[SAtalk] whitelist: help please ;'o(

2003-06-05 Thread Thomas Kinghorn
Hi List. Is there a way to linear search a file with domains that need to be in whitelist_from ? i.e whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED];/usr/exim/whitelist-from/clients OR whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/exim/whitelist-clients/clients}} Regards, Tom Kinghorn

[SAtalk] Get me off this list

2003-06-05 Thread Frank Chibesakunda
- Original Message - From: "Thomas Kinghorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 1:20 PM Subject: [SAtalk] way to linear search whitelists? > Hi List. > > Is there a way to linear search a file with domains > that need

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-05 Thread Dan McDonald
Jack Gostl writes: > I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I should > point my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to > "account_name:server". After I do this, I'm getting authentication > failures. I looked in my server log, and did some traces and I find > that the ac

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-05 Thread Jack Gostl
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Dan McDonald wrote: > Jack Gostl writes: > > > I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I should > > point my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to > > "account_name:server". After I do this, I'm getting authentication > > failures. I looked in my ser

[SAtalk] way to linear search whitelists?

2003-06-05 Thread Thomas Kinghorn
Hi List. Is there a way to linear search a file with domains that need to be in whitelist_from ? i.e whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED];/usr/exim/whitelist-from/clients OR whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/exim/whitelist-clients/clients}} Regards, Tom Kinghorn

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-05 Thread Jack Gostl
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote: > > > > I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I should point > > my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to > > "account_name:server". After I do this, I'm getting authentication > > failures. I looked in my server log, and did so

Re: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (nosubject))

2003-06-05 Thread Alan Leghart
--On Thursday, June 5, 2003 3:29 AM -0700 Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Alan Leghart wrote: OK. So how about the unanswered post from earlier today? --On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 11:07 AM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > When I send e-mail to some people usin

Re: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (nosubject))

2003-06-05 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Alan Leghart wrote: > OK. So how about the unanswered post from earlier today? > > --On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 11:07 AM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > When I send e-mail to some people using spamassassin it gets flagged as > > spam with the Forged-MUA-Outlook fl

Re: [SAtalk] Is there a rule for "username" in Subject line?

2003-06-05 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 05:49:48PM -0400, Michael Clark wrote: > Is there a rule for matching the username in the subject line? I've > been getting lots of spam with a subject line of "mclark, > information for you" or "webmaster turn back time." People that send You mean like USERNAME_IN_SUBJ

Re: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (nosubject))

2003-06-05 Thread Alan Leghart
--On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 1:10 PM -0700 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Listen folks -- you are all too conspiracy-minded here. The last few people who've mailed here, have fit this profile. I know, because I've followed up on it. Anyway, I've fixed the FAQ now to list my address

Re: [SAtalk] how to block or quarantine?

2003-06-05 Thread Hannu Liljemark
> I am running spamd under sendmail 8.12.9 and spamass-milter. > Incoming mail is scanned and marked. Those with a score > 5 > get the X headers with all the nice SA information. But they > still are placed into the users mailbox. Where do I set the > flag to block or quarantine mail with high scor

Re: [SAtalk] Improving my Spamassassin

2003-06-05 Thread Hannu Liljemark
> New to SA, using Postfix2 on Solaris 8. > The server is configured to relay mail internally for delivery. > > I want to run SA in a "site wide" fashion, and at the moment I don't > think it is running as best it could. > > How do I best populate the bayes DB? Run the content_filter as spamd use

[SAtalk] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2003-06-05 Thread Olivier Studer
Hello,   I would like to install spamassassin version 2.55 on Solaris 8 but I recive the following error message when I try to make : ./configurechecking for gcc... gccchecking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executablesmake: *** [binaries.mk] Error

[SAtalk] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2003-06-05 Thread Olivier Studer
Hello,   I would like to install spamassassin 2.55 on Solaris 8. But I recive the following error : "./configurechecking for gcc... gccchecking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executablesmake: *** [binaries.mk] Error 77"   I try to install by using

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-05 Thread Simon Byrnand
> > I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I should point > my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to > "account_name:server". After I do this, I'm getting authentication > failures. I looked in my server log, and did some traces and I find that > the account is begin sub

[SAtalk] Re: [SAtalk] Rép. : Re: [SAtalk] Installation onSolaris 8

2003-06-05 Thread Olivier Studer
Hi,   I have now installed gcc, perl and make for try the installation. But I recive now the following error: ./configurechecking for gcc... gccchecking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executablesmake: *** [binaries.mk] Error 77 Some body can help

[SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-05 Thread Jack Gostl
I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I should point my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to "account_name:server". After I do this, I'm getting authentication failures. I looked in my server log, and did some traces and I find that the account is begin submitted as "

Re: [SAtalk] Warning from Razor

2003-06-05 Thread Hannu Liljemark
> Sometimes when I do 'spamassassin -r' (from mutt) to report > spam to Razor2, I get the message 'Warning - unable to report > spam'. Why's this, anyone? I've looked at my razor-agent.log, > but it's not very infomative. I've noticed sometimes when manually reporting spam the authentication to th

Re: [SAtalk] I'm hoping you can help

2003-06-05 Thread alan premselaar
Daniel, (B (B (BOn 6/5/03 12:41 PM, "Daniel Miles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (B (B[...] (B> (B> Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm in @INC (@INC contains: (B> /~sausr/lib/site_perl/5.6.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i686-linux-thread (B> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.0 (B> /usr/loca

[SAtalk] I'm hoping you can help

2003-06-05 Thread Daniel Miles
I'm trying to set up a non-root spamassassin install on my account at school (CSU) because there is *no* spam filtering avaliable there. What I'm really hoping you can point me to is a no-prior-knowledge document of some sort so that I can learn what I need to learn to get it running. So, I've go

RE: [SAtalk] Restarting sa

2003-06-05 Thread The Slate Family
Hi Adam, Thinking aloud here... Would "killall spamd" be a viable replacement on Linux for: PID=`ps -auwx | grep spamd | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}'` kill -9 $PID Regards, Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adam Denenbe

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread alan premselaar
On 6/4/03 2:07 PM, "Matt Beland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (B (B[...] (B> (B> Does anyone else think this is an odd series of coincidences? Or have I (B> watched too many conspiracy movies lately? (B (Bi've always been suspicious of these emails... which is why i don't reply (B(flame or o

Re: [SAtalk] Problems with SpamAssassin and qmail

2003-06-05 Thread AltGrendel
Jason D. Montgomery wrote: I'm using qmail 1.03, SpamAssassin 2.55, Perl v5.8.0, and procmail v3.22 to run a STMP gateway server to filter spam. This system is a dedicated SMTP/SpamAssassin server and does nothing else. I'm not sure if SA is overloading the system because of the high volume of ma

Re[2]: [SAtalk] Problems with SpamAssassin and qmail

2003-06-05 Thread Subhi S Hashwa
Wednesday, June 4, 2003, 10:27:13 PM, Jason wrote: You might want to check to see if the swap you have is enough. a guesstimate of appropriate size of swap is 2x the amount of memory -Subhi -- Best regards, Subhi S Hashwa mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [SAtalk] X-SA-Relays-Trusted

2003-06-05 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:05:31PM -0600, LuKreme wrote: > After updating to SpamAssassin 2.60-cvs I noticed this new SA header. > Great idea. > > Now, where can I find documentation on it? Or is that something I need > to wait for? > > I did try searching the archives, but "No matches found

RE: [SAtalk] Calling bayes

2003-06-05 Thread urbanbuda
If you run check_bayes_db (found in SA source dir\tools) it should show you some more info about the bayes db. Bayes checks only kick in with 200+spam *and* 200+ ham. It also shows you where it is looking for the bayes db. --- This SF.net ema

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes safety zone

2003-06-05 Thread Simon Byrnand
At 10:30 1/06/03 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 08:34:52AM -0500, Tom Meunier wrote: > I don't understand the Bayes safety zone, where it's set, and why it's hard coded. > there. Looked in MAN SA-LEARN but didn't find anything. Anyone feel to make sure people don't shoot

[SAtalk] Calling bayes

2003-06-05 Thread Michael Montagne
I'm using 2.55 and spamd is being called from another script using the "-x" script. It is run by root. My bayes database files are in a users directory and specified in local.cf with: bayes_path /home/montagne/.spamassassin/bayes bayes_file_mode 0666 There are lots of spams already learned, wel

Re: [SAtalk] how to block or quarantine?

2003-06-05 Thread Cassandra Lynette Brockett
That would be in the spamass-milter configuration. You need to run spamass-milter with the "-r" command and give it the level that you want to auto-bounce the mail in. If you want to just quarantine mail - then you have to run spamassassin twice - once from spamass-milter and once from the users

[SAtalk] how to block or quarantine?

2003-06-05 Thread Pat Masterson
I am running spamd under sendmail 8.12.9 and spamass-milter. Incoming mail is scanned and marked. Those with a score > 5 get the X headers with all the nice SA information. But they still are placed into the users mailbox. Where do I set the flag to block or quarantine mail with high scores? tnx.

[SAtalk] Bayes_toks not growing in size

2003-06-05 Thread Mike Loiterman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I just looked at bayes_toks and noticed that its about 2.5 megs. I would think that it should be larger. Am I wrong? Is this limited by some switch somewhere? - -- Mike Loiterman grantADLER Medical Corporation Tel: 630

Re: [SAtalk] Problems with SpamAssassin and qmail

2003-06-05 Thread Jason D. Montgomery
I just noticed our firewall was blocking egress traffic on tcp port 2703 which SA uses for razor. Once I opened this port on the firewall, things seemed to speed up. I'm not completely sure, but I suspect this may be only part of the problem. later, j -Original Message- From: Jason D. Mo

Re: [SAtalk] @ in href

2003-06-05 Thread Mika Hirvonen
Chris Santerre wrote: Anyone seeing the @ symbol used a lot in URIs? Not really, because any URI requiring an username and/or a password isn't usually public knowledge. href="http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/mp/gh/index.html I've seen quite a few. Might be worth a looksee as the latest spammer trend.

[SAtalk] Problem installing Spamm assasins

2003-06-05 Thread Simon
I tried to install SA but get this error: -- Makefile:92: *** missing separator.  Stop.   when i tried to type this command before i type perl Makefile.PL "export LANG=en_US"   i get this error: -- ./configuremake: ./configure: Command not foundmake: *** [binaries.mk] Error 127--   Any Idea

[SAtalk] Problems with SpamAssassin and qmail

2003-06-05 Thread Jason D. Montgomery
I'm using qmail 1.03, SpamAssassin 2.55, Perl v5.8.0, and procmail v3.22 to run a STMP gateway server to filter spam. This system is a dedicated SMTP/SpamAssassin server and does nothing else. I'm not sure if SA is overloading the system because of the high volume of mail, or if it's mis-configure

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Trap

2003-06-05 Thread Evan Platt
At 12:06 PM 06/04/2003, you wrote: Hi, As I use News Groups I lay myself open to spam email harvesters. I've read Why? My e-mail address in all my posts is from [EMAIL PROTECTED] . All headers point to this address (reply-to, from, etc). My signature says "To reply, simply remove theobvious. fr

[SAtalk] Re: [Crosspost] Strange issues with user preferences and spamass-milter

2003-06-05 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jun 04), Cassandra Lynette Brockett said: > I don't know which header is actually the one being checked for the > USER_IN_WHITELIST test, but the following headers contain the (in this case > domain) information that the user has whitelisted :- > >From (yes, no : at the end th

Re: [SAtalk] @ in href

2003-06-05 Thread Matt Kettler
That's a very old trick. It's also caught by SA. Usually you see the username part try to look like a domain name (ie: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/) look for the HTTP_USERNAME_USED rule to match these. At 03:09 PM 6/4/2003 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: Anyone seeing the @ symbol used a lot in URIs? href=

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Trap

2003-06-05 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* William Stearns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Give this one a look: > http://www.stearns.org/doc/spamassassin-setup.current.html#autoreporting I've got an inexplicable problem with that. One one machine it works just fine, on my other box, i get in ~spamtrap/.procmail/proclog: >From [EMAIL PROT

Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (no subject))

2003-06-05 Thread Justin Mason
Peter P. Benac said: > Ya'll need to realize that this crap is coming from the very people Spam > Assassin was designed to block - THE SPAMMER. > Think people Spam Assassin doesn't just appear on a PC. It needs to be > installed. Perl needs to be installed, a Mail Transfer Agent needs to be > In

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Trap

2003-06-05 Thread William Stearns
Good afternoon, Jim, On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Jim Ford wrote: > As I use News Groups I lay myself open to spam email harvesters. I've read > that a neat way of thwarting them is to put on the sig line the address of > an email account expressly set up to lure spammers to send to the account, > when it

Re: [SAtalk] Web Interface MySQL For Sitewide Config

2003-06-05 Thread Cassandra Lynette Brockett
Currently as far as I know there is no web interface built into SA (even in 2.60), however I have written some scripts for use with Postgres and SA to handle user modifications of the details allowed to be modified by the systems admin. At the moment however I still have a little bit of work to do

[SAtalk] Re: [Crosspost] Strange issues with user preferences and spamass-milter

2003-06-05 Thread Cassandra Lynette Brockett
- Original Message - From: "Dan Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cassandra Lynette Brockett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [Crosspost] Strange issues with user preferences and spamass-milter > Whiteli

Re: [SAtalk] Warning from Razor

2003-06-05 Thread Ed Kasky
Allow me :-) Does it happen all the time? Did you try running it with the debug switch?? Be sure to check your config files to be sure that you have the proper setting. I made this mistake about a week ago... Check ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs and /etc/mail/spamassassin/local/cf for "use_razor2

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Troll is too good a word for these people, we need some new jargon to refer to a trolling spammer, suggestions? "lawyer?" ;) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed

Re: [SAtalk] Improving my Spamassassin

2003-06-05 Thread Stuart Gall
- Original Message - From: "Simon Crowther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:39 PM Subject: [SAtalk] Improving my Spamassassin > Hi, > > New to SA, using Postfix2 on Solaris 8. > The server is configured to relay mail internally for delivery.

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread Stuart Gall
- Original Message - From: "Matt Beland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:07 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject) > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 08:40 pm, Ryan Bingham wrote: > > Didn't this (and all the subsequent flames) just happen? Like severa

[SAtalk] Web Interface MySQL For Sitewide Config

2003-06-05 Thread David Reta
I have read that the MySQL interface is based on user prefs. My problem is that I am running SA 2.55 with Mimedefang on a gateway forwarding to exchange, so there are know user prefs stored on the servers. What I would ultimately like is to store the sitewide config in a database and use a Web Inte

RE: [SAtalk] Restarting sa

2003-06-05 Thread Adam Denenberg
i use this #!/bin/sh PATH=/var/qmail/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin export PATH case "$1" in start) echo "Starting Spamassassin" /usr/bin/spamd -a -d -L -x ;; stop) echo "Stopping Spamassassin..." PID=`ps -auwx | grep spamd | grep -v grep | awk '{prin

[SAtalk] Spam Trap

2003-06-05 Thread Jim Ford
Hi, As I use News Groups I lay myself open to spam email harvesters. I've read that a neat way of thwarting them is to put on the sig line the address of an email account expressly set up to lure spammers to send to the account, when it can then be fed into the Bayes filter and reported to Razor.

RE: [SAtalk] Restarting sa

2003-06-05 Thread Marius Kirschner
Yeah, it works like that.so why is there a 'spamd stop|start' option if we need to kill the process and restart the daemon? ---Marius > -Original Message- > From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:59 PM > To: 'Marius Kirschner'; 'Duncan Findl

[SAtalk] @ in href

2003-06-05 Thread Chris Santerre
Anyone seeing the @ symbol used a lot in URIs?   href=""http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/mp/gh/index.html">http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/mp/gh/index.html   I've seen quite a few. Might be worth a looksee as the latest spammer trend. Chris SanterreSystem Admin"A little nonsense now and then, is relished b

[SAtalk] Warning from Razor

2003-06-05 Thread Jim Ford
Hi, Sometimes when I do 'spamassassin -r' (from mutt) to report spam to Razor2, I get the message 'Warning - unable to report spam'. Why's this, anyone? I've looked at my razor-agent.log, but it's not very infomative. Regards: Jim Ford --- Thi

RE: [SAtalk] Restarting sa

2003-06-05 Thread Chris Santerre
try this ps -ef | grep spamd note process id# then kill -TERM id# then start spamd again (/usr/bin/spamd -d -c -a) or something like that. > -Original Message- > From: Marius Kirschner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:29 PM > To: 'Duncan Findlay'; [EMAIL PR

Re: [SAtalk] web interface update?

2003-06-05 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi, I've updated a version of a previous one. http://mail.limelyte.com/downloads/standalone.tgz or http://mail.limelyte.com/downloads/squirrel-plugin.tgz Regards, Rick Jonathan Nichols wrote: Anybody know where I can find a current version of the SA web interface? The one I'm using now calls

RE: [SAtalk] Restarting sa

2003-06-05 Thread Marius Kirschner
Well, if I try to stop spamd I get the following error message: Could not create INET socket: Address already in use IO::Socket::INET: Address already in use Basically, I want it to re-read the local.cf file. ---Marius > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

[SAtalk] sa-learn and SQL-Configs

2003-06-05 Thread Philip Hofstetter
Hi, I have a setup here, that is based on XAMS (www.xams.org) and I've integrated SpamAssasin to this setup. I did a little patching around in ConfSourceSQL.pm, so my installation can use the database-structure of the XAMS-Framework (with it's unique user-id as key, not the [EMAIL PROTECTED] a

Re: [SAtalk] X-SA-Relays-Trusted

2003-06-05 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:05:31PM -0600, LuKreme wrote: > Now, where can I find documentation on it? Or is that something I need > to wait for? perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf? :) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "As a general rule, don't solve puzzles that open portals to Hell."

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread Patrick Bores
Well, with all the great material gathered so far, we could just start semi-randomly auto-generating these response threads and stick them in the list whenever an e-mail like Marge's comes in. Then we could waste everyone's time without wasting everyone's time. ;-) Patrick On Tuesday, June 3,

[SAtalk] X-SA-Relays-Trusted

2003-06-05 Thread LuKreme
After updating to SpamAssassin 2.60-cvs I noticed this new SA header. Great idea. Now, where can I find documentation on it? Or is that something I need to wait for? I did try searching the archives, but "No matches found for X-SA-Relays-Trusted" and "No matches found for Relays-Trusted" --

Re: [SAtalk] Rép. : Re: [SAtalk] Installation onSolaris 8

2003-06-05 Thread Bob Apthorpe
Hi, On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 16:06:58 +0200 "Olivier Studer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Your solution doesn't work! > > Which tools must I have to make this installation? For example GCC... > And which version ? You need a C compiler, either Sun's compiler (sehr teuer!) or gcc. See

[SAtalk] web interface update?

2003-06-05 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Anybody know where I can find a current version of the SA web interface? The one I'm using now calls stuff that doesn't exist anymore (like report_header, I think) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best

Re: [SAtalk] 2.54 and RBL checks

2003-06-05 Thread Pete O'Hara
If anyone is interested I did some debugging and found that in 2.30 RBL checking code in EvalTests.pm did not strip reserved IP addresses before doing the check and somewhere along the way to 2.54 this was implemented and since I was checking with a 192.168... sender address this did not trigg

[SAtalk] The sound of one spam clapping (was: (no subject))

2003-06-05 Thread Bob Apthorpe
On 04 Jun 2003 11:54:30 -0400 AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 09:52, Chris Santerre wrote: > > > I plan on never replying to these kinds of posts again. It is a scam to > > waste our time. Hell, I may start writing a rule to put them in the spamtrap > > ;) > > > >

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread Thomas Cameron
Interestingly enough, as a test I sent an e-mail to "Marge Golomb" with a read receipt request. I got the receipt, and it appears whoever "marge" is is using OE6. TC --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best

[SAtalk] Re: [Crosspost] Strange issues with user preferences and spamass-milter

2003-06-05 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jun 03), Cassandra Lynette Brockett said: > I have seen many entries like this since configuring spamass-milter > on my site (usernames and hosts addresses that count hidden) :- > > Jun 3 16:12:16 hotline sendmail[2444]: h53NCEH02444: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > size=3600, c

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread Peter P. Benac
Ya'll need to realize that this crap is coming from the very people Spam Assassin was designed to block - THE SPAMMER. By sending this crap to the list they manage to get at least 30 of you all to send messages to the list giving advice. All this advice is doing is adding to needless mail that is

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread AltGrendel
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 09:52, Chris Santerre wrote: > I plan on never replying to these kinds of posts again. It is a scam to > waste our time. Hell, I may start writing a rule to put them in the spamtrap > ;) > Ah, Grasshopper. You have acheved true enlightenment. -- AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTEC

[SAtalk] Improving my Spamassassin

2003-06-05 Thread Simon Crowther
Hi, New to SA, using Postfix2 on Solaris 8. The server is configured to relay mail internally for delivery. I want to run SA in a "site wide" fashion, and at the moment I don't think it is running as best it could. Here is my spamassassin -D --lint output. any suggestions, or pointers to ho

Re: [SAtalk] "Marge Golomb's" go away post (was no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread Ralf Guenthner
> headers. OE6 also creates it's own message id @. The > message id, to be consistant with being sent by OE6 should be @marge. > > Y'all been suckered. :) Excellent observation, Joe! Maybe this dude or dude-ess is a "Simpsons"-Fan. I vote for list-members to ignore such complaints in the future. 8

[SAtalk] RPMS

2003-06-05 Thread Richard Humphrey
Will the 7.3 RPMS on Theo Van Dinters site work on RH 7.1? Richard Humphrey --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dr

[SAtalk] Forged -MUA-Outlook

2003-06-05 Thread sa
When I send e-mail to some people using spamassassin it gets flagged as spam with the Forged-MUA-Outlook flag (pasted below) I use out spamassassin but it does not flag any of my test mail. What triggers this flag? FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK (3.5 points) Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook SKP

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread Thomas Cameron
- Original Message - On Tuesday 03 June 2003 08:40 pm, Ryan Bingham wrote: >Or have I watched too many conspiracy movies lately? No, I think you're right on track - I was just talking to Elvis about this kind of thing the other day on the Mother Ship. -- Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE

RE: [SAtalk] "Marge Golomb's" go away post (was no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread Joe Julian
Received: from marge (ppp025.pfa.centurytel.net [207.230.201.227]) by r2d2.centurytel.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h541GkPB015914 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:16:53 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Marge Golomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PR

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread Thomas Cameron
- Original Message - From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:49 AM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] (no subject) > UNtil you figure out how to send it to the correct address. No human handles > the list. Welcom

[SAtalk] preventing sa-learn from creating user_prefs

2003-06-05 Thread Adam Denenberg
How do you prevent sa-learn from creating user_prefs file? I get this error constantly in my procmail.log file where i run sa-learn on all tagged spam Failed to create default user preference file /usr/home/spamuser/.spamassassin/user_prefs i am running SA 2.55 with -x option FYI. any ideas?

[SAtalk] Rép. : Re: [SAtalk] Installation on Solaris 8

2003-06-05 Thread Olivier Studer
Hello,   Your solution doesn't work!   Which tools must I have to make this installation? For example GCC... And which version ?   Could you send me a output trace for a good installation?   Thanks for your help. /Olivier >>> Jack Gostl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/4/2003 15:49:06 >>>On Wed, 4 Jun 2

[SAtalk] CNET downloads.com has new spam filter section

2003-06-05 Thread Chris Santerre
Like the subject says, they have a new section devoted to spam filters. As you may have guessed, no mention of SAProxy.   http://download.com.com/3150-2382-0.html?tag=dir   I can see why no mention of Spamassassin, as the site is geared towards end lusers. But SAProxy should have been inclu

Re: [SAtalk] Installation on Solaris 8

2003-06-05 Thread Bob Apthorpe
Hi, On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 14:01:05 +0200 "Olivier Studer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I need all step to install spamassassin on a server SUN Solaris 8? It's easy but requires a little reading and preparation: 1. RTFM. Download Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55.tar.gz, unpack, and read README

Re: [SAtalk] Installation on Solaris 8

2003-06-05 Thread Jack Gostl
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Olivier Studer wrote: > I need all step to install spamassassin on a server SUN Solaris 8? perl -MCPAN -e shell install Mail::SpamAssassin -- Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Et

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread Chris Santerre
Received: from marge (ppp025.pfa.centurytel.net [207.230.201.227]) by r2d2.centurytel.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h541GkPB015914 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 "from marge" Hm.. "ppp025" Hmmm. Me thinks if we contacted centurytel.net they would

RE: [SAtalk] OT: SpamAssassin in Playboy 07/2003

2003-06-05 Thread Chris Santerre
LOL, I wonder if I can get that written off as an expense! They have important tech articles now! Good to see someone talking about SA! Chris Santerre System Admin "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men." - Willy Wonka > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Kister [

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread Chris Santerre
UNtil you figure out how to send it to the correct address. No human handles the list. Welcome to the internet! -hint- check the header of EVERY email you got from SATALK list. > -Original Message- > From: Frank Chibesakunda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:1

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin Tag

2003-06-05 Thread Chadwick L. Sorrell
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 04:13, Simon Crowther wrote: > Hi, > > Can anyone point me to the file that I can edit which will allow me to > change the "This mail is probably spam" text, I wish to add a few lines > asking our users to contact our Helpdesk if they have any Qns or wish to > request whitel

[SAtalk] whitelist/blacklist confusion

2003-06-05 Thread Louis LeBlanc
Ok, this is ticking me off. I can't seem to find a certain address I am trying to blacklist. Some of you are familiar with this guy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have his relay rejected at my own server, but that doesn't seem to filter out those messages coming in via fetchmail (they have already been ac

RE: [SAtalk] Spamd & spamassassin - one works one doesn't

2003-06-05 Thread Kevin McKillop
Title: Message I have spamd running as a specific user "mailsrv" using the -u command line parameter.  I the user_prefs file has been created in the users home directory, using the template.  I haven't set anything in it, so I assume it should use the system wide defaults just as spamassassi