Re: GSOC: Guidance on LTO, and Static Analysis Projects

Yatindra Indoria via Gcc writes: > Hello, > > I am an engineering student. I’ve worked on high frequency trading systems, > and (research) on the Linux kernel I/O and memory subsystems. I am looking > to start contributing to GCC, for quite some time now, as my work utilises > it extensively :) >

GSOC: Guidance on LTO, and Static Analysis Projects

Hello, I am an engineering student. I’ve worked on high frequency trading systems, and (research) on the Linux kernel I/O and memory subsystems. I am looking to start contributing to GCC, for quite some time now, as my work utilises it extensively :) But GCC is complex, I believe the mentorship f

Re: Two suggestions for GCC beginners projects

On 28/11/2024 12:18, Aaron Peter Bachmann via Gcc wrote: Two suggestions for GCC beginners projects I watched some of the 2024 Gnu Cauldron videos. The question of what could be a suitable project for a beginner came up. I have two suggestions: 1.    Add a warning when users use reserved or

Two suggestions for GCC beginners projects

Two suggestions for GCC beginners projects I watched some of the 2024 Gnu Cauldron videos. The question of what could be a suitable project for a beginner came up. I have two suggestions: 1.    Add a warning when users use reserved or potentially reserved identifiers in their code. This

Re: Simple GCC projects page

the > cracks originally. > > > I would like to start contributing to GCC. In viewing the relevant pages > > it became clear that they have not been updated for some time, which > > makes starting to contribute a bit more challenging. > > > > To name a few on the

Re: Simple GCC projects page

ewing the relevant pages > it became clear that they have not been updated for some time, which > makes starting to contribute a bit more challenging. > > To name a few on the Simple GCC projects page:1. A few references are > made to the java front-end. Indeed, and this is somethi

Re: Interest in Contributing to OpenACC Support & Code Offloading Projects for GSOC

ware Engineer at Qualcomm > Wireless R&D. I recently discovered your organization and the exciting GSOC > projects you are proposing, namely "Offloading to a separate process on the > same host" and "Enhance OpenACC support." I am writing to express my > enthusi

Interest in Contributing to OpenACC Support & Code Offloading Projects for GSOC

d the exciting GSOC projects you are proposing, namely "Offloading to a separate process on the same host" and "Enhance OpenACC support." I am writing to express my enthusiastic interest in potentially contributing to either of these projects and to inquire about the next steps to

RE: Open Available Projects for Google Summer of Code 2024

On Mon, Jan 22 2024, Vedant Tewari wrote: Hello Vedant, > Hello, > I am expressing my interest as a potential gsoc participant, based on this > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode, are there any available projects > that you might recommend or might be best suited for a potential pr

Re: Inquiry about Getting Started with GCC Projects as a Beginner

s are commonly used in GCC projects? Are there any specific languages that you recommend beginners to focus on initially? GCC is written in a customized mix of C++ and C. Some C++ standard constructs have been handmade, such as vectors. However, if you are familiar with C++, I believe you

Inquiry about Getting Started with GCC Projects as a Beginner

Dear GCC Company, I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to express my interest in working on GCC projects as a beginner and seeking guidance on how to get started. I am excited about the opportunity to contribute to your projects and gain valuable experience in the process. As a

Re: [wwwdocs] C++03 missing on https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 16:54, U.Mutlu wrote: > > On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, except > C++03: > https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html > > This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options -std=c++03 and > -std=gn

Re: [wwwdocs] C++03 missing on https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

of gcc/g++ are listed, >> except C++03: >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html >> >> >> >> This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options >> -std=c++03 >> >> and -std=gnu++03 >> > >> > C++03 is

Re: [wwwdocs] C++03 missing on https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, 19:50 U.Mutlu, wrote: > Jakub Jelinek wrote on 12/15/22 17:59: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:53:19PM +0100, U.Mutlu wrote: > >> On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, > except C++03: > >> https://gcc.gn

Re: [wwwdocs] C++03 missing on https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

Jakub Jelinek wrote on 12/15/22 17:59: On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:53:19PM +0100, U.Mutlu wrote: On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, except C++03: https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options -std=c

Re: [wwwdocs] C++03 missing on https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:53:19PM +0100, U.Mutlu wrote: > On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, except > C++03: > https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html > > This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options -std=c++03 > and -

[wwwdocs] C++03 missing on https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html

On this page all ISO C++ standards versions of gcc/g++ are listed, except C++03: https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html This looks much like an error/omission b/c g++ has the options -std=c++03 and -std=gnu++03

Re: Comment on web page https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx11

assertions" are supported by GCC since version 4.3. Today I tried to use "Static assertions" on an  avr-g++ resp. avr-gcc which identifies itself as: eedjsa@server68:~/projects/AVR_workspace/ATMEGA8U2_32U2$ avr-g++ --version avr-g++ (GCC) 5.4.0

Re: Comment on web page https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx11

ried to use "Static assertions" on an avr-g++ resp. avr-gcc > which identifies > itself as: > > eedjsa@server68:~/projects/AVR_workspace/ATMEGA8U2_32U2$ avr-g++ --version > avr-g++ (GCC) 5.4.0 > Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software;

Comment on web page https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx11

as: eedjsa@server68:~/projects/AVR_workspace/ATMEGA8U2_32U2$ avr-g++ --version avr-g++ (GCC) 5.4.0 Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPO

GCC GSoC 2019 projects: announcement and a mandatory first step

[Sorry for a re-post, I forgot to write a subject and as a consequence the email did not make it through to the mailing list] Hello, I am pleased to announce that six students will be working on GCC or GCC-related Google Summer of Code (GSoC) projects: - JeanHeyd Meneide will be working on

Re: Regarding GSOC Projects

Hello Aadrit, On Sun, Jan 20 2019, Aadrit Aggarwal wrote: > Greetings for the day!! > I'm an undergraduate in my 2nd year at Punjab Engineering College, > Chandigarh. I'm pursuing CSE. > This mail is regarding GSOC Projects. > > *It's my first time, that I

Regarding GSOC Projects

Greetings for the day!! I'm an undergraduate in my 2nd year at Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh. I'm pursuing CSE. This mail is regarding GSOC Projects. *It's my first time, that I'd be participating in an open source event, and apparently first time in GSOC.* I was goi

Re: Regarding projects and begineer guide.

Thanks, I'll check them out. On Thu 6 Dec, 2018, 1:51 AM Eric Gallager, wrote: > On 12/5/18, David Malcolm wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 22:48 +0530, Durgesh Kumar wrote: > >> Dear sir/mam > >> I am durgesh kumar from ABES engineering collenge,ghaziabad,uttar > >> pradesh,india. > >> > >> I

Re: Regarding projects and begineer guide.

On 12/5/18, David Malcolm wrote: > On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 22:48 +0530, Durgesh Kumar wrote: >> Dear sir/mam >> I am durgesh kumar from ABES engineering collenge,ghaziabad,uttar >> pradesh,india. >> >> I am currently in 2nd year of my graduation(Btech CSE ) >> >> I want to contribute in some of your

Re: Regarding projects and begineer guide.

On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 22:48 +0530, Durgesh Kumar wrote: > Dear sir/mam > I am durgesh kumar from ABES engineering collenge,ghaziabad,uttar > pradesh,india. > > I am currently in 2nd year of my graduation(Btech CSE ) > > I want to contribute in some of your prestigious project. So i > request you

Regarding projects and begineer guide.

Dear sir/mam I am durgesh kumar from ABES engineering collenge,ghaziabad,uttar pradesh,india. I am currently in 2nd year of my graduation(Btech CSE ) I want to contribute in some of your prestigious project. So i request you to please provide me some of your top priority project and a begineer gu

Simple GCC projects page

name a few on the Simple GCC projects page:1. A few references are made to the java front-end. I understand that GCJ broke off from GCC a while ago; furthermore, that Java is no longer supported by either GCC or GCJ.2. Under code cleanliness, the bullet for enormous files lists files in the 150

GSoC projects are announced

Hi all ! Sorry this is little late reply. Accepted projects for GSoC are announced. gcc has accepted 3 proposals this year. I want to thank gcc community for accepting proposal for GIMPLE FE project. I will give my best to complete the project. Thanks, Prasad Ghangal

GSoC: Accepted projects

Dear all, we have this year two good GSoC projects for which we managed to get a slot and a mentor: Erik Krisztián Varga will work on the "Addressing mode selection in GCC". Citing the abstract: "CPU architectures often provide a variety of ways to load and save data

Re: Register at the GSoC website to rate projects

[Moving to gcc@ from gcc-patches@] Community, We've got 11 student proposals (good job, students!), and only the N top-rated ones will be accepted into the program. Therefore, we as a community need to make sure that the ratings are representative of our goals -- making GCC the best compiler

Re: About gsoc 2014 OpenMP 4.0 Projects

On Feb 26, 2014, at 12:27 AM, guray ozen wrote: > Hello, > > I'm master student at high-performance computing at barcelona > supercomputing center. And I'm working on my thesis regarding openmp > accelerator model implementation onto our compiler (OmpSs). Actually i > almost finished implementat

Re: About gsoc 2014 OpenMP 4.0 Projects

Hi Güray! Giving some pointers here (but this is not a complete list), to announcements and a few discussion threads, that should already answer some of your questions, give an idea who's currently working on what:

Re: About gsoc 2014 OpenMP 4.0 Projects

eriments in > openacc_1-0_branch. > > Regarding GSoC it would be nice, if you'll apply with your proposal on code > generation. > I think that projects aimed to improve generation of OpenCL or > implementation of SPIR-backend are going to be useful for GCC. > > - > Thank

RE: About gsoc 2014 OpenMP 4.0 Projects

Hi Guray, There were two announcements: PTX-backend and OpenCL code generation. Initial PTX-patches can be found in mailing list and OpenCL experiments in openacc_1-0_branch. Regarding GSoC it would be nice, if you'll apply with your proposal on code generation. I think that projects aim

About gsoc 2014 OpenMP 4.0 Projects

Hello, I'm master student at high-performance computing at barcelona supercomputing center. And I'm working on my thesis regarding openmp accelerator model implementation onto our compiler (OmpSs). Actually i almost finished implementation of all new directives to generate CUDA code and same impl

GSOC 2013 ranking rubric for potential projects

/libstdc++ GSOC applications, and voting to select winning projects. I'm using a different selection criteria this year, and wish to share it with potential participants so that they understand how to maximize their chance for selection. Some background on GCC/libstdc++ GSOC is here: http://gcc.gnu.o

Re: Enquiry on GSoC projects

(see http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki). http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html There are a few unimplemented features left. I'm aware of someone working on ref-qualifiers and someone working on attributes, but the others are open. Jason

Re: Enquiry on GSoC projects

see http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki). > 2. some guidance for a simple project to familiarize myself > with internals of gcc and demonstrate my coding skills. Your best bet is to start with http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GettingStarted Some suggestions are listed on http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/beginner.html as well. Diego.

Enquiry on GSoC projects

Dear gcc contributors, My name is Levon Haykazyan, I am a PhD student at Yerevan State University (Armenia) studying theoretical computer science. I am considering applying to Summer of Code for adding some C++0x support in gcc. I would like to ask potential mentors 1. which of C++0x language

brief update on 2 GSOC'09 GCC projects

Dear all, I got a few minutes between vacations and wanted to give you a small update on the GSOC'09 developments for GCC by Liang Peng and Yunajie Huang from ICT, China (in CC). The projects were about extending GCC to enable fine-grain optimization selection (GRAPHITE optimiza

Projects

pragma's but this is much better system. Or would be great to know some good places to start, even what areas need cleanup, just the projects list and regressions etc all seem to be quite old and not sure which are still relevant! I would like to do this for a while, but i was ultimately thi

RE: http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/optimize.html Why is the biggest problem missing from this page.

Peter Dolding wrote on 21 July 2008 12:12: > Biggest problem is that gimple only works in source code to object. > Not with a stack of objects to exe. We're on the case. You're looking for the LTO project. http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimization cheers, DaveK -- Can't think o

http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/optimize.html Why is the biggest problem missing from this page.

Biggest problem is that gimple only works in source code to object. Not with a stack of objects to exe. This has major downsides for static building. To the point a lot of static builders end up sending all .c files into gcc at once so they get cross object optimised. One possible solution coul

Google Summer of Code 2007 Projects

Hi, I have added to the wiki the list of Google's SoC projects for this year. http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode From my experience of last year, I would recommend to create a wiki page for your project to dump anything that could be remotely useful and to allow people to add comments

Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects

Hello! On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 07:51:13PM +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote: > On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 11:16 +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Would me using (one of) the machines for maintaining GNU/Hurd cross-build > > environments (i.e. binutils, GCC, glibc) be an admissible project? (I'd > > some few

Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects

On 15/12/06, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * IP adresses should not be revealed for now, Ooops! I hope you were not serious with that... Cheers, Manuel.

Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects

one year uptime today: > > Congratulations! Thanks :) > > There are currently 17 users with access to the farm, new users and > > projects are as welcomed as before :). > > Would me using (one of) the machines for maintaining GNU/Hurd cross-build > environments (i.e. binutils, GCC, g

Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects

farm, new users and > projects are as welcomed as before :). Would me using (one of) the machines for maintaining GNU/Hurd cross-build environments (i.e. binutils, GCC, glibc) be an admissible project? (I'd some few GiB of disk storage.) If it is, then... > 1. your ssh public key (HOME/

Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects

up 242 days There are currently 17 users with access to the farm, new users and projects are as welcomed as before :). http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm << GCC Compile Farm Project The GCC CompileFarm Project is seeking volunteers to maintain script machinery to help with GCC developmen

Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects

365 days == gcc06 == 21:08:28 up 365 days == gcc07 == 21:08:28 up 365 days == gcc08 == 21:08:28 up 365 days == gcc09 == 21:08:28 up 242 days There are currently 17 users with access to the farm, new users and projects are as welcomed as before :). http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm << GCC C

Re: GCC 4.3 Projects Page

> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please add your project page to the bottom of: >http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.3_Release_Planning I just added a page for the tuples work. Aldy

Re: GCC 4.3 Projects Page

Daniel Berlin wrote: On 9/1/06, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Buck wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:56:30PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> Please add your project page to the bottom of: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.3_Release_Planning > > BTW, that page provides a link

Re: GCC 4.3 Projects Page

On 9/1/06, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Buck wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:56:30PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> Please add your project page to the bottom of: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.3_Release_Planning > > BTW, that page provides a link to "SampleProjectPage"

Re: GCC 4.3 Projects Page

Joe Buck wrote: On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:56:30PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: Please add your project page to the bottom of: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.3_Release_Planning BTW, that page provides a link to "SampleProjectPage" which does not exist. Thanks! I forgot which Wiki syntax I

Re: GCC 4.3 Projects Page

On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:56:30PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Please add your project page to the bottom of: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.3_Release_Planning BTW, that page provides a link to "SampleProjectPage" which does not exist.

GCC 4.3 Projects Page

tom of: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.3_Release_Planning In this cycle, I'm going to try to prioritize projects for Stage 1 by readiness (e.g., has your patch already been tested fully? is it current with mainline? has the patch already been approved?), and then by time of original submissio

Re: Register Allocator projects summary

Andrew MacLeod wrote: Those are the 4 actions/projects we left the summit with that I am aware of. With any luck at all, one or more of these will have a significant impact on our register allocator. Often projects like these proceed in virtual silence until they are mostly done. Perhaps

Register Allocator projects summary

ttp://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-11/msg00783.html) where I laid out what I thought needed to be done were a new rewrite from scratch to be attempted.. We came away with 4 primary action points/projects. 1 - Its just getting to the point where maybe we can see where Vlad's complete rewrite of

Re: gcc-4.3 projects page?

Dan Kegel wrote: > Is it time to create a GCC_4.3_Projects page > like http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.2_Projects ? > I imagine several projects are already in progress, > but not yet mentioned on the wiki... Yes, I've been thinking about doing that. It's fine with me if

Re: gcc-4.3 projects page?

On Jul 26, 2006, at 7:27 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: Is it time to create a GCC_4.3_Projects page like http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.2_Projects ? I imagine several projects are already in progress, but not yet mentioned on the wiki... I have mentioned one via my user page on wiki. But it is not a

gcc-4.3 projects page?

Is it time to create a GCC_4.3_Projects page like http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.2_Projects ? I imagine several projects are already in progress, but not yet mentioned on the wiki... - Dan

Re: GCC 2006 Summer of Code accepted projects

Hi, Projects, students and mentors for SoC 2006 are now listed at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode (you may edit it to link to your blog, website, or wiki page). Cheers, Manuel. On 25/05/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Daniel, I think it is not a problem that thi

Re: GCC 2006 Summer of Code accepted projects

Daniel, I think it is not a problem that this info appears also in the GCC wiki, is it? Thus, tonight, I will write it down in the GCC wiki for further reference. If someone wishes to send me further information (links to blogs or webpages), you are welcome to send it to my email address. My inte

Re: GCC 2006 Summer of Code accepted projects

Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > "Paul Biggar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Google approved six applications for gcc for Summer of Code 2006. >>> They are: >>> >>> Code parallelization using polyhdral model Plesco Alexandru >>> Escape analysisPaul Biggar >>> Garba

Re: GCC 2006 Summer of Code accepted projects

"Paul Biggar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Google approved six applications for gcc for Summer of Code 2006. > > They are: > > > > Code parallelization using polyhdral model Plesco Alexandru > > Escape analysisPaul Biggar > > Garbage collection tuning

Re: GCC 2006 Summer of Code accepted projects

Google approved six applications for gcc for Summer of Code 2006. They are: Code parallelization using polyhdral model Plesco Alexandru Escape analysisPaul Biggar Garbage collection tuning Laurynas Biveinis java.lang.management in Classpath

Re: GCC 2006 Summer of Code accepted projects

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I guess everybody is very busy. However, it would be nice to set up a > page in the GCC Wiki with the list of projects accepted for this year > SoC and some links. If someone has this information, I would volunteer > to "wikify" it. I've be

GCC 2006 Summer of Code accepted projects

Hi, I guess everybody is very busy. However, it would be nice to set up a page in the GCC Wiki with the list of projects accepted for this year SoC and some links. If someone has this information, I would volunteer to "wikify" it. Cheers, Manuel. PS: yeah, I am also interested part ;

Open-source projects supporting GIMPLE

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there are there any open-source projects supporting GIMPLE (e.g. as the input IR for compilation purposes) and specifically focus on: a) tree transformations b) automating the backend development process Thanks in advance Nikolaos Kavvadias

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> I would prefer it go on savannah, which is more clearly unaffiliated Mark> with any particular commercial entity. Ok, I submitted a request there. Tom

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Tom Tromey wrote: > I am leaning toward putting it into the rhug repository on > sourceware.org, simply because then we (the gcj hackers) won't have to > go through some long project registration process. Speak up if you > have a particular problem with this. Thanks! I would prefer it go on sav

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> The FSF and GCC SC have decided to move fastjar to savannah, and Mark> stop including it in future GCC releases, which will clarify Mark> this situation. Will someone please volunteer to migrate Mark> fastjar out of our repository?

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Mark Mitchell wrote: My guess is that it's OK to include the Sun code, since it's in the public domain. This may just be nit-picking, but the above notice doesn't put the code into the public domain. Sun still owns the copyright of the software. Actually notices at the start of files have ve

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

> Joe Buck writes: Ben> Please specify exactly what you want, and who at the FSF I talk to. Joe> If you have messages giving past discussions of the issue, all the better. If you have a message from the FSF approving the current situation, it would be extremely helpful if you either

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Ross Ridge wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote: >> /* >> * >> * Copyright (C) 1993 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. >> * >> * Developed at SunPro, a Sun Microsystems, Inc. business. >> * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distrib

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 05:09:17PM -0600, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > > > As previously stated, if there is contrary information from FSF lawyers, > > then please gather it and present it to the FSF. > > Please specify exactly what you want, and who at the FSF I talk to. I am not Mark, but I sugges

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Benjamin Kosnik wrote: >> As previously stated, if there is contrary information from FSF lawyers, >> then please gather it and present it to the FSF. > > Please specify exactly what you want, and who at the FSF I talk to. I don't want anything in particular. I can assure you that my idea of a g

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Richard Guenther wrote: > /* > * > * Copyright (C) 1993 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. > * > * Developed at SunPro, a Sun Microsystems, Inc. business. > * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this > * software is

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

> As previously stated, if there is contrary information from FSF lawyers, > then please gather it and present it to the FSF. Please specify exactly what you want, and who at the FSF I talk to. Please do so on-list. -benjamin

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 03:05:17PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > >>> The STL files in libstdc++-v3 need to be clearly marked as not part of > >>> GCC. Benjamin, will you please take care of that, by modifying the > >>> libstdc++-v3/README to indicate that the files origina

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Mark Mitchell wrote: > Benjamin Kosnik wrote: The STL files in libstdc++-v3 need to be clearly marked as not part of GCC. Benjamin, will you please take care of that, by modifying the libstdc++-v3/README to indicate that the files originally from HP are not part of GCC, and spe

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Benjamin Kosnik wrote: >>> The STL files in libstdc++-v3 need to be clearly marked as not part of >>> GCC. Benjamin, will you please take care of that, by modifying the >>> libstdc++-v3/README to indicate that the files originally from HP are >>> not part of GCC, and specifically list those files?

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

> > The STL files in libstdc++-v3 need to be clearly marked as not part of > > GCC. Benjamin, will you please take care of that, by modifying the > > libstdc++-v3/README to indicate that the files originally from HP are > > not part of GCC, and specifically list those files? Huh? What are you

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Richard Guenther wrote: > I'll try my best. And I take it as granted that I can turn to RMS in the case > we only get the usual reactions like > http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2005-07/msg8.html Yes, I think RMS would like FSF maintainers to behave civilly. He did explicitly indicate in

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Richard Guenther wrote: | | > Remembering the patches from Joseph these were from a different part | > of GLIBC than I imported. I imported parts of sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 and | > dbl-64 which contain C implementations of C99 math intrinsics such as |

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

On 17 Mar 2006 23:27:35 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > | > | > I am confused. My interest in libgcc-math is that it helps solve > | > thorny issues with libstdc++-v3 and my expectation is that we can ma

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | | > I am confused. My interest in libgcc-math is that it helps solve | > thorny issues with libstdc++-v3 and my expectation is that we can make | > modification to libgcc-math so that we can't advantage of it. Now, I | > unde

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

On 3/17/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 17, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > So, I think you should remove the dbl-64 code until this is > > resolved, or at least prevent it > > from being compiled by removing whatever Makefile bits compile it > > :-( At the outside, I

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

On 3/17/06, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote: > > > Remembering the patches from Joseph these were from a different part > > of GLIBC than I imported. I imported parts of sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 and > > dbl-64 which contain C implementations of C99 math intrinsics s

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

On Mar 17, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote: So, I think you should remove the dbl-64 code until this is resolved, or at least prevent it from being compiled by removing whatever Makefile bits compile it :-( At the outside, I'd say that in 7 days it should not be in mainline nor any r

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Richard Guenther wrote: > Remembering the patches from Joseph these were from a different part > of GLIBC than I imported. I imported parts of sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 and > dbl-64 which contain C implementations of C99 math intrinsics such as > sin and cos. The flt-32 parts are public domain as i

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Joe Buck wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 01:23:36PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> Richard Guenther wrote: >>> Do I understand this correctly that the upstream GLIBC versions of the >>> files will get their license changed, or will this happen only in the GCC >>> copy? >> Only in the GCC copy. >

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Richard Guenther wrote: > I understand it in the way that we should modify the imported parts > upstream (or not), while we can for sure add glues and wrappers or > other thinks to libgcc-math. Yes, you can add glue/wrappers. > So this discussion only affects flt-32 > and dbl-64 directories. I

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > I am confused. My interest in libgcc-math is that it helps solve > thorny issues with libstdc++-v3 and my expectation is that we can make > modification to libgcc-math so that we can't advantage of it. Now, I > understand that we cannot make modification to libgcc-math

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

On 17 Mar 2006 22:44:37 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > | >> Because RMS has approved the use of GLIBC's software floating-point code > | >> in GCC's runtime libraries, using GPL + exception, the correct thing for > | >> J

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | >> Because RMS has approved the use of GLIBC's software floating-point code | >> in GCC's runtime libraries, using GPL + exception, the correct thing for | >> Joseph Myers to do with his recent patch is to mark those files as not | >> part of GCC,

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

On 3/17/06, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote: > > On 3/17/06, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Because RMS has approved the use of GLIBC's software floating-point code > >> in GCC's runtime libraries, using GPL + exception, the correct thing for > >> Jo

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 01:23:36PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote: > > Do I understand this correctly that the upstream GLIBC versions of the > > files will get their license changed, or will this happen only in the GCC > > copy? > > Only in the GCC copy. Maybe we should che

Re: FSF Policy re. inclusion of source code from other projects in GCC

Richard Guenther wrote: > On 3/17/06, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Richard Guenther, would you please add a README to libgcc-math >> explaining that it that the GLIBC code is not part of GCC, as per the >> web page above? Also, please document that all of the GLIBC files are > > I

  1   2   >