On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 01:27:22AM +0200, cFischer wrote:
> > man muttrc:
>
> now looka here! i got myself a decent, complete distribution, but no
> manualpage for muttrc (5 or something?). moreover, as my little test with
> "set ?<var>" proved, at least =my= 101i would not let me use this thing. i
> guess the world has to apologize to me, then to you, then to the both of
> us, then i'll split in a different direction...fast...before they get me...
the muttrc manpage is in section 5.
> > hmm, who should do his homework? btw: "F" means "filter", not "flag"
>
> and i say flag! if i were you, i'd use "<pipe-message>" instead of "F",
> because that way you don't depend on key mappings.
Hm, it seems that there are very big differences between 1.0.x and
1.1.x. With my old 1.0i there was also no "pgp_clearsign_command".
And with 1.1.x there is no "pgp_default_version". "F" is definitly
Filter (don't forget, I speek about the composer)!
And if you look one or two mails earlier you will see that I already
pipe the message ... I just want to know, which parameter the
filename of the temporary vi-file is! it's not "%s" and not "%f". If
I use them gpg writes the mail to the files "%s" or "%f".
--
Rene Lange ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PGP signature
