On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 8:21 AM Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, Christopher Higgs via gcc wrote: > > If this belongs in a different mailbox, please let me know where it > > should be sent. > > This was the right address, though sadly it somehow fell through the > cracks originally. > > > I would like to start contributing to GCC. In viewing the relevant pages > > it became clear that they have not been updated for some time, which > > makes starting to contribute a bit more challenging. > > > > To name a few on the Simple GCC projects page:1. A few references are > > made to the java front-end. > > Indeed, and this is something we (specifically Eric) addressed, together > with various other issues on this page. > > > Under code cleanliness, the bullet for enormous files lists files in the > > 150-500K sizes. These sizes are not current and there are at least a > > couple of files in the MB range (the C++ parser.c file for example). > > Eric updated these as well, alas some have further grown; I'll see to do a > new tally and update that. > > > Simplifying parser action code. GCC seems to have migrated away from > > parser generators in favor of ad hoc approaches. Does this project still > > apply? > > I don't think so, and will push a patch to remove this and associated > items in a minute. > > A belated thank you for your feedback; I'll be looking for further issue > and will happily look into anything else you may find. >
Oh yeah, I remember there being a few other projects on there that I also remember feeling unsure about how relevant they still were; definitely let us know if you find anything else that seems outdated... > Gerald
