Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin on Gateway server (MX)

[Ralf Guenthner]

Just a thought: It wouldn't only have simplified matters, it would have 
been more secure. Imagine someone hacks your SA box...they'd have access 
to your internal network right away (unless there are other measures not 
mentioned in place of course) In any case, this setup is not 
recommended, but I guess you already knew that?!

Cheers
Ralf G.
Richard Ozer wrote:

I use postfix w/ amavis and spamassassin and it works flawlessly.  I placed
the SA box at my MX record's IP address and then relay (using postfix) to my
primary mail server. The mail server is behind my firewall and uses NAT to
send mail out.  Actually both boxes are behind the firewall... although I
considered keeping the SA box on the outside to simplify matters.
Ro


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk