I'm using spamd which shows 139 spam registered now - I'm thinking I need a
different command because running your suggested command below strangely
reports that only 56 spams are in the DB ...

Tailing the maiilog
Sep  9 15:56:43 ahnold spamd[18508]: debug: bayes: 18508 tie-ing to DB file
R/O /var/qmail/.spamassassin/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
Sep  9 15:56:43 ahnold spamd[18508]: debug: debug: Only 139 spam(s) in Bayes
DB < 200

Running your command:
debug: Initialising learner
debug: using "/root/.spamassassin" for user state dir
debug: bayes: 18535 tie-ing to DB file R/O /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
debug: bayes: 18535 tie-ing to DB file R/O /root/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
debug: debug: Only 56 spam(s) in Bayes DB < 200
debug: bayes: 18535 untie-ing
debug: bayes: 18535 untie-ing db_toks
debug: bayes: 18535 untie-ing db_seen

James
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:52 PM
To: James Herschel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Not sure if my Bayesian filter is adding to the score
...

if you run spamassassin -D --lint it will show you a dbug line:

debug: bayes corpus size: nspam = [number], nham = [number]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Herschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


> Plus I'd just like to know how much further I
> have to go before the Bayes kicks in



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to