At 04:26 PM 1/16/2004, David Roback wrote:
spamd[28929]: debug: RBL: success for 1 of 1 queries
There is a line for a RBL query, but shouldn't the RBL tests shop up in
the "tests line" in the debug log? If RBL is not running site wide, any
ideas why?
The thing that strikes me most about that li
Hi,
We have just implemented SA in a site wide configuration. In debug
mode, I am not seeing any RBL checks in the list of tests, but when I
run spamc on the same message they show up just fine. The final scores
also do not match. Here are parts of the log files.
debug: running raw-body-tex
At 03:50 PM 1/2/04 -0500, Frank Pineau wrote:
As a follow-up to my last post, is there a concise list of the RBL
checks that are enabled by default? When I do a debug, I note that it
does 10 tests, but it doesn't say which 10, and there are three times
that many defined in 20_dnsbl.
Thanks
Check 5
As a follow-up to my last post, is there a concise list of the RBL
checks that are enabled by default? When I do a debug, I note that it
does 10 tests, but it doesn't say which 10, and there are three times
that many defined in 20_dnsbl.
Thanks
--
Frank Pineau
Hey, you know those Roman hackers
Yesterday, I decided to implement RBL checks in SA because I wanted to
use SA as a test platform to evaluate a given RBL before moving that RBL
into sendmail for blocking.
In my local.cf, I changed skip_rbl_checks to 0 and added score
RCVD_IN_SBL 1. Although I was only testing via command-line
sp
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 15:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For some reason the following RBL are timing out, while others are
> working. Is there a way to avoid checking the ones timing out? I am
> running RH 9/SA 2.61/Sendmail.
>
> debug: RBL: success for 8 of 17 queries
> debug: RBL: timeout for ds
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:09 PM
To: 'Richard Humphrey'; 'Spamassassin-List'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RBL timeouts
Just find the testname:
http://useast.spamassassin.org/tests.html
I
-
> From: Richard Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:53 PM
> To: 'Spamassassin-List'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RBL timeouts
>
>
> Sorry for my ignorance but what would be the syntax for
> scoring these to
> 0 in my local.cf
: [SAtalk] RBL timeouts
At 04:03 PM 12/17/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>For some reason the following RBL are timing out, while others are
>working. Is there a way to avoid checking the ones timing out? I am
>running RH 9/SA 2.61/Sendmail.
you can disable them by setting their s
At 04:03 PM 12/17/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason the following RBL are timing out, while others are
working. Is there a way to avoid checking the ones timing out? I am
running RH 9/SA 2.61/Sendmail.
you can disable them by setting their score to 0.
---
For some reason the following RBL are timing out, while others are
working. Is there a way to avoid checking the ones timing out? I am
running RH 9/SA 2.61/Sendmail.
debug: RBL: success for 8 of 17 queries
debug: RBL: timeout for dsbl after 12 seconds
debug: RBL: timeout for dsbl after 12 seconds
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Damien Kemens - Friendly Computers wrote:
> I'm having some troubles configuring local.cf to check to a custom rbl. It
> worked for a time, but then something. nothing that I'm aware of, changed.
> And now it is not working. The rbl is still in the same location, and the
>
I’m having some troubles configuring local.cf to check
to a custom rbl. It worked for a time, but then something… nothing that I’m
aware of, changed. And now it is not working. The rbl is still in the same
location, and the syntax I used has not changed…
Here’s what I have in local.cf:
Hello,
How do I know if I am running through the RBL lists? I turned
sa_local_tests_only to 0 and I have skip_rbl_checks 0 and I get this for a
transaction in the log:
Nov 21 16:51:13 nabu amavis[6216]: (06216-21) ESMTP::10024
/var/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20031121T164659-06216:
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
I have a SA 2.60 new install. Net::DNS is working fine.
skip_rbl_checks 0
Debug shows "debug: RBL: success for 0 of 18 queries", all of them
timing out, even with a large timeout values.
Manual lookup of IP at RBL returns whatever code it's supposed to
(like 127.0.0.2)
What else could be causing S
At 10:23 AM 11/12/03 -0500, Chris Trudeau wrote:
How would I go about determining WHICH RBLS are being used currently (I know
they are "on").
Look through 20_dnsbl_tests.cf, then check to make sure the RBL in question
has a non-zero score in 50_scores.cf.. grep is your friend.
And how would I g
How would I go about determining WHICH RBLS are being used currently (I know
they are "on").
And how would I go about adding/extracting an RBL from the SpamAssassin
checks?
CT
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 21:14, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 05:00 PM 10/13/03 -0400, Jon Fraley wrote:
> >I currently have RBL checks turned off on our SA 2.6. We do our RBL
> >checks at the firewall. Can SA do the RBL checks from within our
> >network behind a virus appliance, or does it just check th
At 05:00 PM 10/13/03 -0400, Jon Fraley wrote:
I currently have RBL checks turned off on our SA 2.6. We do our RBL
checks at the firewall. Can SA do the RBL checks from within our
network behind a virus appliance, or does it just check the last hop
that was made. The reason I ask this is that I d
I currently have RBL checks turned off on our SA 2.6. We do our RBL
checks at the firewall. Can SA do the RBL checks from within our
network behind a virus appliance, or does it just check the last hop
that was made. The reason I ask this is that I do not have control over
our firewall so I can
: [SAtalk] RBL check
I disabled RBL checks because valid Cable/DSL users in DHCP pools would
use their valid mail servers but trip the DHCP pool RBLs based on the
first IP address in the received chain. I believe this is a bug though;
it shouldn't be checking the very first IP address under
ances.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:51 PM
To: 'SpamAssassin-Talk list'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RBL check
I turned mine off today for just that reason. A lot of the legitimate
mai
h dropping
legitimate mailing lists and other relays.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug
Crompton
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:47 AM
To: SpamAssassin-Talk list
Subject: [SAtalk] RBL check
Are others having the degree of disa
t: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:47 AM
To: SpamAssassin-Talk list
Subject: [SAtalk] RBL check
Are others having the degree of disatisfaction with the RBL check that I
am. It seems that seeminly legitimate sites are being tagged as relay's.
Like comcast.com or net and many others that I would not thin
d"
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Crompton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 8:47 AM
> To: SpamAssassin-Talk list
> Subject: [SAtalk] RBL check
>
>
> Are others having the degree of disatisfaction with the RBL
> check that
h dropping
legitimate mailing lists and other relays.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug
Crompton
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:47 AM
To: SpamAssassin-Talk list
Subject: [SAtalk] RBL check
Are others having the degree of disa
Are others having the degree of disatisfaction with the RBL check that I
am. It seems that seeminly legitimate sites are being tagged as relay's.
Like comcast.com or net and many others that I would not think were
allowing relaying. I am about to turn it off or at least lower the score.
Doug
***
I was thinking of all the traffic and many problems with the
whole RBL thing..
Why not just maintain the databases in real time as they are
now but.. Instead of everyone querying them in real time why not do a wget or
something once every 24 hours to pull the DB down to your own server.
: [SAtalk] RBL, any
need for them to be REAL TIME?
I was thinking of all the traffic
and many problems with the whole RBL thing..
Why not just maintain the
databases in real time as they are now but.. Instead of everyone querying them
in real time why not do a wget or something
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:15:40 +0100, you wrote:
>depends on the RBL I guess, there might be an argument for doing that with
>something like spews, or cc specific ones as they probably don't change that
>much hour to hour, but with something like spamcop you'd have no chance as
>it changes all the t
gs
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Me [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 September 2003 07:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] RBL, any need for them to be REAL TIME?
I was thinking
I was thinking of all the traffic and many problems with the
whole RBL thing..
Why not just maintain the databases in real time as they are
now but.. Instead of everyone querying them in real time why not do a wget or
something once every 24 hours to pull the DB down to your own server.
ECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RBL
Hi Pat,
Thank you for giving me yours , but how do you make them active ? I cannot find
'FEATURES' as a key word to put in the local.cf ???
Thank you for your help
CR
-Message d'origine-
De : Pat
At 06:00 PM 9/9/2003 +0200, Céline REDON wrote:
Here is my config : SA Proxy Daemon 2.55 , Postfix
I am currently testing SA with some users.
I did not yet activate Razor /Dcc/Pyzor.
But I am wondering if the tests are really all activated? and if the RBL
are
used ??
How can I be sure of it ???
F
: Céline REDON
Objet : Re: [SAtalk] RBL
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, [iso-8859-1] Céline REDON wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Could anyone tell me if there is some free RBL ??
Here is my list of free ones:
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `relays.ordb.org', `Rejected - see
http://ordb.org/')dnl
FEAT
Hi all,
Here is my config : SA Proxy Daemon 2.55 , Postfix
I am currently testing SA with some users.
I did not yet activate Razor /Dcc/Pyzor.
But I am wondering if the tests are really all activated? and if the RBL
are
used ??
How can I be sure of it ???
** Here are my logs *
Aug
Scott Kopel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's clear that my SA is now performing rbl checks and I apologize for
> being slow, but I still don't see how to configure my local.cf to get
> SA to perform checks at specific rbl lists eg spamcop.net
>
> I checked the suggested urls, but none of them sh
At 23:57 8/09/2003 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 08:28 PM 9/8/03 -0400, Scott Kopel wrote:
It's clear that my SA is now performing rbl checks
and I apologize for being slow, but I still don't see how to configure my
local.cf to get SA to perform checks at specific rbl lists eg spamcop.net
I check
At 08:28 PM 9/8/03 -0400, Scott Kopel wrote:
It's clear that my SA is now performing rbl checks
and I apologize for being slow, but I still don't see how to configure my
local.cf to get SA to perform checks at specific rbl lists eg spamcop.net
I checked the suggested urls, but none of them shows
It's clear that my SA is now performing rbl checks
and I apologize for being slow, but I still don't see how to configure my
local.cf to get SA to perform checks at specific rbl lists eg spamcop.net
I checked the suggested urls, but none of them shows how they work in SA
if someone could paste i
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:51:02PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Yes there is, you do what I suggested, which is run a test message
> (preferably a nice spammy piece of spam) through SpamAssassin in debug
> mode and look at the output. Eg:
>
> spamassassin -D &1 | more
Thanks, I tried this and I
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:31:50PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>> RBL checks are on by default, but you have to have the Net::DNS perl
>> module installed for them to work.
>
> Woah!
>
> I DON'T have that installed! And I never got a warning anywhere?!
> I thought it was working!
>
> Hmmpf.
The
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:31:50PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> RBL checks are on by default, but you have to have the Net::DNS perl
> module installed for them to work.
Woah!
I DON'T have that installed! And I never got a warning anywhere?!
I thought it was working!
Hmmpf.
I just installed t
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:05:01AM +0200, Céline REDON wrote:
> Ok , thank you for these details.
>
> Could you then confirm me it is the parameter "skip_rbl_checks 0" which
> enables the RBL checks..?
Correct me if I am wrong, but yes (I think), along with
NOT using the -L commandline paramete
> Ok , thank you for these details.
>
> Could you then confirm me it is the parameter "skip_rbl_checks 0" which
> enables the RBL checks..?
RBL checks are on by default, but you have to have the Net::DNS perl
module installed for them to work. The easiest way to do that is through
CPAN.
perl -M
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [SAtalk] RBL
At 19:11 27/08/2003 +0200, Céline REDON wrote:
>Thanx Bob,
>Would you know also how to integrate them in Spamassassin?
>In the local.cf file??
>
>Thanx!!
>CR
Umm,
SpamAssassin comes preconfigured with a variety of RBL checks now, and
At 19:11 27/08/2003 +0200, Céline REDON wrote:
Thanx Bob,
Would you know also how to integrate them in Spamassassin?
In the local.cf file??
Thanx!!
CR
Umm,
SpamAssassin comes preconfigured with a variety of RBL checks now, and the
new version 2.60 which sould be out "any time soon" (tm) adds a
Thanx Bob,
Would you know also how to integrate them in Spamassassin?
In the local.cf file??
Thanx!!
CR
Selon Bob Apthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:56:19 +0200 Céline REDON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Could anyone tell me if there is some free RBL ?
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:56:19 +0200 Céline REDON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Could anyone tell me if there is some free RBL ??
Yes, see http://openrbl.org and
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/support/ip4r.htm
-- Bob
---
This sf.ne
Hi all,
Could anyone tell me if there is some free RBL ??
CR
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 06:03:00AM +0300, Ryan Summers wrote:
> I noticed that the process seems to hang everytime it
> runs the RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM test. Knowing little about
> this particular blacklist, I would guess that their rbl
> server is down.
Just another spammer burned by RBLs, think
Appears to be working here doing a manual test. I think setting the
score to 0 disables the test, which you can do in your local.cf.
Ryan Moore
--
Perigee.net Corporation
704-849-8355 (sales)
704-849-8017 (tech)
www.perigee.net
~$ dig 2.0.0.127.relays.osirusoft.com
; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>
Hello all:
I just built a new mail server using qmail + vpopmail and spamassassin to
filter out spam. The last mail server I built using this same configuration
didn't have any trouble with spamassassin. After I installed spamassassin
and the necessary perl modules, I ran some tests and notic
Here's a problem that got us stumped:
We're testing SA 2.55 on a FreeBSD 4.8 system. Things seem to be generally
working except for the fact that all of the RBL tests time out. It doesn't
seem to be a DNS problem with the system in general, because other non-SA
DNS queries work fine, and even SA
Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone using rbl-plus got a better way of integrating it with SA other
> than manually separating it back out into separate DUL, RSS, etc feeds again?
>
> The problem with rbl-plus is that it lists all DUL,RSS,etc DNS domains
> within it's one domain -
Hi there
Has anyone using rbl-plus got a better way of integrating it with SA other
than manually separating it back out into separate DUL, RSS, etc feeds again?
The problem with rbl-plus is that it lists all DUL,RSS,etc DNS domains
within it's one domain - which means that when you activate RCVD
of the RBL by providing good, reliable DNS lookups and saves
some network traffic by caching resolver results.
At 08:59 PM 2/10/2003 +0100, Mark wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spam List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL
hi mike
if i want to overwrite SA default scoring for its
tests, i specify my own scoring on
/etc/mail/spamassassin/spamassassin.cf
it seems that you put them on local.cf that is why it
doesnt work.
hth
dianne
--- Mike McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the following in my .spamass
Mike McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In other words, where are the checks being executed against spamcop and
> ordb and why are checks run against osirusoft? I thought by having the
> 'score RCVD...' in my user prefs file, that instructed SA to check those
> blacklist databases.
>
> Wha
After identification by the group that Net::DNS needed to be installed
for RBL usage to work, I've re-run the command:
spamassassin -tD < sample-spam.txt and a snippet of the output is:
debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM ==> got hit
debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule X_OSIR
Sure do, but eventually I'll try to lookup a non-cached record. If the
server is not responding, then we have to wait for DNS to time out.
--Rich
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Stephen Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks! Setting 'rbl_timeout 5' cut the time down to 10 seconds per
mesage, instead of
* Stephen Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks! Setting 'rbl_timeout 5' cut the time down to 10 seconds per
> mesage, instead of 30. Although I don't think 30 is a bad number at all,
> it can start to be a problem on servers that have a high volume of e-mail,
> and a lot of spamd processes get start
Another dumb question. Where is "rbl_timeout" located? I can't find it
anywhere.
-- Terry
Rich Puhek wrote:
>
> The dsbl lists were not resolving earlier today, still appears to have
> problems.
>
> One fix (suggested by Matt Kettler in a different thread earlier today)
> is to change the RBL
Thanks! Setting 'rbl_timeout 5' cut the time down to 10 seconds per
mesage, instead of 30. Although I don't think 30 is a bad number at all,
it can start to be a problem on servers that have a high volume of e-mail,
and a lot of spamd processes get started because they are just waiting for
a respon
Stephen Bader wrote:
I've noticed that today my messages are taking about 30 seconds each. I'm
assuming this is because of the same things you mentioned. Anyone know for
sure what is going on? I'm not very concerned at this point, as I'm sure
it will be corrected soon, but if it isn't, I would l
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:37:00PM -0600, Stephen Bader wrote:
> I've noticed that today my messages are taking about 30 seconds each. I'm
> assuming this is because of the same things you mentioned. Anyone know for
> sure what is going on? I'm not very concerned at this point, as I'm sure
> it wil
I've noticed that today my messages are taking about 30 seconds each. I'm
assuming this is because of the same things you mentioned. Anyone know for
sure what is going on? I'm not very concerned at this point, as I'm sure
it will be corrected soon, but if it isn't, I would like to know which
checks
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:02:34PM -0600, Terry wrote:
> Today I enabled RBL checking on spamassassin. It is REALLY slow checking all
> of those blackhole lists. (Most messages waiting about 30 seconds) On average
Yeah, today is fairly slow for some of them. It's not always like that, but ...
Today I enabled RBL checking on spamassassin. It is REALLY slow checking all
of those blackhole lists. (Most messages waiting about 30 seconds) On average
we do about 40,000 messages a week, so it's not that big a deal, but I am a
little worried about memory problems when the spammers send in a
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 03:14:09PM -0500, Mike McCandless wrote:
> Matt, I'm not sure how to answer your question of 'is DNS available',
> but here's the output from the command you suggested. Let me know how
> you interpret this.
>
> debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver unavailable? 1
> debug: is DNS ava
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mike McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RBL Usage
> Do you have the perl module Net::DNS install
Do you have the perl module Net::DNS installed?
Run this:
spamassassin -tD
Does it say that DNS is available in the debug output? if not, it won't try
any RBLs.
At 10:57 AM 12/5/2002 -0500, Mike McCandless wrote:
I have the following in my .spamassassin/user_prefs file, in
anticipation that l
e McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:57 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] RBL Usage
> I have the following in my .spamassassin/user_prefs file, in
> anticipation that lookups will be performed against the spamcop and ordb
> RBL
I have the following in my .spamassassin/user_prefs file, in
anticipation that lookups will be performed against the spamcop and ordb
RBL database. However, in the spam that SA is identifying (I get
plenty), I'm not seeing any tests applied for either of these lists.
Have I specified the right opt
Hi there, how would one go about testing RBLs? ie, I have a spamassassin install on
win32, configured just nice, only thing missing is razor/pyzor/dcc (sucks but eh...),
and have added the pop3proxy component, and fudged it to do RBL (it does only local
tests by default), and now I want to verif
Ok, there's not a lot of detail about your problem, but here's some general
things I'd suggest.
First, make sure you have Net::DNS installed and your DNS lookup works.
Run from the command line:
spamassassin -tD
Look at the output to see if it even thinks it is trying or if it thinks
DNS is u
Is it possible your DNS server was wedged somehow?
If you get it to happen again, try the debug run of SA and see what you get.
At 01:45 PM 10/24/2002 -0400, Eric Mings wrote:
The strange thing is that it _was_ working fine until the last day or so.
I just restarted my mailserver and my dns ser
Eric Mings said:
> The strange thing is that it _was_ working fine until the last day or so.
> I just restarted my mailserver and my dns server and now everything is
> working again- spamassassin is doing rbl lookups. It seems very odd to
> me. I cannot see what could have caused it to stop and n
I noticed a dramatic increase in spam that was not being identified
properly by spam assassin on my setup in the last 24 hours. It appears
that for some unknown reason spamassassin is not doing the rbl checks
now. I see no spam that has rbl tags and my nameserver is not caching the
rbl listings as
"Rice, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Actually, it looks like I get RBL+ as one big zone
> rather than a split zone for RBL, DUL, and RSS.
> Is there any way to set up a custom RBL check.
Search for the various rules with OSIRUS in their name and see how they are
implemented. relays.osirusoft
ct it.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:42 PM
To: Rice, Kevin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RBL question
Yes, each RBL has it's own scores and rules. Setting the score of a given
RBL rule disables it,
Yes, each RBL has it's own scores and rules. Setting the score of a given
RBL rule disables it, setting it to anything but zero will enable it.
Maps, being a subscription service, is disabled per default.
Also note that if you're checking a given RBL at the MTA level, checking it
again in Spam
It looks like all of the different pages/posts I've seen on recommended SA setup talk
about turning off RBL lookups. I can understand this in that it could cause things to
timeout waiting on a response from a remote service. I have a subscription to MAPS
though and keep a local copy of their zo
Hi all,
How do I know RBL lookup is working in SA? From the documentation I have
concluded that if "skip_rbl_checks 0" is set SA should do RBL lookups.
However, I never saw a reference to this in any report or header so I am
beginning to wonder if it's really turned on. Apart from this, SA wor
OK I think that was it.
I ran a test with -D and saw the following messages:
is Net::DNS::Resolver unavailable? 1
is DNS available? 0
I interpreted that to mean Net::DNS was not installed or not working. I
figured out how to find and install it after a couple of failed attempts and
now the test
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:48:57PM -0700, Simon Matthews wrote:
> IIRC, I had to do a 'force install' to get Net::DNS to install on my RH 6.2
> systems.
>
>
How about introducing a new SpamAssassin switch such as
-f --features Print version for various Perl modules, main values and SA version
IIRC, I had to do a 'force install' to get Net::DNS to install on my RH 6.2
systems.
Simon
At 11:46 AM 9/27/02 -0700, Tom at ATT wrote:
>Thanks for the response.
>
> > Are you having trouble getting any of the DNS blacklists to work, or just
> > the MAPS RBL?
>Nope, none are working. (MAPS i
Thanks for the response.
> Are you having trouble getting any of the DNS blacklists to work, or just
> the MAPS RBL?
Nope, none are working. (MAPS is still "turned off" because we're a
commercial site.)
> You should certainly see a lot of spam matching RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM.
Nope, nothing.
> I
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 11:34:17AM -0700, Tom at ATT wrote:
> Well this is all pretty foggy to me, but I'm running spamd using the
> supplied spamassassin script which uses the -d -c -a options. Then spamc
> gets called from procmailrc with only a -u option because it complained
> about running a
> How are you running SA? Any "-L" in there? :)
Well this is all pretty foggy to me, but I'm running spamd using the
supplied spamassassin script which uses the -d -c -a options. Then spamc
gets called from procmailrc with only a -u option because it complained
about running as root.
Thanks,
T
Are you having trouble getting any of the DNS blacklists to work, or just
the MAPS RBL?
You should certainly see a lot of spam matching RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM.
If you don't do you have the perl Net::DNS installed? I think that's needed
to make the DNS blacklists to work, but can't say for sure.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 09:45:01AM -0700, Tom at ATT wrote:
> Any tricks to getting RBL to work?
How are you running SA? Any "-L" in there? :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Anybody interested in entrepreneurship, and/or beer ..." - Prof. Vaz
msg08194/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
I moved my SA machine into production to see if that would cause RBL to
start working but still no luck.
Yes, I can do DNS lookups.
I assume I'd see some Spam: Hit! messages referring to the RBL if it was
working, right?
I'm catching about 95% of all spam for a small company with the default
ru
Hi Robert and Justin,
I've documented the original idea (well, saved some emails :-)
at http://bl.reynolds.net.au/ksi/
I've been focusing on learning who to run a dnsbl service,
scanning, and integrating it all together. Current system
was spread over 4 servers, so I'm also merging it all onto
Robert L Mathews said:
> Perhaps someone has already tried this, but it occurs to me that a sort
> of RBL for spammer phone numbers, e-mail addresses, and URLs would be
> useful.
Yes, myself and Mark Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> swapped a few mails
on this in January -- I think it was Mark's
Perhaps someone has already tried this, but it occurs to me that a sort
of RBL for spammer phone numbers, e-mail addresses, and URLs would be
useful.
Almost all spam includes a phone number, an e-mail address, or an URL for
the victim to use to contact the spammer. Of course, many of these are
I couldn't find these previously so I ended up making my own. They appear
to work okay but I have not heavily tested them (and the scores are a
little arbitary). FYI the different 127.1.x.x values RBL+ uses correspond to:
127.1.0.1 RBL
127.1.0.2 DUL
127.1.0.3
Hi Casey,
> I'm using MimeDefang with SpamAssassin and it is working very
> well. My
> question is this: how do I go about configuring which RBL services for
> SpamAssassin to use? Does the SpamAssassin RBL functionality
> work if I'm using MimeDefang?
If you're using default settings: No, i
> -Original Message-
> From: Casey Woods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] RBL Configuration
>
>
> I'm using MimeDefang with SpamAssassin and it is working very
> well. My que
there.
C
Casey Woods wrote:
> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 11:15:11 -0700
> From: Casey Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] RBL Configuration
>
> I'm using MimeDefang with SpamAssassin and it is working very well. My
> question is thi
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
