On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 09:21:46PM +, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just realize that there is no generation of the rtf file if the
> user hypertext support is checked.
> In that case, a pdf file is displayed.
Is this only with rtf, or also with e.g. HTML and .doc?
Can
Hello,
I just realize that there is no generation of the rtf file if the
user hypertext support is checked.
In that case, a pdf file is displayed.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Hello,
I downgraded to latex2rtf-2.3.11, but I get the same behavior.
I none word when I ask for a rtf convertion from lyx, it does not generate
the rft file but display the pdf file.
If I want the rft file, I need to generate a latex (plain) file first and
then to run latex2rtf.
Any ideas
=
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2017 at 2:42 AM
> From: "Richard Heck"
> To: "Patrick Dupre" , lyx
> Subject: Re: convert to rtf
>
> On 09/07/2017 08:02 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have one machine with fedora 24 and on
On 09/07/2017 08:02 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have one machine with fedora 24 and one with fedora 26 (both with lyx 2.2.3)
> When I convert the lyx file to a rtf file, it works well on the
> fedora 24 machine, and it does not work on the machine with
> fedora
Hello,
I have one machine with fedora 24 and one with fedora 26 (both with lyx 2.2.3)
When I convert the lyx file to a rtf file, it works well on the
fedora 24 machine, and it does not work on the machine with
fedora 26.
In both file .lyx/configure.log, I have the same:
\converter latex
On 08/03/2017 06:04 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Version 2.2.3
But the my other concern is about the fact that I can easily get the
pdf file
from lyx, but not from teh .tex file generated by lyx.
Does lyx use a special option of latex?
As Guenter pointed out in your other thread, it makes a diffe
ue, France
===
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 at 8:58 PM
From: "Paul A. Rubin"
To: "Patrick Dupre" , lyx
Subject: Re: lyx to rtf
On 08/03/2017 02:42 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
When I trie to generate a rtf file from lyx, I do not get
any thing.
I can gener
On 08/03/2017 02:42 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
When I trie to generate a rtf file from lyx, I do not get
any thing.
I can generate a tex file from lyx (plain latex), but then
I use latex2rtf and I get:
Formalism_NL_v5.tex:1774 Unknown command '\bm'
Formalism_NL_v5.tex:1783 C
Hello,
When I trie to generate a rtf file from lyx, I do not get
any thing.
I can generate a tex file from lyx (plain latex), but then
I use latex2rtf and I get:
Formalism_NL_v5.tex:1774 Unknown command '\bm'
Formalism_NL_v5.tex:1783 Cannot open 'Formalism_NL_v5.bbl'
Form
On 09/08/2014 03:57 AM, Renato wrote:
Hi,
I'm newbe to lyx. I often plays with Latex and I found Lyx a very usefull tools.
I've just started using it, and I have two principal question:
1 - how can I handle .rtf file?
Sorry, what do you want to do with the RTF file?
Richard
Hi,
I'm newbe to lyx. I often plays with Latex and I found Lyx a very usefull tools.
I've just started using it, and I have two principal question:
1 - how can I handle .rtf file?
for the second, I will open another post.
TIA
Renato
Hi,
I want to send some collaborators a document who do (and will) not use LyX or LaTeX. Therefore, I am trying to export it to either RTF (preferred) or ODT.
The LyX-file contains subdocuments and a BibTeX-bibliography. I am using LyX 2.1, Windows 7 and MikeTeX.
When I am using the RTF
iled on searches), and it does provide an option to switch between
numbered and numbered sections.
> What are the rtf2latex2e calling parameters?
> Maybe you should call rtf2latex2e with the option -p1, not higher, see
> documentation.
Yes, I have tried -p1.
> That is a big difference
h that I did not want LaTeX to give me.
What are the rtf2latex2e calling parameters?
Maybe you should call rtf2latex2e with the option -p1, not higher, see
documentation.
> When I typed the document(s) in Word or Writer, [...]
That is a big difference. rtf2latex2e is aimed at Word's rtf o
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 10:26 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
>>
>> Richard,
>>
>> Does LyX XHTML output preserve enough LyX metadata to be suitable as
>> an import format?
>
> You mean back into LyX?
Yes. With XML formats becoming ubiquitous that seems like
On 05/14/2012 10:26 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
Richard,
Does LyX XHTML output preserve enough LyX metadata to be suitable as
an import format?
You mean back into LyX?
Richard
Richard,
Does LyX XHTML output preserve enough LyX metadata to be suitable as
an import format?
Nico
--
On 05/14/2012 08:36 AM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
Hi guys
Either rtf2latexe does a very bad job, or I'm missing some tips on its usage.
It looks to me as if this is under active development:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=374868&group_id=22324&func=browse
so you could try reporting bug
t and structure (i.e.
sectioning). There is no need to deal with figures or tables, and even
retaining formatting (bold and italic fonts) is not a requirement.
Paragraph spacing should conform to LyX settings, whereby an empty
line is removed if there is no provision for such spacing in LyX.
This way, one
it does, it means that a brace { or } or a backslash is missing
or misplaced in the rtf output.
For bugfixing it would be helpful if you send me a sample file which
shows the problem, by personal mail.
Regards, Wilfried
--
Wilfried Hennings
whiskey hotel underscore november golf at golf mike xray dot delta echo
Janwillem van Dijk writes:
Just managed to get something workable straight to docx.
File Export LyX → HTML (MSWORD)
pandoc -f html mypaper.html -t docx -o mypaper.docx
Only a few tweaks like
1) change all .png into .eps as I want the original eps in the docx
2) change font to Tim
Just managed to get something workable straight to docx.
File Export LyX <../LyX.html> ? HTML (MSWORD)
pandoc -f html mypaper.html -t docx -o mypaper.docx
Only a few tweaks like
1) change all .png into .eps as I want the original eps in the docx
2) change font to TimesNewRoman
3) change alignmen
Thanks Wilfried, I thought already of the newer versions. However, I
cannot compile the source on Linux; qmake just does nothing. I als
tried 2.1.1 on Windows but there my problems persist. As an example
the LaTeX line (from export as pdflatex):
\item Use operational
Janwillem van Dijk wrote:
> Unfortunately removing -p has no effect and both LibreOffice 3.5.2.2
> and Word 2007 give the same result.
Then something is broken.
By the way, latex2rtf 1.9.19 is quite old (released Nov 2007).
The current Unix version 2.1.0 was released March 2010, and there is
2.1
Unfortunately removing -p has no effect and both LibreOffice 3.5.2.2
and Word 2007 give the same result.
The eLyXer route gives reasonable html which can be copied into LO or
Word but need a little reformatting. However, in the eLyXer output the
order of references (coming from a *.bib export o
Janwillem van Dijk wrote:
> I have a paper written in Lyx that when exported to rtf produces more or
> less garbage. Everywhere where there is inline math the text get
> corruptes. Also the references in the text are corruped. The references
> come from a BibTeX that is an export
Janwillem van Dijk writes:
> Use operational quantities defined in
> ICRU51: H\s\do5(p)\(0.07\),
> H\s\do5(p)\(3\)
> and H\s\do5(p)\(10\)
> where it should be Hp(0.07) etcetra with H italic and p roman
> subscript coming from $H_{\mathrm{p}}(0.07)$
Please hav
Dear Rainer,
Thanks for your answer. I guess you men "Conversion to doc via pandoc"
of 16-04-2012. Browsing the discussion this looks promising.
Unfortunately my LyX and LaTeX skills are sub-standard and I would
greatly appreciate some more detailed step by help on the use of \format
and \conv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/04/12 21:42, Janwillem van Dijk wrote:
> I have a paper written in Lyx that when exported to rtf produces more or less
> garbage.
> Everywhere where there is inline math the text get corruptes. Also the
> references in the text
&g
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2012, 21:42:08 schrieb Janwillem van Dijk:
> I have a paper written in Lyx that when exported to rtf produces more or
> less garbage. Everywhere where there is inline math the text get
> corruptes. Also the references in the text are corruped. The references
>
I have a paper written in Lyx that when exported to rtf produces more or
less garbage. Everywhere where there is inline math the text get
corruptes. Also the references in the text are corruped. The references
come from a BibTeX that is an export from Zotero.
an example:
Use terms and
e:
>
> On May 2, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>
>> I load the RTF into OpenOffice (NeoOffice to be correct) into
>> which I have installed the writer2latex extension and export as
>> Ultraclean. That I manipulate a little with TexShop removing the
&
On May 2, 2011, at 7:37 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
> On May 2, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>
>> I load the RTF into OpenOffice (NeoOffice to be correct) into which
>> I have installed the writer2latex extension and export as Ultraclean.
>> That I manipula
On May 2, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> I load the RTF into OpenOffice (NeoOffice to be correct) into which
> I have installed the writer2latex extension and export as Ultraclean.
> That I manipulate a little with TexShop removing the \bigskip and the
> likes (whic
Eric,
I load the RTF into OpenOffice (NeoOffice to be correct) into which
I have installed the writer2latex extension and export as Ultraclean.
That I manipulate a little with TexShop removing the \bigskip and the
likes (which I could do with a Perl Script too) and then tex2lyx it.
That works
On May 2, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> I have no clue about mac or rtf2latex2e, but I hear there are projects such
>> as fink and macports which make it easy to install applications like this
>> one.
>
> I have it installed with the help of macports.
Thanks, Stephan. I'll check it
On May 1, 2011, at 11:17 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
> I have no clue about mac or rtf2latex2e, but I hear there are projects such
> as fink and macports which make it easy to install applications like this
> one. Here are some relevant posts from the past:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-user
Am 02.05.2011 um 05:17 schrieb Julien Rioux:
> On 01/05/2011 11:03 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>> On May 1, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>>> I looked in the scripts folder of the LyX package. It's not there. I ran it
>>> in terminal, and the result was: "-bash: rtf2latex2e: command not fo
On 01/05/2011 11:03 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On May 1, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
I looked in the scripts folder of the LyX package. It's not there. I ran it in terminal,
and the result was: "-bash: rtf2latex2e: command not found". Is it a LyX
specific script? Or is it used in the wider
On May 1, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
> I looked in the scripts folder of the LyX package. It's not there. I ran it
> in terminal, and the result was: "-bash: rtf2latex2e: command not found". Is
> it a LyX specific script? Or is it used in the wider LaTeX community?
>
> My copy of LyX
On May 1, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 3:09 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>> I'm brand new -- to LyX, LaTeX, and TeX. The whole shebang.
>>
>> I've attempted to import an RTF document into LyX. Under Preferences/File
>> Handling/
On 01/05/2011 3:09 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
I'm brand new -- to LyX, LaTeX, and TeX. The whole shebang.
I've attempted to import an RTF document into LyX. Under Preferences/File
Handling/Converters I've set the From: format to RTF and the To: format to
LaTeX (Plain). The converter
I'm brand new -- to LyX, LaTeX, and TeX. The whole shebang.
I've attempted to import an RTF document into LyX. Under Preferences/File
Handling/Converters I've set the From: format to RTF and the To: format to
LaTeX (Plain). The converter identified for this translation is r
On 02/02/2011 11:31 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote:
On Feb 2, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
Now what? Do I need to hunt down a different package...?
Looks like it. Apparently:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg62704.html
it is on MacPorts, or at least was.
In
On Feb 2, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote:
>>
>> ... and asking " which latex2rtf" as BH advised Mathias to do --Thank you
>> BH!
>> now gets me "/usr/local/bin/latex2rtf"
>>
> T
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote:
>>
>> ... and asking " which latex2rtf" as BH advised Mathias to do --Thank you
>> BH!
>> now gets me "/usr/local/bin/latex2rtf"
>>
> T
On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote:
... and asking " which latex2rtf" as BH advised Mathias to do --Thank you BH!
now gets me "/usr/local/bin/latex2rtf"
That is good. It will allow you to export to RTF, but not to import.
But when I run Lyx and ask it to
om the terminal
>>>
>> Can someone on Mac help Michelle here?
>
> From the terminal,
>
> /Applications/LyX.app/Contents/MacOS/lyx
Thank you Kevin!
(Thank you Richard also, I really appreciate you taking the time to respond.)
My terminal error for the failed rtf i
Dear BH
Thanks! I have check on my second computer, my macbook, on which I had
not already performed the latex2rtf setup and the terminal command did
not return anything.
So this means that Mac users in general, with MacTeX and Lyx cannot
in general use the export to rtf command?
Maybe the dmg
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Mathias GIREL wrote:
> Dear all
> I think I have found something. It is a dmg that installs latex2rtf (I think
> it was missing from my distribution). You will find it here.
> http://www.tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/2010-April/043664.html
> I have to experim
Dear all
I think I have found something. It is a dmg that installs latex2rtf (I think it
was missing from my distribution). You will find it here.
http://www.tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/2010-April/043664.html
I have to experiment on complex files, with bibtex entries and the like, but
t
Thanks for the answer!
I did that, but alas to no avail. I have the export to RTF in the "File" menu,
but when I try that, even with the standard "splash.lyx" file, I have the error
message:
"Une erreur s'est produite lors de l'exécution :
latex2rtf "
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Mathias GIREL wrote:
> Dear Listers
> I have trouble using the RTF converter in Lyx (1.6 and 2.0beta3) on OSX Snow
> Leopard. I have a MacTex/Texlive2010 distribution.
> I have not been able to find an effective and up to date way to install
>
Dear Listers
I have trouble using the RTF converter in Lyx (1.6 and 2.0beta3) on OSX Snow
Leopard. I have a MacTex/Texlive2010 distribution.
I have not been able to find an effective and up to date way to install
latex2rtf on my system
Older messages on Forums referred to I-installer or Darwin
Piero Faustini schrieb:
HTML quality is much better than I thought, but I can't open it with OOo 3.0 (I
obtani only markup text)
I tested yesterday some files and get relatively nice looking files (OOo 3.0.1). You could now
alternatively look for HTML to RTF/ODT converters.
regards Uwe
> Sure, but it is good to have a starting point. At least you don't have
> to retype it all again.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex Fernández.
>
>
HTML quality is much better than I thought, but I can't open it with OOo 3.0 (I
obtani only markup text)
Good work!
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> It is well known that ooolatex is buggy and often fails. I would try to use
>> eLyXer to convert your document to HTML and then open the result With
>> OpenOffice 3 and save it as RTF or whatever you like.
>> h
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> It is well known that ooolatex is buggy and often fails. I would try to use
> eLyXer to convert your document to HTML and then open the result With
> OpenOffice 3 and save it as RTF or whatever you like.
> http://www.nongnu.org/e
n open the result With OpenOffice 3 and save it as RTF or whatever you like.
http://www.nongnu.org/elyxer/
But don't expect too much. When you need a nice DOC file, you have to write your file with
OpenOffice or Word.
regards Uwe
After the total re-installation of LyX 1.6.2 and MikTeX, now I'm able to
produce simple .odt, but still can't convert my thesis.
I confirm that I am not able to convert to OO using a full Miktex
installation with Lyx 1.6.1
Murat
2009/3/31 rgheck :
> Piero Faustini wrote:
>>
>> Some more details if this can help you helping me!
>>
>> I tried different exports:
>> - Latex always works perfect (Alleluja!)
>> - HTML works
>> -
Piero Faustini wrote:
Some more details if this can help you helping me!
I tried different exports:
- Latex always works perfect (Alleluja!)
- HTML works
- HTML (Word) crashes LyX (And doesn't work): a bunch of seconds after "execute
command htlatex..." the graphics of GUI disappear and the LyX
Some more details if this can help you helping me!
I tried different exports:
- Latex always works perfect (Alleluja!)
- HTML works
- HTML (Word) crashes LyX (And doesn't work): a bunch of seconds after "execute
command htlatex..." the graphics of GUI disappear and the LyX instance can't be
reco
Hello,
I hate to re-open this subject, but I've still NEVER been able to convert a
"Hello world" doc to RTF, OOo, Word Doc or whatever, and I use LyX since 1.5.0
version (now 1.6.2).
So this message is just for those who till yesterday never could export and
then found the light
Nikos:
> I need some help. I have an article (for a Newsletter) which I have to
> deliver today. I am trying unsuccessfully to export my document _at
> least_ as an RTF to make my colleague's life easy :-).
> [I still have problems with all kinds of _external_ file formats]
>
Folks,
I need some help. I have an article (for a Newsletter) which I have to
deliver today. I am trying unsuccessfully to export my document _at
least_ as an RTF to make my colleague's life easy :-).
[I still have problems with all kinds of _external_ file formats]
I get the following err
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:09:57 + (UTC)
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-02-25, Typhoon wrote:
>
> >> > And you're sure it's in your path? Basically, the short version
> >> > here is: Make sure it works from the command line; if not, it
> >> > won't work in LyX; if yes, it should.
>
> > LyX uses
On 2009-02-25, Typhoon wrote:
>> > And you're sure it's in your path? Basically, the short version
>> > here is: Make sure it works from the command line; if not, it won't
>> > work in LyX; if yes, it should.
> LyX uses the oolatex script to export to open document. On my Debian
> Lenny, tex4ht i
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:06:09 +0100
Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 21:48 -0500, rgheck wrote:
> > Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 09:10 +0800, Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
> > >
> > >>> Yes, I have installed the tex4ht package long ago. And never
> > >>> had l
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 21:48 -0500, rgheck wrote:
> Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 09:10 +0800, Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
> >
> >>> Yes, I have installed the tex4ht package long ago. And never had luck
> >>> nor for odt export neither for html export.
> >>>
> >>> Nikos
> >>>
>
Nikos Alexandris wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 09:10 +0800, Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
Yes, I have installed the tex4ht package long ago. And never had luck
nor for odt export neither for html export.
Nikos
I am in Ubuntu 8.04, I just know from this forum that LyX can export to
OpenD
Typhoon wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:59:23 -0500
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:52:32PM +0100, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
Thank you for your time Andrew. Unfortunately it does not work for
me. Cheers, Nikos
Hrm. I wonder what's different about the environment
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 09:10 +0800, Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yes, I have installed the tex4ht package long ago. And never had luck
> > nor for odt export neither for html export.
> >
> > Nikos
> >
> > I am in Ubuntu 8.04, I just know from this forum that LyX can export to
> OpenDocumen
>
>
> Yes, I have installed the tex4ht package long ago. And never had luck
> nor for odt export neither for html export.
>
> Nikos
>
> I am in Ubuntu 8.04, I just know from this forum that LyX can export to
OpenDocument, with the help of LaTeX package tex4ht. I then installed
text4ht from Synaptic
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:59:23 -0500
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:52:32PM +0100, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your time Andrew. Unfortunately it does not work for
> > me. Cheers, Nikos
>
> Hrm. I wonder what's different about the environments, then. Maybe
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:52:32PM +0100, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
>
> Thank you for your time Andrew. Unfortunately it does not work for me.
> Cheers, Nikos
Hrm. I wonder what's different about the environments, then. Maybe
someone can suggest to us how to tell whether the same bits are
install
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 12:28 -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 05:57:38PM +0100, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> > I have tex4ht installed under Ubuntu II / 64-bit. But no way to get it
> > working. Do you mind sharing you preferences (under File Handling)?
>
> I presume you mean Pr
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 12:23 -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> > Nikos:
> >
> >>> You mean you "just hit the export to ODT" and voila... you open the ODT
> >>> and see the file you prepared with LyX (even if it needs corrctions
> >>> concerning appearance/structure etc.) ??
>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 05:57:38PM +0100, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> I have tex4ht installed under Ubuntu II / 64-bit. But no way to get it
> working. Do you mind sharing you preferences (under File Handling)?
I presume you mean Preferences/Converters (which is all I have here). The
LaTeX(plain)-
Nikos Alexandris wrote:
Nikos:
You mean you "just hit the export to ODT" and voila... you open the ODT
and see the file you prepared with LyX (even if it needs corrctions
concerning appearance/structure etc.) ??
Andrew:
Yep.
A
I have tex4ht installed under Ubuntu II / 64
Nikos:
> > You mean you "just hit the export to ODT" and voila... you open the ODT
> > and see the file you prepared with LyX (even if it needs corrctions
> > concerning appearance/structure etc.) ??
Andrew:
> Yep.
> A
I have tex4ht installed under Ubuntu II / 64-bit. But no way to get it
work
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:30:04PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Thanks, I am on Lyx 1.6.x on Kubuntu 8.04. I will install tex2ht and
> see how it goes.
I have 1.6.1 on my Mac, and while I have the menu item I have never
managed to get the export to work directly. As I say, however, I
think it has
> My Debian system is LyX v 1.5.5 and I have tex4ht (which is what does
> the OOo conversion) 20080701-2. Hope that helps.
>
Thanks, I am on Lyx 1.6.x on Kubuntu 8.04. I will install tex2ht and
see how it goes.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 05:28:14PM +0100, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> You mean you "just hit the export to ODT" and voila... you open the ODT
> and see the file you prepared with LyX (even if it needs corrctions
> concerning appearance/structure etc.) ??
Yep.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@shinkuro.c
e that helps.
You mean you "just hit the export to ODT" and voila... you open the ODT
and see the file you prepared with LyX (even if it needs corrctions
concerning appearance/structure etc.) ??
FWIW, I never managet to get any export besides some RTF once.
Kind regards, Nikos
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 05:41:27PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Thanks. I do not seem to have an option to export to ODT. Must I add
> something?
I think it's dependent on the version of LyX and LaTeX you have
installed. It Just Works for me on the latest Debian stable. I don't
know what's under
> I didn't read that URL, but the best way I find is to export to
> OpenDocument, open it in OpenOffice.org, fix the right-hand border (at
> least, I always have to), and save it as a Word .doc file.
>
Thanks. I do not seem to have an option to export to ODT. Must I add something?
--
Dotan Cohen
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 07:30:51PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> I need to export a document for a MS Office user. I do not see an
> option to export as DOC or RTF in Lyx 1.6, and PDF will not do because
> he needs to annotate the document. The best info online that I could
> find is
I need to export a document for a MS Office user. I do not see an
option to export as DOC or RTF in Lyx 1.6, and PDF will not do because
he needs to annotate the document. The best info online that I could
find is this tedious document:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=2755091&postcou
Am 04.12.2008 um 15:49 schrieb Konrad Hofbauer:
If there is no native os x version, then install macports (www.macports.org/>), and from there install the needed packages.
I made the same experience as Joachim K. Rennstich, so I followed the
advice of Konrad Hofbauer, downloaded the Mac-OSX
Dr. Joachim K. Rennstich wrote:
I am trying to import a RTF document into Lyx 1.6 (Mac OS X 10.5.5,
Intel) through the "File > Import > Rich Text Format..." command but get
the following error:
An error occurred whilst running rtf2latex2e 'whateverfile.rtf'
I am trying to import a RTF document into Lyx 1.6 (Mac OS X 10.5.5,
Intel) through the "File > Import > Rich Text Format..." command but
get the following error:
An error occurred whilst running rtf2latex2e 'whateverfile.rtf'
I have been looking up rtf2l
"Matts Lindström"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using Lyx 1.6 rc2 (on Ubuntu Hardy Heron). This is my question: is
> it somehow possible to export a lyx document to rtf (or .odt or .doc)
> *with* bibliography and citations included *and* correctly formated by
Hi,
I'm using Lyx 1.6 rc2 (on Ubuntu Hardy Heron). This is my question: is
it somehow possible to export a lyx document to rtf (or .odt or .doc)
*with* bibliography and citations included *and* correctly formated by
bibtex? Thus far I've had no success using the rtf-export: the
docume
On 26.02.08, rgheck wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this
> option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-)
So it works similar to
* the [default] option in the line-sp
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an
extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't
occur to me that "justified" would apply to that. But maybe it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an
extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur
to me that "justified" would apply to that. But maybe it does.
(paragraph formatting is otherwise
Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an
extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur
to me that "justified" would apply to that. But maybe it does.
(paragraph formatting is otherwise defined in the class?)
My take is that if "justified" wasn't there I probably would have
tried it. But if it actually removes paragraph formatting (even if
it resorts to the default for the context) wouldn't it be clearer
to say "Remove Paragraph Formatting"? I'm surmising it's doing
both. So I understand th
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
