Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2 support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is "upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versions are buggy". In the 2 weeks I was gone, have things settled down a little with Razor releases? Traffic on the razor-users mailing list seems ambiguous to me.
What do you all think? C On Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 02:54 AM, Mike Burger wrote: > I'm sure we could live with that, too. <G> > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > >> Theo Van Dinter wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote: >>> >>>> Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the >>>> current CVS will >>>> be release ready? >>> >>> >>> Good question. I haven't seen anything on the list about a >>> planned 2.40 >>> release date yet. Hopefully soon. :) >> >> Hopefully not soon ;-) >> >> Seriously, we have a lot of big changes, and SA 2.3x works fine. I'd >> advocate a backport of the Razor2 stuff into the 2.3 branch first and >> release it as 2.32, rather than try and rush 2.40 out. >> >> Matt. >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Stuff, things, and much much more. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Stuff, things, and much much more. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
