mutt-1.1.13 is out on:
ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/
Please use a mirror site for downloading; see
http://www.mutt.org/download.html for a list.
This version adds a couple of bug fixes, and a new option
named imap_force_ssl which can be used to unconditionally
access IMAP s
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:20:44AM +0200, cFischer wrote:
> > tweaked the "correct" config files. Anyway, right now I'm just too lazy to
> > throw away sendmail :)
> that is, i tried smail. easy to configure and much leaner than sendmail.
IMHO you should forget sendmail and use qmail.
* Works *
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 12:48:29AM +0200, Stefan Bender wrote:
> I'm lucky that this is my own computer and I'm my own sysadm right
> now, but you may have to ask your sysadmin to install procmail for
> you, to make it possible to move mails from /var/mail (or
> /var/spool/mail) to your home direc
On 2000-05-03 09:18:02 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> configure worked fine, but make gave me immediately:
> make: *** No rule to make target m4/funcdecl.m4', needed by aclocal.m4'.
Ups. This is a mistake in m4/Makefile.am.
funcdecl.m4 is attached.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
dnl --
I just tried to build 1.1.13 with (as far as I remember) exactly the
same ./configure parameters as worked for 1.1.12, I get the following
error on running 'make' :-
$ make
make: *** No rule to make target `m4/funcdecl.m4', needed by `aclocal.m4'. Stop
and under Solaris I get:-
borg% make
mak
I have just uploaded mutt-1.1.14. The code base is
identical to 1.1.13. However, this time, all files needed
for a successful build should be included.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
PGP signature
hi again,
q: I want to include my operating system in the header (it's
completely useless, but it's fun) with "X-Operating-System". The
problem is, the output of `uname -a` includes a "#", which gets
recognized as a comment in the .muttrc.
Any suggestions?
regards,
--
Rene Lange ([EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 10:09:47AM +0200, Rene Lange wrote:
:
:q: I want to include my operating system in the header (it's
:completely useless, but it's fun) with "X-Operating-System". The
:problem is, the output of `uname -a` includes a "#", which gets
:recognized as a comment in the .muttrc.
I
one more question :)
I have to send to ONE specific receiver the pgp signed mails clear.
Which command do I have to use in combination with the send-hook
command? pgp_clearsign_command is defined .. but now - how to use?
thanks,
--
Rene Lange ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PGP signature
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 09:09:00AM +0200, Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:20:44AM +0200, cFischer wrote:
> > > tweaked the "correct" config files. Anyway, right now I'm just too lazy to
> > > throw away sendmail :)
>
> > that is, i tried smail. easy to configure and much
i didn't find any mentioning of mutt's "filter-entry", to be found in the
compose context. what can i do with it?
tia,
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed-03.05.00-00:48, Stefan Bender wrote:
> So if you ask about my general setup, it's just qmail as MTA, a
> personal .qmail file, which runs procmail, some recipies in
> .procmailrc to sort the mails (don't forget to add a `/' for
> _maildirs_ and proper versions of procmail :) and that's it.
On Tue-02.05.00-22:56, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> The Mutt-based:
> 1) Set up a Mutt alias with the addresses and when sending your message,
> put this alias in the Bcc: field. In the To: field, put yourself or
> perhaps something like "undisclosed-recipients:;".
how do i specify an alias for sever
I am trying to make it easy to move between a set of local folders
and some remote IMAP folders. I seem to be able to go one way but not
the other.
I have in my muttrc file:-
set folder=~/Mail
which means that (unless I change it) '=' or '+' means my local mail
folder. If I haven't changed
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 10:51:20AM +0200, Rene Lange wrote:
> I have to send to ONE specific receiver the pgp signed mails clear.
> Which command do I have to use in combination with the send-hook
> command? pgp_clearsign_command is defined .. but now - how to use?
hm, on the website of mutt I f
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:20:44AM +0200, cFischer muttered:
> On Tue-02.05.00-16:34, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > After getting a little more familar with how things are done in SUSE I
> > tweaked the "correct" config files. Anyway, right now I'm just too lazy to
> > throw away sendmail :)
>
> an
> macro compose S "Fgpg --no-verbose --batch -o - --passphrase-fd 0
> --armor --textmode --clearsign %?a?-u %a? %f"
>
> .. but this doesn't work.
ok, my next try was:
macro compose S "|gpg --clearsign --armor\n"
to pipe the mail to gpg manualy. It works fine, but not really :)
The mail gets s
I set these in my muttrc file:
macro index \cb | urlview\n
macro pager \cb | urlview\n
And now when I'm in pager viewing text that contains URL
links, I press Ctl-B, but the message at bottom comes up
"Pipe command:" - am I doing something wrong, or is this
supposed to happen? I'm expecting to
cFischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 03 May 2000:
> how do i specify an alias for several email addresses?
Easy:
alias mylist alias1, alias2, alias3
It might work with full names and addresses too, I've not tried that.
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] //
Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 03 May 2000:
> I set these in my muttrc file:
>
> macro index \cb | urlview\n
> macro pager \cb | urlview\n
>
> And now when I'm in pager viewing text that contains URL
> links, I press Ctl-B, but the message at bottom comes up
> "Pipe command:" -
Hi, folks
I have some problems with mutt compiling with --enable-imap --with-ssl
--with-gpg on my debian slink box. It's a 2.0.38 Kernel with glibc 2.
I have attached the tarball with the output I get from ./cofigure and
make
Any idea?
Thanks, Kai
PS: I have asked some friends of mine. they don
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 06:57:14AM -0700, Kai Blin wrote:
> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 06:57:14 -0700
> From: Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: SSL/IMAP problem
>
> Hi, folks
>
> I have some problems with mutt compiling with --enable-imap --with-ssl
> --with-gpg on my d
Hello,
cFischer wrote on Wed, May 03 2000 08:54:36:
> procmail can be installed, if i recall this right, without
> priviledges, sgid mail and suid root. it drops priviledges as soon
> as it knows who's recipe is running and the neccessary locks are in
> place.
Yeah, some people also told this
On Wed 03.0500-08:18, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> You didn't try postfix.
no. did you? is it big 'n nasty?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Wed, May 03, 2000 at 04:50:35PM +0200, cFischer a écrit:
> > You didn't try postfix.
>
> no. did you? is it big 'n nasty?
I did. It's small 'n beautiful.
Arnaud.
PGP signature
2000-05-03-10:50:35 cFischer:
> On Wed 03.0500-08:18, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > You didn't try postfix.
>
> no. did you? is it big 'n nasty?
Nope. Postfix is not big or nasty. It is, by design: simple to
install, configure, and maintain; fast; secure; and as compatible
with sendmail as neede
I just started seeing a problem with my "mailboxes" - I
subscribe to 2 mailing lists, and I have procmail filter
mail for each of those 2 to their own mutt mailbox. I
also filtered everything else to =INBOX-Mutt. My
"mailboxes" looks like
mailboxes ! =INBOX-Mutt =in-l-dbiusers =in-l-muttusers
Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 03 May 2000:
> Now if I read in-l-dbiusers, when I finish, it tells me
> that in-l-muttusers has "N"ew mail - but there isn't any
> new mail. When I read in-l-muttusers, when I finish it
> tells me that in-l-dbiusers has "N"ew mail - but it
> doesn'
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 03 May 2000:
> Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 03 May 2000:
> > Now if I read in-l-dbiusers, when I finish, it tells me
> > that in-l-muttusers has "N"ew mail - but there isn't any
> > new mail. When I read in-l-muttusers, when I fi
--lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My problem: The envelope from is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I already tried to
set hostname =3D "innominate.de"
but to no avail. How can I specify which envelope
On Wed 03.0500-13:21, Bennett Todd wrote:
> But both Postfix and qmail are very fast and reliable and secure,
> and they're both enormously simpler to configure and maintain than
> sendmail. I'd definitely recommend removing sendmail nearly
> everywhere. There are occasional jobs that sendmail can
Mikko Hänninen [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 03 May 2000:
> > Now if I read in-l-dbiusers, when I finish, it tells me
> > that in-l-muttusers has "N"ew mail - but there isn't any
> > new mail. When I read in-l-muttusers, when I finish it
> > tells me
2000-05-03-15:33:31 cFischer:
> i'm puzzled: why's qmail with 232k only about 1/3rd the size of
> postfix?
I'm too lazy to download qmail to confirm this guess, but I'm
strongly inclined to bet that the answer is: documentation. Postfix
is very very richly internally documented.
> ah well and an
macro compose S "|gpg --clearsign --armor >/tmp/mistbuebchen\n"
PGP signature
> macro index \cb | urlview\n
> macro pager \cb | urlview\n
macro index \cb "| urlview\n"
macro pager \cb "| urlview\n"
On Wed 03.0500-12:33, Rene Lange wrote:
> macro compose S "Fgpg --no-verbose --batch -o - --passphrase-fd 0
> --armor --textmode --clearsign %?a?-u %a? %f"
hmm. 'F' flags a message. %?a? -u %a? substitutes the address, but only
if known, else this space is blank and %f takes the workload: it
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 10:35:51PM +0200, cFischer wrote:
> > .. but this doesn't work.
>
> because you don't do your homework. i'm telling you only whats in
> manual.txt. excuse me for telling the truth.
it's ok, but look below.
> > gpg is called, but says something like "Syntax: [option]
On Wed 03.0500-17:49, Stefan Bender wrote:
> Yeah, some people also told this but I wondered how does procmail
> move the mails without having privileges? To clarify it: At my
> University they installed mutt (kindly) but there I cannot move nor
> delete mails from /var/something/mail/$user, becau
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 04:28:33PM -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> Mikko Hänninen [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 03 May 2000:
> > > Now if I read in-l-dbiusers, when I finish, it tells me
> > > that in-l-muttusers has "N"ew mail - but there isn't any
>
I'm attempting to do the following:
send-hook . 'unmy_hdr cc'
send-hook user@kcls\\.org'my_hdr cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
The problem is, the header change always takes affect for the following
message instead of the current one. What am I doing wrong?
-- Scott McDermott
-- Systems & Network Admin
On Wed 03.0500-23:56, Rene Lange wrote:
> man muttrc:
now looka here! i got myself a decent, complete distribution, but no
manualpage for muttrc (5 or something?). moreover, as my little test with
"set ?" proved, at least =my= 101i would not let me use this thing. i
guess the world has to apol
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 03:52:51PM -0700, Scott McDermott wrote:
> send-hook . 'unmy_hdr cc'
> send-hook user@kcls\\.org'my_hdr cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>
> The problem is, the header change always takes affect for the following
> message instead of the current one. What am I doing wrong?
Mutt do
On Wed 03.0500-21:37, Martin Högman wrote:
> but to no avail. How can I specify which envelope from mutt should use when
> talking to my local sendmail?
1 set my_hdr from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2 /.../sendmail muss mit -f und ggf. -V aufgerufen
werden. ich nehme mal an, dass du bestenfalls ei
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 01:27:22AM +0200, cFischer wrote:
> > man muttrc:
>
> now looka here! i got myself a decent, complete distribution, but no
> manualpage for muttrc (5 or something?). moreover, as my little test with
> "set ?" proved, at least =my= 101i would not let me use this thing.
44 matches
Mail list logo
