On 2010-02-23, Ted Walther wrote:
> I have so little upload bandwidth I don't want to waste
> any; only 80k up on a good day,
"on a good day" implies that it's variable - unless you know the actual
bandwidth you have available, or are prepared to set a lower value that
gives sufficie
hi misc@
someone from Germany sent me an irda/usb dongle a few
weeks ago, sadly i accidentally deleted his mail from
my mbox and need to get back in touch with him.
if you recognize yourself, mail me ;)
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
freelance developer/sysadmin/consultant
http:
On 23 February 2010 12:59, Ted Walther wrote:
> I have a simple setup; a soekris box running 4.6 doing NAT for my local
> network.
>
> I'd like a configuration to give skype traffic top priority, then my DNS
> server, then ssh sessions, then http and SSL, then everything else, and
> bittorrent. I
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 04:04:39PM +0200, Aram H??v??rneanu wrote:
> Besides what's written above. EAL is meaningless unless you read the
> Protection Profile. EAL is the assurance level *against* the
> protection profile. If your PP specifies only that in your systems,
> users login using password
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:51:28PM +0200, Aram H??v??rneanu wrote:
> EAL4 is meaningless. The auditor is not required to view the software
> in any way (binary or source).
Wrong. EAL4 is the lowest EAL that includes ADV_IMP.1, which in turn
requires checking the actual implementation, i.e. source
Ted Walther wrote:
> I'd like a configuration to give skype traffic ...
SIP and H.323 are the two open protocols for VoIP. Ports has pjsua and
Ekiga.
http://www.pjsip.org/pjsua.htm
http://ekiga.org/
There are many others and they can be used to call any other SIP-phone
(or H.323
On 2/22/2010 9:23 AM, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
Unless some benefactor is willing to come forward and deal with the
logistical headache of doing the paperwork and keeping it all as
up to date as it needs to be, it's not going to happen, even if
getting an EAL meant ponies, rainbows, and money trees
I would ignore this if you don't like Off topic posts, and flame me if
you so wish, just there is a small discussion going on in a debian mail
list and this post made me chuckle a bit...reminded me of Jason's
presentation about bsd dying. In hindsight, why I said anything in the
first place I will
On 2010-02-23, Michal wrote:
> I would ignore this if you don't like Off topic posts, and flame me if
> you so wish, just there is a small discussion going on in a debian mail
> list and this post made me chuckle a bit...reminded me of Jason's
> presentation about bsd dying. In hindsight, why I sa
On Monday 22 February 2010, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 19:47, Jean-Francois wrote:
> > Seems appropriate in the latest man, but did not appear in my man page.
> > The -R is'nt available in version 4.4 ? any way to proceed ?
>
> As far as I know, softraid didn't support rebuild
On Monday 22 February 2010, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Making again the test on 4.6 Now I have "bioctl: BIOCCREATERAID: Invalid
> argument" however on a another machine. Am I wrong in any point ?
>
> Is there any need to compile raid into the kernel as I saw here ?
> http://www.argon18.com/raid_openbsd
I have a daemon process I've written and trying to debug, however,
whenever it crashes, I get no core file.
1. The daemon does a setrlimit of RLIMIT_CORE to RLIM_INFINITY (same as
if I had done "ulimit -H -c unlimited" in the shell before starting the
process).
2. The daemon sets its working dire
On Feb 23 13:36:56, Anthony Howe wrote:
> I have a daemon process I've written and trying to debug, however,
> whenever it crashes, I get no core file.
>
> 1. The daemon does a setrlimit of RLIMIT_CORE to RLIM_INFINITY (same as
> if I had done "ulimit -H -c unlimited" in the shell before starting
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:35:11PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Feb 23 13:36:56, Anthony Howe wrote:
> > I have a daemon process I've written and trying to debug, however,
> > whenever it crashes, I get no core file.
> >
> > 1. The daemon does a setrlimit of RLIMIT_CORE to RLIM_INFINITY (same as
On 23/02/2010 14:35, Jan Stary whispered from the shadows...:
> On Feb 23 13:36:56, Anthony Howe wrote:
>> I have a daemon process I've written and trying to debug, however,
>> whenever it crashes, I get no core file.
>>
>> 1. The daemon does a setrlimit of RLIMIT_CORE to RLIM_INFINITY (same as
>>
hi misc,
i have two outgoing DSL connections using PPPoE.
i've read about mpath in the FAQ (together with ifstated(8)) and
scoured the PF examples but i haven't found any straightforward
examples using PPPoE.
any pointers or advice would be most welcome.
/e
On 23/02/2010 14:35, Jan Stary whispered from the shadows...:
> On Feb 23 13:36:56, Anthony Howe wrote:
>> I have a daemon process I've written and trying to debug, however,
>> whenever it crashes, I get no core file.
>>
>> 1. The daemon does a setrlimit of RLIMIT_CORE to RLIM_INFINITY (same as
>>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:10:16PM +0800, Edwin Eyan Moragas wrote:
> hi misc,
>
> i have two outgoing DSL connections using PPPoE.
>
> i've read about mpath in the FAQ (together with ifstated(8)) and
> scoured the PF examples but i haven't found any straightforward
> examples using PPPoE.
>
> a
Hello,
I have 2 SATA drives without an additional SATA controller on this
box. I have tried this in ATA Mode, and also in AHCI mode. Disk reads
are 50% higher. Userland compilation takes 55min when the usual on
other similar hardware is 35 min.
Could somebody check my dmesg and comment? It bring
* Michael Lechtermann [2010-02-22 22:45]:
> Hi,
>
> >>> it's a slightly weird side-effect. a quick glance indicates that the
> >>> tzero timestamp is part of the stats struct and tables don't keep
> >>> stats/counters by default any more. for some time tho. i don't
> >>> remember any recent chang
* Andreas Mueller [2010-02-22 23:57]:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> > err? packets matching the state are of course queued in the queue
> > specified in the rule, what else?
>
> Maybe I am influenced too much with linux traffic-shaping/firewalling.
> And from that point, I was not concious about what
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:40:29PM +0100, Michael Lechtermann wrote:
> >>> it's a slightly weird side-effect. a quick glance indicates that the
> >>> tzero timestamp is part of the stats struct and tables don't keep
> >>> stats/counters by default any more. for some time tho. i don't
> >>> remember
* Alex Carver [2010-02-23 05:53]:
> I've been working on getting gpsd working on one of my old Sun IPXes
> but I've run into a problem with ldattach needing the /dev/cuaa
> device. The serial port /dev/ttya is working with gpsd directly but
> ldattach requires /dev/cuaa. However, according to th
You need -current to have a fighting chance with that server.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:10:45AM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have 2 SATA drives without an additional SATA controller on this
> box. I have tried this in ATA Mode, and also in AHCI mode. Disk reads
> are 50% higher.
Here's a little "do nothing" daemon server that demonstrates the problem.
---
#include
int
main()
{
(void) daemon(1,1);
(void) chdir("/tmp");
printf("before uid=%d euid=%d\n", getuid(), geteuid());
(void) setuid(1);
printf("after uid=%d euid=%d\n", getuid
Anthony Howe wrote:
>>
>> Are you possibly catching the signals yourself?
>
> I trap several signals, but not SIGABRT.
>
> I handle these myself...
>
> SIGHUP
> SIGINT
> SIGQUIT
>
> And ignore these...
>
> SIGPIPE
> SIGTERM
> SIGALRM
> SIGXCPU
> SIGXFSZ
> SIGVTALRM
>
> The daemon is threade
* Dan Harnett [2010-02-23 17:19]:
> 'pfctl -t tablename -T expire ' is also currently broken.
> Everything appears to be removed from the table immediately regardless
> of ''.
>
> $ sudo cat /etc/pf.conf
> table persist counters
>
> $ sudo pfctl -vv -t testing -T add 172.16.1.8 172.16.1
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> * Alex Carver [2010-02-23 05:53]:
>> I've been working on getting gpsd working on one of my old Sun IPXes
>> but I've run into a problem with ldattach needing the /dev/cuaa
>> device. The serial port /dev/ttya is working with gpsd directly
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:17:58AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Jason Beaudoin
> wrote:
> > not necessarily.. I had a wacky HD controller that provided similar
> > results in dmesg, but if the op asked, I'm guessing that isn't the
> > case :P
> >
>
> Ok I am runni
It's "brand new".
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:31:20AM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
> Why would that be , Marco? What special about this hardware?
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > You need -current to have a fighting chance with that server.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 23,
Why would that be , Marco? What special about this hardware?
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> You need -current to have a fighting chance with that server.
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:10:45AM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have 2 SATA drives without a
On 2010-02-23, Edwin Eyan Moragas wrote:
> hi misc,
>
> i have two outgoing DSL connections using PPPoE.
>
> i've read about mpath in the FAQ (together with ifstated(8)) and
> scoured the PF examples but i haven't found any straightforward
> examples using PPPoE.
>
> any pointers or advice would b
I just upgraded a production server to -current (needed latest PostgreSQL)
I also am using a forum and wanted to add a second forum using
PostgreSQL (first has been using mysql)
This software supports doing this.
All is working fine, except one script called from crontab to send out
subscript
On 2010-02-23, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I just upgraded a production server to -current (needed latest PostgreSQL)
Did you upgrade all packages? Specifically, any Perl XS modules must
have been built with a version of Perl matching the Perl binary, so if
you didn't upgrade these (e.g. DBD::Pg) that
> 3. The program does not use file system setuid bits, BUT does use the
> setuid() et al. system calls to drop privileges from root to some other
In OpenBSD -- if you change uids, you don't get core dumps.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Anthony Howe wrote:
> Without the call to setuid, then the daemon will create a core file in /tmp.
>
> What I would like to know is how to get a core file when the daemon
> program uses setuid/seteuid family of functions, which appears to make
> it subject to kern
On 2010-02-23, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Dan Harnett [2010-02-23 17:19]:
>> 'pfctl -t tablename -T expire ' is also currently broken.
>> Everything appears to be removed from the table immediately regardless
>> of ''.
>>
>> $ sudo cat /etc/pf.conf
>> table persist counters
>>
>> $ sudo
B.B. Capacitaciones Sin LC-mites
Curso-Taller de ActualizaciC3n:
b La Planilla de Pagob
B!CADA CENTAVO CUESTA!
Este seminario consultivo le servirC! al departamento de
Planilla, Recursos Humanos y Contabilidad para Actualizarse
en la incidencia del Nuevo Salario MC-nimo, ademC!s del manejo
de
Hi,
>> I don't remember any changes in that area lately so this puzzles me.
>> do we know when this breakage was introduced, approximately?
>>
>
> I found a couple of boxes with May 2009 kernels where expire
> works as expected. I can't think of anything I have running code
> dated between then a
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2010-02-23, Chris Bennett wrote:
I just upgraded a production server to -current (needed latest PostgreSQL)
Did you upgrade all packages? Specifically, any Perl XS modules must
have been built with a version of Perl matching the Perl binary, so if
you didn't
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 05:24:30PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Dan Harnett [2010-02-23 17:19]:
> > 'pfctl -t tablename -T expire ' is also currently broken.
> > Everything appears to be removed from the table immediately regardless
> > of ''.
> >
> > $ sudo cat /etc/pf.conf
> > table
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Anthony Howe wrote:
>> Without the call to setuid, then the daemon will create a core file in
/tmp.
>>
>> What I would like to know is how to get a core file when the daemon
>> program uses setuid/seteuid fami
On 23/02/2010 20:56, Philip Guenther whispered from the shadows...:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Anthony Howe wrote:
>>> Without the call to setuid, then the daemon will create a core file in /tmp.
>>>
>>> What I would like to know is
> On 23/02/2010 18:28, Theo de Raadt whispered from the shadows...:
> >> 3. The program does not use file system setuid bits, BUT does use the
> >> > setuid() et al. system calls to drop privileges from root to some other
>
> > In OpenBSD -- if you change uids, you don't get core dumps.
>
> Which
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:28:17PM -0500, Dan Harnett wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 05:24:30PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > I don't remember any changes in that area lately so this puzzles me.
> > do we know when this breakage was introduced, approximately?
>
> I have narrowed it down to be
> On 23/02/2010 21:09, Theo de Raadt whispered from the shadows...:
> >> On 23/02/2010 18:28, Theo de Raadt whispered from the shadows...:
> 3. The program does not use file system setuid bits, BUT does use the
> > setuid() et al. system calls to drop privileges from root to some other
> >
On 23/02/2010 21:09, Theo de Raadt whispered from the shadows...:
>> On 23/02/2010 18:28, Theo de Raadt whispered from the shadows...:
3. The program does not use file system setuid bits, BUT does use the
> setuid() et al. system calls to drop privileges from root to some other
>>
>>> In O
> I just find it odd from a practical view point that kern.nosuidcoredump
> no longer applies, though understand from a security view point that one
> would want to avoid slip ups by the developer between setuid and seteuid
> or in forgetting to restore the setting to a secure mode after debugging.
On 23/02/2010 21:24, Theo de Raadt whispered from the shadows...:
>> On 23/02/2010 21:09, Theo de Raadt whispered from the shadows...:
On 23/02/2010 18:28, Theo de Raadt whispered from the shadows...:
>> 3. The program does not use file system setuid bits, BUT does use the
>>> setuid()
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Alex Carver [2010-02-23 05:53]:
I've been working on getting gpsd working on one of my old Sun IPXes
but I've run into a problem with ldattach needing the /dev/cuaa
device. The serial port /dev/ttya is working with gpsd directly but
ldattach requires /dev/cuaa. However
Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Henning Brauer
wrote:
* Alex Carver [2010-02-23 05:53]:
I've been working on getting gpsd working on one of my old Sun IPXes
but I've run into a problem with ldattach needing the /dev/cuaa
device. The serial port /dev/ttya is working w
On 23/02/2010 21:34, Theo de Raadt whispered from the shadows...:
> Instead, as a group our policy is to turn these things on, not make it
> easy for them to be turned off, and thus enforce the policy strictly,
> and thereby we educate people using these functions to get used to the
> choices they
Hi everybody,
A few months ago, I upgraded my home server to new hardware. I've performed
a clean install of 4.6 (and follow -stable), and since the machine now has
a multi-core CPU, I chose the MP kernel. The machine works fine, but I've
noticed some sudden resets (and subsequent automatic boots)
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Anthony Howe wrote:
> On 23/02/2010 20:56, Philip Guenther whispered from the shadows...:
...
>> Look Ted, you perhaps should feel guilty about other things, but not
>> that: Anthony's test program dumps core in /var/crash/ Just Fine with
>> kern.nosuidcoredump=2
Hello,
I had a R201 running in 4.6 i386 stable..I was told this configuration
was very new.. so I got a new box this time its a PowerEdge is R200
without any special PCI SATA controller. With 2 SATA II Hard Disks.
BIOS Sata setting is set to be in ATA Mode (its either this or OFF).
Either after
Your disks are still wd so io sucks. Use -current.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 03:22:28PM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had a R201 running in 4.6 i386 stable..I was told this configuration
> was very new.. so I got a new box this time its a PowerEdge is R200
> without any special PCI S
[IMAGE]Congreso Nacional iMex
Internet Marketing Experts 2010 - MC)xico D.F.
Sponsored By:
WSI We Simplify the Internet - Google - Congress & Marketing
Fecha: Viernes 26 de Marzo de 2010 - Sede: Crowne Paza Hotel de MC)xico
Objetivos y beneficios
"B?QuC) puede hacer la mercadotecnia en internet po
Hi.
Is there any way to change / update _ACx values in thermal zone?
My notebook HP Compaq 6510b seems to have a broken ACPI, and I want to
play a bit with it.
Thanks.
--
Rafal Brodewicz
Hi Guys,
I'm about to order myself a YubiKey for use with my desktop, I may be
able to purchase aditional ones to donate to the project if any
developers are interested in polishing off support for OpenBSD, the
majority of tools available in the developer section are released under
a BSD licen
Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have.
I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been
testing on various operating systems lately. That's how well they do
while under disk io load, concurrently.
An example would be to tar -zxvf a large t
I'm planing to get a Dell R610 with single Xeon 5570
(since it's the only supporting the 5570)
and and dual Intel PRO/1000 ET for routing/pf.
I jumped on this
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=126350942910630&w=2
and
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=126015771720104&w=2
mentioning about proble
> I'm planing to get a Dell R610 with single Xeon 5570
> (since it's the only supporting the 5570)
> and and dual Intel PRO/1000 ET for routing/pf.
>
> I jumped on this
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=126350942910630&w=2
> and
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=126015771720104&w=2
>
> ment
On 24/02/10 02:59, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
I jumped on this
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=126350942910630&w=2
and
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=126015771720104&w=2
mentioning about problems with R610 and OpenBSD.
I've also found these 2 bug reports for R610:
http://marc.info/?l=o
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:10:16PM +0800, Edwin Eyan Moragas wrote:
>> hi misc,
>>
>> i have two outgoing DSL connections using PPPoE.
>>
>> i've read about mpath in the FAQ (together with ifstated(8)) and
>> scoured the PF examples but i ha
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-02-23, Edwin Eyan Moragas wrote:
>> hi misc,
>>
>> i have two outgoing DSL connections using PPPoE.
>>
>> i've read about mpath in the FAQ (together with ifstated(8)) and
>> scoured the PF examples but i haven't found any straigh
On 24/02/10 03:13, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Bot the R610 and R710 had issues (2nd generation bnx(4) was
unsupported, and the disk performance sucked). Two people stood up and
contributed one of each to the project, and these issues were
resolved. Getting these leading edge machines into our hands i
where's your dmesg? have you tried a -current snapshot?
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 18:20, Noah McNallie wrote:
> Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have.
> I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been
> testing on various operating systems lat
> > Bot the R610 and R710 had issues (2nd generation bnx(4) was
> > unsupported, and the disk performance sucked). Two people stood up and
> > contributed one of each to the project, and these issues were
> > resolved. Getting these leading edge machines into our hands is
> > always the best way t
On 2010/02/24 09:37, Edwin Eyan Moragas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > On 2010-02-23, Edwin Eyan Moragas wrote:
> >> hi misc,
> >>
> >> i have two outgoing DSL connections using PPPoE.
> >>
> >> i've read about mpath in the FAQ (together with ifstated(8)
On 02/23/2010 08:47 PM, Bryan wrote:
where's your dmesg? have you tried a -current snapshot?
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 18:20, Noah McNallie wrote:
Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have.
I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been
testin
Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Henning Brauer
wrote:
* Alex Carver [2010-02-23 05:53]:
I've been working on getting gpsd working on one of my old Sun IPXes
but I've run into a problem with ldattach needing the /dev/cuaa
device. The serial port /dev/ttya is working w
Hello,
I believe that these disks are SATA II
(http://www.seagate.com/ww/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=6278576e14ee9110VgnVCM10
f5ee0a0aRCRD)
and thus would always fall under wd driver as per the man page.
I believe that sd is for scsi only. Is this assumption correct?
Andres
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 a
On 02/23/2010 08:47 PM, Bryan wrote:
where's your dmesg? have you tried a -current snapshot?
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 18:20, Noah McNallie wrote:
Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have.
I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been
testin
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Noah McNallie wrote:
> if by -current snapshot you mean openbsd 4.6 then yes, that's what i'm
> using.
>
>
By looking at the head of dmesg(8) output or by the following command:
$ sysctl kern.version
...you will get information pertaining to the version installe
Not. You can run OpenBSD 4.6 and run 4.6-Release, 4.6-Stable(Release +
patches) or 4.6-Current. So 4.6 doesn't say much about what in fact
you are running. The description of each one is in :
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors
But, only your dmesg could say exactly what you are running a
I run them with multi 10Gb adapters and over 16TB of storage as my lab
infrastructure box. Compiles pretty darn nicely, yay 16 cores ;-)
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:59:54AM +0200, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> I'm planing to get a Dell R610 with single Xeon 5570
> (since it's the only supporting th
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:46:57PM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I believe that these disks are SATA II
> (http://www.seagate.com/ww/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=6278576e14ee9110VgnVCM10f5ee0a0aRCRD)
> and thus would always fall under wd driver as per the man page.
>
> I believe that sd
* Dan Harnett [2010-02-23 21:19]:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:28:17PM -0500, Dan Harnett wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 05:24:30PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > > I don't remember any changes in that area lately so this puzzles me.
> > > do we know when this breakage was introduced, approx
* Alexander Carver [2010-02-24 04:01]:
> Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Henning Brauer
> >wrote:
> >>* Alex Carver [2010-02-23 05:53]:
> >>>I've been working on getting gpsd working on one of my old Sun IPXes
> >>>but I've run into a problem with ldattach needing the
79 matches
Mail list logo
