Justin wrote:
> - All headers are reproduced in full. Some address obfuscation has
> taken
> place; hostnames in some cases have been replaced with
> "example.com",
> which should have a valid MX record (if I recall correctly). In
> most
> cases though, the headers appear as t
Putting on my Commercial Software hat, Deersoft is entering final beta
on our SpamAssassin for Exchange product. We're looking for beta
testers. If anyone's interested, please contact me quickly to get in.
Current version of the product is targeted at Exchange 2000; 5.5 is in
the pipeline b
Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release
it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2
support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is
"upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versions are buggy". In the 2
weeks I was gone, have things settled down
On Monday, July 8, 2002, at 08:03 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> Patrice Fournier said:
>
>> I was wondering if there was someplace where we could have a new rule
>> tested automatically against both spam and non-spam corpus to see how
>> effective it is. Is this something everyone must make on th
Hello folks,
I'm back and well rested after 2 weeks on tropical islands.
Highly recommend both Petit St Vincent
(http://www.psvresort.com) and Martinique to anyone wanting to
get away for a while.
Turns out that about a day after I left, one of my colleagues
broke my server, with the result
So the origin of the problem here is that Justin is Irish, and I
grew up in the UK so my s/z o/ou etc. spelling plus my grammar
is some weird half-assed mishmash of brit and american.
C
On Saturday, June 22, 2002, at 08:57 PM, Danita Zanre wrote:
> Only if you're an American - and by the sp
I noticed this problem at the time, but ignored it, cos I
figured anyone who actually bothered reading the changelog would
likely know what the deal was. But that was probably a bad
assumption since our userbase has started growing so huge now.
We should probably file a bugzilla ticket again
Eduardo,
It would be very helpful if you could translate as many rules as you
want (and even create new portuguese ones where appropriate). The way
to do this would be to follow the examples for the
spanish/german/french/polish rules and descriptions we already have.
See the files in rules/25*
Hmm, strange. Shouldn't be a locking issue if you're just forwarding
the mail on... Have you tried -F1 instead of -F0? And if that doesn't
fix it, try adding a : on the end of the second procmail recipe:
:0:# All messages
! etcetcetc
and see if that fixes it (though I doubt it).
C
On We
Fixed.
C
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 20:12, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
> In 20_body_tests.cf in the latest CVS:
>
> > describe NO_COSTNo suck thing as a free lunch (3)
>
>
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://l
File a bugzilla ticket on it. If I'm bored one day, I'll do it just to
get everyone to stop complaining about it :)
C
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 21:13, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> * Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020408 23:05]:
> >
> >
> > I used postgresql, wasn't a problem, but you have to re-do the tab
Not sure what the bug ever was. We do use compilenow in spamd. What
compilenow does is allow you to precompile the regexs without passing an
actual message through. It's intended to be called exactly once when
you startup a long-lived scanner process which can then fork to process
individual me
I don't remember if I replied or not -- I don't think I did though.
This looks very odd to me. It seems like it should not be having any
trouble reading the file. Try (temporarily) relaxing the ACL on the
directory/file to allow r for all on files, and rx for all on
directories (/etc, /etc/mail
--- Begin Message ---
Mr Hughes,
> Hi there Paul. I'm currently maintaining the SpamAssassin
> project for Justin Mason while he's off on vacation. He's
> the guy, by the way, who jokingly put the "profit is dirty"
> message on his webpage.
I will adjust the page to reflect that. I'll also
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 20:55, Paul Myers wrote:
> > 1. SpamAssassin does not block mail. There is no facility
> > for blocking or bouncing mail in SpamAssassin, and blocking
> > or bouncing is highly discouraged both in the documentation,
> > and on the SpamAssassin mailing list.
>
> I'll adjust
Install SA, install Razor, then run spamd without the -L flag and it'll
use Razor. Read the FAQ first though on the website.
C
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 08:27, ed wrote:
> I am curious about how others on the list have implemented Razor in their
> email systems along with SA...
>
> I have a fairly
Well, ETA for 2.2 is ASAP, so soon you won't have to know what CVS is to
get this stuff.
C
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 05:21, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> Easier... h... I dunno, I think most people would find any working non
> CVS-solution easier than having to panic while trying to figure out wha
Well, I don't know about despicable, but certainly it would have been
polite for him to contact me before publically badmouthing me and
encouraging wide distribution of his misrepresentations about my
character and my work.
C
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 22:29, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> Furthermore, his
ssassin is a
good product, not just claim "it's awesome" and then say that anyone who
criticizes it is a lunatic.
C
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 22:27, Rob McMillin wrote:
> Craig R Hughes wrote:
>
> >Hi there Paul.
> >
> [...]
>
> >
> >
> >Yours,
ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin ?
C
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 01:56, Sean Rima wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes told this:
>
> > What does spamassassin -D say?
> >
>
>
> debug: using "/usr/share/sp
Must be a holdover from some other regex system -- I think it means
"beginning of word" in some regex syntax or other, like:
\b(?=\w)
in perl
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 00:45, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Craig Hughes wrote:
> > I think the problem is you need to escape the <.
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 12:50, Ryan Hammond wrote:
> Any suggestions out there? Am I barking up the completely incorrect tree?
> Is there an easy way to verify that we are actually using procmail? etc.
Your recipe looks plausible, spamassassin seems to be working. Have you
thought of the "ask
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 21:55, Justin Wilson wrote:
> 4.Recommended procedure for taking the redhat-rc-script.sh and making it a
> startup script?
# mv redhat-rc-script.sh /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd
# chkconfig --add spamd
# service spamd start
C
___
Spamas
It's a known issue. In fact, it's in the FAQ at
http://www.spamassassin.org/faq.html
C
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 20:29, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> Hello Gurus,
>
> I hope that you are well, is there a known issue with Vipul's razor 1.20 and
>spam assassin latest released version ? I installed vipul
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 19:46, Paul Rushing wrote:
> This message pertains to using AWL and SQL options.
>
> if you will look at the spamd and Conf.pm code, you will see that
> per-user AWL files are by default defined as ~/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
>
> This depends on the setuid code in spamd
What does spamassassin -D say?
C
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 15:44, Sean Rima wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I am using the current CVS and have my local.cf with all my
> whitelist_from lines in /etc/mail/spamassassin but this is not being
> checked. Once I moved it to /
Well if it's your own formail.pl, then just change its signature line :)
The GA *can* score things higher than 4 -- it's limited to the range of
-4..4 +/- (gaussian noise of mean 0, sd=1)
C
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 07:20, Daniel Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:33:58AM
it is mutually exclusive. If you use SQL, you can in no way shape or
> form use AWL, it won't work. You can't use them both at the same time
> with the current code, so thats mutually exclusive.
>
> Brian
>
>
> On 4 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
>
> >
Thanks for your contributions while you were with us Andrew. And feel
free to come back any time!
C
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 05:27, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > You're probably trying to unreg your real email address instead of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you're still having trouble,
> > let me kno
Ok, sounds like it's worth taking a look at in 2.3
C
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 04:54, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Apr 2002, Sean Rima wrote:
> Implementing a DCC client system in Perl, grafting that into
> SpamAssassin, then enabling it with a configuration parameter to the
> SpamAssassin or
I think the problem is you need to escape the <. As far as a src=cid
rule, I don't think we have one yet in CVS -- I think there was a
bugzilla about this though, I haven't gone through in a while to flush
patches into CVS -- I'll try and do that this week so everything in
bugzilla works its way
What are the permissions on /home/spamc itself?
C
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 10:29, Shane Hickey wrote:
> Howdy all, I'm sure I'm doing something stupid, but I can't get spamd to
> start when I specify -a.
>
> I start spamd like so "spamd -d -x -F1 -u spamc"
>
> I'm starting spamc out of procmail l
2-04-04 at 12:13, Craig Hughes wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 01:50, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> > > I've not played with this since a 2.0 linux kernel, however on that if
> > > you have the transparent proxy code in place - which *terminates* the
> > > conne
I imagine he probably saw some banner ad on Sourceforge or one of the
mailing list archives, none of which have anything to do with SA, except
that we're leaching their free services.
C
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 03:02, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Blars Blarson wrote:
> > I've been testing spamassassin fo
Top ten (message IDs changed to protect the spamtraps). Note these were
when scanning with mass-check, so no network tests.
[craig@belphegore masses]$ sort -rn +1 spam.log |head -10
Y 51
/home/craig/spams/spamtrap.mbox:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SUBJ_HAS_SPACES,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_2,NO_REAL_NAME,EARN_
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 01:50, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> I've not played with this since a 2.0 linux kernel, however on that if
> you have the transparent proxy code in place - which *terminates* the
> connection (so X thinks its talking to Z but is actually talking to Y -
> if you want Z involved
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 01:40, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > So X connects to what it thinks is Z, but is really Y. Now what I want
> > to do is have Y open a connection on to Z, and transparently monitor the
>
> Y would not "monitor the traffic" but really act impersonnate Z when
> it talks to X and
Tony, I've been holding off on DCC until I thought it was a robust
enough system to use. I'm still somewhat haunted by Razor's
hiccuppiness in days gone by. In your experience is DCC nicely
stable/functional now? I was very intrigued by the project when I first
heard about it around 6 months or
My impression? Not much. Most of what arrives at my mailbox is stuff
that's semi-legitimate, like snail junk mail. It's just irritating to
have to sift through it all. Only rarely do I get stuff that's a ponzi
scheme, or a Nigerian who needs help with his millions of dollars, etc.
C
On Wed,
I'd say it's extremely unlikely to occur in anything other than a
Formail-generated email, or any discussion of Formail-generated emails.
In the corpus, it appears 6 times in nonspam, and 435 times in spam.
All the nonspam instances are bugtraq postings, which might want to be
removed from the c
Not really mutually exclusive, just probably AWL won't behave the way
you expect... It should be pretty easy to create a SQLBasedWhitelist.pm
for people who want AWL to store stuff in the SQL db. I'm really pretty
surprised noone's done it and contributed it back yet.
C
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 2
I have a question; I've run into this particular one myself before in
trying to do transparent proxying. Let's say you have client X trying
to connect to server Z, and you want to transparently proxy the TCP
connection through Y, which happens to know the protocol Z speaks. In
this instance, we'
Well, there is a release number, when there's a release. Otherwise it's
just a timestamp that identifies the whole contents of CVS; individual
files have version numbers. File a bugzilla ticket on the version
number in -h/-v thing and it'll probably get done pretty fast since it's
so easy.
You're probably trying to unreg your real email address instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you're still having trouble,
let me know and I can remove you through the admin interface I think.
C
On Wednesday, April 3, 2002, at 06:20 PM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> I can't believe I'm writing a "un
Thailand and China ;) Sometimes Korea.
C
PS Just kidding Olivier
On Wednesday, April 3, 2002, at 05:53 PM, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> On 3 Apr 2002 the voices made Craig Hughes write:
>
>> Besides, you might be a spammer in disguise, and giving you my address
>> would lea
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 16:31, Sean Rima wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Duncan Findlay yowled:
>
> > Are you using a Pentium 100 with 40 MB RAM?
>
> No a P90 with 32mb :)
Would that be one-downsmanship?
C
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTE
Wow, money and pizza! I've been offered beer before too :)
Seriously though, we're happy you like using it. And we're in it for
the love and satisfaction, not the pizza and money :)
Besides, you might be a spammer in disguise, and giving you my address
would lead to Guido and his boys showing
Thorsten,
if you create a ticket on bugzilla.spamassassin.org and attach your
script, then assign the ticket to me, I'll add it to the distribution.
C
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 10:41, Thorsten Edler wrote:
> Hello, once again!
>
> I have a working startup-script for SuSE Linux 7.1 (and with that
>
You've got a new rules file hanging around somewhere still. 2.11 didn't
understand 'uri' rules that are in CVS, which were in a newly added
file. So re-installing 2.11 replaced most of the *.cf files, but did
not remove the files that 2.11 never knew about in the first place!
Remove /usr/share/
It's not impossible -- we could have a token like _MATCH_ which could be
used in rule 'describe' sections which would be replaced by $&, and
maybe _LINE_ which would be replaced by the whole line, if a rule
matched, or something. File a bugzilla ticket on it and we'll see what
can be done. Sound
1) The fetchmail/procmail/spamc solution is probably the way to go --
install that on your high-speed-connected-not-yours machine, then
connect to that machine with your POP clients over dialup.
2) I don't know of anything that currently automatedly does the
compare-incoming-emails-for-similarity
My contribution to this discussion is going to be this:
Don't delete the mail. Keep it around somewhere, and browse it
occasionally for false positives.
C
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 07:44, Sundial Services International, Inc. wrote:
> Gentlebeings... you are all on high-speed links and you're think
Yes, please do.
C
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 06:37, Gregor Lawatscheck wrote:
> At 06:49 03/04/2002, you wrote:
> >Also, this is the second legitimate e-mail that came to me in the last
> >couple of days through osirusoft and was rejected.
>
> This is because of the RBL checking mechanism. It check
FYI, trying to get out 2.2 in the next week or so. I think we've got
enough new stuff and bug fixes, performance enhancements, etc that it's
time for a release soon. Just a little polishing, checking the docs are
up to date, re-scoring and we'll be set. nonspam.log submitters -- get
ready to ma
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 20:49, Marsha Hanchrow wrote:
> I had sent a question form to a company that manufactures ventilating
> equipment, and the reply was caught as spam. I've included only a small
> portion of the pdf attachment that probably set the CASHCASHCASH, but I
> noticed no consecuti
Just F everyone's I, the problem was LINE_OF_YELLING through a line of
.'s was yelling. Well, lines of lots of punctuations things, but in the
case mentioned here, it was the line of ..
C
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 14:36, Matthew Cline wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 April 2002 06:40 pm, Evan Martin
Just to point out -- you can still call spamc from procmail as long as
spamd is running *somewhere* -- you can point spamc to a spamd located
on a remote machine if you want to.
C
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 09:53, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
> a non-privileged user. One complicating factor is that the
> m
The trouble is though Chris that SA keeps trying to do things like open
$HOME/.spamassassin (what's $HOME set to under cygwin?), or open a
connection to syslog on localhost (does cygwin redirect syslog stuff to
the Event log or something?). I think the problem is not so much that
it won't run on
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 17:11, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> The only problems come when you get "spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-
> spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-
> spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-crash-and-burn" as
> soon as fetchmail k
Yes, I'd say relay reporting is outside the scope of SA. Even razor
reporting is a little dodgy, given that Razor has its own program to do
exactly that. But razor reporting is in there already, so I probably
won't take it out.
C
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 16:33, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Ap
Yeah, you're wrong. spamc will automagically pass the username it's
executing as to spamd. So spamc -u $LOGNAME is identical to spamc.
spamc -u somethingelse is however not the same as spamc by itself. So
the distinction is based on what userID spamc is running as. I myself
use spamc -u becau
File a bugzilla ticket on it, and attach the patch, then assign the
ticket to me.
C
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 10:12, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jim Holmes wrote:
>
> > --On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Jus
Looks like the solution is right there to me. Is there some way I could
make it more apparent? No point having the FAQ if people are seeing it,
but not finding the answer!
C
FAQ
I'm having trouble with Razor 1.20 and SpamAssassin. Help!
SpamAssassin claims that Razor is not installed when it
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 04:27, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> AHA Lists wrote:
> > I am running spamd on my redhat 6 box and spamd is taking up 5.3% memory.
> > IS this normal?
> >
> > root 3401 0.0 5.3 7848 6792 ?S08:44 0:00 perl
> > /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -a
> >
>
> This is Perl. It
No, it's not spam. It's stuff like views into SAP systems, supply chain
exception notices, things like that. Definitely stuff you don't want to
not get in your inbox immediately.
C
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 04:13, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Craig Hughes wrote:
> > Update f
It's almost certainly a rule with a "bad" regex -- could you send me an
email with attached a sample of an email that causes the high cpu usage?
Thanks,
C
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 17:33, Phydeaux wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> Today I found one of my systems almost hung because of spamd
> processes that
Try the following:
# . /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions
# killproc spamd
What does it say?
C
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 09:57, AHA Lists wrote:
> I am running this as root. Any other ideas?
>
>
>
> on 4/1/02 11:43 AM, Craig Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Only
Ok, the web page is now updated.
I also sent an email to Tiffany Shlain, GMA's "computer expert" to
hopefully clarify things with her so she's ready next time :)
C
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 09:35, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 08:41, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> > Simply use the
Only thing I can think of is you're not root when trying to run the
shutdown script, so you can't kill the process. Become root first, then
run the script.
C
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 06:57, AHA Lists wrote:
> When ever I try and stop spamd I get an error using the redhat init script.
>
> /etc/rc.
Oh my god. SpamAssassin on GMA. We're doomed.
Cheryl, I didn't see the show, but I imagine that they probably failed
to point out that SA doesn't currently run on Windows. I'll try calling
the show and seeing what they actually said, and if they want some
clarification of things...
C
On Mon,
Sounds great Ed. Could you stick the patch in a bugzilla ticket so we
can track it, then assign it to me once it's ready to roll into CVS?
Thanks,
C
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 01:30, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> I am working on a vpopmail patch to SA. My first go at it on Friday looks
> g
stop/start of both spamd and syslog, the restart didn't
> seem to hack it..
>
> Thanks for the reply,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> On 31 Mar 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
>
> > Restart it -- it needs to reopen its connection to syslog to get the new
> > tim
Restart it -- it needs to reopen its connection to syslog to get the new
time.
C
On Sun, 2002-03-31 at 19:56, Matt Dickinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in england, and following the recent time change from GMT to BST,
> I've noticed that everything on the system seems ok, apart from spamd.
> It still
Could be a missing 'From ' line at the head of the email. When you say
it shows up in the spool file, do you mean shows up when you cat/more
the file, or shows up with 'mail' instead of Pine/IMAP?
C
On Sun, 2002-03-31 at 15:22, Jeff Bacon wrote:
> Anyone else see this: spamd is running and it m
Well, you'll need mail to be able to create/read/write the contents of
the directory, do I'd say try to make it
drwxrwx--- 2 jjbacon mail4096 Mar 6 08:13 .spamassassin
So that'd be
$ chgrp -R mail .spamassassin
$ chmod g+rwx .spamassassin
C
On Sun, 2002-03-31 at 15:18, Jeff Bacon wrot
On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 23:27, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> is being destroyed by the U.S." debate here>
Mmmm, Celine Dion...
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
I'll send out the word a day or two before release (when the rules are
mostly in a state of frozen-ness) for submitters to CVS update and
re-masscheck then submit.
C
On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 21:28, Matthew Cline wrote:
> When should the mass-check results be sent in? Are they solicited before new
On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 11:54, dman wrote:
> where you simply pull a labled lever. I remember in 3rd when the
> first Bush (Sr.) election was. The teachers took us all down and we
> got to vote in the voting machine. The other problem with the
Uh, New York lets 3rd graders vote? No wonder that
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 17:10, Matthew Cline wrote:
> On Friday 29 March 2002 04:40 pm, Marsha Hanchrow wrote:
>
> > Why in the world is "body Contains at least 3 dollar signs in a row
> > CASHCASHCASH -0.839" now scored as a negative?
>
> Now SA uses a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to set the scores. I
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 22:29, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 01:38:24AM +0100, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 the voices made Rick Macdougall write:
> >
> > > From: "Craig Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
Yes, there are a number of multipart/mixed loopholes at the moment.
Planning to use MIME::Tools to do some more serious deconstruction on
the messages and their parts in future release. At the moment I'm
actually thinking it'll be in 2.3 and I'll release 2.2 in the coming
week, since the MIME::T
Ok, any socialist country will do.
C
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 09:54, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 01:10:08AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 07:27, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > > I'm *so* glad it's a 4 day weekend!
> >
> &g
Something like:
POST /path/to/script HTTP/1.1\r\n
Host: foo.bar.com\r\n
scriptvar=value\r\n
scriptvar=value\r\n
\r\n
I think. You can run netcat in listen mode:
nc -l -p 9876
Then from another terminal run wget/curl against it
curl -d 'scriptvar=test' http://localhost:9876/fake/path/script.c
root 3002 0.0 0.5 10364 8924 ?SMar19 0:04
/usr/bin/perl -w /usr/bin/spamd -D -d -L -c -a -F0
It's allocated 10364k on my machine, of which after 10 days uptime 8924
is resident in core, being around 0.5% of my 1.5GB -- this seems to be
about normal. What's taking up memory i
Try "nc" instead of "netcat" -- the nice thing about netcat/nc is that
you can pipe input to it and pipe output from it, which telnet can't.
Also, it doesn't try to negotiate telnet options, which some telnets do
sometimes.
C
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 02:09, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> mail60: netcat
>
That's not HTTP. You meant:
$ echo -e 'GET /path/to/script.cgi HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n' | netcat
www.example.com 80
or
$ echo -e 'GET /path/to/script.cgi HTTP/1.1\r\nHost:
www.example.com\r\n\r\n' | netcat www.example.com 80
Of course wget or curl is a lot easier. For posting something, you can
us
Also, SA has absolutely nothing to do with this. It just happens to be
some people who use SA discussing how to do it. It's not part of SA,
and won't be.
C
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 20:20, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 08:57:12PM -0700, Michael Moncur wrote:
> > If anyone's worr
I'm guessing you need to use some kind of deliver program to get the
mail to the right place -- what IMAP server is that? It seems to not be
expecting the user's mail spool to change without knowing about it,
which seems like a weird thing to do in a mail server, but as I said, it
probably wants
Awesome, thanks Olivier. I'll add it to CVS.
C
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 08:08, Charlie Watts wrote:
> I'm curious if most SA users are using Subject: rewriting or not.
It's the default. People are lazy. I bet it's not just the majority,
but the *vast* majority.
C
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 14:35, Shayne Hardesty wrote:
> this earlier this week.. As spamassassin evolves, rules will need to be
> updated regularly (weekly?), but I think forcing a recompile and reinstall
This shouldn't be the case, if the rules are thoughtfully produced to
start with. I'm runnin
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 07:27, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> I'm *so* glad it's a 4 day weekend!
Dammit, I need to move back to the UK
C
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Update from Silicon Valley: I've seen a couple products in the last few
days that send out emails as part of an enterprise software system where
they contain an IFRAME to embed a dynamically updating web page inside
an email. The idea is you send out an email which then provides a
container for t
Well, one issue is that rules are sometimes evals, with corresponding
updates to Mail::Spamassassin::EvalTests
You can basically do a limited CVS checkout of just the rules and
EvalTests today if you want -- cvs is very flexible that way. Or you
could checkout the whole thing, and then only inst
*/1 * * * * cd ~/code/spamassassin;cvs commit -m 'Round the clock'
;)
C
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 02:24, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Olivier Nicole wrote:
> >>In many ways, yes. They have a round-the-clock team watching honeypots
> >>for new outbreaks and updating rules accordingly. SA is much more
>
Maybe we could leave the default as SPAM and then in the docs
somewhere hidden say:
SPAM really means might be spam. Do not sue.
C
PS People have way too much time on their hands to spend so much of it
wondering about whether someone maybe might sue, and if they did,
whether they'
Just FYI, the CVS-version config file option spam_level_stars will be
useful for this purpose too, for the less procmail proficient.
C
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 23:18, Michael Moncur wrote:
> leading zero. This way everything has a 2-digit score, so now I can truly sort
> by SpamAssassin score in Ou
27 Mar 2002 the voices made Craig Hughes write:
>
> > The problem is that outgoing mail follows a different path. I'm not sure
> > where you'd interpose the "add to AWL" bit on the outbound path. I guess if
> > you know the SMTP server your MUA is sending
I still say that if they show up in court to sue anyone, they're
exposing themselves to serious countersuits. The only reason I haven't
sued a lot of spammers is because I don't think I'd be able to get any
judgement against them in a place where I could show they had assets.
If they come to me
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 20:47, dman wrote:
> Still, I think the idea of keeping a backup of the server in a
> different locality (jurisdiction) is a reasonable precaution. Come
> on, you've read (some) of the ridiculous stuff in the papers and the
> news, haven't you?
[craig@belphegore spamassassi
1 - 100 of 470 matches
Mail list logo
