Re: [SAtalk] Spamc fails, but spamassassin works

This ended up being a local firewall issue that I have resolved. Thanks for looking. At 10:21 AM 1/28/2004, James Ervin wrote: I have two mail servers running spamassassin. One has spamd running and uses: # send mail through spamassassin :0fw | /usr/bin/spamc This works and I get a nice log

RE: [SAtalk] some spam not getting scored

I just made a related post minutes after this original post. I am experiencing the exact same issue and included my headers with the original post entitled "Strange Headers - no score assigned" Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. James -Original Message- Fr

[SAtalk] Spamc fails, but spamassassin works

24 620 S 0.0 0.5 0:00 procmail 2836 root 9 0 508 508 428 S 0.0 0.4 0:00 spamc ____ James Ervin City of Bedford Box 807 Bedford, VA 24523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (540)587-6040 Cell: (5

[SAtalk] Scores not being assigned?

ML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=spam version=2.61 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on spambox.mydom

[SAtalk] Strange Headers - no score assigned

_MULTI,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=spam version=2.61 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on spambox.mydomain.com Thanks for your input - it's much appreciat

RE: [SAtalk] [OT] - The current state spam.

iles (we all know the ones) of their customers computers. So, their defense to not stopping it is we allow all traffic unobstructed, unbiased and unfiltered. Thanks, James -Original Message- From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:27 AM T

RE: [SAtalk] [OT] - The current state spam.

ore desirable IMHO. This technology obviously exists and I think is a much better option. Thanks, James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pierre Thomson Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:13 AM To: Chris Santerre Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-m

[SAtalk] How to re-process a whole /var/spool/mail/inbox file...

spam messages. I would like to write a batch file that will reprocess (or whatever would be called the procedure to rescan the entire mail /var/spool/mail/userid) each account. Thanks in advance for any suggestions or comments. -- L. James

[SAtalk] How to reject bad local mail addresses with spamassassin and exim 3

n't seem to check if the local address is valid and tries to deliver it anyways. Am I missing something in this config? I've included my transport and router rules for SpamAssassain below. Please CC me for I am not subscribed. Thanks. -- James Lamanna spamcheck: driver = pipe command = &q

[SAtalk] Ack...razor2 error =(

Hey all! Just saw this in my logs...: Jan 15 10:39:42 gateway spamd[11059]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in connect while running with -T switch at /usr/lib/perl5/i386-linux/IO/Socket.pm line 108, line 358. Anyone seen this? Thanks! James

[SAtalk] skip attachment scanning?

Quick question for the list…   Our users receive a lot of .doc attachments that seem to be caught with various rules such as backhair.  We have no intention of removing the backhair tests though.  Anyone know of a simple way to skip attachment scanning or at least what test to use to nega

RE: [SAtalk] newbie: windows binary as auto spam

You can change the score, yes, I infact, did the same thing. In the local.cf you put this line: score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 100 HTH Thanks, James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoffrey Lane Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:05 PM

[SAtalk] Remove OSIRUSOFT RBL?

everyone as an Open Relay in an effort to get people to stop using his RBL. How do I remove checks X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY and RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM from my installed version of SpamAssassin? -James --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux

[SAtalk] Bayes locked?

Hey all! Saw the following in my logs this morning: Dec 16 06:39:54 gateway spamd[9846]: Cannot open bayes databases /var/empty/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Anyone else see this? Thanks! James __ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity

RE: [SAtalk] SA for IM?

I used to get spams with the native Aol messenger, got trillian and haven't had a problem (I checked "only allow buddies in my list" to send me messages, this seems to have solved the problem, the same goes for ICQ, don't use yahoo or msn, so can't help you there. Thanks,

[SAtalk] Windows Install & Cygwin....

I have used www.exit0.us's process for installing spamassassin (not very in depth). I ram sa-learn to put in the ham/spam in to the db (~1k messages each). I can run spamc -c http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ Spamassassin-talk ma

RE: [SAtalk] Returns 0/0 instead of score...

Thanks for your reply... Before I was able to run spamc -c mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Spamassassin' Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Returns 0/0 instead of score... At 09:15 AM 12/4/2003, James wrote: >Ok, I have run in some

[SAtalk] Returns 0/0 instead of score...

=_HITS_ required=_REQD_ tests=_TESTS_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_ # Miscellaneous Entries ok_languagesen fr ok_locales en trusted_networks192.168.0. Thanks, James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

>>I just got this virus message that appears to have come from sourceforge. >>Did anyone else get this or did my antivirus FP on me? >FP.. that exact message passed through my copy of clamscan just fine.. >clamav is updated hourly here. We had it hit as a vi

RE: [SAtalk] Config File Location....

all Status _YESNO_, hits=_HITS_ required=_REQD_ tests=_TESTS_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_ # Miscellaneous Entries ok_languagesen fr ok_locales en trusted_networks192.168.0. Thanks, James -Original Message

[SAtalk] Config File Location....

installing SA in a cygwin environment. I was able to run sa-learn (spam/ham) or ~ 1k messages each with no problems. It is returning spam probability to the command prompt, but is now writing the header information to the email. Thanks in advance Thanks, James

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.55 running sweet, upgrade to 2.60 and no workie =(

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:15:35 -0500 (EST) "William Stearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good morning, James, > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, James Nonya wrote: > > > I'm running Slackware 8.1 which comes with perl 5.6.1. > > I've been running spamd

[SAtalk] SA 2.55 running sweet, upgrade to 2.60 and no workie =(

tch at /usr/lib/perl5/Cwd.pm line 92. I am running spamd as user filter (running this setup -> http://www.advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html). Filter has: /bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin set as the $PATH. Anyone have any leads on why this is happening and how I can fix i

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin Log??

, include LOGABSTRACT=all and VERBOSE=yes in your procmailrc. Perhaps another will suggest ways to get SA without spamd to log. ..__o ... . \< . (_)/(_) James Ervin "When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race."

[SAtalk] Log files and statistics

I have seen some users posting statistics for SA. I see the logging is built into maillog, but what packages are good at processing the log files? I have found a program called "Sawmill" but that seems a little larger than I was looking for. I would like to know some basic statistics such

[SAtalk] Comments on CBL DNSBL (cbl.abuseat.org)

been detected through spam traps. Any comments about the use of this list would be appreciated. Thanks. -- Robert -- Robert James Kaes--- Flarenet Inc. ---(519) 426-3782 http://www.flarenet.com/consulting/ * Putting the Service Back in Internet Service Pro

Re: [SAtalk] Comments on CBL DNSBL (cbl.abuseat.org)

l worth a look. Does anyone know why SpamAssassin only used the dynablock.easynet.nl list, and not any of the other *.easynet.nl lists? Are those *.easynet.nl lists composites or duplicates of other lists already in SpamAssassin? -- Robert -- Robert James Kaes--- Flarenet

[SAtalk] Comments on CBL DNSBL (cbl.abuseat.org)

been detected through spam traps. Any comments about the use of this list would be appreciated. Thanks. -- Robert -- Robert James Kaes--- Flarenet Inc. ---(519) 426-3782 http://www.flarenet.com/consulting/ * Putting the Service Back in Internet Service Pro

RE: [SAtalk] Can you customize the body of a spam message

/usr/share/spamassassin/10_misc.cf contains that infobut it will get overwritten if/when you upgrade versions. James Stenglein -Original Message- From: Paul Hirschorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:10 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [S

[SAtalk] Forged From addresses and whitelist rule

I can tell spamassassin which IP is the MTA for my domain? It would make sense to me that spamassassin should know what my proper MTA is, and if the header is forged, it shouldn't apply the whitelist rule. SpamAssassin 2.55 Qmail-scanner 1.60 qmail 1.03 Any ideas? James Received: from mail.q

[SAtalk] "no subject" not being prepended?

First off...Spamassassin rules.  One little issue though...   Has anyone run into an problem where spamassassin is catching the spam and trying to prepend the *SPAM* but it fails when there is no subject line?  We are using SA2.60/sendmail 8.12.10/spamass-milter on redhat 9 as a g

[SAtalk] Auto Whitelist assistance?

e default AWL settings. Thank you, James Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from spam.my.domain (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) by my.domain with SMTP (My Mail server software 1.1) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 05:38:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 15013 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Oc

[SAtalk] Feeding the Bayesian - AWL getting in the way

MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE,USERPAS S,USER_IN_WHITELIST Oct 10 11:46:58 cygnus spamd[14010]: logmsg: clean message (-80.0/5.0) for qmailq:401 in 4.9 seconds, 7096 bytes. Oct 10 11:46:58 cygnus spamd[14010]: clean message (-80.0/5.0) for qmailq:401 in 4.9 seconds, 7096 bytes. Oct 10 11:46:58 cygnus spamd[14010]: debug: ba

Re: [SAtalk] passing user: in qmail scripts

spamassassin/spamassassin.sh It should hopefully be commented enough to follow. If you go up one directory in the path above you will find additional information. (The key lines are the recipient comment though.) I hope this helps. -- Robert -- Robert James Kaes--- Flarenet Inc. ---(5

[SAtalk] Can SpamAssassin do a weighted scoring count?

Hello, I have checked various pods and archives as well as the distributed filters but can't determine if this is possible. I am running SpamAssassin on Unix Solaris 9. I have been using procmail and perl for years and until I installed SA I had rudimentary spam detection with procmail's weighte

[SAtalk] Help in Understanding how to make a local.cf file...

ow to give “Critical Update” including in the subject field, 5 points. How to give "September 2003, Cumulative Patch" included in the body 5 points. Thanks in advance for anyone who has any input on this. -- L. James -- ------

[SAtalk] No X-Spam-Report for ham?

Hi all, Trying searching the archives and Google for this, but I can't see a way to force a breakdown for ham. The X-Spam-Report works great for spam, but I'd like a breakdown for ham so I can see which rules are getting hit and/or need to be tweaked. Is there a way to do this

[SAtalk] Tagging MAILER-DAEMON's

config?). Any ideas? - James --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforg

[SAtalk] Ham and Spam script

Has anyone written a script that run sa-learn through an IMAP folder? James --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] routing only non-local mail to spamassassin

I currently have the following router statement (using exim 4.22): spamcheck_router: driver = accept transport = spamcheck local_parts = lsearch;/etc/mail/spamusers no_verify condition = "${if and { {!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} \ {!eq {$received_protocol}{spam-scanned}

RE: [SAtalk] Is no message-id header a good measure of spam?

Thanks for the input ... gives me a better understanding of the implications ... I tried to grep for MSG_ID in the cf files and could not find anything ... this could be a useful rule to incorporate I think as it was blocking A LOT of spam for us. James Herschel -Original Message- From

[SAtalk] Is no message-id header a good measure of spam?

We've got two mail servers in place right now - one is my spam gateway with spamassassin that is running with a small group of test users, and the other is the primary email server running Eudora Interent Mail Server (yuck). A colleague of mine put a bunch of filters on the EIMS server, which incl

RE: [SAtalk] Not sure if my Bayesian filter is adding to the score ...

t is there a way to combine the two separate databases? James Herschel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Deugau Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 7:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Not sure if my Bayesian filter is adding to

RE: [SAtalk] Logfile of Spam-detected mails

Yes. In your exim config, make sure you have a line in your main section: system_filter = /etc/mail/system-filter (or whatever /path/filename you want to use) Then in the system_filter file: logfile /var/log/spamlog(or whatever /path/filename you want to use) #

RE: [SAtalk] Not sure if my Bayesian filter is adding to the score ...

R/O /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks debug: bayes: 18535 tie-ing to DB file R/O /root/.spamassassin/bayes_seen debug: debug: Only 56 spam(s) in Bayes DB < 200 debug: bayes: 18535 untie-ing debug: bayes: 18535 untie-ing db_toks debug: bayes: 18535 untie-ing db_seen James -Original Message-

[SAtalk] SA 2.6 + KAV 4.5 + Exim 4.22

Has anyone had any luck integrating the latest Kaspersky smtpscanner 4.5 into a working SA + Exim config? The new KAV uses two instances of Exim - a listener and your regular config. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to

RE: [SAtalk] Not sure if my Bayesian filter is adding to the score ...

ideas? Thanks! -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:12 PM To: James Herschel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Not sure if my Bayesian filter is adding to the score ... At 10:57 AM 9/9/2003 -0400, James Herschel wrote: &g

[SAtalk] Not sure if my Bayesian filter is adding to the score ...

taking the Bayes into consideration because I'm below 200 emails in the DB right now, or am I missing something here? Thanks! James --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___

[SAtalk] exim 4.22 - spamassassin router question

Is there a way to only send mail to spamassassin if a user is in a certain list? Though this doesn't work, this is what I'm trying to accomplish: spamcheck_router: no_verify condition = "${if and { {!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} \ {!eq {$received_protocol}{spam-scanned}}} {1

RE: [SAtalk] OSIRUSOFT -- should they be used any more?

bout this. Regards, Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Miller Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 4:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] OSIRUSOFT -- should they be used any more? With all the trouble OSIRUSOFT is having, is it time

[SAtalk] OSIRUSOFT -- should they be used any more?

et us off the list before our class 'C' networks get added short of calling him or sending a fax. But I've been told that he will permanently black list anyone who calls or faxes him directly. I have complete removed all osirusoft check in SA and Sendmail. It may be time to completely remov

[SAtalk] help with spam report

I'm trying to create a script that periodically emails a report to a user with the sender and subjects of the emails that got flagged as spam. The snippet below is from my spamlog. Does anyone know how to extract just the "From: somesender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" and "Subject: details of transact

RE: [SAtalk] Appliances vs SA

On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 02:09 PM, K Old wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've been using SA for at least a year or two now and love it! We > combine it with MailScanner with ClamAV and out of 20,000 emails per > week receive no viruses and block out around 4,000 pieces of > spam.and r

[SAtalk] rule to reference list

Is there a way to have a rule reference a list in another file? For example instead of having: rawbody spammer_site/(?:site1\.com|site2\.com)/i have it access a list that contains: site1.com site2.com --- This SF.Net email spons

[SAtalk] whitelist_to alternatives

Hello, My setup is internet --> exim 4.20 (linux) --> spamassassin 2.60 (linux) --> exchange 2000. Emails flagged as spam go to a spambox on the exchange server (so I can retrieve false positives if necessary). I currently have a group of about 200 or so involved in testing the spam filtering

[SAtalk] Exim 4 w/ Remote SPAMD help

Does anyone have a working Exim 4 config that uses a remote spamd server? Having problems setting this up. --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available n

RE: [SAtalk] Bayes_journal HELP!

account since changed to deliver spam instead of sending it to /dev/null has averaged 10 spam every 510 minutes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 12:49 PM To: James Nelson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes_journal

RE: [SAtalk] Bayes_journal HELP!

2003 11:02 AM To: James Nelson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes_journal HELP! On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:50:36AM -0500, James Nelson wrote: > By default all spamassassin users have bayes enabled. do other users have write perms to that directory? -- Randomly Generated Tagli

RE: [SAtalk] Bayes_journal HELP!

like that. Yet he is the only one with this bayes_journal file. -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 10:37 AM To: James Nelson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes_journal HELP! On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:47:14AM -0500

[SAtalk] Bayes_journal HELP!

I have searched the archives and found no relavent info. So here is my questions/problems. 1) When and why is the bayes_journal file created? 2) What info is being written to this file? It appears to be various tests... Here is the problem that appears to have occurred. 1 user out of thous

[SAtalk] RE: [Mimedefang] HTML stripped from email

I'm having a similar problem and I'm still unclear how to completely disable HTML defanging in a message. I have set 'defang_mime 0' in /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf (for mimedefang) and /usr/share/spamassassin/10_misc.cf report_safe 0. What am I missing to completely disable HTML d

RE: [SAtalk] Easy to use logfile analyser

There's a perl script that analyzes spam statistics from your log files: http://www.gryzor.com/tools/#spamstats -Original Message- From: Daniel Siegers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Easy to use logfile analyser

RE: [SAtalk] hits equals required hits but slips through

That was it. I now check for at least 5 stars or hits=5.0. Thanks guys! -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:00 AM To: Test, James Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] hits equals required hits but slips through On

[SAtalk] hits equals required hits but slips through

I'm using 2.60 (though I would get the same problem with 2.55), and once in a while spam that scores a 5.0 (my required_hits is 5.0) slips through because it shows the X-Spam_Level as 4 stars instead of 5 (my check to flag as spam is to look for at least 5 stars).. Any ideas? Should I be using a

RE: [SAtalk] tricky spam

I like to make lots of custom rules (I gratifying watching how effective they can be). I have several that I update with porn words that spammers try to be clever with. In your case: body CLEVER_P0RN/(?:sexua1|0rgies|ph0t0s|sch00l)/i Notice that they use one's for the letter L, zero's

RE: [SAtalk] Missed Spam samples

([213.237.76.86] helo=polbox.com) by machiavelli.team17.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19aFip-00059A-KJ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 15:15:08 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Melva R. James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

[SAtalk] need help running spamd on remote system

I have exim 4.20 running as my MTA with multiple virus checkers, and would like to do the spam filtering on another system, can anyone who has done this successfully give some guidance. Preferably using SSL between the machines. --- This SF.N

Mystery Solved! [Was: Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not whitelisting?}

--- Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:42:31 -0400 Theo Van > Dinter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:26:42AM -0700, James > Nonya wrote: > >> Yet the email is

[SAtalk] Whitelist not whitelisting?

Any reason why the whitelist *may* not be whitelisting? Kind of odd...I've tried both: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from @domain.net Yet the email is still processed. Anything I'm missing here? __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC

[SAtalk] rules not working

Using spamassassin 2.54 + red hat 8.0 + exim 4.20. I have made some custom rules, and sometimes incoming mail seems to totally bypass my custom rules. I had a piece of spam come in that did not seem to be analyzed by my local.cf file. I can then take that same mail and forward it to go throug

[SAtalk] Razor2 check skipped & MySQL Preferences

starting spamd? The options I am currently using when starting spamd are -dqx. -James --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Mana

[SAtalk] SpamAssassin causing procmail failure?

t archives, and did some googling, and found one other user out there experiencing this, but no resolution. I've watched verbose output of both spamassassin, and procmail logging, neither provides any insight as to what the trouble could be. Any ideas? -James ---

[SAtalk] Razor error...

Has anyone come across this error, in syslog? I'm running the latest Spamassassin and Razor, almost looks like the perl net::dns isn't installed but as far as I can tell, it is... Thanks, spamd[13409]: razor2 check skipped: Transport endpoint is not connected Died at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5

RE: [SAtalk] Creating a "spam" folder in on Exchange Server, automagically...

n the first place... -Original Message- From: Upwood, James Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Creating a "spam" folder in on Exchange Server, automagically... After fighting this, I woke up this morning and bam, it hit me. This is ho

[SAtalk] Creating a "spam" folder in on Exchange Server, automagically...

After fighting this, I woke up this morning and bam, it hit me. This is how I was able to make a "spam" folder in a users exchange store without doing it manually for every account: - Open your inbox and create a new .pst file, call it whatever you want. - Create a new folder inside that .pst cal

RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users?

to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 8:00 AMTo: Upwood, James; Shayne Lebrun; SpamAssassinSubject: RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users?     Hi, I had the same problem. To see wich enviroment variables are configured I have executed an script into defaultdelivery t

RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users?

Message- From: Upwood, James Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:50 AM To: Shayne Lebrun; SpamAssassin Subject: RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users? Great, that worked... Only problem is, it is only seeing the user "root" in the DB. This makes me assume that I still have to ha

RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users?

ith a flag to use sql prefs; -q as I recall. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Upwood, James > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:04 AM > To: Andreas Haase; SpamAssassin > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without loc

RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users?

: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:08 AM To: SpamAssassin Subject: Re: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users? On Wed, 28 May 2003, Upwood, James wrote: > All I am interested in is maintaining whitelists/blacklists - per > user. Is this possible? It would be neat to be able to put a command >

RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users?

Great, looks like what I needed :) Thanks, -Jim -Original Message- From: Andreas Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:08 AM To: SpamAssassin Subject: Re: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users? On Wed, 28 May 2003, Upwood, James wrote: > All I

[SAtalk] User_prefs without local users?

I am running SA 2.54 along with sendmail (8.12.9) as the MTA on the same box. This setup is for inbound internet mail only, as it is sitting behind our firewall, and pushes mail after being "spam scanned" to our internal exchange server, hence the exchange server sends outbound mail directly. Wo

RE: [SAtalk] Forwarding and Spamd

Thanks!! Thank you, James D. Stallings > -Original Message- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 10:52 AM > To: James D. Stallings > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Forwarding and Spamd > > >

[SAtalk] spamd/spamc improvement

ed to take a Homedir: option in addition to/instead of the User: option. Any thoughts on this? It looks like it would be easy to implement James --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com Understand how to protect your customers per

Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and spamc/spamd milter problem

> On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:21:09PM -0800, James Long wrote: > > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin', `S=3Dlocal:/var/run/spamass-milter.= > sock, F=3D, T=3DC:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m') > > spamassassin and spamc aren't milters, so you're not going to get very >

[SAtalk] Sendmail and spamc/spamd milter problem

I am seeking to install spamassassin in milter mode on a FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE system. The goal is for this system to act as a spam-filtering mail server based on MX records. For mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I want to have this FreeBSD server functionioning as an MX host for example.com, preferen

Re: Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd frozen?

eg/tag On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Lars Hansson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 06:38:43 -0500 > "James D. Stallings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Does anyone know if the problems with Razor Server have been > > fixed? I would

RE: [SAtalk] Re: spamd frozen?

Is there a way to code for the freeze again... Say if this starts up disable Razor? Kind of like the P, --paranoid option? Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Treaster Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd frozen?

Does anyone know if the problems with Razor Server have been fixed? I would hate to take away the '-L' and start loosing email again. Thanks Jim Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag

Re: Re: [SAtalk] spamd frozen?

Man you forget how GREAT SA is until it dies and you have 160 emails of which 3 are good!! Thanks Jim On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Bernd Schmelter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Lindsey Simon wrote: > > I can attest to the same situation on two different servers, both > > debian woody, happenin

[SAtalk] Spamassassin causing mail to reject with Service Unavailable

SPAMD just stopped and started really messing things up. I bounced the server, stoped and started the processes for sendmail and spamd, but it keeps hosing Here is what happens: I start getting messages stating the the email service is not available and the message is sent back to the sender

RE: [SAtalk] web interface for regular users configuration

I got this to work, but my question is the ownerships. My webserver runs under apache, so the process will only work if I set the permissions to the .spamassassin directory and the user-perfs to apache. But then the spamassassin blows because it runs under the users name (pop account name). Do I

Re: Re: [SAtalk] 2 Questions: RBL and IP/domain blocking

You can enter these into access_db and place a DENY after each of the dns names. I know you can enter partials for the DNS you want to block (like: .ni and .jp, etc..) but I do not think you can do that with the access_db. I think all entires in the access_db have to be fully qualified. Any

Re: RE: [SAtalk] re: Hispeedmedia: spam with images as content

Stupid question.. But what file are you placing this in? Thanks Jim Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Michael Moncur ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > There

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

you'd like I can post my script. It also does a bunch of other things like pull the spam_limit from a SQL database, and also handle the forwarding of email to a remote address. -- Robert -- -- Robert Ja

[SAtalk] false positive - please add to "nonspam" corpus

The announcement of Debian 3.0r1 was labeled as spam, with these hits: SPAM: Hit! (2.7 points) BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list SPAM: Hit! (2.4 points) BODY: No such thing as a free lunch (2) SPAM: Hit! (1.8 points) No MX records for the From: domain The mentions of "free" had to

[SAtalk] SPAMD Rules for Scoring

I put this question in before, but messed up the Subject... so here I go again Is there a way to update the SPAMD Scoring Rules without loading a new version of the product? If so, I was unable to find the rules and if I found them... I am not sure I would know where to put them. Thanks

Re: Re: [SAtalk] Whitelisting/Blacklisting - How

Is there anyway to update your rules without doing a complete upgrade? Thanks!! Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag --- This sf.net e

[SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

Does anyone know if there is a way that I can have SA send a message that is detected as spam back to the spammer stating you are not welcome and this message is blocked...?? Or is that asking for trouble. Thanks Jim Get your own "800" number V

RE: [SAtalk] rejection notice being sent

Ok found out more information. my relay box is delieverying to the To field so that list servers and aliased accounts are delivered back to the To: and the the Delivered-To: field. anyone know how to correct this? Bryan James Armstrong Teasdale LLP [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Bryan James <[EM

Re: Re: [SAtalk] web interface?

Yes If you have a URL for this, please publish. That would be great!! Thanks Jim On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Patrick Bores ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Mark, > > I posted the file to the SATalk list. Hopefully it made it through > okay. If not, I"ll post a URL link. > Don't know about

  1   2   >