My ip is listed in SORBS for the simple reason that it is in a dynamic block of addresses administered by my ISP. SORBS just states that I should use my ISP mail server which I already do.
Since SORBS only adds 0.10 to the spamassassin total I'm not concerned.
Aye, and it's a byproduct of the SORBS system now having a dynamic IP list as a part of their overall list (dynablock).
RCVD_IN_SORBS just means your IP is listed in any one of the lists.. that's why the score is so low. The actual point-hit is supposed to come from a specific list rule.
DynaBlock was adding 4.00 and if I remember correctly spamassassin had a problem where it was ignoring the fact that I was using my ISP's server.
That is a bug. SA is supposed to skip dynablock checks on the first IP..
Anyone who's copy of SA is incorrectly checking dynablock against the originating hop needs to set a trusted_networks statement by hand to work around the issue.
(From what I've read in bugzilla the actual bug has to do with SA's automatic assessment of trusted_networks getting confused and declaring that there are no trustable servers, not even the local IP. Typicaly happens for servers that are NATed or otherwise inside a private network with a 10.*, 192.168.* or other non-routable IP address)
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
