I imagine he probably saw some banner ad on Sourceforge or one of the mailing list archives, none of which have anything to do with SA, except that we're leaching their free services.
C On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 03:02, Matt Sergeant wrote: > Blars Blarson wrote: > > I've been testing spamassassin for a month or two, and just put it > > into production on my home system (so all incoming mail will be scanned). > > > > The mailing list archives freqently have adds for a well-known spam > > support service, and the list itself is in the same IP block with a > > major company that refuses to handle their spam problem resonsibly. > > (I had to open holes in BlarsBL to subscribe to the list.) > > > > Is the former just a case of ignoring where adds are placed, does the > > company expect to be assosiated with anti-spam despite their lack of > > responsible handling of abuse complaints, or do they just think that > > a tool that spamassassin will reduce the number of complaints they > > have to handle? > > The plain answer is that there is no conspiracy to be found here. We > genuinely want to stop ALL spam. I'm not going to waste my time going > into details researching any of your claims I'm afraid. The proof is in > the code. > > Matt. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
