Ryan Moore ---------- Perigee.net Corporation 704-849-8355 (sales) 704-849-8017 (tech) www.perigee.net
David L. Crow wrote:
First, thanks so much for Spamassassin. It works so well!
I received an email with the following Received headers:
Received: from ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com [24.93.36.230]) by waterloo.OrangeBlood.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8NDa2UW031261 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 08:36:02 -0500 Received: from 448xc01 (cs2439-220.austin.rr.com [24.243.9.220]) by ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with SMTP id h8NDZk8V029596; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 08:35:47 -0500 (CDT)
And the scoring system provided:
3.5 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP [24.243.9.220 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org] 2.6 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address [Dynamic/Residential IP range listed by] [easynet.nl DynaBlock - <http://dynablock.easynet.nl/errors.html>] 0.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL RBL: Received via a relay in dnsbl.njabl.org [24.243.9.220 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org]
The mail was sent from a "dynamic host" directly to the appropriate ISP SMTP server using "Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158" and then delivered to my host. Should this message really have been marked as coming from a dynamic host? Can/should the first Received: header be ignored?
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
