On 3/17/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 17, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > So, I think you should remove the dbl-64 code until this is > > resolved, or at least prevent it > > from being compiled by removing whatever Makefile bits compile it > > :-( At the outside, I'd say that in 7 days it should not be in > mainline nor any release branch if permission isn't secured.
If there is consensus that the source should be (temporarily) removed then that is fine with me, though I'd prefer to just disable the makefile bits to give RMS some more time than 7 days. Also I won't have much time to dedicate to this problem until in two weeks, apart from emergency stuff like requested. Richard.
