At 01:22 PM 1/30/2004, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
1. spamassassin ! Plain sa installation . What next ? Training ?
1000 Spam and 1000 Ham ??
Bayes training is a good thing. Ideal is to have a spam/ham training ratio
close to what comes into your server in reality. However, considerable
variance
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 10:41 PM 1/20/04 -0600, C. Bensend wrote:
> >Is the problem that I'm _forwarding_ the tagged emails from one host
> >to the other? I don't have the capability to bounce, I can only forward.
>
> A forwarded message is a brand new message. That bran
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 11:48, Atif Faruqui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running Qmail-1.03 running qmail-scanner-1.16 which calls SpamAssassin-2.61.
> This is running on a Solaris 9 box. This is a relay configuration in which relay
> server
> accepts mail, do spam filtering (spamassassin) and virus check
Upgrade spamassassin, along with the new rulesets, to the latest version.
Turn on Bayesian learning and download the excellent custom rulesets at
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm.
You'll be amazed at how much these custom rulesets help. Just place the
files in the sam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 22 January 2004 08:48, Atif Faruqui wrote:
> I am running Qmail-1.03 running qmail-scanner-1.16 which calls
SpamAssassin-2.61.
> This is running on a Solaris 9 box. This is a relay configuration in which
relay server
> accepts mail, do sp
The email might be to large and aren't getting scanned. What are your spamc
options?
You can use the '-s' to bump up the max message size when calling it. There
is someplace else it's set to but I can't remember where.
spamc -s 35
-Original Message-
From: Atif Faruqui [mailto:[EMAIL PR
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 13:56, Webmaster wrote:
>
> Hmmm, when I look at the Qmail configuration in Webmin I see no
> reference (nor a place for it) to spamc. I don't even see a reference to
> spamassassin. When I look at the qmail action in the bootup process, this
> is the entire script:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: marc jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 10:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin doesn't appear to be running...?
>
>
> your mta should call spamc which would then i
arc jackson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin doesn't appear to be running...?
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:56:49 -0800
> -Original Message-
> From: marc jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 22,
Updated RPMS for Mandrake Linux 9.2 are available here:
ftp://ftp.neocat.org/perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63-1mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.neocat.org/spamassassin-2.63-1mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.neocat.org/spamassassin-tools-2.63-1mdk.i586.rpm
and the SRPM:
ftp://ftp.neocat.org/spamassassin-2.63-1mdk.
Any thoughts on the simplest way of installing spamassassin _and_ keeping it
current? On Redhat I used CPAN, no problems with it, guess I'm not 100%
sure on the benefits of doing it using CPAN vs RPM.
Any other "gotchas" with Suse and Spamassassin that I should know of? Quick
search of the archi
Working great here - about 100 active accounts now on a small mail server,
SuSE 9.0. If your MTA uses spamd we found that the startup script for SuSE
8.2 located at http://devel-home.kde.org/~kmail/unsupported/spamd works
great.
We install only from cpan for SA on SuSE 9. No issues at all.
Todd
OK, downloaded the source rpm and (i think) sucessfully built it into the pm
files, however I'm getting the following when installing:
perl(Pod::Usage) is needed by perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62-1
perl(HTML::Parser) is needed by perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62-1
I've done a little diggi
> A forwarded message is a brand new message. That brand new message is NOT
> sa tagged, even though it may contain some SA markups because the other
> message was tagged.
Ah, that would certainly explain it. Thanks for the info, Matt. :)
I'll just have to figure out some other way of doing it
At 10:41 PM 1/20/04 -0600, C. Bensend wrote:
Is the problem that I'm _forwarding_ the tagged emails from one host
to the other? I don't have the capability to bounce, I can only forward.
A forwarded message is a brand new message. That brand new message is NOT
sa tagged, even though it may con
At 04:33 PM 1/20/04 +0100, Ralf Vitasek wrote:
i tested many things with the trusted users settings and googled around
but i had no luck so far.
except that i stumbled on a posting from this lists archive that makes me
think that something is broken and that it would be fixed in the upcoming
2.
> Can somebody please give me some advice?
>
> Regards,
> Phillip Lucs
I tried all of these and more, and finally settled on qmail-scanner style
install. I'm using vpopmail, qmail, qmail-scanner, spamassassin, and
clamscan.
Qmail-scanner is my glue, and is plugged in via the tcp.smtp file.
Inf
Morning Ralf.
Matt has a problem that I think is specifically caused because his server is
Nated. He had to add the private network to his trusted networks list.
I don't have that problem, and Theo acknowleges that there is a bug that
should be fixed in 2.70.
I haven't heard a definite schedule
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:02 PM 1/19/04 +0100, Anders Sveen wrote:
I'm actually listed because it originates from a dynamic ip-range.
Nothing more. It surprises me that they lists ip's for only beeing
dynamic, but then I discovered the way RBLs are being used by
mailservers and then it actually
At 09:02 PM 1/19/04 +0100, Anders Sveen wrote:
I'm actually listed because it originates from a dynamic ip-range. Nothing
more. It surprises me that they lists ip's for only beeing dynamic, but
then I discovered the way RBLs are being used by mailservers and then it
actually made sense. It doesn
Tanen wrote:
Hello,
I’m searching a solution, to send back, mails, who haven’t been detect
as spam, on the mail server, for put it on a mail box, or folder, for
use the sa-learn command, and give to SpamAssassin more values to catch
spams.
How to put mails who have been downloaded on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to the spamassassin group,
I still have not been able to get spam
assassin running on my machine.
I suggest that you try a dual qmail installation w/ amavisd-new as the
glue...
Installed qmail in
/var/qmail_in
/var/qmail_out
/var/qmail_in will listen on port 25 a
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:55:58AM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> Any idea when we'll get RPMs available for the new release?
I made them available today: http://www.spamassassin.org/released/RPMs/ :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
And in the limiting case where the optimizer is completely broke
--On Monday, January 19, 2004 11:07 AM -0600 Bob Apthorpe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rpm -ta SOURCES/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62.tar.gz
That should be rpmbuild, not rpm. In later versions of rpm the installer no
longer automagically calls the builder, and you have to invoke it directly.
You can als
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:07:13AM -0600, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> It's (usually) not difficult to build your own. This initial directory
> is for SuSE; Red Hat hides their build tree elsewhere, like
> /usr/src/redhat:
Yeah. I put one up though, it ought to get out to the released area
in the next
I'm actually listed because it originates from a dynamic ip-range.
Nothing more. It surprises me that they lists ip's for only beeing
dynamic, but then I discovered the way RBLs are being used by
mailservers and then it actually made sense. It doesn't make sense the
way SA uses it. :)
I'm awar
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:55:58 -0500 (EST) "Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea when we'll get RPMs available for the new release?
It's (usually) not difficult to build your own. This initial directory
is for SuSE; Red Hat hides their build tree elsewhere, like
/usr/src/redhat:
#
Any idea when we'll get RPMs available for the new release?
--
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 0
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:30:53AM +, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> F/FE/FELICITY/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62.tar.gz
> where as the 2.61 and previous show..
> J/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.61.tar.gz
>
> has the author changed then?
I now have comaintainer status on CPAN to upload new versions. It us
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical
and heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited
commercial/bulk email).
Had a look at the CPAN version (from mirror.ac.uk) and it's showing the
Distribution as..
F/FE/FELICITY/Mail-SpamAssassin-
Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
Your missing the case where the mail is not coming from a private network or
a nated server.
I experience this problem (as mentioned in the bug report) from roaming
users who are connecting through authenticated SMTP to their mail server,
and relaying to me. I'd have to trust
PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin checks on Received headers (and RBL's
> such as RCVD_IN_SORBS)
>
>
> At 05:49 PM 1/18/04 -0800, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:
> >Problem with this fix is it only fixes things for my users
> locally - when my
> >users send mail to
At 05:49 PM 1/18/04 -0800, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:
Problem with this fix is it only fixes things for my users locally - when my
users send mail to someone else, they would have to set the same networks as
trusted.
This is untrue..
What ALL affected admins must do is set trusted_networks to is _the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerry
> Doris
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 5:24 PM
> To: Matt Kettler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin checks on Received headers (and RBL's
> such as RCVD_IN_SORBS)
>
>
>
> >DynaBlock was adding 4.00 and if I remember correctly spamassassin had a
> >problem where it was ignoring the fact that I was using my ISP's server.
>
> That is a bug. SA is supposed to skip dynablock checks on the first IP..
>
> Anyone who's copy of SA is incorrectly checking dynablock against
At 08:23 PM 1/18/04 -0500, Gerry Doris wrote:
My ip is listed in SORBS for the simple reason that it is in a dynamic
block of addresses administered by my ISP. SORBS just states that I
should use my ISP mail server which I already do.
Since SORBS only adds 0.10 to the spamassassin total I'm not co
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
snip..
> 1) work with the RBL to get de-listed
>
> 2) change ISPs to move your IP to a different block.
>
> And that's about it.. The fact that SA notices that a source IP is listed,
> even though you use a legitimate mail relay, is NOT a bug. It's
> in
At 11:22 PM 1/18/04 +0100, PieterB wrote:
What's the best practice preventing this? Changing SpamAssassin in
some way, masquerading/munging Received-headers, or something else?
1) work with the RBL to get de-listed
2) change ISPs to move your IP to a different block.
And that's about it.. The fac
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 16:13, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical
> and heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited
> commercial/bulk email).
>
> Downloading
> ---
>
> Pick it up from:
>
> http://SpamAssassin.org/release
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 04:39:00PM -0800, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
> Hey Theo - does this fix this bug as well?
>
> Don't see it updated in the bug list, so thought I'd check.
>
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2906
Nope, that's a 2.70 milestone bug currently.
BTW: please don't
Hey Theo - does this fix this bug as well?
Don't see it updated in the bug list, so thought I'd check.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2906
Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Summary of major changes since 2.61
> ---
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, snowchyld wrote:
> how does one go about setting up an SMTPReject wrt SA ?
> are there docs for sendmail/exim/qmail etc ?
>
> i would love to 5xx say spam above certain threshold with a rude message ^_^
For Sendmail, take a look at spamass-milter. Unfortunately, you
w
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin on Gateway server (MX)
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:20:16AM -0600, David B Funk wrote:
> > > If you SMTP reject the spam, it never hi
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:20:16AM -0600, David B Funk wrote:
> > If you SMTP reject the spam, it never hits your queue, so no problem
> > with the garbage piling up and no bombarding poor innocent 'joe-job'
> > victims. It's better than auto-deleting
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:20:16AM -0600, David B Funk wrote:
> > If you SMTP reject the spam, it never hits your queue, so no problem
> > with the garbage piling up and no bombarding poor innocent 'joe-job'
> > victims. It's better than auto-deleting
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:20:16AM -0600, David B Funk wrote:
> If you SMTP reject the spam, it never hits your queue, so no problem
> with the garbage piling up and no bombarding poor innocent 'joe-job'
> victims. It's better than auto-deleting spam, as a legit message
> that is accidentally mis-i
At 10:03 AM 1/16/04 +0530, Rahul Baweja wrote:
Hi,
How can i check if the Spam Assassin is working or not?
send yourself a GTUBE:
http://www.spamassassin.org/gtube/
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 15 January 2004 20:33, Rahul Baweja wrote:
> How can i check if the Spam Assassin is working or not?
What haved you tried? Did you look at the header info of the email? How are
you getting the email to SpamAssassin?
Douglas
-BEGIN
At 1/15/2004 06:04 PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
>> The last line is the new one, and it escapes any % signs in the
>> Message-ID. I don't use spamd so I can't confirm this to be the case,
>> but seems likely as I think it also uses Sys::Syslog.
>
>That shouldn't matter as spamd uses
> syslog
Just a thought: It wouldn't only have simplified matters, it would have
been more secure. Imagine someone hacks your SA box...they'd have access
to your internal network right away (unless there are other measures not
mentioned in place of course) In any case, this setup is not
recommended, but
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 09:56 AM 1/15/04 +0545, Pankaj wrote:
> >I feel I am being a bit misunderstood. I simply need to configure my MX to
> >have SpamAssassin running.I do not need any antivirus .
> >How do I do it ? Running RedHat Linux 8.1 and Sendmail 8.12.10 in it.
>
[s
At 1/12/2004 02:47 PM -0500, Mick Szucs wrote:
>A message arrived the other day that when it was processed by spamd was logged
>in /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/maillog (like all other mail
>processed by spamd.) The message in question contained a high volume of
>control characters in t
I use postfix w/ amavis and spamassassin and it works flawlessly. I placed
the SA box at my MX record's IP address and then relay (using postfix) to my
primary mail server. The mail server is behind my firewall and uses NAT to
send mail out. Actually both boxes are behind the firewall... although
At 09:56 AM 1/15/04 +0545, Pankaj wrote:
I feel I am being a bit misunderstood. I simply need to configure my MX to
have SpamAssassin running.I do not need any antivirus .
How do I do it ? Running RedHat Linux 8.1 and Sendmail 8.12.10 in it.
If your mailserver is relaying, it's not possible to jus
On January 13, 2004 01:34 pm, Chadwick L. Sorrell wrote:
> > A message arrived the other day that when it was processed by spamd was
> > logged in /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/maillog (like all other
> > mail processed by spamd.) The message in question contained a high
> > volume of cont
> Hi all,
>
> I did check the archives for the answer to this one, but the keywords involved
> are vague enough that it may have been answered and I couldn't find it.
>
> A message arrived the other day that when it was processed by spamd was logged
> in /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/m
hand off to internal system
BTW, we are not using amavisd or any other product on this box.
Gary Smith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Matt Kettler
Sent: Tue 1/6/2004 7:12 AM
To: Chris Maher; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
]
Sent: 06 January 2004 14:35
To: Randal, Phil; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin for SMTP gateway
Thanks, Phil!
do you have any specific notes/hints/suggestions? I'm fairly new to the
lower-level linux/ spam assassin world and could use all the pointers I can
get.
--c
004 10:12 AM
To: Chris Maher; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin for SMTP gateway
At 09:25 AM 1/6/04 -0500, Chris Maher wrote:
>I've got a RH9 server with SA2.61-1 installed. The server is a gateway
>for a number of different email domains. company1.com, company2.net,
&
At 09:25 AM 1/6/04 -0500, Chris Maher wrote:
I've got a RH9 server with SA2.61-1 installed. The server is a gateway
for a number of different email domains. company1.com, company2.net,
company3.org. I've got the three companies in /etc/mail/access and the
forwarding/relaying is working fine.
ECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 06,
2004 9:31 AMTo: Chris Maher;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SAtalk]
SpamAssassin for SMTP gateway
You
might want to consider using MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info) to virus
scan and feed the emails to spamassassin.
Cheers,
Title: SpamAssassin for SMTP gateway
You
might want to consider using MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info) to virus
scan and feed the emails to spamassassin.
Cheers,
Phil
-Phil
RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK
---
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 01:59, Dr Aldo Medina wrote:
> El lun, 05-01-2004 a las 07:46, Chris Thielen escribió:
> > On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 07:15, Dr Aldo Medina wrote:
> > > El dom, 30-11-2003 a las 01:28, Chris Thielen escribió:
> > > > Dr Aldo Medina said:
> > > > > Using Debian Sarge with spamassas
El lun, 05-01-2004 a las 07:46, Chris Thielen escribió:
> On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 07:15, Dr Aldo Medina wrote:
> > El dom, 30-11-2003 a las 01:28, Chris Thielen escribió:
> > > Dr Aldo Medina said:
> > > > Using Debian Sarge with spamassassin-2.60-2 deb package and
> > > > procmail-3.22-7.
> > > >
>
At 04:08 PM 1/3/04 -0800, Danny Aldham wrote:
I run a mail hosting/relay box for a number of domains. I would like to
offer spamassassin as a service, but some clients may not want to see
the subject changed, etc. Is there a way to have spamassassin_2.61
check a list of domains, and not score e-mai
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 07:15, Dr Aldo Medina wrote:
> El dom, 30-11-2003 a las 01:28, Chris Thielen escribió:
> > Dr Aldo Medina said:
> > > Using Debian Sarge with spamassassin-2.60-2 deb package and
> > > procmail-3.22-7.
> > >
> > > Even when it used to work, since a few weeks it seems like spama
El dom, 30-11-2003 a las 01:28, Chris Thielen escribió:
> Dr Aldo Medina said:
> > Using Debian Sarge with spamassassin-2.60-2 deb package and
> > procmail-3.22-7.
> >
> > Even when it used to work, since a few weeks it seems like spamassassin
> > doesn't follow my local.cf rules. For example, even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 03 January 2004 16:08, Danny Aldham wrote:
> I run a mail hosting/relay box for a number of domains. I would like to
> offer spamassassin as a service, but some clients may not want to see
> the subject changed, etc. Is there a way to have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Danny,
Saturday, January 3, 2004, 4:08:24 PM, you wrote:
DA> I run a mail hosting/relay box for a number of domains. I would like to
DA> offer spamassassin as a service, but some clients may not want to see
DA> the subject changed, etc. Is ther
> -Original Message-
> From: Douglas Kirkland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 3:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin only working on 127.0.0.1 & not on
> external mail
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 26 December 2003 15:00, Wendel, Jesse wrote:
> I finally figured out what was going on. Don't have it solved, but have a
better question at least.
>
> First though, I tried Carl's suggestion - no joy. Tried uninstalling and
reinstalling
Wendel, Jesse
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin only working on 127.0.0.1 & not on
> external mail
>
>
>On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Wendel, Jesse wrote:
>
> > Okay - well, I followed your suggestion and gave it a shot.
> > Below is the
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Wendel, Jesse wrote:
> Okay - well, I followed your suggestion and gave it a shot.
> Below is the entire /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin file as
> modified - SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -c -a -m5 -H -i 0.0.0.0" -
> after which I restarted the service.
>
> It still isn't working.
> -Original Message-
> From: Douglas Kirkland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 7:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin only working on 127.0.0.1 & not on
> external mail
>
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 23:31, Wendel, Jesse wrote:
> >Also check out the -i option.
> >
> > -i ipaddress, --listen-ip=ipaddress, --ip-address=ipad-
> > dress
> > Tells spamd to listen
>-Original Message-
>From: Douglas Kirkland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tue 12/23/2003 8:34 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc:
>Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin only working on 127.0.0.1 &
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 19:00, Wendel, Jesse wrote:
> Yes - except that when I look at the logs from my production server, which
you can see in my original email, they're also serving up emails from
127.0.0.1 - but the email is coming from extern
esse wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Douglas Kirkland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 6:42 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin only working on 127.0.0.1 & not on
> > external mail
> >
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Douglas Kirkland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 6:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin only working on 127.0.0.1 & not on
> external mail
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 17:26, Wendel, Jesse wrote:
> And then today, when I went back through all of my maillog's on the test
box, spamd has never worked except for mail coming from the test box itself.
Anything coming from outside is NOT analy
Hi Everyone,
I have SpamAssassin up and running both in test and in production. In production,
everything is fine. In test, not so much. I originally thought Test was broken just
since the changes I made yesterday, but the deeper I look, it appears test has been
broken all along.
Red Hat
Mike,
If you're installing on a Windows box (to integrate with GroupWise/Guinevere or
whatever), use Perl 5.6.1 instead of 5.8.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.
At 01:58 PM 12/22/2003, Mike Schultz wrote:
When I go to the Spam Assassin directory and type perl makefile.pl it
works fine and asks for email or url to suspect spam report. then it said
file good, Writing makefile for mail::spamassassin, makefile written by
ExtUtils::MakeMake 6.17. Then when
;
> I have the following line in my fstab:
>
> tmpfs /var/spool/filter tmpfs size=100M 0 0
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Network
> Admin
> Sent: 15 December 2003 22:33
>
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Justin Mason wrote:
> http://osdir.com/Article198.phtml
>
> Editor's Choice for Best Application (Top 5 environments):
>
> Email: SpamAssassin (Double Winner)
Well done, gentlemen! {hoists glass}
++
> CONGRADULATIONS to all the devs!! You deserve it!
Yes congratulations - and thanks for your hard work and dedication!
> I can't think of any other program that has made me happier
> the SA. OK, maybe MacPlaymate ;)
You dog!
---
This SF.
CONGRADULATIONS to all the devs!! You deserve it!
I can't think of any other program that has made me happier the SA. OK,
maybe MacPlaymate ;)
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 3:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
: 01454 465661
Fax : 01454 465601
Mobile : 07979 913494
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : www.superh.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
JRiley
Sent: 17 December 2003 22:12
To: Andrew Chaplin; SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin and
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Steven Rocha wrote:
> Scott,
> I think there is some merit and I was thinking the same thing. I have
> made some changes to Sendmail, Mimedefang, and SA for my installation
> and think a configuration repository that puts them all together would
> be great.
>
> I would be
Message -
From: "Andrew Chaplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:51 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin and SendMail
> > --On Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:47 AM -0800 Scott Harris
> &g
> --On Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:47 AM -0800 Scott Harris
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I too love this combo and have a question for the group. I was thinking
>> of documenting my configuration over the holiday break. Do people
>> generally feel this would be useful? Basically, I don'
broke..
Specific
install docs are ALWAYS welcomed! Just make sure you add them to the wiki!! www.exit0.us
--Chris
-Original Message-From: Mike Carlson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003
3:08 PMTo: Ceva; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matt
KettlerSubject: RE: [S
I use SA + SendMail + SpamAss-Milter on FreeBSD.
1. Install FreeBSD
2. Install SpamAssassin from the ports collection:
cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin; make install clean;
3. Install SpamAss-Milter
cd /usr/ports/mail/spamass-milter/; make install clean;
I then follow the instruct
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Scott Harris
Sent: Wed 12/17/2003 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin and SendMail
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Justin
>
--On Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:52 PM -0500 "Billy A. Pumphrey"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I too love this combo and have a question for the group. I was thinking
> of documenting my configuration over the holiday break. Do people
> generally
> feel this would be useful? Basically, I
--On Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:47 AM -0800 Scott Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I too love this combo and have a question for the group. I was thinking
> of documenting my configuration over the holiday break. Do people
> generally feel this would be useful? Basically, I don't want t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Justin
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 9:08 AM
> To: Brian Sneddon
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin and SendMail
>
> On Wed, 17
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Justin
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 9:08 AM
> To: Brian Sneddon
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin and SendMail
>
> On Wed, 17
-r removes the X-Spam markup, I assume you mean -- or it removes your
own domain somehow?
At any rate, I whipped up a perl script to clean up the headers before
reporting spam or for whitelisting. It's pasted below; you're (all) free
to ignore it, use it, or improve it as you want.
#!/usr/loca
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Brian Sneddon wrote:
> Do any good docs exist on using SpamAssassin with Sendmail as a gateway to
> an Exchange server? This is how I configured the spam filter we use here at
> work (Sendmail+SpamAssassin+spamass-milter) and if there aren't any good
> docs on this (and peopl
1 - 100 of 696 matches
Mail list logo
