--On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 1:10 PM -0700 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Listen folks -- you are all too conspiracy-minded here.

<snip>
The last few people who've mailed here, have fit this profile.   I know,
because I've followed up on it.

Anyway, I've fixed the FAQ now to list my address instead of
SpamAssassin-talk.  I'll do the same on the /tag page.

--j.


OK. So how about the unanswered post from earlier today?

--On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 11:07 AM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 > When I send e-mail to some people using spamassassin it gets flagged as
 > spam with the Forged-MUA-Outlook flag (pasted below)
 >
 > I use out spamassassin but it does not flag any of my test mail. What
 > triggers this flag?
 >
 > FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK (3.5 points)  Forged mail pretending to be from MS
 > Outlook
 >
 > SKP
 >

Are you telling me that this buffon has turned SpamAssassin into a MUA?

Perhaps we nominate as a new member of the SA development team. A SpamAssassin MUA would allow users like Marge to delete the software from their workstations. Then, "ra" can modify the code to re-install itself three days later...sort of viral and persistent.

I think not. I'll classify this one as a dumb spammer looking for more hints to re-write spam to bypass filters.

YMMV. Hopefully your changes will relieve some of the "I'm the president" posts.

--Alan


------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to