On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 09:09:00AM +0200, Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:20:44AM +0200, cFischer wrote:
> > > tweaked the "correct" config files. Anyway, right now I'm just too lazy to
> > > throw away sendmail :)
>
> > that is, i tried smail. easy to configure and much leaner than sendmail.
>
> IMHO you should forget sendmail and use qmail.
> * Works *VERY GOOD*
> * easy and fast to configure
> * easy setup for dial-up connections with different ISPs
> * ...
> * ...
IMHO don't flame. You should nothing. I can say all of this ^^ about
postfix (www.postfix.org) and apend:
* easy everything
* easy migrating from sendmail
* ... blablabla
I don't like flames :/ Let everybody use what he likes and is used to ...
(sendmail, qmail, postfix, exim ... )
--
< Martin Mačok [EMAIL PROTECTED] <iso-8859-2>
\\ http://kocour.ms.mff.cuni.cz/~macok/ http://underground.cz/ //
\\\ -= t.r.u.s.t n.0 o.n.e =- ///
