Maybe we could leave the default as ****SPAM**** and then in the docs somewhere hidden say:
**** SPAM really means might be spam. Do not sue. C PS People have way too much time on their hands to spend so much of it wondering about whether someone maybe might sue, and if they did, whether they'd have a leg to stand on, and how much it'd cost to defend, and how we could do things to make SA survive, etc, etc. Geez, there's a recession going on -- get back to work! On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 13:24, Jason Kohles wrote: > On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 15:58, dman wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 09:08:43AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote: > > | > > | Some of the spam I get is -not- *commercial* mail. Just random weird bulk > > | spam nonsense. And "UNSOLICITED MAIL" is shorter. :-) > > | > > | I'm curious if most SA users are using Subject: rewriting or not. > > > > I kinda use it. I mean, it's turned on, but I only see that subject > > when I view the spam folder. I had turned it off at one point, but > > then I think I messed up my filters and thought SA was misbehaving. > > Seeing that tag in the subject is an clear pointer that my filter > > wasn't right. > > > I use it, and personally I prefer the very short 'SPAM', to the very > long and unweildy 'POSSIBLE UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL EMAIL', which I > suspect is so long that none of the original subject would be displayed > in many mail clients. > > -- > Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Senior System Architect > Red Hat Professional Consulting http://www.redhat.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
