.cf file
> is not being
Question... for some reason, even if I explicitly enable autolearn in
the config file it always shows autolearn=no in the headers of a scanned
email, is there something I'm missing?
Running SpamAssassin version 2.6 on FreeBSD with sendmail and
spamass-milter, I've checked to make sure the the rul
At Tue Sep 23 13:55:28 2003, Robert Nicholson wrote:
>
> Forgive me but do the # of hits actually have to be more than
> required_hits?
>
> I was under the impression that if I set required_hits to 6 then
> whenever hits was greater than or equal to required_hits then that mail
> would be cons
Hello everyone.
I was curious if anyone had an experiences with Spampd?
Im currently trying to decide on whether to use spampd or spamd on our mail
gateway.
Our gateway is running postfix, and I wanted all incoming mail received on
the gateway to be sent through SpamAssassin and tagged accordin
with 'subject_tag *SPAM* (_HITS_)' in local.cf
i get the score in the subject
now with this spam result
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.8 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,EXCUSE_10,
HTML_30_40,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TA
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:32:15PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Hallo Erik Slooff,
>
> am Dienstag, 23. September 2003, 20:18:08, schriebst Du:
>
> >> > You need to pass the logfile name of your mail-daemon, e.g.
> >> > ./spamstats0.4b5.pl /var/log/mail
> >> > I use spamd, and it works.
> >>
> >> >
Er...not quite on topic, but I need a sanity check bad...real bad.
I try to keep my system clean. I run a firewall, spybot, and a good/updated
virus scanner...and hey! SA on my linux server...although I don't get much
if any spam on this account. My ISP account is another matter entirely.
I also
By default SA will check the 9 previous hosts listed in the RECEIVED
headers. You could lower that by using "num_check_received" directive in
your usr_prefs/local.cf, I currently use a setting of four.
Ryan Moore
--
Perigee.net Corporation
704-849-8355 (sales)
704-849-8017 (tech)
www.per
I think the main thrust of his answer was that Google Is Your Friend.
http://www.gryzor.com/tools/
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Knuth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > First hit after googling for spamstats and perl:
> > http://freshmeat.net/projects/spamstats/?topic_id=245
>
> tha
Hallo Erik Slooff,
am Dienstag, 23. September 2003, 20:18:08, schriebst Du:
>> > You need to pass the logfile name of your mail-daemon, e.g.
>> > ./spamstats0.4b5.pl /var/log/mail
>> > I use spamd, and it works.
>>
>> > Markus
>>
>> you have an link for this script? Thank you.
>>
> First hit a
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Chris Tatro wrote:
> Can anyone please help me on this?
I presume you've run "spamassassin -D --lint" ?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
