I would start by using a java gui tool to design the look and feel
of the xmailer and allow the application to load java classes
or lets call them plug-ins. There is lots of stuff available
for java including good design patterns and methodologies.
Once the overall design is completed then tran
> There is a short but sweet[1] article on ZDNet today regarding FreeBSD:
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/zdtv/screensavers/answerstips/story/0,3656,2324624,00.html
Hmm, can't find that sweet thing -- typo?
Dirk
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers"
Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:
>
> > > It is other way around. I don't want half of FreeBSD binaries linked
> > > with libc.so.3 and half is linked with libc.so.4.
> >
> > Recompile. You have the sources.
>
> ??? What recompile? Why do you think I have the sources - there is
> quite a few binary-only Fre
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 10:00:46PM -0700, Ben Jackson wrote:
> I just did that upgrade (been with freebsd since 1.1!) and everything
> seems pretty smooth. I did a 2.2->3.1 upgrade on another machine so
> I'm probably glossing over some aout issues (mainly that you have to
> find them and move the
Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
>
> On Thu, 09 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> > I'm more tempted to revert to the major/minor versioning. Every change
> > triggers a minor version bump, but only if the library is still backwards
> > compatible with minor version 0 and t
Hi,
I once had a similar situation: I had wiped my disklabel.
I forgot what it was exactly what I did, but it was something along the
lines of this:
- boot fixit cdrom
- run a commandline like this:
hd /dev/rwdnnn | grep "hh hh hh" (where 'hh hh hh' is the superblock magic
number, I can't find
Hello,
Currently I'm trying to determine a reasonable set of NetWare
utilities which should be included in the source tree.
ncplib isn't just a NetWare file system. It also provides services
similar to original NetWare client from Novell. Below I'll put a short
descriptio
On 10-Sep-99 Boris Popov wrote:
> mount_nwfs - similar to mount_nfs
> ncplogin- creates permanent connection to a NetWare server
> without an actual mount,
> ncplogout - destroy permanent connection,
> ncpl
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 06:29:57PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 10-Sep-99 Boris Popov wrote:
> > mount_nwfs - similar to mount_nfs
> > ncplogin- creates permanent connection to a NetWare server
> > without an actual mount,
Hi,
New patches can be found on http://www.FreeBSD.org/~marcel/signal/
I'm currently running my system with the complete set of patches, including
world. After solving how to do the integration and after creating the
proper patches for alpha systems, this should be ready for inclusion. So,
if you
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
>
> The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be mount_nwfs
> because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the rest
> of it could be a port I think :)
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> >
> IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the
> source tree. Anything else could be available as ports/net/nw-utils.
An IPX/SPX stack is already in the tree and pa
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 04:58:52PM +0700, Boris Popov wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> > >
> > IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the
> > source tree. Anything else could be available as po
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Lutz Albers wrote:
> --On Freitag, 10. September 1999, 10:56 +0930 Daniel O'Connor
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 09-Sep-99 Nate Williams wrote:
> >> VM doesn't do HTML/MIME very well, although I understand in later
> >> versions of XEmacs they've incorporated some packages that h
Hi ...
We are running a system where we use the libpcap to capture
packets from an ethernet device. We've been observing a problem where
the monitor program goes into an endless loop and spins for ever.
I've compiled the program with debugging on and observed that the
call-back function is calle
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > An IPX/SPX stack is already in the tree and past year made it more
> > or less functional.
> >
> Read: I fully agree with Daniel.
Daniel also left mount_nwfs :)
>
> Forgive me my ignorance, but I'd like a quick response: what about mult
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 05:24:00PM +0700, Boris Popov wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > > An IPX/SPX stack is already in the tree and past year made it more
> > > or less functional.
> > >
> > Read: I fully agree with Daniel.
>
> Daniel also left mount_nwfs :)
>
Boris Popov wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> >
> > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be mount_n
wfs
> > because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the r
est
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> You have the problem; you also have the solution. I don't want the complete
> history of development bundled in a library. That's my problem. Now tell me
> how do I solve it?
Well, yes, this is a problem, and I cannot offer a solution. I only
will say the following only
Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:
> FreeBSD 4.0 currently have a nice feature - libc compatibility with
> FreeBSD 3.x. That is, I can link a program build on 3.x with the libc
> build from src/lib/libc on -current, either dynamically or statically.
> I also can do it in other way around. I _use_ this feature
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 09-Sep-99 Jason Young wrote:
> > After some thought, I think the mount option idea is best. I hadn't
> > thought of that before. One might want to apply different procfs
> > security policies to different mounts of procfs, especially in a
> >
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Yes, that's acceptable. But mount_nwfs require libncp.so and this
> > means that ncp library sources will be also required. So KLD, mount_nwfs
> > and libncp should go into source tree and other utilities can be a port.
> >
> > Other thoughts ?
Boris Popov wrote:
> Currently I'm trying to determine a reasonable set of NetWare
> utilities which should be included in the source tree.
Is it possible to have utilities to query and modify NDS?
> ncpurge - purge specified salvagable files,
hi, there
> ee does the same. The reason is that the program does not check for EOF
> on stdin, it continuously loops. It's a bug in the program. The thing
> that could have been changed is a signal from the shell that is no
> longer sent or so.
>
> The problem is the program, not the OS.
>
> It
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 10:26:26AM +0200, Alex Le Heux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I once had a similar situation: I had wiped my disklabel.
I know its easy to suggest somebody else do things, but turning this
into software might make for a very handy salvage tool, without a lot
of work for the author. W
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On 10-Sep-99 Boris Popov wrote:
> > mount_nwfs - similar to mount_nfs
> > ncplogin- creates permanent connection to a NetWare server
> > without an actual mount,
> > ncplogo
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
:Does it do IMAP? I have only seen *1* emailer which does IMAP properly (xfmail)
:all the others either don't support it at all, or treat IMAP like POP (ie just
:fetch mail from INBOX).
Pine does IMAP just fine. I used to use it to read mail on box a,
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On 10-Sep-99 Boris Popov wrote:
> > > mount_nwfs - similar to mount_nfs
> > > ncplogin- creates permanent connection to a NetWare server
> > > without an actual mount,
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > Currently I'm trying to determine a reasonable set of NetWare
> > utilities which should be included in the source tree.
>
> Is it possible to have utilities to query and modify NDS?
I'm working on this (currently only queries). ND
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> >
> > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be
> > mount_nwfs
> > because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the
> > rest
> > of it could be
At least one person has already written this program...
THeey have mentionned this in the hackers list so maybe a search of the
list may turn something up..
withing th last 2 years from memory.
Julian
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Robert Sexton wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 10:26:26AM +0200, Alex L
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:51:50AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> At least one person has already written this program...
>
> THeey have mentionned this in the hackers list so maybe a search of the
> list may turn something up..
> withing th last 2 years from memory.
>
> Julian
It's on my TODO
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be
> > mount_nwfs because building it without the kernel source could be a
> > problem, but the rest of it could be a port I think :)
> Thats like suggesting we make the 'ipfw' command a port and leave t
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> "Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> > > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be
> > > mount_nwfs because building it without the kernel source could be a
> > > problem, but the rest of it could be a port I think :)
> > Thats like sugg
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> > Why? What kernel code does this need?
> The ncpfs kernel code for one.
> We're talking about less than 500k of code here.
> You want to take the anti-bloatist stance you'll have to do better than
> that. Try libreadline for starters. :)
Bah like I care enough to care
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999 03:08:40 +0930, "Daniel O'Connor" wrote:
>
>"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
>> You want to take the anti-bloatist stance you'll have to do better than
>> that. Try libreadline for starters. :)
>
>Bah like I care enough to care ;)
Yow! I had no idea it was so large!
I have an (as
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Parag Patel wrote:
> I have an (as yet still incomplete) full-screen text-editor library I
> wrote a long time ago - in C++ even - that supports (on a terminal using
> termlib but not curses) full-screen editing, simultaneous "live"
> multiple overlapping windows/views of buffe
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999 14:07:12 EDT, "Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
>
>Clean it up and add perl bindings to it. Thats something that perl sorely
>misses. Come to think of it, libedit could use perl bindings... Hummm...
Gaah - another big line-editing library! My editor's even smaller than
libedit!
In message Julian
Elischer writes:
: At least one person has already written this program...
I wrote one, but didn't post it. Someone else wrote one and did post
it. It really is bog simple to get a good first guess. Harder to get
it perfect.
Message-ID: <376e42bd.117b3...@pobox.com>
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> Clean it up and add perl bindings to it. Thats something that perl sorely
> misses. Come to think of it, libedit could use perl bindings... Hummm...
/usr/ports/devel/p5-ReadLine-Gnu
Also /usr/ports/devel/p5-ReadLine-Perl, whic
In message <37d93d65.627a...@dons.net.au> "Daniel O'Connor" writes:
: > Thats like suggesting we make the 'ipfw' command a port and leave the
: > kernel bits in the tree. Since all this stuff depends on being in sync,
: > the only reasonable way to do this is to put it in the tree.
:
: Why? What
On 10-Sep-99 Jamie Bowden wrote:
> :fetch mail from INBOX).
> Pine does IMAP just fine. I used to use it to read mail on box a, with
> incoming accessd via box b, and storage on box c. Now I just forward
> everything to one account and procmail it all.
Umm.. welll I'd like to know to enable
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, David Scheidt wrote:
> It looks like something ate your attachments. Try setting all the values
> that mtable reports on.
I think I just forgot them.
I uncommented
options NCPU=2 # number of CPUs
options NBUS=4 # number of busses
optio
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Daniel J. O'Connor wrote:
:
:On 10-Sep-99 Jamie Bowden wrote:
:> :fetch mail from INBOX).
:> Pine does IMAP just fine. I used to use it to read mail on box a, with
:> incoming accessd via box b, and storage on box c. Now I just forward
:> everything to one account and pro
Attached is an article from the Wall Street Journal Online Edition.
---
September 10, 1999
Beyond Linux, Free Systems
Do Their Bit to Build Web
By LEE GOMES
Staff Rep
Good day.
This is part one of what is (hopefully) will be my long and hard look in the
IP routing in FreeBSD as we know it. I must admit that i am out of shape on
many subjects and so much of this data may be wrong because of me doing
the Wrong Thing.
Anyway - these are the compressed results of da
And thus spake Matthew N. Dodd, on Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 02:07:12PM -0400:
> Clean it up and add perl bindings to it. Thats something that perl sorely
> misses. Come to think of it, libedit could use perl bindings... Hummm...
>
> Kevin? :)
Bleah, one thing at a time :) Once I finish with my c
On 10-Sep-99 Jamie Bowden wrote:
> :Umm.. welll I'd like to know to enable sub folder support in it then..
> :Haveing multiple accounts on different machines would be nice too (then it
> :could do what xfmail can)
> In 'Incoming Folders' type 'a' and it will ask you for the server name to
> add.
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> >
> IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the
> source tree. Anything else could be available as ports/net/nw-utils.
I tend to agree. If we bring in all of this stuff (eve
On 10-Sep-99 Daniel J. O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 10-Sep-99 Jamie Bowden wrote:
>> :Umm.. welll I'd like to know to enable sub folder support in it then..
>> :Haveing multiple accounts on different machines would be nice too (then it
>> :could do what xfmail can)
>> In 'Incoming Folders' type 'a' an
> Attached is an article from the Wall Street Journal Online Edition.
-hackers may be the wrong place for this, but I'll follow up
and note that this article is the headline article in the second section
("Marketplace" or "Marketing", I forget) in today's regular old print
version of the WSJ.
Pet
Dirk GOUDERS wrote:
>
> > There is a short but sweet[1] article on ZDNet today regarding FreeBSD:
> >
> >
> http://www.zdnet.com/zdtv/screensavers/answerstips/story/0,3656,2324624,00.html
>
> Hmm, can't find that sweet thing -- typo?
Nope, it worked fine for me. Given how short it is, this
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I tend to agree. If we bring in all of this stuff (even though I
> appreciate it's very useful) we should also bring in samba into the
> base tree by symmetry.
Thats the idea. Once Boris gets a chance to finish cifsfs the plan is to
import it into the t
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I tend to agree. If we bring in all of this stuff (even though I
> > appreciate it's very useful) we should also bring in samba into the
> > base tree by symmetry.
>
> Thats the idea. Once Boris gets a ch
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Thats the idea. Once Boris gets a chance to finish cifsfs the plan is to
> > import it into the tree the same as the Netware client stuff.
>
> Okay. If that's the plan, then I don't have any objections.
>
> I do hate the idea of having to reimplement
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> > Okay. If that's the plan, then I don't have any objections.
> >
> > I do hate the idea of having to reimplement samba because of the licensing
> > though - it already does quite a good job at SMB serving, it seems a waste
> > to duplicate the effort
On 09-Sep-99 Andrew Reilly wrote:
> XFMail isn't acceptable, because I've got 130M of mbox mail
> boxes in a deep directory hierarchy, and I'd like to keep them
> that way. The last time I looked at XFMail it insisted on an
> un-nested mh-directory style of mailbox. Is it still the case?
It sup
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > any idea on how to force ATX power supplies to restart after a power
> > outage without having someone press the 'power' button on the front
> > panel ? All the motherboards i can find now have their bios with two
> > options:
> >
> > Disabled
> >
Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
>
> On Thu, 09 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> > I'm more tempted to revert to the major/minor versioning. Every change
> > triggers a minor version bump, but only if the library is still backwards
> > compatible with minor version 0 and
Hi,
I once had a similar situation: I had wiped my disklabel.
I forgot what it was exactly what I did, but it was something along the
lines of this:
- boot fixit cdrom
- run a commandline like this:
hd /dev/rwdnnn | grep "hh hh hh" (where 'hh hh hh' is the superblock magic
number, I can't find
Hello,
Currently I'm trying to determine a reasonable set of NetWare
utilities which should be included in the source tree.
ncplib isn't just a NetWare file system. It also provides services
similar to original NetWare client from Novell. Below I'll put a short
descripti
On 10-Sep-99 Boris Popov wrote:
> mount_nwfs - similar to mount_nfs
> ncplogin- creates permanent connection to a NetWare server
> without an actual mount,
> ncplogout - destroy permanent connection,
> ncp
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 06:29:57PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 10-Sep-99 Boris Popov wrote:
> > mount_nwfs - similar to mount_nfs
> > ncplogin- creates permanent connection to a NetWare server
> > without an actual mount,
Hi,
New patches can be found on http://www.FreeBSD.org/~marcel/signal/
I'm currently running my system with the complete set of patches, including
world. After solving how to do the integration and after creating the
proper patches for alpha systems, this should be ready for inclusion. So,
if yo
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
>
> The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be mount_nwfs
> because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the rest
> of it could be a port I think :)
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> >
> IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the
> source tree. Anything else could be available as ports/net/nw-utils.
An IPX/SPX stack is already in the tree and p
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 04:58:52PM +0700, Boris Popov wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> > >
> > IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the
> > source tree. Anything else could be available as p
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Lutz Albers wrote:
> --On Freitag, 10. September 1999, 10:56 +0930 Daniel O'Connor
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 09-Sep-99 Nate Williams wrote:
> >> VM doesn't do HTML/MIME very well, although I understand in later
> >> versions of XEmacs they've incorporated
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > An IPX/SPX stack is already in the tree and past year made it more
> > or less functional.
> >
> Read: I fully agree with Daniel.
Daniel also left mount_nwfs :)
>
> Forgive me my ignorance, but I'd like a quick response: what about mul
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 05:24:00PM +0700, Boris Popov wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > > An IPX/SPX stack is already in the tree and past year made it more
> > > or less functional.
> > >
> > Read: I fully agree with Daniel.
>
> Daniel also left mount_nwfs :)
>
Boris Popov wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> >
> > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be mount_n
wfs
> > because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the r
est
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> You have the problem; you also have the solution. I don't want the complete
> history of development bundled in a library. That's my problem. Now tell me
> how do I solve it?
Well, yes, this is a problem, and I cannot offer a solution. I only
will say the following only
Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:
> FreeBSD 4.0 currently have a nice feature - libc compatibility with
> FreeBSD 3.x. That is, I can link a program build on 3.x with the libc
> build from src/lib/libc on -current, either dynamically or statically.
> I also can do it in other way around. I _use_ this featur
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 09-Sep-99 Jason Young wrote:
> > After some thought, I think the mount option idea is best. I hadn't
> > thought of that before. One might want to apply different procfs
> > security policies to different mounts of procfs, especially in a
> >
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Yes, that's acceptable. But mount_nwfs require libncp.so and this
> > means that ncp library sources will be also required. So KLD, mount_nwfs
> > and libncp should go into source tree and other utilities can be a port.
> >
> > Other thoughts ?
Hi ...
We are running a system where we use the libpcap to capture
packets from an ethernet device. We've been observing a problem where
the monitor program goes into an endless loop and spins for ever.
I've compiled the program with debugging on and observed that the
call-back function is call
Boris Popov wrote:
> Currently I'm trying to determine a reasonable set of NetWare
> utilities which should be included in the source tree.
Is it possible to have utilities to query and modify NDS?
> ncpurge - purge specified salvagable files,
>From a user perspective,
hi, there
> ee does the same. The reason is that the program does not check for EOF
> on stdin, it continuously loops. It's a bug in the program. The thing
> that could have been changed is a signal from the shell that is no
> longer sent or so.
>
> The problem is the program, not the OS.
>
> I
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 10:26:26AM +0200, Alex Le Heux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I once had a similar situation: I had wiped my disklabel.
I know its easy to suggest somebody else do things, but turning this
into software might make for a very handy salvage tool, without a lot
of work for the author.
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On 10-Sep-99 Boris Popov wrote:
> > mount_nwfs - similar to mount_nfs
> > ncplogin- creates permanent connection to a NetWare server
> > without an actual mount,
> > ncplog
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
:Does it do IMAP? I have only seen *1* emailer which does IMAP properly (xfmail)
:all the others either don't support it at all, or treat IMAP like POP (ie just
:fetch mail from INBOX).
Pine does IMAP just fine. I used to use it to read mail on box a,
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On 10-Sep-99 Boris Popov wrote:
> > > mount_nwfs - similar to mount_nfs
> > > ncplogin- creates permanent connection to a NetWare server
> > > without an actual mount,
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > Currently I'm trying to determine a reasonable set of NetWare
> > utilities which should be included in the source tree.
>
> Is it possible to have utilities to query and modify NDS?
I'm working on this (currently only queries). N
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> >
> > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be mount_nwfs
> > because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the rest
> > of it could be a port I
At least one person has already written this program...
THeey have mentionned this in the hackers list so maybe a search of the
list may turn something up..
withing th last 2 years from memory.
Julian
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Robert Sexton wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 10:26:26AM +0200, Alex
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:51:50AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> At least one person has already written this program...
>
> THeey have mentionned this in the hackers list so maybe a search of the
> list may turn something up..
> withing th last 2 years from memory.
>
> Julian
It's on my TOD
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be
> > mount_nwfs because building it without the kernel source could be a
> > problem, but the rest of it could be a port I think :)
> Thats like suggesting we make the 'ipfw' command a port and leave
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> "Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> > > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be
> > > mount_nwfs because building it without the kernel source could be a
> > > problem, but the rest of it could be a port I think :)
> > Thats like sug
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> > Why? What kernel code does this need?
> The ncpfs kernel code for one.
> We're talking about less than 500k of code here.
> You want to take the anti-bloatist stance you'll have to do better than
> that. Try libreadline for starters. :)
Bah like I care enough to car
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999 03:08:40 +0930, "Daniel O'Connor" wrote:
>
>"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
>> You want to take the anti-bloatist stance you'll have to do better than
>> that. Try libreadline for starters. :)
>
>Bah like I care enough to care ;)
Yow! I had no idea it was so large!
I have an (as
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Parag Patel wrote:
> I have an (as yet still incomplete) full-screen text-editor library I
> wrote a long time ago - in C++ even - that supports (on a terminal using
> termlib but not curses) full-screen editing, simultaneous "live"
> multiple overlapping windows/views of buff
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999 14:07:12 EDT, "Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
>
>Clean it up and add perl bindings to it. Thats something that perl sorely
>misses. Come to think of it, libedit could use perl bindings... Hummm...
Gaah - another big line-editing library! My editor's even smaller than
libedit!
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Julian Elischer
writes:
: At least one person has already written this program...
I wrote one, but didn't post it. Someone else wrote one and did post
it. It really is bog simple to get a good first guess. Harder to get
it perfect.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PR
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> Clean it up and add perl bindings to it. Thats something that perl sorely
> misses. Come to think of it, libedit could use perl bindings... Hummm...
/usr/ports/devel/p5-ReadLine-Gnu
Also /usr/ports/devel/p5-ReadLine-Perl, whi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel O'Connor" writes:
: > Thats like suggesting we make the 'ipfw' command a port and leave the
: > kernel bits in the tree. Since all this stuff depends on being in sync,
: > the only reasonable way to do this is to put it in the tree.
:
: Why? What kernel cod
On 10-Sep-99 Jamie Bowden wrote:
> :fetch mail from INBOX).
> Pine does IMAP just fine. I used to use it to read mail on box a, with
> incoming accessd via box b, and storage on box c. Now I just forward
> everything to one account and procmail it all.
Umm.. welll I'd like to know to enable
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, David Scheidt wrote:
> It looks like something ate your attachments. Try setting all the values
> that mtable reports on.
I think I just forgot them.
I uncommented
options NCPU=2 # number of CPUs
options NBUS=4 # number of busses
opti
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Daniel J. O'Connor wrote:
:
:On 10-Sep-99 Jamie Bowden wrote:
:> :fetch mail from INBOX).
:> Pine does IMAP just fine. I used to use it to read mail on box a, with
:> incoming accessd via box b, and storage on box c. Now I just forward
:> everything to one account and pr
Attached is an article from the Wall Street Journal Online Edition.
---
September 10, 1999
Beyond Linux, Free Systems
Do Their Bit to Build Web
By LEE GOMES
Staff Re
Good day.
This is part one of what is (hopefully) will be my long and hard look in the
IP routing in FreeBSD as we know it. I must admit that i am out of shape on
many subjects and so much of this data may be wrong because of me doing
the Wrong Thing.
Anyway - these are the compressed results of d
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
