"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On 10-Sep-99 Boris Popov wrote:
> > > mount_nwfs - similar to mount_nfs
> > > ncplogin - creates permanent connection to a NetWare server
> > > without an actual mount,
> > > ncplogout - destroy permanent connection,
> > > ncplist - displays various information about client itself
> > > and NetWare servers,
> > > ncprint - allows to send job to NetWare printer,
> > > ncpsend - sends message to NetWare user or server console,
> > > ncplpd - simple NetWare print server,
> > > ncpurge - purge specified salvagable files,
> > > ncpsvc - remote control for a NetWare server,
> > > ncpasswd - allows to change password for a NetWare user.
> >
> > Is there any reason to not have it as a port?
> >
> > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be
> > mount_nwfs because building it without the kernel source could be a
> > problem, but the rest of it could be a port I think :)
>
> Thats like suggesting we make the 'ipfw' command a port and leave the
> kernel bits in the tree. Since all this stuff depends on being in sync,
> the only reasonable way to do this is to put it in the tree.
Or having mount_nfs in the base but moving nfsd/nfsiod/nfsstat to ports.
:-)
Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message