On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 10:35:51PM +0200, cFischer wrote:
> > .. but this doesn't work.
>
> because you don't do your homework. i'm telling you only whats in
> manual.txt. excuse me for telling the truth.
it's ok, but look below.
> > gpg is called, but says something like "Syntax: [option]
> > [filename]", so it won't do.
>
> gpg has docs too, you know.
I know it, this should only show that gpg is called.
> > Please help, the person who uses the old pgp style is my boss! :)
>
> and he can't read either? aren't there any kids or old folks in the
> vicinity? they go to school every once in a while and might be of help.
the point is, to sign the mail in cleartext is not the only thing.
If this works, it's easy to encrypt the mail in the same way.
> now i'm sorry. am too tired, shouldn't do mailing.
yeah ..
> before i forget: es gibt kein pgp_clearsign_command. ich habe sogar ":set
> ?pgp_clearsign_command" eingegeben. mutt kennt die variable nicht.
man muttrc:
pgp_clearsign_command
Type: string
Default: ""
This format is used to create a "clearsigned" old-
style PGP attachment. Note that the use of this
format is strongly deprecated.
hmm, who should do his homework? btw: "F" means "filter", not "flag"
..
greetings ..
--
Rene Lange ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PGP signature
