Joe Buck wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 01:23:36PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> Richard Guenther wrote: >>> Do I understand this correctly that the upstream GLIBC versions of the >>> files will get their license changed, or will this happen only in the GCC >>> copy? >> Only in the GCC copy. > > Maybe we should check that question with RMS. After all, RMS is the one > who doesn't want us to fork imported code; aren't we talking about forking > at least the license? There would be two distinct copies of certain > files, differing only in the license text.
Yes, but they will have to differ anyhow so that they can proclaim that they are not part of GCC. So, I think it is clear what the files should say in the GCC repository. I will ask RMS if the files should change in the GLIBC repository as well, but it doesn't need to affect Joseph's (as of yet unreviewed) patch. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
