Re: some attachments disappearing

y from within the pager by hitting the "e" key. -- Rejo Zenger E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @rejozenger | J r...@zenger.nl OpenPGP 1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532 A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4 XMPP OTR 271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF 4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF S

Re: understanding PGP encrypt to myself

key is encrypted with your and the recipients' key. That way, the message may have a large number of recipients, but doesn't increase in size as much. -- Rejo Zenger E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @rejozenger | J r...@zenger.nl OpenPGP 1FBF 7B37

Re: Saving a message as unread

.. where "[mailbox]" designates the destination. Kind regards, -- Rejo Zenger E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @rejozenger | J r...@zenger.nl OpenPGP 1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532 A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4 XMPP OTR 271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF 4BE2 E000 E708

Re: Multiple crypt-hook behavior

s for your work! -- Rejo Zenger E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @rejozenger | J r...@zenger.nl OpenPGP 1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532 A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4 XMPP OTR 271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF 4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF Signal0507 A41B F4D6 5DB4 937D E8A1 29B6

Re: Multiple crypt-hook behavior

7;t hurt I think. -- Rejo Zenger E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @rejozenger | J r...@zenger.nl OpenPGP 1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532 A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4 XMPP OTR 271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF 4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF Signal0507 A41B F4D6 5DB4 937D E8A1

Re: Multiple crypt-hook behavior

s the prompt universally annoying? Is this worth an option? If you are asking me, most definately yes. And, I am pretty sure I'm not the only one: <http://www.woolridge.ca/mutt/confirm-crypt-hook.html>. -- Rejo Zenger E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @

Re: Multiple crypt-hook behavior

++ 04/04/15 16:33 +0200 - Rejo Zenger: I have specificaly selected and configured a number of key ID's for a mailinglist. This is a deliberate action, and if a key is not available there is no need to select an alternative. Keys are always So, actually, the current situation where mutt

Re: Multiple crypt-hook behavior

One of the reasons the key selection still fails is when a key is available, but unusable (e.g. the key has expired). In that case I would like to have the option to either send the message encrypted to the remaining keys (the other crypt-hooks), or to cancel the sending of the message. Anywa

Re: Multiple crypt-hook behavior

https://github.com/rejozenger/mutt-multiple-crypt-hook -- Rejo Zenger E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @rejozenger | J r...@zenger.nl OpenPGP 1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532 A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4 XMPP OTR 271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF 4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF Signal

Re: Encrypting when possible

anything with those, but the first one is ready to implement (I am using the patch myself on a daily basis). -- Rejo Zenger E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @rejozenger | J r...@zenger.nl OpenPGP 1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532 A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4 XMPP

Re: Encrypting postponed messages

. Would it be useful to be able to encrypt, even if the message encryption flag is not set? If so, I could use some opinions, because defining the interface for that starts to get complicated. To me, that is of no particular use. Against what version is the patch you have provided?

Re: integration with mu (or similar programm)

he right track: it does open another instance of mutt, then switches back to the first instance when closing the second. Functional-wise, this does what I asked for. Thanks! Others who have replied, thanks! -- Rejo Zenger E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @

Re: integration with mu (or similar programm)

ng for something even better: having the results presented in the same window. >I'd think you could adapt this approach to your own mail indexer. Sure, sure, but it wasn't exactly what I was looking for. Second best, for now. -- Rejo Zenger E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738

integration with mu (or similar programm)

search string and have the results returned immediately. Does anyone know if this is possible - other than hacking the code of mutt? [1] http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/UseCases/SearchingMail -- Rejo Zenger E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @rejozenger | J r

Re: Encrypting to gpg groups

will be signed against ID's 0x012345678ABCDEFG and 0xABSDEFGH01234567. This doesn't work out of the box. You need to patch mutt for that. See: - <https://github.com/rejozenger/mutt-multiple-crypt-hook> - <https://github.com/rejozenger/mutt-multiple-crypt-hook/releases> Hop

Re: Cancel limit-search?

++ 21/03/14 14:13 -0400 - Peter P.: >when I run a search across a folder using the "limit" function, I >can't find a way to stop it while it is searching through messages >(apart from killing mutt). Ctl-g doesn't work. Is there any this can >be done? Limit to &q

Re: folder-hook for sending to lists

= ' in configuration file (correct me if i'm wrong >please). so perhaps a macro? Untested, probably something like the following will work: unmy_hdr To: -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail preferred . +31.6.39642738 . @rejozenger pgp8ofTavLqC2.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: how do disable Fcc?

++ 02/02/14 14:06 -0500 - glphvgacs: >right now i have: >set record = /dev/null > >but i have a feeling that's not the canonical way of doing this. any >suggestions? Untested, but I presume "unset record" will work. -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rej

Re: auto reply to html-mails

ME/body_of_autoreply.txt) | $SENDMAIL -t Or something along those lines. Untested. Procmail has lots of example in the procmailex manpage as well as on the internet. -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail preferred . +31.6.39642738 . @rejozenger pgpsJs4E3Pe5M.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: sending encrypted mail to mailinglist

replied with the notion that this would be extremely unlikely and that, under Dutch law [1], in such cases it's safe to asume it was released under GPLv2. [1] Artikel 3:35 Burgerlijk Wetboek. -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail pr

Re: sending encrypted mail to mailinglist

es do not contain any copyright or license information. The only [...] >I believe Rejo is within rights to publish these modified patches under a >GPLv2 license. IATNAL. Good catch. -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail preferred .

Re: sending encrypted mail to mailinglist

or not being able to contact owner is considered to be a problem: "orphaned works". >Credit does not mitigate copyright violation. Like I said: I am aware of that. I will not repeat quoting myself. -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail preferred . +31.6.39642738 . @rejozenger pgp5u6waLYwqt.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: sending encrypted mail to mailinglist

re is no room for these afformentioned pre- and assumptions in copyright. So, I just removed the repository from github.com. -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail preferred . +31.6.39642738 . @rejozenger pgppAigZlmT64.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: sending encrypted mail to mailinglist

++ 16/09/13 23:12 +0200 - Rejo Zenger: >I am using mutt to send encrypted e-mail to mailinglist with a small and >stable set of subscribers. In order to automate this I am running 1.5.16 >with a slightly modified patch for 1.5.6 from [1]. This patch allows me >to define multiple cry

Re: mutt: new user

nsert mode of vim already, when I see the typo. -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail preferred . +31.6.39642738 . @rejozenger pgpZVsF_o4IIT.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: mutt: new user

++ 17/11/13 08:16 -0600 - rlhar...@oplink.net: >$ mkdir -p ~/.mail/archive/(cur,new,tmp) That should have curly brackets and read: mkdir -p ~/.mail/archive/r{ur,new,tmp} -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail preferred . +31.6.39642738 . @r

Re: viewing encrypted multipart attachments

e access the encrypted attachment >> (binary/octet-stream) from within mutt. [...] >I'm not expert here, but do you have urlview installed? And what are the other >programs, don't remember but those that view the M$ word docs... (there must >be mention in the manual and/or

Re: viewing encrypted multipart attachments

lapsed and is rendered as quoted above. If I scroll down to the multipart/encrypted part, then hit enter, it'll reveal all parts it contains but it'll be shown as plain text (and I am not able to specifically select the binary/octet-stream part and hit enter to open in it's default a

Re: viewing encrypted multipart attachments

nary/octet-stream would be html or something else, the problem would remain. The shortcut "v" will show the hierarchy like this: - multipart/mixed - multipart/encrypted - text/plain But it won't make accessible what is inside the multipart/encrypted container. -- Rejo Zeng

Re: viewing encrypted multipart attachments

++ 16/10/13 17:36 +0200 - Rejo Zenger: >Sometimes, I receive e-mails that are (at least partly) encrypted and >that included attachments. I am not able to view those attachments. So, >when I open the message I see: [...] >So, in order to view the attachment, I should prees "

viewing encrypted multipart attachments

le)? Thanks for the help! -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail preferred . +31.6.39642738 . @rejozenger pgpKivyNhVAKH.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: message "could not copy" upon opening message

ing out of disk space :P)). -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail preferred . +31.6.39642738 . @rejozenger pgpyUI2XORZzF.pgp Description: PGP signature

message "could not copy" upon opening message

[...] pgp.c:520: mutt_mktemp returns "/tmp/mutt-ix-501-8083-2". Checking mailcap file: /Users/rejo/.mailcap mailcap entry: text/html; elinks -dump %s ; copiousoutput field: copiousoutput handler.c:1589: mutt_mktemp returns "/tmp/mutt-ix-501-8083

Re: sending encrypted mail to mailinglist

on some other patch. The format of the document has changed from one markup language to the other. If you do the code, I'll do the documentation. :P) -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail preferred . +31.6.39642738 . @rejozenger pgp8RemZRBFMW.pgp Description: PGP signature

sending encrypted mail to mailinglist

rk on such a journey: has anyone this done already? :) [1] http://www.woolridge.ca/mutt/multiple-crypt-hook.html -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail preferred . +31.6.39642738 . @rejozenger pgp1jFa7PcWhn.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

understand you do not want to use such a "auto-sync" fuctionality. This is why such a variable should be left off by default (and configurable). If it's off by default, I think this functionality would be a usefull addition. It's not something I am missing now per se, but I

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

#x27;t think of a reason why this would be bad (especialy if it's configurable and the default is "off"). -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: multipart/alternative question

<http://www.mail-archive.com/mutt-users@mutt.org/msg37364.html> [2] <http://www.mail-archive.com/mutt-users@mutt.org/msg37430.html> -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: accecepted ssl certificate suddenly not remembered

++ 09/07/09 21:41 +0200 - Rejo Zenger: >>Hmm. Kinda sounds like a certificate problem to me. When does your >>certificate expire? I'm guessing it expired yesterday. >[...] > >No, it will be valid for some more months. However, your remark made me >investigate th

Re: accecepted ssl certificate suddenly not remembered

openssl s_client") and it seems there is another problem with the certificate indeed. Will investigate and update when I have cleared this. Thanks a lot for the input. -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x21DBEFD4 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

accecepted ssl certificate suddenly not remembered

= 0 | read(0, "a", 1) = 1 | rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {0x4645d0, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x7f536d000100}, NULL, 8) = 0 | open("/home/rejo/.mutt_certificates", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_APPEND, 0666) = 5 | fstat(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0600, st_size=2538, ...}) = 0

Re: mutt removing stuff in brackets from subject

something like "Re: Example" or even "Re: Aw: Re: Example" (which both would match the given regular expression) it would leave the subject alone. As a result, mutt would never create a mess like "Re: Aw: Re:" - but it would leave it that way if it's there a

Re: mutt removing stuff in brackets from subject

ault reply_regexp "Re: test". I see. I expected mutt to use this regular expression to determine whether it should prepand the current subject with "Re: " or that it should leave it intact (if there is a match) - instead of removing whatever is matched and replacing i

Re: mutt removing stuff in brackets from subject

, if present, mutt will not prepend the subject with another "Re:" when replying. I don't think it will actually remove a thing from the Subject. -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Maildir or mbox?

There are two differences: the trailings slash in the mailbox name and the trailing colon on the first line of the recipe. If the colon is present, procmail will use file locking. Without the colon, procmail will not lock the file before writing. Anyway, this is off topic. :P) -- Rejo Zen

Re: Sort the mbox by arbitrary way?

++ 08/05/09 20:35 +0800 - Wu, Yue: >When I start mutt -y to read the mbox mails, mutt always sort them by >alphabetic sequence, can I configure its sorting method to fit my preference? I guess <http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html#sort> is what you are looking for? --

Re: not detecting new mail in MailDir format?

type variable inside mutt (using ":set mbox_type = maildir" in the index) and then check for mail? -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: no list-id header for mutt-u...@mutt.org

ir format. If so, than the trailing colon on the first line is superflucious. It's needed for file locking, which you want when multiple processes could write to the same file at the same time. When using maildir, you will not see that problem and therefor you don't need the file locking.

Re: no list-id header for mutt-u...@mutt.org

:mutt-us...@mutt\.org> mutt-users Or, as this header isn't supposed to look differently: :0: * ^List-Post: <mailto:mutt-us...@mutt\.org>$ mutt-users -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: quoting urls in replies

e accomplished with this command line option. I now have overruled the generic text/html mailcap entry with a specific one in ~/.mailcap, using the same line as in the generic file, but with the addition of this particular option. This seems to do the trick. thank you all for all of you

Re: quoting urls in replies

ge parts. I should tweak their configuration in order to have plain text fed into my editor, right? -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: does mutt splitting large messages?

in-efficient for sending large files. An example of a protocol that is designed for it, would be FTP. You may want to use an online service like yousendit.com - allthough I would qever use such a service myself. -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG enc

Re: quoting urls in replies

same information in the plain text version as they do in the html version. As for now, let me experiment with this. I will definately respond to this thread if the workaroudns mentioned in other postings do work for me. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mutt.user/31766 -- Rejo

Re: quoting urls in replies

x27;t change a thing in the way mutt shows the threads. So, this is no longer an issue (on itself). What does remain is the original problem: why is it that in replies the URI's are mangled? -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefe

quoting urls in replies

"set tw=72 fo+=aw smartindent" +2' set indent_string = ">" set use_8bitmime = no Anyone? Thanks in advance! -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: imap, maildir, folders with both subfolders and messages

s consistent. Just to make sure I have a correct understanding of your explanation and the documentation: the $imap_delim_chars variable just tells mutt what it should take as folder delimiter and it doesn't influence it's rendering in the folder browser. Right? -- Rejo Zenger . .

imap, maildir, folders with both subfolders and messages

contain messages. Right? Then, I noticed that in the IMAP folder listing, any folder that contains any sub-folders has this trailing dot in the name. I presume this is normal behaviour. If so, then what is the additional value of the "+" mark? Thanks a lot for the clarificati

Re: Record

a network problem than a problem with mutt itself. Can you make sure "mail.sabanciuniv.edu" is the correct hostname and is reachable for you (outside of mutt, try doing a traceroute to the server and/or manually connect on the imap port)? -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x75FC50F3 . <https:/

Re: not all attachments shown in pager

e you've outlined above has *explicitly* marked the text/plain >component as completely and fully equivalent to the subsequent >multipart/mixed component. Mutt considers the message's structure to >be essentially gospel for the purposes of rendering: if it's [...] Point taken.

Re: not all attachments shown in pager

of the | message contain more content is usefull. Right now, by looking at the | text/plain alternative (5), I missed the inclusion of a Word docment | (10) in the other alternative (6). Thanks a lot in advance! -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: not all attachments shown in pager

++ 18/12/08 10:11 +0100 - Rejo Zenger: >Aah. That makes sense. In a more simplified rendering: > > 1multipart mixed > 2 ├─>textplain > 3 └─>message rfc822 > 4 └─> multipart alter

Re: not all attachments shown in pager

++ 18/12/08 10:20 +0800 - bill lam: >On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Rejo Zenger wrote: >> |I 1 [multipa/alternativ, >> 7bit, 178K] >> |I 2 AA> [text/plain, 7bit, >> us-ascii, 1.8K] >> |I 3 AA>

not all attachments shown in pager

nother attachment, the applica/pdf part, in the message. The sender was using: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Now, the question is the same, why didn't I see the attachment in the pager? I am running mutt 1.5.17+20080114, from Debian Etch. -- Rejo Zenger . . 0x75FC50F3 . <http

Re: synchronization of two maildirs

s to need an IMAP (am I right?). Any other >programs that can work for me. If not, I may end up writing my own! I am not sure whether it suits your situation, but you may want to have a look at imapsync, see <http://www.linux-france.org/prj/imapsync/>. -- Rejo Zenger . <[EMAIL

Re: tag pattern

uot;T\[.*patch.*\]" # tag using pattern See: - http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#ss3.6 - http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttGuide/Macros -- Rejo Zenger . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Wild Cards not working with mutt ?

*.csv -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null >2. Do we have any restriction on the length of the file name to be >sent.? As I have very long file names. I don't know about that. -- Rejo Zenger . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: urls longer than terminal width in iterm

arches several times (but apparantly using the wrong keywords) and now it turns out to be such an easy solution... :) Thanks a lot. -- Rejo Zenger . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

urls longer than terminal width in iterm

ick these addresses the newline and plus sign are replaced by "+ ", resulting in an invalid URL. Is there a way to circumvent this? -- Rejo Zenger . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Mutt problem, probably with procmail

ilboxes it is useless (as you never have two processes writing to the same file). -- Rejo Zenger . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> GPG encrypted e-mail prefered. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: send-hook not working

>by more specific situations. > >Yes. First . is matched, and then ~C. Yup. -- Rejo Zenger . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: send-hook not working

es" With the first one, it doesn't work. Without the first line, it does. I am still *first* setting the default and have that default overruled by more specific situations. -- Rejo Zenger . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: send-hook not working

his line and see what else is broken. :) Thanks a lot for the help. -- Rejo Zenger . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: send-hook not working

figure out why this hook doesn't work. >> So, what is the most likely thing I am overlooking? > >This only seems to work with edit_hdrs turned off. I do not have enabled this option. According to the manual it's "no" by default and I do not get to see the headers whe

send-hook not working

-hooks's, but not send-hook's). Everything works the way I want it, but just this doesn't. I have, of course, checked the docs, the wiki and the FAQ's. Still I can't figure out why this hook doesn't work. So, what is the most likely thing I am overlooking?

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

as well as to my mailbox settings in mutt - allthough the latter possibly could be done on the run as well. -- Rejo Zenger . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . 0x75FC50F3 . <https://rejo.zenger.nl> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: OT: column 72 in mutt with xterm && vim

at 72 characters. When typing text normaly, it will wrap text at that boundary. Whenever I am editing text (adding a few words), this will no longer work automagicaly. I can then use "gqap" to reformat the paragraph and it't will rewrap again to that boundary. Works nicely - althou

Re: macro to unset flags and save to folder

"set resolve=noNO^.2008set resolve=yes" ... and it seems to work like a charm. Cool. Thanks a lot for the input. -- Rejo Zenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> https://rejo.zenger.nl signature.asc Description: Digital signature

macro to unset flags and save to folder

esume this is influenced by the "resolve" variable, but even when disabling that variable it doesn't do what I want. Does anyone have any idea? -- Rejo Zenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> https://rejo.zenger.nl signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Mail-Followup-To header, where defined?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Does anyone of you know which documents describes / defines this Mail-Followup-To header? Thanks in advance, -R. - -- # [EMAIL PROTECTED] (pgp: see headers) - http://www.sisterray.nl -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4

Re: removing duplicate messages + changing mailbox

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ++ 12/02/01 08:04 + - Nelson D. Guerrero: >Roel, the answer to that question is making a rule on your .procmailrc >to delete themThis is what I have. > >:0 Whc: .msgid.lock >| formail -D 16384 .msgid.cache >:0 a: >/dev/null The ":" on the sec

Problem with PGP linebreaks

Hi, I'm using Mutt 1.2.5i and GPG 1.0.4 on a Linux 2.2.16. I have been told the encrypted email I'm sending does not have the correct linebreaks. This is a hexdump of a part of a message I have sent to him. Linebreaks are platform-specific ("0A"; Unix style) instead of the platform- independent

Re: header problems?

++ 13/01/01 07:03 -0600 - ktb: > send to. I receive but can't send. Also some of my personal > friends have reported that they send to me and the mail is > bounced back to them. I'm using exim (debian) My isp is Most likely those problems are not related to mutt. I guess you

Re: what hook to use when setting headers depending on current folder?

esn't work for me. It seems to me that folder-hooks are overwritten by the send-hooks. I have a number of send-hooks followed by a few folder-hooks. The folder-hooks do not work as expected. The send-hooks do. Any idea how to solve this? -Rejo. -- = Rejo Zenger

what hook to use when setting headers depending on current folder?

ually writing the message. Any idea how to solve this? Thanks in advance, -Rejo. -- = Rejo Zenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] = http://mediaport.org/~sister (and my_urls.html)

PGP oldstyle signatures [2]

... and i forgot to attach the parts of my muttrc where things get loaded for GPG and PGP. -Rejo. -- = Rejo Zenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] = http://mediaport.org/~sister (and my_urls.html) PGP: see headers

PGP oldstyle signatures

to be done by GPG. I have attached both muttrc parts for GPG and PGP. This is from the main muttrc: source $HOME/.mutt/muttrc-gpg macro generic 2 ":source /home/rejo/.mutt/muttrc-pgp2\n" macro generic 1 ":source /home/rejo/.mutt/muttrc-gpg\n" This is a part of a me

Re: send-hook changing from address?

++ 17/04/00 02:21 +0300 - Mikko Hänninen: >> So, i tried this (wrapped): >> >> send-hook '~f 2[0-9]*[rfma]?(\.trap)?(NOSPAM)?(+rejo)?@sisterray.xs4all.nl' >> 'my_hdr From: Rejo Zenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' > >> This does not work

send-hook changing from address?

p)?(NOSPAM)?(+rejo)?@sisterray.xs4all.nl' 'my_hdr From: Rejo Zenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' to change From: Rejo Zenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to From: Rejo Zenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This does not work. Any idea why? [2] Another things. Is it possib

Re: [1.0.1i] slow opening of mailboxes

++ 28/03/00 15:35 +0200 - Thomas Roessler: [slow opening of mailboxes] >Do you use NFS? Nope. I'm running on a standard P3 with Linux as OS. Just the regular stuff... -Rejo. -- = Rejo Zenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] = http://mediaport.org

[1.0.1i] slow opening of mailboxes

ool/mail" SHAREDIR="/usr/local/share/mutt" SYSCONFDIR="/usr/local/etc" -ISPELL _PGPPATH="/usr/bin/pgp" _PGPV2PATH="/usr/bin/pgp" _PGPGPGPATH="/usr/bin/gpg" Any idea what the problem is? -Rejo. -- = Rejo Zenger

one mailboxes, no new mail found

Hi, I have several folders, but in two of them no new mail is noticed (when browsing thru folders with new mail or looking for folders marked with N in the folderlist). One of them is /home/rejo/mail/spam-usenet, although i seem to have set up everything correct: $ la mail/spam* -rw

Re: Extra space in Subject

the mentioned >effect. The default reply_regexp ("^(re|aw):[ \t]*") should not show >this behavior. Mmm... let me see: $ grep reply_regexp .muttrc set reply_regexp="^(re|aw):[\t]*" Looks like i'm using the default, but with a space left out. I will add the s

Extra space in Subject

Foobarbaz everytime i reply. Any idea where this comes from, and what i should do to avoid this behaviour? -- = Rejo Zenger [Sister Ray Crisiscentrum] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = http://mediaport.org/~sister (and my_urls.html) PGP: s

Re: macros - is there any logic about when they work or not?

++ 30/11/99 09:13 + - Chris Green: >2 - The manual is wrong about using ^ to indicate control characters. I guess it depends from system to system (and possibly the way of quoting). Could people on different systems try this? -Rejo. -- = Rejo Zenger [Sister Ray Crisiscent

Re: my_hdr question.

++ 27/11/99 09:58 +0200 - Mikko Hänninen: >Rejo Zenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 26 Nov 1999: >> send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'my_hdr From: Rejo Zenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' >> send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'my_hdr Reply-To: Rejo Zenger <[EMAIL

small send-hook problem

nmy_hdr Reply-To:' send-hook . 'unmy_hdr Cc:' send-hook . 'set reverse_name' send-hook . 'set signature=~/.signature' send-hook . 'set attribution="++ %{%d/%m/%y %H:%M

Re: error

. Usually located in /usr/share/vim/syntax/. -Rejo. -- = Rejo Zenger [Sister Ray Crisiscentrum] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = http://mediaport.org/~sister PGP: see headers

Re: How to deal with duplicate messages

Hi, i wrote: ++ 13/11/99 21:01 +0100 - Rejo Zenger: >> :0 Wh: msgid.lock >-^ >> | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache > >There shouldn't be a space there. You'd better change this to > :0 Wh :msgid.lock > :0 Wh:msgid.lo

Re: Colors

++ 13/11/99 11:37 -0500 - Subba Rao: >Each time I start mutt, I get the following errors. >Error in /home/subb3/.muttrc, line 65: default: no such color Change default to black (or whatever your background is or should be) and i guess your problem is gone. -Rejo. -- = Rejo

Re: How to deal with duplicate messages

er/personal/procmailrc. I think you can safely rewrite the second part of the recipes above to: :0a | formail -a X-Note: Message-ID seen before recently." Hope this helps. -Rejo. -- = Rejo Zenger [Sister Ray Crisiscentrum] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = http://mediaport.org/~sister PGP: see headers

  1   2   >