On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 04:58:52PM +0700, Boris Popov wrote: > On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > Is there any reason to not have it as a port? > > > > > IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the > > source tree. Anything else could be available as ports/net/nw-utils. > > An IPX/SPX stack is already in the tree and past year made it more > or less functional. > Read: I fully agree with Daniel.
Forgive me my ignorance, but I'd like a quick response: what about multiple ethernet frames for IPX? Is it supported in -current? In -stable? Thanks, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the r...@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank, r...@freebsd.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
