how-can-efficacy-vs-severe-disease-be-strong-when-60-of-hospitalized-are-vaccinated
>>>>> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.covid-datascience.com%2fpost%2fisraeli-data-how-can-efficacy-vs-severe-disease-be-strong-when-60-of-hospitalized-are-vaccinated&c
Get off my lawn!
On 8/19/21 8:31 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
Whatever happened to getting paid a lot of money to anticipate the wishes of
your employer?
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 8:22 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM]
From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 8:22 AM
> To: friam@redfish.com
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] vax v unvax
>
> Maybe. But we pay her $150 for 3 hours of work. That's $50/hr. She also takes
> things we no longer want, like my old acoustic guit
Whatever happened to getting paid a lot of money to anticipate the wishes of
your employer?
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 8:22 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] vax v unvax
Maybe. But we pay her $150 for 3 hours of w
Maybe. But we pay her $150 for 3 hours of work. That's $50/hr. She also takes
things we no longer want, like my old acoustic guitar, and sells them on ebay.
Saves us a trip to Goodwill. So, while tipping her seems reasonable, I feel
like we're already treating her quite well. There's a point whe
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:15 AM uǝlƃ ☤>$ wrote:
> Excellent. Thanks for the Gelman and Morris explanations.
>
> As for paying for a couple of days off for Tami, she's only here for ~3
> hours every 2 weeks. So, it's unclear how to go about giving her 2 days
> off... I'd gladly pay her $100 or so
;
>>>>
>>>> Next the statistics police will be telling us how to use the data!
>>>>
>>>> Oh, and someone noticed that a lot of the unvaccinated can't afford to
>>>> take two days off for vaccination side effects, no medical leave, you
Show respect by showing her the door. If someone wants clean contracts that
don't stress their emotional modulation, give it to them.
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 7:04 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] vax v
Glen, that has to be the comment of the day winner. Well said!
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:07 AM uǝlƃ ☤>$ wrote:
> I appreciate that. But while I'm taking her and her ideas seriously,
> discussing them calmly while holding a cup of coffee, people who hold those
> very same ideas are carrying AR-15
h back except
> people that go way out of their way like Glen.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Friam <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> On Behalf Of David Eric Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 1:09 PM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied C
I appreciate that. But while I'm taking her and her ideas seriously, discussing
them calmly while holding a cup of coffee, people who hold those very same
ideas are carrying AR-15 rifles and Don't Tread on Me flags while marching
around downtown in desert fatigues, claiming they'll break into th
and so are thus less susceptible; smaller social networks
>> and lower spatial density. And further they attach themselves to these
>> crazy ideas because no one ever has the opportunity to push back except
>> people that go way out of their way like Glen.
>>
>> --
oun...@redfish.com>> On
> Behalf Of David Eric Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 1:09 PM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] vax v unvax
>
> This is one that it would be nice to see broke
riam-boun...@redfish.com>> On
> Behalf Of David Eric Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 1:09 PM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] vax v unvax
>
> This is one that it would be nice to see
r vaccination side effects, no medical leave, you could
>>> try offering her 2 days and a few hours pay to get vaccinated.
>>>
>>> -- rec --
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 4:58 PM Marcus Daniels
>>> wrote:
>>>
>&
du/nthompson/
From: Friam On Behalf Of Frank Wimberly
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 11:01 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] vax v unvax
Simpson's paradox: even though two variables might be correlated in subgroups
of a population they
gt; On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 4:58 PM Marcus Daniels
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Another hypothesis is that they tend to be less engaged in the economy
>>>> and their communities and so are thus less susceptible; smaller social
>>>> networks and lower spatia
te:
>>
>>> Another hypothesis is that they tend to be less engaged in the economy
>>> and their communities and so are thus less susceptible; smaller social
>>> networks and lower spatial density. And further they attach themselves to
>>> these crazy id
invite her back until the pandemic has become endemic. A
> > distinction without a difference but then she can win the argument. :-)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 12:54 PM
> > To:
thus less susceptible; smaller social
>> networks and lower spatial density. And further they attach themselves to
>> these crazy ideas because no one ever has the opportunity to push back
>> except people that go way out of their way like Glen.
>>
>> -Origina
This is one that it would be nice to see broken down by age and other
conditions.
If unvaxxed hospitalizations are a true “cross section of America” (like jury
duty), whereas the vaxxed ones are mainly old or sick with something else, that
would be an important variable for deriving a risk prof
"S ... our house cleaner is anti-vax. My friends tell me we should
fire her. I've resisted confronting her over it."
Since you are asking for an opinion, I believe that abstaining from
her service because you feel that your household is at risk directly
or at risk of becoming a vector for the
way out of their way like Glen.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Friam On Behalf Of David Eric Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 1:09 PM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] vax v unvax
>
> This is one that it would be
people that go way
out of their way like Glen.
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of David Eric Smith
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 1:09 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] vax v unvax
This is one that it would be nice to see broken
aniels wrote:
> Just don't invite her back until the pandemic has become endemic. A
> distinction without a difference but then she can win the argument. :-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 12:54
Just don't invite her back until the pandemic has become endemic. A
distinction without a difference but then she can win the argument. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 12:54 PM
To: FriAM
Subject: [FRIAM] vax v unvax
S ... our house cleaner is anti-vax. My friends tell me we should fire her.
I've resisted confronting her over it. But hospitals being overrun influenced
me to press her a little bit. I claimed that the majority of hospitalizations
are the unvaxxed. She claimed that down near her (I think c
27 matches
Mail list logo
