Re: Encrypting postponed messages

[Rejo Zenger]

++ 07/01/15 14:57 -0800 - Kevin J. McCarthy:

I'm wondering if that is sufficient for people interested in the patch,
or whether a quadoption for postpone_encrypt would be more useful.  For
a quadoption, I would keep the behaviour the same: the quadoption would
only be consulted if the message encryption flag was set.

Thanks for the patch, I will apply it one of these days. Seems to be a usefull addition for me. I don't need the quadoption solution, but that may be different for other people. However, a quadoption would somewhat make it more consistent with the other options.

Would it be useful to be able to encrypt, even if the message encryption
flag is not set?  If so, I could use some opinions, because defining the
interface for that starts to get complicated.

Against what version is the patch you have provided?






--
Rejo Zenger

To me, that is of no particular use. E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @rejozenger | J r...@zenger.nl

OpenPGP   1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532  A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4
XMPP OTR  271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF  4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF

pgpqj5KBWf9GJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature