* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Mon-01 21:49 -0700]:
>
>sorry in advance for the vim question, but i'll bet
>someone here knows the answer :>
you should've been sorry if you were using emacs :)
>and (i can't resist)... one more quick vi / vim question.
>is there a quick way to make
David wrote:
> Hmmm, don't use them? :)
yes probably good advice...
> Let's see... you get 'A', 'B', etc, in insert or in command mode? I
> can't reproduce either situation with 5.8 (std debian(x86) potato
> package here). Perhaps it has something to do with your terminal/OS.
> Looks like 5.
Gary Johnson wrote:
> This behavior is controlled in part by the 'comments' option, the
> default value of which is:
>
> s1:/*,mb:*,ex:*/,://,b:#,:%,:XCOMM,n:>,fb:-
thanks. since vim was installed in my home dir and since i don't have
an /etc/vimrc, this value wasn't set. copying /etc/vimr
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:46:52PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> i'm using vim 5.8 here (use 5.6 on most of my other machines i think).
> with vim 5.6 if i type 'gqip' quotes are preserved, but on the machine
> with 5.8 (ok i just checked on my work machine and with 5.7 too) it
> ignores the quote
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:46:52PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> so this:
> > adsfdasf adsf asdf adsf asdfl kjlkjkljk
> > adsf lkjkljkadfs adslf
> > adf adfs adfs test test test
>
> (gqip)
> turns into:
> > adsfdasf adsf asdf adsf asdfl kjlkjkljk > adsf lkjkljkadfs adslf > adf
> adfs adfs test
sorry in advance for the vim question, but i'll bet someone here knows
the answer :>
i have a copy of mutt setup in my home directory on a shell account that
i don't have root access for. i also installed vim 5.8 here since their
version of vim is old.
i'm using vim 5.8 here (use 5.6 on most of
Josh --
...and then Josh Huber said...
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
%
% > someone. I'm considering using --lsign-key to keep things quiet but
% > I then need to figure out how to differentiate between locally
% > signed and globally signed keys for when I "care".
%
% I accidentally
--mvpLiMfbWzRoNl4x
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 at 18:18:09 +0200, Enrique de la Torre wrote:
> I'm a spanish mutt user. I use emacs as editor:
>=20
>
> set editor=3Demacs # reall
--uQr8t48UFsdbeI+V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 at 16:12:25 -0400, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote:
[...]
> What do you guys do? Put up with the warning? Sign the key even if
> you're not sure
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:53:24AM +0200, Björn Lindström wrote:
>
> I don't use procmail; I use maildrop. What does this procmail recipe do? I
> would like to translate it into maildrop.
>
I use maildrop and this is what I use to convert clearsign's
hello,
is there any way to make mutt prompt me to add an alias
based on some other field, other then From: ?
thanks,
denis
--
// mailto: Denis Perelyubskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
// icq : 12359698
// PGP : http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~denisp/files/pgp.asc
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 08:13:39AM -0700 or thereabouts, Ryan Allen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just curious what people are using for an address book application
> if anything at all?? I use vim as my editor for mutt, and would like to
> know if there are any applications avaliable that work well with
Thus spake Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> you can set an option to use the old style of encryption; i'm not sure
> if there's an easy way to make mutt automatically check signatures that
> use the old style method, although i'm sure a quick search on google
> would turn up something regardin
--19HmC3QOnaNVzKTI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 at 13:47:32 +0200, Cedric Duval wrote:
> * Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09/16/01 05:47]:
> > A temporary workaround is something like thi
--da9oBGf5DLtF9ehv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 at 17:19:26 -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Will --
>=20
> ...and then Will Yardley said...
> % David T-G wrote:
> % > > it seems kind of silly to m
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:53:24AM +0200, Björn Lindström wrote:
I don't use procmail; I use maildrop. What does this procmail recipe do? I
would like to translate it into maildrop.
> I think this widely circulated piece of code in your .procmailrc
> should take care of that.
>
> --
Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010918 01:50]:
> you can set an option to use the old style of encryption; i'm
> not sure if there's an easy way to make mutt automatically
> check signatures that use the old style method, although i'm
> sure a quick search on google would turn up something regar
* Jean-Sebastien Morisset ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010917 13:15]:
> I'm really enjoying GnuPG, especially the auto-fetch feature for unknown
> keys (which never worked for me in PGP). As I accumulate public keys, I'd
> like to lsign the keys (--lsign-key cmdarg) to remove that little warning.
> Unfort
Matt Spong wrote:
> While we're on the subject of GPG, why is it that mutt's method of
> signing messages seems to differ from that of every other mailer on
> the planet? It doesn't seem to recognize some signatures, either (for
> example, those of Jean-Sebastien Morisset on this list) - the text
David T-G wrote:
> Ah :-) Well, you can't use the Bourne shell without proper licensing,
> and GNU/Linux is all about free stuff. There's a written-from-scratch
> PDksh public domain ksh out there, but bash is the only ready-today
> free sh clone (and then some :-) out there.
ahh forgot about t
Hi all
While we're on the subject of GPG, why is it that mutt's method of
signing messages seems to differ from that of every other mailer on the
planet? It doesn't seem to recognize some signatures, either (for
example, those of Jean-Sebastien Morisset on this list) - the text of
the signature
J-S --
...and then Jean-Sebastien Morisset said...
% I'm really enjoying GnuPG, especially the auto-fetch feature for unknown
% keys (which never worked for me in PGP). As I accumulate public keys, I'd
*grin* Ah, the bliss of using the proper tool :-)
% like to lsign the keys (--lsign-key cmd
Thomas --
...and then Thomas Kniep said...
% Hi ...
Hello!
%
% I have read all the mails about the missing N Flag on not so new mails but
% none of the tips seam to work for me.
It can be confusing. What you describe actually sounds like the correct
behavior.
%
% I am using the latest De
Cliff --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
% Hello
Hi again!
% Now that I have joined the mutt fan club I would like also to
*grin*
% somehow read news messages with it..
Check out the nntp patches; there are two or three out there.
% Is this feasible ?
Yep. After all, it's mutt, eve
Will --
...and then Will Yardley said...
% David T-G wrote:
% > > it seems kind of silly to me - i rarely use the bourne shell but i
...
% >
% > No, it's not silly at all -- /bin/sh is one of the things that can be
...
% > Doing away with /bin/sh would be a Very Bad Thing.
%
% agreed. i meant
Thus spake Jean-Sebastien Morisset ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> What do you guys do? Put up with the warning? Sign the key even if
> you're not sure? Use the X-PGP-Fingerprint header as a second
> validation? Use fingerprints in signatures?
Personally, I put up with the warning and sign the key only w
I'm really enjoying GnuPG, especially the auto-fetch feature for unknown
keys (which never worked for me in PGP). As I accumulate public keys, I'd
like to lsign the keys (--lsign-key cmdarg) to remove that little warning.
Unfortunately, there's no good way to authenticate the key.
What do you guy
David T-G wrote:
> > it seems kind of silly to me - i rarely use the bourne shell but i
> > like the fact that it's there in bsd systems (and that if i specify
> > /bin/sh that's exactly what i'm getting).
>
> No, it's not silly at all -- /bin/sh is one of the things that can be
> found on any un
Hi ...
I have read all the mails about the missing N Flag on not so new mails but
none of the tips seam to work for me.
I am using the latest Debian mutt (1.3.22i) on an a Debian potato system. I
use the courier-IMAP-Server. And this N Flag just does not seam to work for
me.
I have new mail in
Hello
Now that I have joined the mutt fan club I would like also to
somehow read news messages with it..
Is this feasible ?
Is it ridiculous ?
--
Regards
Cliff
Alexander Wasmuth wrote:
>
> I don't know how it works (but it does), it comes with newer version of
> mutt (contrib/gpg.rc) and there isn't any screen output after
> encrypting.
Actually it has nothing to do with the original question. But in the
current mutt tarball (1.3.22.1i) in all of the
Jean-Sebastien Morisset schrieb:
> > What kind of output? Can you give a dump?
>
> After I select the key, GnuPG displays:
>
> ---BEGIN---
> gpg: using secondary key BB114335 instead of primary key C9B99AE1
> gpg: No trust check due to --always-trust option
> gpg: writing to `-'
> gpg: ELG-E/CA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:11:33PM +0200, Victor Yegorov wrote:
>>
my passphrase and have the message sent. Instead, I have to view GnuPG's
output and press enter. I'm sure GnuPG users have come up with some
>
> What kind of output? Can yo
On 2001.09.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Cliff Sarginson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
> I like to have threads collapsed by default.
> However I would like some indication in the index display
> that a message is the first in a thread.
> Anyone know how I can do this ?
Use %M, or %?
Hello
I like to have threads collapsed by default.
However I would like some indication in the index display
that a message is the first in a thread.
Anyone know how I can do this ?
--
Regards
Cliff
hi all,
I'm a spanish mutt user. I use emacs as editor:
set editor=emacs # really simple ;)
Everytime I save an email, emacs shows a warning asking me to select
the character coding system, because it finds some non ASCII
characters (iso-8859-1):
The target
Hi Gary:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:39:28AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> Your mailcap looks fine. Do you have a line like this in your muttrc?
>
> auto_view text/html
No. Thanks!
> You'll need that to have HTML content expanded in-line. What is MSHTML?
A standard for sending multi-part ema
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 08:13:39AM -0700, Ryan Allen wrote:
> What are people using out there, and how are they set up?
> Cut and Paste is only efficient for so long
abook
http://abook.sourceforge.net/
HTH
Andre
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 08:13:39AM -0700, Ryan Allen wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I'm just curious what people are using for an address book application
| if anything at all?? I use vim as my editor for mutt, and would like to
| know if there are any applications avaliable that work well with mutt
| and vim
Hi,
I'm just curious what people are using for an address book application
if anything at all?? I use vim as my editor for mutt, and would like to
know if there are any applications avaliable that work well with mutt
and vim. Curses based would be great, much like pine uses.
What are people us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Make sure your pgp_getkeys_command option is empty. If it tries to execute
a script which doesn't exist, it will cause this effect.
LateR!
js.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 05:27:25PM -0400, Gord Mc.Pherson wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>Does anyone know how
Dan et al --
...and then Dan Boger said...
% On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 06:46:08AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% > % is it possible to include an attachment into mails automatically
% > % (like a signature) ?
...
% > that creating the Attach: header by hand will attach a file (yep, just
% > tested it).
* Jean-Sebastien Morisset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [17.09.2001 13:55]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thanks, but my wait_key is set to 'no'. :-)
>
Well, first thing at my mind.
>
> >> my passphrase and have the message sent. Instead, I have to view GnuPG's
> >> output and pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks, but my wait_key is set to 'no'. :-)
LateR!
js.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:14:07PM +0200, Victor Yegorov wrote:
> * Jean-Sebastien Morisset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [17.09.2001 12:19]:
>> I just switched to GnuPG from PGP a little while ago, and s
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 06:46:08AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> % is it possible to include an attachment into mails automatically
> % (like a signature) ?
>
> Let's see, here... Back in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Adam
> Lazur asked if anyone had such a thing, and I haven't seen any reply.
> That might be
* Jean-Sebastien Morisset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [17.09.2001 12:19]:
> I just switched to GnuPG from PGP a little while ago, and so far I really
> like everything -- the options make more sense, and the screen output is
> nicer. My only problem is that when I encrypt/sign, I'd like to just enter
> my
Johannes --
...and then Johannes Zellner said...
% Hi,
%
% is it possible to include an attachment into mails automatically
% (like a signature) ?
All of the time? Hmmm... That's an interesting one.
A while back there was discussion of a macro, probably in vim rather
than in mutt, to scan fo
David --
...and then David Champion said...
% On 2001.09.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
% "David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% >
% > % Quoting FreeBSD's "man sh" [from the listing of special parameters]:
...
% > Aha! I don't use BSD (yet), so I don't have access to that, or at least
...
Will --
...and then Will Yardley said...
% David T-G wrote:
% > Aha! I don't use BSD (yet), so I don't have access to that, or at
% > least hadn't thought to search the web for a copy of the freebsd sh
% > man page. My linux system doesn't even have a man page for sh,
% > preferring info or wha
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 19:18:19 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > but as I said before, you can get what you're looking for by modifying the
> > terminfo description. there's no need to modify the C code.
>
> But then, this will break the applications
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:25:31AM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
[...]
> another that it does or doesn't). I think the solution here is to
> specify an absolute path to ssmtp, but I may be wrong.
an absolute path helped! Thanks for this trivial tip.
--
Johannes
Hi,
is it possible to include an attachment into mails automatically
(like a signature) ?
--
Johannes
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 09:15:58AM -0800, Tim Johnson wrote:
> Hello All:
> Does mutt have the ability to "translate" MSHTML to that
> the text will appear in the body of the message?
> I'm using mutt 1.2.5i on RH 6.0
> Below is the text of my ~/.mailcap
> ###
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 04:42:10PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
| David T-G wrote:
| > Aha! I don't use BSD (yet), so I don't have access to that, or at
| > least hadn't thought to search the web for a copy of the freebsd sh
| > man page. My linux system doesn't even have a man page for sh,
| > pr
54 matches
Mail list logo
