At 01:22 PM 1/30/2004, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
1. spamassassin ! Plain sa installation . What next ? Training ?
1000 Spam and 1000 Ham ??
Bayes training is a good thing. Ideal is to have a spam/ham training ratio
close to what comes into your server in reality. However, considerable
variance
Hello ,
this has been posted also to the xmail list.
I thought I had problems posting here so...
---
Hello lst !!
(in a vibrant loud attittude [and voice :-)] ! )
OK ! Topic of the month and the next ... Spamassassin !!
OK , a co
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 10:41 PM 1/20/04 -0600, C. Bensend wrote:
> >Is the problem that I'm _forwarding_ the tagged emails from one host
> >to the other? I don't have the capability to bounce, I can only forward.
>
> A forwarded message is a brand new message. That bran
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 11:48, Atif Faruqui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running Qmail-1.03 running qmail-scanner-1.16 which calls SpamAssassin-2.61.
> This is running on a Solaris 9 box. This is a relay configuration in which relay
> server
> accepts mail, do spam filtering (spamassassin) and virus check
n the same directory as local.cf and run spamassassin --lint -D to
make sure there are no syntax errors.
RO
- Original Message -
From: "Atif Faruqui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 8:48 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Spamassassin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 22 January 2004 08:48, Atif Faruqui wrote:
> I am running Qmail-1.03 running qmail-scanner-1.16 which calls
SpamAssassin-2.61.
> This is running on a Solaris 9 box. This is a relay configuration in which
relay server
> accepts mail, do sp
if Faruqui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Spamassassin on Qmail Relay
Hi,
I am running Qmail-1.03 running qmail-scanner-1.16 which calls
SpamAssassin-2.61.
This is running on a Solaris 9 box. This is a relay configurat
Hi,
I am running Qmail-1.03 running qmail-scanner-1.16 which calls SpamAssassin-2.61.
This is running on a Solaris 9 box. This is a relay configuration in which relay server
accepts mail, do spam filtering (spamassassin) and virus check (Mcaffee) and then
sends mail to exchange server. Lately i a
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 13:56, Webmaster wrote:
>
> Hmmm, when I look at the Qmail configuration in Webmin I see no
> reference (nor a place for it) to spamc. I don't even see a reference to
> spamassassin. When I look at the qmail action in the bootup process, this
> is the entire script:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: marc jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 10:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin doesn't appear to be running...?
>
>
> your mta should call spamc which would then i
arc jackson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin doesn't appear to be running...?
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:56:49 -0800
> -Original Message-
> From: marc jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 22,
Updated RPMS for Mandrake Linux 9.2 are available here:
ftp://ftp.neocat.org/perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63-1mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.neocat.org/spamassassin-2.63-1mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.neocat.org/spamassassin-tools-2.63-1mdk.i586.rpm
and the SRPM:
ftp://ftp.neocat.org/spamassassin-2.63-1mdk.
Any thoughts on the simplest way of installing spamassassin _and_ keeping it
current? On Redhat I used CPAN, no problems with it, guess I'm not 100%
sure on the benefits of doing it using CPAN vs RPM.
Any other "gotchas" with Suse and Spamassassin that I should know of? Quick
search of the archi
.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Hutchings
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 9:06 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [SAtalk] Spamassassin on Suse 9.0?
Looking at changing from Redhat 9.0 to new hardware and thought given
SpamAssassin 2.63 SRPM:
http://rpms.alerque.com/SRPMS/spamassassin-2.63-1.src.rpm
SpamAssassin 2.63 RPMS compiled for PLD i686:
http://rpms.alerque.com/RPMS/
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools
e a little digging and I think i need perl-PDL which I'm now
downloading using Yast.. wondered if anyone's come across this problem
before.. tempted just to use CPAN :-)
rgds,
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Hutchings
> Sent: 21 January 2004 15:06
> To: '
Please excuse me if this is obvious, but I have tried to RTFM and I can't
figure out why I'm still seeing no SA info in my headers (no indication that
SA is doing anything). My ISP installed SA 2.60 on a RedHat 7.0 box. Using
Webmin, I can see the module installed and I see Spamassassin in the boot
Looking at changing from Redhat 9.0 to new hardware and thought given the
redhat/fedora support/lifespam issues I'd look at Suse.. seems well
regarded, well supported and has newbie-friendly admin tools even in console
mode..
Any thoughts on the simplest way of installing spamassassin _and_ keepin
> A forwarded message is a brand new message. That brand new message is NOT
> sa tagged, even though it may contain some SA markups because the other
> message was tagged.
Ah, that would certainly explain it. Thanks for the info, Matt. :)
I'll just have to figure out some other way of doing it
At 10:41 PM 1/20/04 -0600, C. Bensend wrote:
Is the problem that I'm _forwarding_ the tagged emails from one host
to the other? I don't have the capability to bounce, I can only forward.
A forwarded message is a brand new message. That brand new message is NOT
sa tagged, even though it may con
At 04:33 PM 1/20/04 +0100, Ralf Vitasek wrote:
i tested many things with the trusted users settings and googled around
but i had no luck so far.
except that i stumbled on a posting from this lists archive that makes me
think that something is broken and that it would be fixed in the upcoming
2.
Hey folks,
I'm having some problems de-SpamAssassin-ifying some emails. Here is
what I am trying to do:
1) Emails coming into my production mailserver are scored via spamc (still
SpamAssassin 2.60) and filtered appropriately. This works perfectly.
2) I want to forward some (or eventually
> Can somebody please give me some advice?
>
> Regards,
> Phillip Lucs
I tried all of these and more, and finally settled on qmail-scanner style
install. I'm using vpopmail, qmail, qmail-scanner, spamassassin, and
clamscan.
Qmail-scanner is my glue, and is plugged in via the tcp.smtp file.
Inf
SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical
and heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited
commercial/bulk email).
Downloading
---
Pick it up from:
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63.tar.gz
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-
Morning Ralf.
Matt has a problem that I think is specifically caused because his server is
Nated. He had to add the private network to his trusted networks list.
I don't have that problem, and Theo acknowleges that there is a bug that
should be fixed in 2.70.
I haven't heard a definite schedule
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:02 PM 1/19/04 +0100, Anders Sveen wrote:
I'm actually listed because it originates from a dynamic ip-range.
Nothing more. It surprises me that they lists ip's for only beeing
dynamic, but then I discovered the way RBLs are being used by
mailservers and then it actually
At 09:02 PM 1/19/04 +0100, Anders Sveen wrote:
I'm actually listed because it originates from a dynamic ip-range. Nothing
more. It surprises me that they lists ip's for only beeing dynamic, but
then I discovered the way RBLs are being used by mailservers and then it
actually made sense. It doesn
Tanen wrote:
Hello,
I’m searching a solution, to send back, mails, who haven’t been detect
as spam, on the mail server, for put it on a mail box, or folder, for
use the sa-learn command, and give to SpamAssassin more values to catch
spams.
How to put mails who have been downloaded on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to the spamassassin group,
I still have not been able to get spam
assassin running on my machine.
I suggest that you try a dual qmail installation w/ amavisd-new as the
glue...
Installed qmail in
/var/qmail_in
/var/qmail_out
/var/qmail_in will listen on port 25 a
Hi to the spamassassin group,
I still have not been able to get spam
assassin running on my machine.
What I have tried so far is as follows,
/etc/default/spamassassin
# Change to one to enable spamd
ENABLED=1
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:55:58AM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> Any idea when we'll get RPMs available for the new release?
I made them available today: http://www.spamassassin.org/released/RPMs/ :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
And in the limiting case where the optimizer is completely broke
--On Monday, January 19, 2004 11:07 AM -0600 Bob Apthorpe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rpm -ta SOURCES/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62.tar.gz
That should be rpmbuild, not rpm. In later versions of rpm the installer no
longer automagically calls the builder, and you have to invoke it directly.
You can als
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:07:13AM -0600, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> It's (usually) not difficult to build your own. This initial directory
> is for SuSE; Red Hat hides their build tree elsewhere, like
> /usr/src/redhat:
Yeah. I put one up though, it ought to get out to the released area
in the next
I'm actually listed because it originates from a dynamic ip-range.
Nothing more. It surprises me that they lists ip's for only beeing
dynamic, but then I discovered the way RBLs are being used by
mailservers and then it actually made sense. It doesn't make sense the
way SA uses it. :)
I'm awar
Hello,
I’m searching a solution, to send back, mails,
who haven’t been detect as spam, on the mail server, for put it on a mail
box, or folder, for use the sa-learn command, and give to SpamAssassin more
values to catch spams.
How to put mails who have been downloaded on the mail
cl
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:55:58 -0500 (EST) "Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea when we'll get RPMs available for the new release?
It's (usually) not difficult to build your own. This initial directory
is for SuSE; Red Hat hides their build tree elsewhere, like
/usr/src/redhat:
#
Any idea when we'll get RPMs available for the new release?
--
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 0
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:30:53AM +, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> F/FE/FELICITY/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62.tar.gz
> where as the 2.61 and previous show..
> J/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.61.tar.gz
>
> has the author changed then?
I now have comaintainer status on CPAN to upload new versions. It us
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical
and heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited
commercial/bulk email).
Had a look at the CPAN version (from mirror.ac.uk) and it's showing the
Distribution as..
F/FE/FELICITY/Mail-SpamAssassin-
Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
Your missing the case where the mail is not coming from a private network or
a nated server.
I experience this problem (as mentioned in the bug report) from roaming
users who are connecting through authenticated SMTP to their mail server,
and relaying to me. I'd have to trust
PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin checks on Received headers (and RBL's
> such as RCVD_IN_SORBS)
>
>
> At 05:49 PM 1/18/04 -0800, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:
> >Problem with this fix is it only fixes things for my users
> locally - when my
> >users send mail to
At 05:49 PM 1/18/04 -0800, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:
Problem with this fix is it only fixes things for my users locally - when my
users send mail to someone else, they would have to set the same networks as
trusted.
This is untrue..
What ALL affected admins must do is set trusted_networks to is _the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerry
> Doris
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 5:24 PM
> To: Matt Kettler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin checks on Received headers (and RBL's
> such as RCVD_IN_SORBS)
>
>
>
> >DynaBlock was adding 4.00 and if I remember correctly spamassassin had a
> >problem where it was ignoring the fact that I was using my ISP's server.
>
> That is a bug. SA is supposed to skip dynablock checks on the first IP..
>
> Anyone who's copy of SA is incorrectly checking dynablock against
At 08:23 PM 1/18/04 -0500, Gerry Doris wrote:
My ip is listed in SORBS for the simple reason that it is in a dynamic
block of addresses administered by my ISP. SORBS just states that I
should use my ISP mail server which I already do.
Since SORBS only adds 0.10 to the spamassassin total I'm not co
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
snip..
> 1) work with the RBL to get de-listed
>
> 2) change ISPs to move your IP to a different block.
>
> And that's about it.. The fact that SA notices that a source IP is listed,
> even though you use a legitimate mail relay, is NOT a bug. It's
> in
At 11:22 PM 1/18/04 +0100, PieterB wrote:
What's the best practice preventing this? Changing SpamAssassin in
some way, masquerading/munging Received-headers, or something else?
1) work with the RBL to get de-listed
2) change ISPs to move your IP to a different block.
And that's about it.. The fac
I have the same problem as listed on
http://blog.f12.no/roller/page/anders/20040104#spamassassin_tweaking_2
Because Spamassassin scans all the received headers for
RBLs, and not just checks if the one host connecting and
delivering the mail is in the RBL (like most mailser
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 16:13, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical
> and heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited
> commercial/bulk email).
>
> Downloading
> ---
>
> Pick it up from:
>
> http://SpamAssassin.org/release
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 04:39:00PM -0800, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
> Hey Theo - does this fix this bug as well?
>
> Don't see it updated in the bug list, so thought I'd check.
>
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2906
Nope, that's a 2.70 milestone bug currently.
BTW: please don't
Hey Theo - does this fix this bug as well?
Don't see it updated in the bug list, so thought I'd check.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2906
Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Summary of major changes since 2.61
> ---
SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical
and heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited
commercial/bulk email).
Downloading
---
Pick it up from:
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62.tar.gz
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, snowchyld wrote:
> how does one go about setting up an SMTPReject wrt SA ?
> are there docs for sendmail/exim/qmail etc ?
>
> i would love to 5xx say spam above certain threshold with a rude message ^_^
For Sendmail, take a look at spamass-milter. Unfortunately, you
w
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin on Gateway server (MX)
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:20:16AM -0600, David B Funk wrote:
> > > If you SMTP reject the spam, it never hi
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:20:16AM -0600, David B Funk wrote:
> > If you SMTP reject the spam, it never hits your queue, so no problem
> > with the garbage piling up and no bombarding poor innocent 'joe-job'
> > victims. It's better than auto-deleting
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:20:16AM -0600, David B Funk wrote:
> > If you SMTP reject the spam, it never hits your queue, so no problem
> > with the garbage piling up and no bombarding poor innocent 'joe-job'
> > victims. It's better than auto-deleting
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:20:16AM -0600, David B Funk wrote:
> If you SMTP reject the spam, it never hits your queue, so no problem
> with the garbage piling up and no bombarding poor innocent 'joe-job'
> victims. It's better than auto-deleting spam, as a legit message
> that is accidentally mis-i
At 10:03 AM 1/16/04 +0530, Rahul Baweja wrote:
Hi,
How can i check if the Spam Assassin is working or not?
send yourself a GTUBE:
http://www.spamassassin.org/gtube/
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 15 January 2004 20:33, Rahul Baweja wrote:
> How can i check if the Spam Assassin is working or not?
What haved you tried? Did you look at the header info of the email? How are
you getting the email to SpamAssassin?
Douglas
-BEGIN
Hi,
How can i check if the Spam Assassin is working or
not?
Rahul
At 1/15/2004 06:04 PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
>> The last line is the new one, and it escapes any % signs in the
>> Message-ID. I don't use spamd so I can't confirm this to be the case,
>> but seems likely as I think it also uses Sys::Syslog.
>
>That shouldn't matter as spamd uses
> syslog
Just a thought: It wouldn't only have simplified matters, it would have
been more secure. Imagine someone hacks your SA box...they'd have access
to your internal network right away (unless there are other measures not
mentioned in place of course) In any case, this setup is not
recommended, but
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 09:56 AM 1/15/04 +0545, Pankaj wrote:
> >I feel I am being a bit misunderstood. I simply need to configure my MX to
> >have SpamAssassin running.I do not need any antivirus .
> >How do I do it ? Running RedHat Linux 8.1 and Sendmail 8.12.10 in it.
>
[s
At 1/12/2004 02:47 PM -0500, Mick Szucs wrote:
>A message arrived the other day that when it was processed by spamd was logged
>in /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/maillog (like all other mail
>processed by spamd.) The message in question contained a high volume of
>control characters in t
I use postfix w/ amavis and spamassassin and it works flawlessly. I placed
the SA box at my MX record's IP address and then relay (using postfix) to my
primary mail server. The mail server is behind my firewall and uses NAT to
send mail out. Actually both boxes are behind the firewall... although
At 09:56 AM 1/15/04 +0545, Pankaj wrote:
I feel I am being a bit misunderstood. I simply need to configure my MX to
have SpamAssassin running.I do not need any antivirus .
How do I do it ? Running RedHat Linux 8.1 and Sendmail 8.12.10 in it.
If your mailserver is relaying, it's not possible to jus
I feel I am being a bit misunderstood. I simply need to configure my MX to
have SpamAssassin running.I do not need any antivirus .
How do I do it ?
Running RedHat Linux 8.1 and Sendmail 8.12.10 in it.
List: spamassassin-talkSubject:
RE:
[SAtalk] setting up spamassassin on G
I recently upgraded our SA through the Perl CPAN setup.
I upgraded from 2.57(?) to the latest 2.61. Everything went
great, but when I look at the headers, they report version
2.60, not 2.61. Did I miss something, or did someone else?
Todd Adamson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On January 13, 2004 01:34 pm, Chadwick L. Sorrell wrote:
> > A message arrived the other day that when it was processed by spamd was
> > logged in /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/maillog (like all other
> > mail processed by spamd.) The message in question contained a high
> > volume of cont
> Hi all,
>
> I did check the archives for the answer to this one, but the keywords involved
> are vague enough that it may have been answered and I couldn't find it.
>
> A message arrived the other day that when it was processed by spamd was logged
> in /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/m
Hrm, must have been ignored because it didn't say "Habeas" in the subject
line. I'd love an opinion or two as to whether or not the problem I've
outlined below is something to be concerned about which merits further
testing or not.
Thanks,
---
Hi all,
I did check the archives for the answer
Hi all,
I did check the archives for the answer to this one, but the keywords involved
are vague enough that it may have been answered and I couldn't find it.
A message arrived the other day that when it was processed by spamd was logged
in /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/maillog (like a
HEllo dear all,
On a test machine, (qmail+inetd)
using qmail-queue substitution method
ex:
qmail-queue:
#!/bin/sh
/usr/bin/spamc | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.orig
all work fine, 99% spam detected!
...but when i try to setup another pc with qmail+tcpserver
the substitution method not appear to
hand off to internal system
BTW, we are not using amavisd or any other product on this box.
Gary Smith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Matt Kettler
Sent: Tue 1/6/2004 7:12 AM
To: Chris Maher; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
]
Sent: 06 January 2004 14:35
To: Randal, Phil; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin for SMTP gateway
Thanks, Phil!
do you have any specific notes/hints/suggestions? I'm fairly new to the
lower-level linux/ spam assassin world and could use all the pointers I can
get.
--c
004 10:12 AM
To: Chris Maher; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin for SMTP gateway
At 09:25 AM 1/6/04 -0500, Chris Maher wrote:
>I've got a RH9 server with SA2.61-1 installed. The server is a gateway
>for a number of different email domains. company1.com, company2.net,
&
At 09:25 AM 1/6/04 -0500, Chris Maher wrote:
I've got a RH9 server with SA2.61-1 installed. The server is a gateway
for a number of different email domains. company1.com, company2.net,
company3.org. I've got the three companies in /etc/mail/access and the
forwarding/relaying is working fine.
ECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 06,
2004 9:31 AMTo: Chris Maher;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SAtalk]
SpamAssassin for SMTP gateway
You
might want to consider using MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info) to virus
scan and feed the emails to spamassassin.
Cheers,
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
Chris MaherSent: 06 January 2004 14:26To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SAtalk]
SpamAssassin for SMTP gateway
Hello all,
Here's my scenario:
I've got a RH9 server with SA2.61-1
Title: SpamAssassin for SMTP gateway
Hello all,
Here's my scenario:
I've got a RH9 server with SA2.61-1 installed. The server is a gateway for a number of different email domains. company1.com, company2.net, company3.org. I've got the three companies in /etc/mail/access and the forwardi
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 01:59, Dr Aldo Medina wrote:
> El lun, 05-01-2004 a las 07:46, Chris Thielen escribió:
> > On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 07:15, Dr Aldo Medina wrote:
> > > El dom, 30-11-2003 a las 01:28, Chris Thielen escribió:
> > > > Dr Aldo Medina said:
> > > > > Using Debian Sarge with spamassas
El lun, 05-01-2004 a las 07:46, Chris Thielen escribió:
> On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 07:15, Dr Aldo Medina wrote:
> > El dom, 30-11-2003 a las 01:28, Chris Thielen escribió:
> > > Dr Aldo Medina said:
> > > > Using Debian Sarge with spamassassin-2.60-2 deb package and
> > > > procmail-3.22-7.
> > > >
>
At 04:08 PM 1/3/04 -0800, Danny Aldham wrote:
I run a mail hosting/relay box for a number of domains. I would like to
offer spamassassin as a service, but some clients may not want to see
the subject changed, etc. Is there a way to have spamassassin_2.61
check a list of domains, and not score e-mai
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 07:15, Dr Aldo Medina wrote:
> El dom, 30-11-2003 a las 01:28, Chris Thielen escribió:
> > Dr Aldo Medina said:
> > > Using Debian Sarge with spamassassin-2.60-2 deb package and
> > > procmail-3.22-7.
> > >
> > > Even when it used to work, since a few weeks it seems like spama
El dom, 30-11-2003 a las 01:28, Chris Thielen escribió:
> Dr Aldo Medina said:
> > Using Debian Sarge with spamassassin-2.60-2 deb package and
> > procmail-3.22-7.
> >
> > Even when it used to work, since a few weeks it seems like spamassassin
> > doesn't follow my local.cf rules. For example, even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 03 January 2004 16:08, Danny Aldham wrote:
> I run a mail hosting/relay box for a number of domains. I would like to
> offer spamassassin as a service, but some clients may not want to see
> the subject changed, etc. Is there a way to have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Danny,
Saturday, January 3, 2004, 4:08:24 PM, you wrote:
DA> I run a mail hosting/relay box for a number of domains. I would like to
DA> offer spamassassin as a service, but some clients may not want to see
DA> the subject changed, etc. Is ther
I run a mail hosting/relay box for a number of domains. I would like to
offer spamassassin as a service, but some clients may not want to see
the subject changed, etc. Is there a way to have spamassassin_2.61
check a list of domains, and not score e-mail or change the subject for mail
addressed t
Hi,
System: Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 3 running perl 5.8.0
I am trying to install SpamAssassin via CPAN as I don't want to use Red
Hat's 2.55 RPM.
I cannot get it installed as ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.21 craps out VERY badly
with most tests failed.
I've filed a bug report with ExtUtils::MakeMake
Are suggestions and discussion regarding spamassassin rules discussed here?
The GUARANTEED_100_PERCENT tested should be expanded to phrases like
"100% safe" "100% satisfaction", etc.
Some spam about HGH are getting through, because the HGH are being
spaced out with several non-ascii characters.
> -Original Message-
> From: Douglas Kirkland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 3:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin only working on 127.0.0.1 & not on
> external mail
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 26 December 2003 15:00, Wendel, Jesse wrote:
> I finally figured out what was going on. Don't have it solved, but have a
better question at least.
>
> First though, I tried Carl's suggestion - no joy. Tried uninstalling and
reinstalling
Wendel, Jesse
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin only working on 127.0.0.1 & not on
> external mail
>
>
>On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Wendel, Jesse wrote:
>
> > Okay - well, I followed your suggestion and gave it a shot.
> > Below is the
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Wendel, Jesse wrote:
> Okay - well, I followed your suggestion and gave it a shot.
> Below is the entire /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin file as
> modified - SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -c -a -m5 -H -i 0.0.0.0" -
> after which I restarted the service.
>
> It still isn't working.
> -Original Message-
> From: Douglas Kirkland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 7:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin only working on 127.0.0.1 & not on
> external mail
>
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 23:31, Wendel, Jesse wrote:
> >Also check out the -i option.
> >
> > -i ipaddress, --listen-ip=ipaddress, --ip-address=ipad-
> > dress
> > Tells spamd to listen
>-Original Message-
>From: Douglas Kirkland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tue 12/23/2003 8:34 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc:
>Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin only working on 127.0.0.1 &
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 19:00, Wendel, Jesse wrote:
> Yes - except that when I look at the logs from my production server, which
you can see in my original email, they're also serving up emails from
127.0.0.1 - but the email is coming from extern
esse wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Douglas Kirkland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 6:42 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin only working on 127.0.0.1 & not on
> > external mail
> >
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Douglas Kirkland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 6:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin only working on 127.0.0.1 & not on
> external mail
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP S
1 - 100 of 1033 matches
Mail list logo
