Thanks for your input so far! This is odd though. I sent an unmarked spam to my spam mailbox and ran "/usr/bin/sa-learn --spam --dir /home/spam/Maildir/new/" to learn the spam. I did not see the amount of spams reported in the Bayes DB increase.
Is there anyway to list the emails in the Bayes DB? Maillog says 132 spam, but does not mention anything being registered as ham. This is a little odd because I have registered about 10 emails via the nospam mailbox and sa-learn -ham. Plus I'd just like to know how much further I have to go before the Bayes kicks in ;-) Any ideas? Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:12 PM To: James Herschel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Not sure if my Bayesian filter is adding to the score ... At 10:57 AM 9/9/2003 -0400, James Herschel wrote: >Is it not taking the Bayes into consideration because I'm below 200 emails >in the DB right now, or am I missing something here? Correct. SA has only been trained with 132 spam messages so far, and will not activate bayes until the database has been trained with 200 spam and 200 nonspam (aka ham) messages. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
