On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
> Just a minor correction,
>
> try this:
>
> header__BLOCKTOFFICEOUTTo =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> header__BLOCKFOFFICEOUTFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> metaBLOCK_MY_OFFICE(__BLOCKTOFFICEOUT && !__BLOCKFOFFICEOUT)
> describeBLOCK
Just a minor correction,
try this:
header__BLOCKTOFFICEOUTTo =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
header__BLOCKFOFFICEOUTFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
metaBLOCK_MY_OFFICE(__BLOCKTOFFICEOUT && !__BLOCKFOFFICEOUT)
describeBLOCK_MY_OFFICENo E-mail to alias from outside
scoreBLO
hi i am trying to setup a rule so that we wont get mail to our local
alias from an outside address, this is what i wrote but it doesnt seem
to work as i thought it would, can u give any advice
header BLOCKTTOFFICEOUT To = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
header BLOCKTTOFFICEOUT From != [EMAIL P
At 07:50 AM 10/21/2003, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
Do all custom rules have to be added to the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file OR
can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
SA will by default parse *.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Thus, you can put
them in a separate CF file
Thomas Kinghorn Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 7:50 AM
> Do all custom rules have to be added to the
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> file OR can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
They can be in any .cf file within the /etc/mail/spamassassin folder.
cheers,
Colin
Co
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Kinghorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:50 AM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules >> local.cf
>
>
> Hi List.
>
> Just a quick question.
>
> D
Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
Hi List.
Just a quick question.
Do all custom rules have to be added to the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file OR
can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
Either will probably work, but it depends a bit on how you call
SpamAssassin. Generally
Yes.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas
Kinghorn
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:50 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules
Yes, any *.cf file in that directory will be parsed for rules / config
options.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> Just a quick question.
>
> Do all custom rules have to be added to the
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/lo
Hi List.
Just a quick question.
Do all custom rules have to be added to the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file OR
can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
This is for a system wide installation.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Tom Kinghorn
---
Thanks Chris!
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:59 AM
> To: 'Larry Gilson'
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - HTML and Line Breaks
&g
t;A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men." - Willy
Wonka
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 10:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - HTML and Line Breaks
&g
Hi All,
I have been successfully using the rule that tests for content after the
ending HTML tag. One problem I don't quite understand how to fix is if the
content is not on the same line as the tag but after a line break. If I
understand correctly, rawbody will not work with line breaks but bod
I'm getting pummeled with a few dozen copies of the latest MS
worm/trojan every hour so I figured I'd try to get SA to flag them, but
unfortunately I'm not having very much luck. I've been trying to add
some custom rules to my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf but they never
seem to match. Here are
Hey Chris,
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
> See why I don't need bayes or net tests ;) I catch 99% of
> spam. I've had a breakthru today that should catch the ones
> that have been sneaking in. (Matt and JMason, the doc I sent
> you guys has a pattern in the Message-ID he
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:24 AM
> To: 'Chris Santerre'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> > -Original Messag
Hi Chris,
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
> Nope, sorry. Didn't catch that. THey are run from seperate cf
> files in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir. They are run for the
> entire company! Every bit of email that enters company is
> subject to all of these rules.
Matt's rul
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:48 AM
> To: spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> > > -Ori
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:58 AM
> >
> > Do you have a feel for the number of rules that would need to be
> > in user_prefs to have a significant impact on perform
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:08 AM
> To: 'Chris Santerre'; 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
>
>
> >
Hi Tom,
You can find it here:
http://www.wot.no-ip.com/show.me/Projects/Blocklist/
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier
> A google of [reg2rule] and [reg2rule.pl] brings up nada.
> Throw me a bone?
---
This SF.net
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
> I'm not sure about performance loss. I have every rule (That isn't a
> duplicate) in the SA rule emporeum running now. Plus all the
> evil domains generated by reg2rule.pl, plus more custom ones I
> haven't put on the Emporeum yet. I say I h
Thanks Matt! Points well taken. As I only use SA on a gateway with very
limited access, I have not been too worried about the potential spamd
exploit. However, user_prefs is not my first choice. In fact, I would
rather use local.cf with spamd. I just don't like the idea of restarting
spamd eve
, 2003 8:12 AM
> To: 'Larry Gilson'; 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
[ ]
> evil domains
> generated by reg2rule.pl, plus more custom ones I haven't put on the
[ ]
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:58 AM
> To: 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
> Thanks Matt! I hope this question is not too igno
At 8/25/03 09:05 PM , Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yes, this is normal. I understand v.2.60 can be given a HUP signal, like
At 00:05 26/08/2003 -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yep.
Regards,
Simon
Thanks Matt! I hope this question is not too ignorant . . . Do you have a
feel for the number of rules that would need to be in user_prefs to have a
significant impact on performance relative to spamd with everything else
being equal? I am just looking for a rough guess. I could imagine that the
At 12:05 AM 8/26/03 -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yes, local.cf and all of the /usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf files are
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Regards,
Larry
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM W
t: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:20 PM
> > To: SA-Talk
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql -- body BUG?
> >
> >
> > hmmm. actually this is having a problem working for body also.
> >
> > I do however get "Checking priveleged com
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:20 PM
> To: SA-Talk
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql -- body BUG?
>
>
> hmmm. actually this is having a problem working for body also.
>
>
|
333 | NULL |
+++-
++---+
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 06:03 PM, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
T
ED] | score ADAM_TEST| 100 |
333 | NULL |
+++-
++---+
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 06:03 PM, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Dallas L. Engelken
Cc:
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> dallas,
>
> in order to make a rule like
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> dallas,
>
> in order to make a rule like
>
, 2003-07-28 at 14:41, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
> > > To: Dallas L. Engelken
> > > Cc: SA-Talk
> > > Subject: RE:
nenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
> > To: Dallas L. Engelken
> > Cc: SA-Talk
> > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
> >
> >
> > I am actually using prefs perfectly with the DB.
> >
> > My que
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> I am actually using prefs perfectly with the DB.
>
>
lken wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:44 AM
> > To: SA-Talk
> > Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
> >
> >
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I am usi
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:44 AM
> To: SA-Talk
> Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I am using SA 2.55 with mysql user prefs.
>
> Does any
Hey guys,
I am using SA 2.55 with mysql user prefs.
Does anybody know if its possible to use per-domain/user rules using
mysql?
thanks
adam
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-com
st
*Subject:* [SAtalk] Custom Rules Forum? Listing?
Is there a forum, list or anything for custom rules that people
have tested, are coming up with?
If not would anyone be interested in one?
Bill
I have an unused forum site at http://www.tark.us that may u
regex.) I have
everyone to thank every morning when my spamtrap is full.
Thanks
Chris
(still
learning to write better regex)
-Original Message-From: Nichols, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:02
PMTo: Spamassassin-ListSubject: [SAtalk] Custom Rules
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nichols, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Spamassassin-List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Custom Rules Forum? Listing?
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello
Hello William,
Tuesday, July 8, 2003, 11:44:00 PM, you wrote:
NW> What is a Wiki?
NW> Bill Nichols
See http://wiki.org/wiki.cgi?WhatIsWiki
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:41:05PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> A Wiki is one of the easiest ways to set up space for
> collaborative contributions.
Great idea - a Wiki is not only one of the easiest, but one of the best
ways to set this up!
Regards: Jim Ford
--
Spam poison - don't use! --
What is a Wiki?
Bill Nichols
-Original Message-
From: Abigail Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 5:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RM> If someone can come up with a good method of discussing/exchanging
RM> custom rules that won't seriously impact the value of
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 01:41, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> RM> If someone can come up with a good method of discussing/exchanging custom
> RM> rules that won't seriously impact the value of this basic list, I have
> RM> some resources available at menschel.net we can use for that purpose.
>
> A Wiki i
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 01:41, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> RM> If someone can come up with a good method of discussing/exchanging custom
> RM> rules that won't seriously impact the value of this basic list, I have
> RM> some resources available at menschel.net we can use for that purpose.
>
> A Wiki i
RM> If someone can come up with a good method of discussing/exchanging custom
RM> rules that won't seriously impact the value of this basic list, I have
RM> some resources available at menschel.net we can use for that purpose.
A Wiki is one of the easiest ways to set up space for
collaborative con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello William,
Tuesday, July 8, 2003, 12:01:59 PM, you wrote:
NW> Is there a forum, list or anything for custom rules that people have
NW> tested, are coming up with?
NW> If not would anyone be interested in one?
I've benefited from the rules peop
Is there a forum,
list or anything for custom rules that people have tested, are coming up
with?
If not would anyone
be interested in one?
Bill
Ok, I have written my custom rules and assigned it a 0 value in my local.cf.
Now I need to know what entries to use in my SQL table for me to give (just
me) a higher value than 0 for that rule. The rule name is
PORNOGRAPHIC_TERMS. I can't use user preference files because out SA is
spread across
"Doug Eubanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to create a custom rule and have it applied only for
> certain users? We are using a MySQL database for the preferences and
> would like to write a rule that filters out common pornographic terms
> and assigns them a VERY high score to s
Is it possible to create a custom rule and have it
applied only for certain users? We are using a MySQL database for the
preferences and would like to write a rule that filters out common
pornographic terms and assigns them a VERY high score to start with. Then
we want to give the user the
Tom Allison wrote:
> Klaus Heinz wrote:
> >A mistake (corrected in the most current CVS sources) disabled 'header'
> >rules specified in the users' configuration file. 'body' rules should
> >work, though. See also
> >
>
> This doesn't apply to Mail::SpamAssassin?
As the mistake happened in PerMs
Klaus Heinz wrote:
Patrick Bores wrote:
Piping a message to spamassassin applies the rule correctly.
Piping the same message to spamc ignores the rule.
Any ideas as to why this is happening?
A mistake (corrected in the most current CVS sources) disabled 'header'
rules specified in the us
Patrick Bores wrote:
> Piping a message to spamassassin applies the rule correctly.
> Piping the same message to spamc ignores the rule.
> Any ideas as to why this is happening?
A mistake (corrected in the most current CVS sources) disabled 'header'
rules specified in the users' configuration fi
I should have mentioned. I've restarted spamd countless times, it
still does not work.
Patrick
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 11:15 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
Did you restart spamd?
service spamassassin restart
--or--
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
--or--
Whatever your flavor of *nix us
Did you restart spamd?
service spamassassin restart
--or--
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
--or--
Whatever your flavor of *nix uses to stop and restart the spamd
service.
-Michael
>>> Patrick Bores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/11/02 10:34AM >>>
Hello,
I have the following in my user_prefs file:
Hello,
I have the following in my user_prefs file:
header MY_WHITELIST Subject=~/test/
score MY_WHITELIST -100
Piping a message to spamassassin applies the rule correctly.
Piping the same message to spamc ignores the rule.
My local.cf file looks like this:
allow_user_rules 1
rewrite_subjec
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:14:16PM +0200, Denis wrote:
> I am aware of the user_prefs file, but I have not found good syntax
> descriptions (what man page to check ??).
You could also use /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf for a global setting.
You want to look at the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man
Hi all,
Have successfully been using SpamAssassin from Debian Testing for a while, and
I must say I love the way I now have 97% of my spams cleaned automatically !
One thing I was searching for was how to easily create custom additions to the
rulesets.. What I want to do is add in strings to m
64 matches
Mail list logo
