If anyone is interested I did some debugging and found that in 2.30 RBL checking code in EvalTests.pm did not strip reserved IP addresses before doing the check and somewhere along the way to 2.54 this was implemented and since I was checking with a 192.168... sender address this did not trigger the RBL lookups where in 2.30 it did.

Pete

Hi,
I am running SpamAssassin 2.54 and can't seem to get rbl checks working. I have "skip_rbl_checks 0" in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. I have the default rules files with plenty of RBLs to check against. When I run "spamassassin -D rbl=-9 -t < /var/tmp/test" I get the following as part of the output:


debug: Score set 1 chosen.
debug: checking RBL dnsbl.njabl.org., set njabl
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
debug: trying (3) yahoo.de...
debug: looking up MX for 'yahoo.de'
debug: MX for 'yahoo.de' exists? 1
debug: MX lookup of yahoo.de succeeded => Dns available (set dns_available to hardcode)
debug: is DNS available? 1
debug: Got the following IPs:
debug: But only inspecting the following IPs:
debug: Check_rbl returning 0
debug: checking RBL orbs.dorkslayers.com., set relay
debug: Got the following IPs:
debug: But only inspecting the following IPs:
debug: Check_rbl returning 0
debug: checking RBL ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org., set rfci
debug: Got the following IPs:
debug: But only inspecting the following IPs:
debug: Check_rbl returning 0
debug: checking RBL results in set njabl for 127.0.0.2
debug: checking RBL results in set osirusoft for 127.0.0.2
debug: checking RBL query.bondedsender.org., set relay
debug: Got the following IPs:
debug: But only inspecting the following IPs:
debug: Check_rbl returning 0


with the only entry in the dns logs being
03-Jun-2003 16:51:42.511 queries: XX+/192.168.3.101/yahoo.de/MX/IN

where as in 2.30 I have dns entries for all of the RBL servers that were being used in 2.30 rules:
03-Jun-2003 16:42:28.755 queries: XX+/192.168.3.101/microsoft.com/MX/IN
03-Jun-2003 16:42:28.764 queries: XX+/192.168.3.101/150.1.168.192.list.dsbl.org/A/IN
03-Jun-2003 16:42:28.767 queries: XX+/192.168.3.101/150.1.168.192.multihop.dsbl.org/A/IN
03-Jun-2003 16:42:28.769 queries: XX+/192.168.3.101/150.1.168.192.orbs.dorkslayers.com/A/IN
03-Jun-2003 16:42:28.772 queries: XX+/192.168.3.101/150.1.168.192.relays.osirusoft.com/A/IN
03-Jun-2003 16:42:28.774 queries: XX+/192.168.3.101/150.1.168.192.relays.ordb.org/A/IN
03-Jun-2003 16:42:28.777 queries: XX+/192.168.3.101/150.1.168.192.ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org/A/IN
03-Jun-2003 16:42:28.779 queries: XX+/192.168.3.101/150.1.168.192.relays.visi.com/A/IN
03-Jun-2003 16:42:28.782 queries: XX+/192.168.3.101/150.1.168.192.dialups.mail-abuse.org/A/IN


We are running perl-5.6.0 which in the docs from what I could tell didn't seem to be a problem.

Any help would be greatly appreciated,
Pete








------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to