On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
> Just a minor correction,
>
> try this:
>
> header__BLOCKTOFFICEOUTTo =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> header__BLOCKFOFFICEOUTFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> metaBLOCK_MY_OFFICE(__BLOCKTOFFICEOUT && !__BLOCKFOFFICEOUT)
> describeBLOCK
Just a minor correction,
try this:
header__BLOCKTOFFICEOUTTo =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
header__BLOCKFOFFICEOUTFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
metaBLOCK_MY_OFFICE(__BLOCKTOFFICEOUT && !__BLOCKFOFFICEOUT)
describeBLOCK_MY_OFFICENo E-mail to alias from outside
scoreBLO
At 07:50 AM 10/21/2003, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
Do all custom rules have to be added to the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file OR
can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
SA will by default parse *.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Thus, you can put
them in a separate CF file
Thomas Kinghorn Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 7:50 AM
> Do all custom rules have to be added to the
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> file OR can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
They can be in any .cf file within the /etc/mail/spamassassin folder.
cheers,
Colin
Co
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Kinghorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:50 AM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules >> local.cf
>
>
> Hi List.
>
> Just a quick question.
>
> Do all custom rules have to be added to the
> /e
Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
Hi List.
Just a quick question.
Do all custom rules have to be added to the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file OR
can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
Either will probably work, but it depends a bit on how you call
SpamAssassin. Generally
Yes.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas
Kinghorn
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:50 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules >> local.
Yes, any *.cf file in that directory will be parsed for rules / config
options.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> Just a quick question.
>
> Do all custom rules have to be added to the
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/lo
Thanks Chris!
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:59 AM
> To: 'Larry Gilson'
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - HTML and Line Breaks
&g
You are correct. MK (I think) has a rule like this submitted to the Emporium
and it hits just like you described. I don't know of anyway around this.
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
"A little nonsense
Hey Chris,
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
> See why I don't need bayes or net tests ;) I catch 99% of
> spam. I've had a breakthru today that should catch the ones
> that have been sneaking in. (Matt and JMason, the doc I sent
> you guys has a pattern in the Message-ID he
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:24 AM
> To: 'Chris Santerre'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> > -Original Messag
Hi Chris,
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
> Nope, sorry. Didn't catch that. THey are run from seperate cf
> files in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir. They are run for the
> entire company! Every bit of email that enters company is
> subject to all of these rules.
Matt's rul
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:48 AM
> To: spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> > > -Ori
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:58 AM
> >
> > Do you have a feel for the number of rules that would need to be
> > in user_prefs to have a significant impact on perform
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:08 AM
> To: 'Chris Santerre'; 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
>
>
> >
Hi Tom,
You can find it here:
http://www.wot.no-ip.com/show.me/Projects/Blocklist/
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier
> A google of [reg2rule] and [reg2rule.pl] brings up nada.
> Throw me a bone?
---
This SF.net
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
> I'm not sure about performance loss. I have every rule (That isn't a
> duplicate) in the SA rule emporeum running now. Plus all the
> evil domains generated by reg2rule.pl, plus more custom ones I
> haven't put on the Emporeum yet. I say I h
Thanks Matt! Points well taken. As I only use SA on a gateway with very
limited access, I have not been too worried about the potential spamd
exploit. However, user_prefs is not my first choice. In fact, I would
rather use local.cf with spamd. I just don't like the idea of restarting
spamd eve
, 2003 8:12 AM
> To: 'Larry Gilson'; 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
[ ]
> evil domains
> generated by reg2rule.pl, plus more custom ones I haven't put on the
[ ]
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:58 AM
> To: 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
> Thanks Matt! I hope this question is not too igno
At 8/25/03 09:05 PM , Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yes, this is normal. I understand v.2.60 can be given a HUP signal, like
At 00:05 26/08/2003 -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yep.
Regards,
Simon
Thanks Matt! I hope this question is not too ignorant . . . Do you have a
feel for the number of rules that would need to be in user_prefs to have a
significant impact on performance relative to spamd with everything else
being equal? I am just looking for a rough guess. I could imagine that the
At 12:05 AM 8/26/03 -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yes, local.cf and all of the /usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf files are
t: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:20 PM
> > To: SA-Talk
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql -- body BUG?
> >
> >
> > hmmm. actually this is having a problem working for body also.
> >
> > I do however get "Checking priveleged com
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:20 PM
> To: SA-Talk
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql -- body BUG?
>
>
> hmmm. actually this is having a problem working for body also.
>
>
|
333 | NULL |
+++-
++---+
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 06:03 PM, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-----Original Message-
From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
T
ED] | score ADAM_TEST| 100 |
333 | NULL |
+++-
++---+
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 06:03 PM, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Dallas L. Engelken
Cc:
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> dallas,
>
> in order to make a rule like
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> dallas,
>
> in order to make a rule like
>
, 2003-07-28 at 14:41, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
> > > To: Dallas L. Engelken
> > > Cc: SA-Talk
> > > Subject: RE:
nenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
> > To: Dallas L. Engelken
> > Cc: SA-Talk
> > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
> >
> >
> > I am actually using prefs perfectly with the DB.
> >
> > My que
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> I am actually using prefs perfectly with the DB.
>
>
I am actually using prefs perfectly with the DB.
My question is if i can use the DB to create "rules" for users. Like
putting something like
header BAD_SUBJECT Subject =~ test
score BAD_SUBJECT 3.0
stuff like that in the DB
thanks
adam
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:21, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:44 AM
> To: SA-Talk
> Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I am using SA 2.55 with mysql user prefs.
>
> Does anybody know if its possible to use per-dom
Chris Santerre wrote:
Did my list give you the rule writing sickness Bill? ;)
I'm in for a rule forum for sure! I just keep writing more rules every
week. But to make it separate will not work. The SA developers should
be part of the discussion, as they may have better insight as to what
the
Did my list
give you the rule writing sickness Bill? ;)
I'm in
for a rule forum for sure! I just keep writing more rules every week. But to
make it separate will not work. The SA developers should be part of the
discussion, as they may have better insight as to what the next SA ruleset wil
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nichols, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Spamassassin-List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Custom Rules Forum? Listing?
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:41:05PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> A Wiki is one of the easiest ways to set up space for
> collaborative contributions.
Great idea - a Wiki is not only one of the easiest, but one of the best
ways to set this up!
Regards: Jim Ford
--
Spam poison - don't use! --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello William,
Tuesday, July 8, 2003, 12:01:59 PM, you wrote:
NW> Is there a forum, list or anything for custom rules that people have
NW> tested, are coming up with?
NW> If not would anyone be interested in one?
I've benefited from the rules peop
"Doug Eubanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to create a custom rule and have it applied only for
> certain users? We are using a MySQL database for the preferences and
> would like to write a rule that filters out common pornographic terms
> and assigns them a VERY high score to s
Tom Allison wrote:
> Klaus Heinz wrote:
> >A mistake (corrected in the most current CVS sources) disabled 'header'
> >rules specified in the users' configuration file. 'body' rules should
> >work, though. See also
> >
>
> This doesn't apply to Mail::SpamAssassin?
As the mistake happened in PerMs
Klaus Heinz wrote:
Patrick Bores wrote:
Piping a message to spamassassin applies the rule correctly.
Piping the same message to spamc ignores the rule.
Any ideas as to why this is happening?
A mistake (corrected in the most current CVS sources) disabled 'header'
rules specified in the us
Patrick Bores wrote:
> Piping a message to spamassassin applies the rule correctly.
> Piping the same message to spamc ignores the rule.
> Any ideas as to why this is happening?
A mistake (corrected in the most current CVS sources) disabled 'header'
rules specified in the users' configuration fi
I should have mentioned. I've restarted spamd countless times, it
still does not work.
Patrick
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 11:15 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
Did you restart spamd?
service spamassassin restart
--or--
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
--or--
Whatever your flavor of *nix us
Did you restart spamd?
service spamassassin restart
--or--
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
--or--
Whatever your flavor of *nix uses to stop and restart the spamd
service.
-Michael
>>> Patrick Bores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/11/02 10:34AM >>>
Hello,
I have the following in my user_prefs file:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:14:16PM +0200, Denis wrote:
> I am aware of the user_prefs file, but I have not found good syntax
> descriptions (what man page to check ??).
You could also use /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf for a global setting.
You want to look at the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man
48 matches
Mail list logo
